企業社會責任治理對會計績效之影響： 利害關係人議合之中介效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：18.190.152.38

姓名

陳宇峰(YU-FENG CHEN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

企業社會責任治理對會計績效之影響：利害關係人議合之中介效果
(The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Governance Structure on the Accounting Performance : The Mediating Effects of Stakeholder Engagement)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響	★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性	★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素	★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例	★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數	★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果	★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-6-20以後開放)

摘要(中)

近些年來企業社會責任開始受到社會大衆的關注，在臺灣的企業編制企業社會責任報告書也是大勢所趨。本文特別針對企業發佈的企業社會責任報告書，探討企業之企業社會責任治理對於會計績效（資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率）之關係，以及利害關係人議合層級對於此關係是否具有中介效果。本文研究之樣本選取2014-2017年，達到臺灣證券交易所「上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」強制揭露要求的企業，扣除遺漏值後1,084家企業選爲樣本。本研究結果顯示，有設立企業社會責任委員會的企業，對於企業之會計績效表現越佳；此外，有設立CSR委員會的企業，與利害關係人諮商的層級也越高；最後，在綜合效果中，諮商層級對於設立企業社會責任委員會與會計績效之正向顯著關係有中介效果。

摘要(英)

In recent years, corporate social responsibility has begun to receive the attention of the public. The establishment of corporate social responsibility reports in Taiwan is also a general trend. This article specifically addresses the CSR report issued by the company to explore the relationship between corporate CSR governance for accounting performance （return on assets, return on equity）, and whether the stakeholder engagement level has a mediating effect on this relationship. The sample of this paper was selected from 2014 to 2017, and reached the requirements of the mandatory disclosure requirements of the “Working Methods for the Preparation and Reporting of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of Listed Companies” on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. After deducting the missing value, 1,084 enterprises were selected as samples. The results of the study show that companies with a Corporate Social Responsibility committee have better accounting performance for their companies. In addition, companies with CSR committees have higher levels of consultation with stakeholders. Finally, in the comprehensive in the effect, the consultative level has a mediating effect on the positive and significant relationship between the establishment of the CSR committee and accounting performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 利害關係人
★ 企業社會責任委員會
★ 利害關係人議合
★ 股東權益報酬率
★ 中介效果

關鍵字(英)

★ Corporate Social Responsibility
★ Stakeholder Engagement
★ Return on equity
★ Return on assets
★ Mediation effect
★ CSR Committee

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
表目錄 V
一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景 1
1-2研究動機 4
二、文獻探討與假說發展 5
2-1 CSR治理對會計績效的影響 5
2-2 CSR治理對利害關係人議合層級的影響 7
2-3利害關係人議合層級的中介效果 8
三、研究設計 11
3-1研究期間、資料來源與樣本選取 11
3-2主要變數衡量 11
四、實證結果 21
4-1 樣本與敘述統計分析 21
4-2相關係數分析 26
4-3迴歸分析 26
4-4穩健性分析 30
4-5 額外分析 34
五、結論與建議 39
5-1研究結論與貢獻 39
5-2研究限制與建議 39
六、參考文獻 41
附錄一、利害關係人議合：舉例說明 46

