摘要(英) |
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the fatigue behavior of SD420W deformed reinforcement and SD690 thread deformed reinforcement, and to verify the fatigue cumulative damage theorem, by means of the fatigue test testing on the reinforced concrete beams.
The test is based on the repeated load test method, under the action of different stress differences (fr), corresponding fatigue life, and the measurement at the beam midpoint deflection and concrete strain. The testing will be performed to the normal strength and high strength reinforced concrete beams to mainly explore the fatigue behavior of SD420W and SD690 steel bars.
The fatigue cumulative damage test is also carried out through the S-N curve to plan several stress difference amplitudes (fr). It was then given few limited cycle numbers(Ni) to evaluate the fatigue damage value(D), being defined as the ratio of the cycle(Ni) to the corresponding(Nfi). According to Miner’s linear cumulative damage theory when the fatigue cumulative damage value D=1, the tested beam will be destroyed. By such a experimental study, a proper fatigue cumulative damage theorem can be verified.
According to the previous high-strength reinforced concrete beam fatigue test 〔13、14〕 and the results obtained from this research, the S-N curves of SD420W deformed reinforcement and SD690 thread deformed reinforcement are similar to the empirical formula proposed by Helgason. The fatigue fractural area is also measured to SD420W deformed steel bar and the SD690 thread deformed steel bar after fatigue fracture occurred, the fatigue crack area of the two types of bars is about 80% for SD420W bars, and about 6% for SD690 bars. The fracture surface of the SD690 bar is very flat in comparison with the SD420W bar.
The result of the fatigue cumulative damage test showed the fatigue cumulative damage values did not match the Miner rule, which is linearly cumulated damage value to the theoretical D=1. However, the fatigue cumulative damage values obtained according to the Minin′s rule modified by Hashin were pleasantly consistent with the experimental results.
|
參考文獻 |
〔1〕 M. P. Collins, and D. Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures, Pren-tice-Hall, New Jersey, 1991.
〔2〕 ACI Committee 215, “Considerations for Design of Concrete Structures Subjected to Fatigue Loading”, ACI 215R-74, American Concrete In-stitute, 1997.
〔3〕 J. Moehle, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, McGraw-Hill Education, United States of America, 2015.
〔4〕 Neville, A. M., Properties of Concrete, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1996.
〔5〕 中國土木水利工程學會混凝土工程委員會, 鋼筋混凝土學 (土木406-100), 科技圖書, 臺北市, 民國一百年。
〔6〕 廖文正, 林致淳, 詹穎雯, 「台灣混凝土彈性模數建議公式研究」, 結構工程期刊, 第三十一卷, 第三期, 第5-31頁, 民國一百零五年。
〔7〕 中華民國結構工程學會、中華民國地震工程學會、國家地震工程研究中心, 高強度鋼筋混凝土結構設計手冊, 初版, 中華民國結構工程學會, 臺北市, 民國一零六年十二月。
〔8〕 T. Helgason, J. M. Hanson, N. F. Somes, W. G. Corley, and E. Hongnestad, Fatigue Strength of High Yield Reinforcing Bars, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 164, Trans-portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976.
〔9〕 彭耀南、江文卿, 「鋼筋混凝土樑之疲勞行為」, 中國土木水利工程學刊, 第一卷第二期, 147-152頁, 民國七十八年三月。
〔10〕 Z. Hashin, and A. Rotem, “A Cumulative Damage Theory of Fatigue Failure”, Materials Science and Engineering, pp. 147-160, 1978.
〔11〕 交通技術標準規範公路類公路工程部, 公路橋梁設計規範, 初版, 交通部, 臺北市, 民國九十八年十二月。
〔12〕 經濟部標準檢驗局, 「CNS 560 A2006 鋼筋混凝土用鋼筋」, 土木材料及品質管理相關國家標準(CNS規範), 民國九十七年九月。
〔13〕 鐘偉綸, 「鋼筋混凝土梁疲勞行為之初步研究」, 國立中央大學, 碩士論文, 民國一百零七年。
〔14〕 王勇智,鐘偉綸,葉子鉦,「鋼筋混凝土梁疲勞行為之初步研究」,第14屆結構工程研討會暨第4屆地震工程研討會,,福容大飯店,台中市,民國一百零七年十一月。
〔15〕 C. Bentz, and M. P. Collins, Programs of Response-2000, University of Toronto, V. 1.0.5, Aug. 2000.
〔16〕 Z. Hashin, “A Reinterpretation of the Palmgren-Miner Rule for Fa-tigue Life Prediction”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 47, pp. 324-328, 1980.
|