| 姓名 |
張河世剛(Truong Ha The Cuong)
查詢紙本館藏 |
畢業系所 |
營建管理研究所 |
| 論文名稱 |
可行性研究報告質量管理研究 - 以越南湄公河三角洲為例
(A research on quality management of feasibility study reports - A case study of Mekong Rive Delta, Vietnam)
|
| 檔案 |
 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
 [相關文章]  [文章引用]  [完整記錄]  [館藏目錄]  [檢視] [下載]- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
|
| 摘要(中) |
近年來，越南政府對於國際已開發國家提供越南政府援助發展項目或公共投資項目預算浪費在國會中的爭議越趨激烈。 根據規劃和投資部2017年越南十四大會議的第三期報告，主要造成預算浪費的原因通常來自項目審批，預算分配和項目實施，初步設計和政策/計劃的製定過程。
當尋找以上議題的真正原因時，大多數研究人員只關心審查項目建設階段而不是準備階段。 事實上，根據最近在烏干達和索馬里項目施行成功的結果表明，項目的成功實施，將會對規劃活動和人力資源管理三個因素產生積極和顯著的影響[1]。可行性研究基本上在項目設計和施工前是極度重要和具優先性的，因為它直接影響了項目的成功[2]。 在第一階段時期，在獲得當局批准之前，一般上必要的大量的準備和施行程序的一致性，以便可行性研究進行必要的檢查和評估。 因此，上述改善的內容將有助於減少上述浪費。
進行可行性研究的文獻回顧研讀且建構相關知識，接著設計一份30個問題的調查問卷。 然後透過電子郵件或社群媒體工具將該設計之問卷發布給受訪者，以找出影響大湄公河三角洲區域(Mekong River Delta)可行性研究的績效質量的一些關鍵因素。 另一方面，本研究依據挪威學者開發的“傳統方案上最佳”可行性研究的模型則根據可能的解決方案進行略微修改，以處理這些關鍵性的因素，且該微調模型是依據越南建築法2014年6月18日的50/2014/QH13的基礎進行整合性調整。
在大湄公河三角洲區域進行可行性研究報告的過程中，發現了50個因素，並且最終得到了19個關鍵性的因素。 其中，與人類行為佔了極為重要的因素。 相關政府機構對其執行項目的主觀意圖也導致了可行性研究最終結果品質下降的重要因素，其次的影響品質因素則是申請程序和資料可信性。此研究成果可做為越南營造行業所有從業人員(包括投資者) 在施行營建工程項目前參考之文獻材料。 |
| 摘要(英) |
In recent years, the growing criticism of the wastefulness of government budget in Official Development Assistant (hereinafter-called ODA) projects or public investment projects on Vietnamese National Assembly forums has become more severely. According to the Report of Ministry of Planning and Investment at the third meeting of National Assembly XIV in 2017, the main culprits usually derive from the processes of project approval, budget allocation and project implementation, initial design and build in policy/ program.
When seeking for real reasons of those issues, most researchers are merely interested in scrutinizing project construction phase rather than preparation one. In fact, a recent research result on project success in Uganda and Somalia indicates that the success of projects shall affect positively and significantly on three factors named feasibility study, planning activities, and managing human resource. The feasibility study, basically, is extremely important and high priority before the employment of project design and construction happen due to its direct affections of project success. The first phase normally contains a ton of procedures that need preparing and employing consistently so that the feasibility study shall be examined and evaluated on essential aspects before obtaining the approval of authorities. Hence, the improvement in contents of that material shall help to defer the above-mentioned wastefulness.
A literature review on the feasibility study was built, followed by a 30-question survey questionnaire. It was then distributed to respondents by emails or social media tools in order to find out some crucial factors that are affecting the performance quality of the feasibility studies in Mekong River Delta. On the other hand, a “best practice” model of the feasibility studies developed by a Norwegian scholar shall be modified slightly by possible solutions for dealing with those crucial factors, and the model shall be integrated on the basis of Vietnamese construction law no. 50/2014/QH13 dated 18/6/2014.
