||The Drama-in-Education (DIE) in the classroom has always had a positive impact on the performer’s oral communication skills. The digital learning theater (DLT) combines drama based learning and technology to allow teachers and students to perform theatrical performances in the classroom. However, the audience can only watch the show without substantial participation. After a long-term observation, it was found that when an actor performed on the stage, the audience would gradually ignore the performances on the stage because they were not related to themselves, thereby reducing the motivation of learning.|
In order to enable students to participate in the performance on the stage and absorb teaching content. This study proposes the digital learning theater with audience participation and interaction. It will add the interactive response to the digital learning theater, allowing the audience to put more focus on the stage performances, and learn the theatrical contents of the performance through question and answer. Moreover, the interactive question and answer will save it for students to review based on cards.
According to the result, the digital learning theater with audience participation and interaction can improve student’s learning efficiency and outcomes. In addition, students will have a higher level of participation and concentration in the digital learning theater with audience participation and interaction. The teachers also believe that the digital learning theater with audience participation and interaction can enable students to achieve learning goals more quickly.
||吳木崑. (民 98). 杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示.|
吳韋毅. (2016). 教室內的數位互動式學習劇場.
林司樺. (2018). 在數位劇場情境中之教師用卡片教學互動系統.
羅元甫. (2015). 教室內的數位鏡室學習劇場.
劉育芳. (2017). 數位劇場與戲劇式學習之情境與角色安排與扮演考量. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication, elearning, and
interactivity- A review of the research.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic Motivation and the Process of
Learning: Beneficial Effects of Contextualization, Personalization, and
Courtney, R. (1974). Play, Drama & Thought: The Intellectual Background to Drama
Duffy, T. M., Ed., & Jonassen, D. H., Ed. (1992). Constructivism and the Technology
of Instruction: A Conversation.
Haseman, W. D., Nuipolatoglu, V., & Ramamurthy, K. (2002). An empirical
investigation of the influences of the degree of interactivity on user-outcomes in a multimedia environment. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 31.
Pham, X.-L., Chen, G.-D., Nguyen, T.-H., & Hwang, W.-Y. (2016). Card-based design combined with spaced repetition: A new interface for displaying learning elements and improving active recall. Computers & Education, 98, 142-156. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.014
Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. F. H. (2006). Use of a Classroom Response System to Enhance Classroom Interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398-403. doi:10.1109/te.2006.879802
Sims, R. (2010). Promises of Interactivity: Aligning Learner Perceptions and Expectations With Strategies for Flexible and Online Learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87-103. doi:10.1080/01587910303050
WANG, M. C., HAERTEL, G. D., & WALBERG, H. J. ( 1992). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature.
Wu, Y.-C. J., Wu, T., & Li, Y. (2017). Impact of using classroom response systems on students′ entrepreneurship learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.013
Zyoud, M. (2010). Using drama activities and techniques to foster teaching English as a foreign language: A theoretical perspective.