博碩士論文 105430001 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:11 、訪客IP:18.205.96.39
姓名 薛涵濡(HSUEH.HAN-RU)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
(The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Vision on the Accounting Performances: the Mediating Effects of CSR Performances)
相關論文
★ 利害關係人包容性:企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響:以企業社會責任願景為調節變數★ 企業社會責任揭露與盈餘管理的關係-道德取向或政治成本取向?
★ 企業經營模式及申請上櫃個案研究-以H企業為例★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯 ──以企業社會責任願景調節
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 願景對於一家企業之成功是一項重要因素,願景讓企業全體成員擁有一致之目標,如同一盞明燈帶領著企業朝向成功之道路前進。本研究針對企業之CSR願景做研究,探討企業之CSR願景對於會計績效(股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率)之關係,以及CSR績效對於此關係是否具有中介效果。本研究之樣本選取自2007~2017年《天下雜誌》企業公民獎得獎且營收超過一百億之公司,扣除金融業及遺漏值後共59家企業為選取樣本。研究結果顯示,企業網頁呈現的CSR願景越多,對於企業之會計績效表現越佳;此外,企業網頁之CSR願景越多越能提升企業之CSR績效;最後,在綜合效果中,CSR績效對於CSR願景與會計績效之正向顯著關係有中介效果。
摘要(英) Abstract
The vision is an important factor for the success of a company. The vision allows all members of the company to have a common goal, such as a bright light that leads the company toward success. This study specifically focuses on the CSR vision and discusses the relationship between CSR vision and accounting performances (return on equity, return on assets). To explore whether the association between CSR vision and accounting performances is affected by the CSR performances. The sample of this study has been selected from CommonWealth Magazine. The companies that had won awards for the Corporate Citizenship Awards in 2007-2017 and had revenues in excess of 10 billion. A total of 59 companies were selected after deducting the financial industry and missing data. The results of the study show that the more CSR visions, the better the company′s accounting performance. In addition, the more CSR visions can enhance the company′s CSR performance; finally, in the overall effect, the CSR performance has the mediating effect on positive association between the CSR vision and accounting performances.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業社會責任
★ 企業社會責任願景
★ 企業社會責任績效
★ 股東權益報酬率
★ 資產報酬率
★ 中介效果
關鍵字(英) ★ corporate social responsibility
★ corporate social responsibility vision
★ corporate social responsibility performance
★ return on equity
★  return on assets
★ mediating effect
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
誌謝詞 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 v
圖目錄 v
一、緒論 1
二、文獻探討與假說發展 5
2-1 CSR願景對會計績效的影響 5
2-2 CSR願景對CSR績效的影響 7
2-3 CSR績效的中介或抑制效果 8
2-3-1 企業社會責任與會計績效之關係呈現負向關係 9
2-3-2 企業社會責任與會計績效之關係呈現正向關係 9
三、研究設計 11
3-1 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源 11
3-2 主要變數衡量 11
3-2-1 中介或抑制變數-企業社會責任績效 11
3-2-2 應變數-會計績效 12
3-2-3 自變數-CSR願景 13
3-2-4 控制變數 14
3-3 研究模型 15
四、實證結果 18
4-1 樣本與敘述統計分析 18
4-2 相關係數分析 24
4-3 迴歸分析 26
4-4 額外分析:會計績效成分之分析 29
4-4 SOBEL檢定 29
4-5 額外分析:會計績效成分之分析 31
五、結論與建議 36
5-1 研究結論與貢獻 36
5-2 研究限制與建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄一、2017天下雜誌企業公民獎問卷 41
附錄二、企業社會責任績效評分內容:舉例說明 52
參考文獻 參考文獻
沈中華與張元,2008,企業的社會責任為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國 FTSE 社會責任指數為例,經濟論文,36(3):339-385。
李效雲與申俊龍,2004,企業願景的作用及其建設,管理科學文摘,4:28-29。
李效雲與李曉晶,2006,領導願景對企業績效的影響研究。管理科學文摘,6:102-104。
李秀英、劉俊儒與楊筱翎,2011,企業社會責任與公司績效之關連性,東海管理評論,第十三卷第一期:77-112。
陳基祥,2013,創業願景與創業績效之關聯性研究,創業管理研究,第八卷第三期:57-84。
楊慧華,2002,企業文化、企業願景、經營策略與經營績效之關係研究-以臺灣國際觀光旅館為實證,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
鄧美貞與王琬青,2002,企業社會責任與財務績效:以經營效率為中介效果,朝陽商管評論,第十一卷第二期:77-104。
劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿,2014年6月, 企業社會責任與公司治理, 公司績效之關連性研究,科際整合管理研討會,17-30,東吳大學企業管理學系,台北市。
Aupperle , K. E., A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield.1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28(2): 446-463.
Bartkus, B., M. Glassman, and B. Mcafee. 2006. Mission statement quality and financial performance, European Management Journal 24(1): 86-94.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual、strategic、and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182.
Bennis , W., and B. Nanus . 1985. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge,
Harper and Row, New York.
Bhattacharya , C. B., and S. Sen. 2004.Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California. Management Review 47(1): 9-24.
Choi, J. S., Y. M. Kwak, and C. Choe. 2010. Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management 35(3): 291-311.
Collins, J. C., and J. I. Porras. 1996. Building your company′s vision. Harvard Business Review 74(5): 65–77.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine 13: 32–33.
Griffin, J. J., and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society 36(5): 5-31
Hamburger, Y .A. 2000. Mathematical leadership vision. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 134(6): 601-611.
Hawkins, S., N. M. Ratcliffe, and A. Sagastizabal. 1998. The use of thin silver films for the detection of low concentrations of hydrogen supplied. Analytica Chimica Acta 359 (1-2): 125-132.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., and E. A. Locke. 1996. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of applied psychology 81(1): 36-51.
Kotter, J. P. 1996. Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Locke, E. A., and G. P. Lathan 1990. A Theory of goal-setting and task performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Lynna, G. S., and A. E. Akgunb. 2001. Project visioning: its components and impact on new product success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18(6): 374-387.
McGuire, J. B. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance, Academy of Management Journal 31(4): 854-872.
McWilliams, A., D. S. Siegel, and P. M. Wright.2006. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies 43: 1-18.
Molloy, C. A., P. Manning-Courtney, and S. Swayne, 2002. Lack of benefit of intravenous synthetic human secretin in the treatment of autism. Autism Dev Disord 32:545-551.
Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
Nanus, B. 1992. Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Parsons, A. L. 2002. What determines buyer–seller relationship quality? an investigation from the buyer’s perspective. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(2): 4-12.
Peters, R., and M. R. Mullen. 2009. Some evidence of the cumulative effects of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. The Journal of Global Business Issue 3: 1-14.
Sashkin, M. 1996. Becoming a visionary leader. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Schuler, D. A., and M. Cording. 2006. A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review 31: 540-558.
Shieve, L. T., and M. B. Shoenheit.1987.Leadership: Examining the elusive Alexandria. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Waddock, S. A., and S. B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303-319 .
指導教授 陳建中 審核日期 2018-7-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明