A number of 50 factors found and ended up with 19 critical ones for carrying out feasibility study reports in Mekong River Delta. Wherein, factors relating to human actors prevail. Subjective intentions of governing bodies for their executed projects also contributed for lower quality of feasibility study products, followed by factors of procedures and data reliability. The research results may become a reliable reference for stakeholders when carrying out pre-construction activities in Vietnamese construction industry. |
| 關鍵字(中) |
★ 可行性研究
★ 大湄公河三角洲區域
★ 關鍵成功因素
★ 施行營建工程項目前
★ 越南營造行業 |
關鍵字(英) |
★ Feasibility study
★ Mekong River Delta
★ Critical success factor
★ Pre-construction phase
★ Vietnamese construction industry |
| 論文目次 |
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS v
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF TABLES ix
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE PROBLEM 1
1.1. Research background 1
1.2. Research motivations 2
1.3. Research objectives 2
1.4. Research questions 3
1.5. Research processes 3
1.6. Structure of the thesis 3
Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEW INTO THE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4
2.1. Scope of chapter 4
2.2. Definition of a feasibility study 4
2.2.1. Definitions by international academics 4
2.2.2. Definitions by Vietnamese construction laws 5
2.3. Contents of a typical feasibility study 5
2.4. Definition of quality management 8
2.4.1. Definition by PMBOK [5] 8
2.4.2. Definition by Vietnamese construction regulations 8
2.4.3. Quality management of feasibility study under Vietnamese construction laws 8
2.5. The role of the feasibility study in a project life cycle 8
2.6. The limitations of the feasibility study on project life cycle 9
2.7. Critical successful factors of a feasibility study 10
2.7.1. Definition of critical successful factor 10
2.7.2. Critical successful factors of a feasibility study 10
2.8. Summary of this chapter 11
Chapter 3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 13
3.1. Scope of chapter 13
3.2. Research methodology 13
3.3. Methods of data collection 14
3.3.1. Interviewing experts 14
3.3.2. Data from informants 18
3.3.3. Postal questionnaire survey 18
3.4. Methods of analysis 25
3.5. Summary of this chapter 25
Chapter 4. RESEARCH ANALYSES AND FINDINGS 26
4.1. Scope of the chapter 26
4.2. Analysis of the results 26
4.2.1. Responses to the first research question 26
4.2.2. Responses to the second research question 38
4.3. Case study 40
4.3.1. Development for a checklist from CSFs 40
4.3.2. Plausible scenarios for using FS evaluation form 42
4.3.3. Checklist applications for each case study 44
4.4. Summary of this chapter 47
Chapter 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 48
5.1. Scope of the chapter 48
5.2. Research summary 48
5.3. Academic contributions 48
5.4. Recommendations 48
5.5. Research limitations and suggestions for future works 49
REFERENCES 50
APPENDIX 1 Expert interview – Viewpoints of a government manager 51
APPENDIX 2 Expert interview – Viewpoints of a project owner 52
APPENDIX 3 Expert interview – Viewpoints of a scholar 58
APPENDIX 4 Expert interview – Viewpoints of a government manager (2nd time) 61
APPENDIX 5 The survey questionnaire 67
APPENDIX 6 The table of recording scheme 74
APPENDIX 7 The table of label information and values 82
APPENDIX 8 The table of correlation analysis of top 19 factors 86 |
| 參考文獻 |
[1] Abou-Zeid, A., A. Bushraa and M. Ezzat (2007). "Overview of feasibility study procedures for public construction projects in Arab countries." Engineering Sciences 18(1).
[2] Brockhouse, J. W. (2010). "Vital Steps: A Cooperative Feasibility Study Guide."
[3] Chan, A. P. C., D. Scott and A. P. L. Chan (2004). "Factors Affecting the Success of a Construction Project." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 130(1): 153-155.
[4] Dahie, A. M., A. A. Osman and A. A. Omar (2017). "The Role of Project Management in Achieving Project Success: Empirical Study from Local NGOs in Mogadishu-Somalia." International Journal of Engineering Science 14844.
[5] Duncan, W. R. (1996). "A guide to the project management body of knowledge."
[6] Duy Nguyen, L., S. O. Ogunlana and D. Thi Xuan Lan (2004). "A study on project success factors in large construction projects in Vietnam." Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 11(6): 404-413.
[7] Gemmill, B. and A. Bamidele-Izu (2002). "The role of NGOs and civil society in global environmental governance." Global environmental governance: Options and opportunities: 77-100.
[8] Heralova, R. S. (2017). "Life Cycle Costing as an Important Contribution to Feasibility Study in Construction Projects." Procedia Engineering 196: 565-570.
[9] Jónsson, H. R. (2012). Feasibility analysis procedures for public projects in Iceland.
[10] Jónsson, H. R. (2012). Feasibility analysis procedures for public projects in Iceland. Master, Reykjavik University.
[11] Kiani, S., V. Yousefi, S. Yakhchali and A. Mellatdust (2014). "Identifying program critical success factors in construction industry." Management Science Letters 4(6): 1325-1334.
[12] Kruger, C. E., J. Jensen, C. Frear and G. Yorgey (2018). "Completing a successful feasibility study for an anaerobic digestion project."
[13] Matson, J. (2000). "Cooperative feasibility study guide."
[14] Naoum, S. (2012). Dissertation research and writing for construction students, Routledge.
[15] Nguyen, D. T., C. Smith, M. Manning and D.-T. Nguyen (2014). FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPPs) IN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN VIETNAM: STAKEHOLDER’S PERSPECTIVE. 2014 Asia Conference on Economics & Business Research (ACEB 2014) CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS.
[16] Nguyễn, H. (2017). "Nhận diện 3 lãng phí trong đầu tư công." Báo Đầu tư điện tử.
[17] Rockart, J. F. (1979). "Chief executives define their own data needs." Harvard business review 57(2): 81-93.
[18] Shen, L.-y., V. W. Tam, L. Tam and Y.-b. Ji (2010). "Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice." Journal of Cleaner Production 18(3): 254-259.
[19] XIII, V. N. A. (2014). The construction law. 50/2014/QH13. V. N. A. XIII.
[20] Yang, J., G. Q. Shen, M. Ho, D. S. Drew and A. P. Chan (2009). "Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects." Journal of civil engineering and management 15(4): 337-348.
[21] Zhang, S., F. Pan, C. Wang, Y. Sun and H. Wang (2017). "BIM-Based Collaboration Platform for the Management of EPC Projects in Hydropower Engineering." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 143(12): 04017087. |
| 指導教授 |
王翰翔博士(Professor Wang Han-Hsiang)
|
審核日期 |
2019-1-21 |
| 推文 |
 facebook  plurk  twitter  funp  google  live  udn  HD  myshare  reddit  netvibes  friend  youpush  delicious  baidu
|
| 網路書籤 |
 Google bookmarks  del.icio.us  hemidemi myshare
|
