博碩士論文 106430013 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:4 、訪客IP:18.208.186.19
姓名 賴育絜(Yu-Chieh Lai)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 企業社會責任治理對企業社會責任績效之影響
(The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance)
相關論文
★ 利害關係人包容性:企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響:以企業社會責任願景為調節變數★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任揭露與盈餘管理的關係-道德取向或政治成本取向?★ 企業經營模式及申請上櫃個案研究-以H企業為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-6-11以後開放)
摘要(中) 近年來,有關企業社會責任(corporate social responsibility, CSR)之議題備受關注,過去有許多文獻探討公司治理對企業社會責任績效之影響,本文以企業社會責任治理的角度出發,探討企業社會責任治理對於企業社會責任績效之影響。本研究之樣本選取2014-2017年,以達到臺灣證券交易所「上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」強制揭露要求的企業,總計1084家企業爲樣本。根據研究結果顯示,公司設置負責經濟、環境和社會主題的決策之委員會對CSR績效有正向影響;此外,不論董事兼任或未兼任委員會主席,皆是較佳的CSR治理,也會對CSR績效產生正面之影響。
摘要(英) In recent years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an important issue due to the occurrences of corporate frauds and scandal. Most literature discusses the impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility performance. This article specifically addresses the impact of corporate social responsibility governance on corporate social responsibility performance. The sample of this study was selected from 2014 to 2017 and met the requirements of the mandatory disclosure requirements of the “Working Methods for the Preparation and Reporting of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of Listed Companies” on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In total, 1084 enterprises were selected as samples. The results of the study show that the companies with a CSR committee have better CSR performance. Besides, compared with companies without CSR committee, regardless the chairman of the committee is the board director or not, the company will have better CSR governance and then have a positive impact on CSR performance.
關鍵字(中) ★ 企業社會責任(CSR)
★ 企業社會責任治理
★ 企業社會責任績效
★ 企業社會責任委員會
★ 董事
關鍵字(英) ★ corporate social responsibility (CSR)
★ corporate social responsibility governance
★ corporate social responsibility performance
★ CSR committee
★ board director
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
二、文獻探討與假說發展 3
2-1企業社會責任績效 3
2-2企業社會責任治理對企業社會責任績效之影響 6
三、研究設計 9
3-1 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源 9
3-2 變數衡量 10
3-2-1應變數—CSR績效 10
3-2-2自變數—CSR治理 12
3-2-3控制變數 13
3-3 研究模型 14
四、實證結果 17
4-1 樣本資料敘述統計分析 17
4-2 相關係數分析 20
4-3迴歸分析 22
4-4 遞延效果分析 25
五、結論與建議 28
5-1 研究結論與貢獻 28
5-2 研究限制與建議 29
參考文獻 30
參考文獻 金融監督管理委員會,台灣證券交易所,2016。上市上櫃公司治理實務守則。
全球永續性標準理事會(Global Sustainability Standards Board),GRI Standard,2016。
池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瀅臻,2014,企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球 500 大公司的證據,管理學報,31(1):1-19。
李弈靜,2017,策略性企業社會責任動機與企業社會責任績效──以臺灣強制揭露企業社會責任報告書之公司為例,國立中央大學會計研究所碩士論文。
林怡瑄,2012,企業社會責任與股價關聯性之研究─採用 Ohlson模型,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
祝道松,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,9(2):237-270。
郭千鈺,2015,CEO 薪酬、員工薪酬與企業績效的關聯—企業社會責任的觀點,東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
陳振遠、王健聰,2017,公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響,中山管理評論,25(1):135-176。
張元、涂峻瑋與許敏政,2017,社會責任表現較佳的公司有較低的股價崩盤風險嗎?—來自上海證券交易所的證據,兩岸金融季刊,5(2)。
許孟書、張元、陳俞如,2017,產業競爭與公司在社會責任上投入之關聯,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系碩士論文。
黃正忠,2014,CSR及企業永續治理的商業意義,證券櫃檯月刊,171:45-47。
黃玉佩,2011,企業社會責任與經營績效之研究,長庚大學工商管理學系碩士論文。
曾奕婷,2018,企業社會責任對公司價值之影響-短期與長期效果,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系碩士論文。
劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿,2014,企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究,2014第17屆科際整合管理研討會:17-30。
劉哲誠,2017,企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例,國立中央大學會計研究所碩士論文。
Adams, C. A. 2002. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(2): 223-250.
Amran, A., S. P. Lee, and S. S. Devi. 2014. The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment 23(4): 217–235.
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row
Cowen, S., L. Ferreri, and L. Parker, 1987, The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2): 111-122.
Danvila del Valle, I., J. M. Diez Esteban, and O. Lopez de Foronda. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability committee inside the board, Working paper, SSRN no. 2260382. University of Burgos, Burgos.
Eccles, R.G., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2011. The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. Working paper, SSRN no.1964011. Harvard Business School, Allston, MA.
Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 36(5): 5-31.
Birindelli, G., S. Dell’Atti, A.P. Iannuzzi, and M. Savioli. 2018. Composition and activity of the board of directors: impact on ESG performance in the banking system, sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal 10(12): 1-20.
Helfaya, A., and T. Moussa. 2017. Do Board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(8): 1061-1077.
Hussain, N., U. Rigoni, and R.P. Orij. 2018. Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics 149(2): 411-432.
Ioannou, I., and G. Serafeim. 2011. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Working paper SSRN no. 1799589. London Business School and Harvard Business School.
Jamali, D., A. Safieddine, and M. Rabbath. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships, corporate governance. An International Review 16(5): 443-459.
Mackenzie, C. 2007. Boards, Incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case for a Change of Emphasis. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5): 935-943.
Mallin, C., and G. Michelon. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research 41(2): 119-144.
McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): 603-609.
Ricart, J. E., M.Á. Rodríguez, and P. Sánchez. 2005. Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 5(3): 24–41.
Spitzeck, H. 2009. The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 9(4): 495–505.
Ullman, A. H. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 540–557.
Welford R. 2007. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(1): 42-51.
指導教授 陳建中(Chien-Chung Chen) 審核日期 2019-7-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明