參考文獻

中文文獻
方俊儒、李秀英與龍春伶，2008，「獨立董監事對公司績效與盈餘品質之影響-控制股東之調節效果」，會計與公司治理，5（1）：55-80。
廖婉鈞、林月雲與虞邦祥，2009，「知覺組織利害關係人重要程度與組織績效之關係：企業責任作為之中介效果」管理學報, 26（2）：213-232。
許文馨，2014，「審計委員會是否較監察人更能提升盈餘品質」，台大管理論叢，24 卷（S1）：203-232。
池祥麟與林怡君，2007，“企業社會績效與企業財務績關聯性之分析道瓊 STOXX 永續性指數為例”，2007年企業倫理和公司治理國際研討會論文集，臺北大學合作經濟學系。
池祥萱、池祥麟與梁綺羚，2016，「企業社會責任之策略性分析」，管理評論，35（1）：21-45。
張兆國、靳小翠與李庚秦，2013，「企業社會責任與財務績效之間交互跨期影響實證研究」，華中科技大學管理學院，（430074)。
英文文獻
Aldamen, H. K., Duncan., S. Kelly., R. Mc. Namara, and S. Nagel. 2012. Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance 52（4）: 971-1000.
Arnstein, SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation .American Institute of Planners Journal 35（4）:216-224.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research：Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51（6）:73-1182.
Bowman, E. H., and M. Haire. 1975. strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California management review 18（2）: 9-58.
Chan, K. C., and J. Li. 2008. Audit committee and firm value： Evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors. Corporate Governance： An International Review 16 （1）:16-31.
Clarkson, B. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 20:92-117.
Coombs, Joseph E., and K. Matthew. Gilley. 2005. Stakeholder Management as a Predictor of CEO Compensation: Main Effects and Interactions with Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal 26（9）:827-840.
Cummings. JF. 2001. Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes:A cross-sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience , Business Ethics:A European Review 10（1）:45-52.
Cowen, S., Ferreri. L.,and Parker, L. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 12 (2):111e122.
Donaldson. 1999. Ｒesponse: Making Stakeholder Theory Whole Academy of Management Ｒeview 4 ( 2 ) : 237-241.
Eccles, R. G., I. Ioannou., and G. Serafeim. 2011. The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. Working paper SSRN no.1964011. Harvard Business School. Allston. MA.
Eberhardt, Toth. E. 2017. Who should be on a board corporate social responsibility committee? Ournal of Cleaner Production 140:1926-1935.
Freeman, E . W., and Evan. 1990. Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 (4) : 337-359.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks A. C., and Parmar B. 2004. Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 15（3）:364-369.
Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York times magazine 13:32-33.
Frooman, J. S. 1999. Stakeholder Influence Strategy, Academy of Management Review24（2）: 191-250.
Greenley, G. E., and G. R. Foxall. 1997. Multiple Stakeholder Orientation in UK Companies and the Implications for Company Performance. Journal of Management Studies 34（2）:260-284.
Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate:Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society 36（5）:5-31.
Griffin J.J., and J. F. Mahon. 1996. The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate:Twenty - Five Years of Incomparable research. Business and Society 36（1）:5-31.
Hawkins, S., N. M. Ratcliffe, and A. Sagastizabal. 1998. The use of thin silver films for the detection of low concentrations of hydrogen sulphide. Analytica Chimica Acta 359（1-2）:125-132.
Herremans I., J. Nazari, F. Mahmoudian. 2016. Stakeholder relationships , engagement, and sustainability reporting, Journal of business Eehics 138（3）:447-435.
Huijstee, and J. Glasbergen, T. M., Felps., and G. Bigley. 2007. A Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decision: The Role of Stakeholder Culture. Academy of Management Review 32（1）:137-155 .
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4):305-360.
Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control:An empirical analysis The Accounting Review 80（2）:649-675.
Luk, C. L., O. H. M. Yau , A. C. B. Tse, L. Y. M. Sin, and R. P. M. Chow. 2005. Stakeholder Orientation and Business Performance:The Case of Service Companies in China. Journal of International Marketing 13（1）:89-110.
Manetti, G. 2011. The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting:Empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment management 18（2）:110-122.
Molloy, C. A., P. Manning-Courtney, and S. Swayne. 2002. Lack of benefit of intravenous synthetic human secretin in the treatment of autism. Autism Dev Disord 32:545-551.
Moskowitz, M. 1972. Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks Business and Social Review 1 （1）: 71-75.
Ow DL. T. Swift, K. Hunt. 2001. Question the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting Accounting Forum25（3）:323-338.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Porter, M. E., and C. Linde. 2005. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9（4）:97-118.
Thomson I., and J. Bebbington. Social and environmental reporting the UK：A perspectives on Accounting 16（5）:507-533.
Tsoutsoura M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ph. D. dissertation, Working Paper：University of California.
Wheeleer D., J. Elkington. 2001. The end of the corporate encironmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Business Strategy and the Environment 10（1）:1-14.
法規、準則與網絡資料
金融監督管理委員會金管證發，2017，「上市上櫃公司治理實務守則」，第二十七條（設置功能性委員會）。
中華民國勞動部，2014，「勞資會議實施辦法」。
全球永續性標準理事會（GSSB），2016，GRI, GRI Standard ，102-一般治理。
英國標準協會，2015，AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard。
中華民國企業永續發展協會，2019，BCSD，網址：www.csronereporting.com。
CSR天下企業公，2019，網址：http://topic.cw.com.tw/csr/。

指導教授

陳建中(Jian-Zhong CHEN)

審核日期

2019-6-21

推文