博碩士論文 106457013 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:35.172.150.239
姓名 倪瑜璟(YU-CHING NI)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 個人組織適配與公司企業社會責任活動參與之關聯─企業社會責任歸因之中介效果
(The Relationship between Person- Organization Fit and CSR participation: The Moderating Effect of CSR Attributions)
相關論文
★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯-以IC設計產業為例★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響 以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2022-8-31以後開放)
摘要(中) 企業如何投入企業社會責任活動至今仍是非常重要的課題,從另一方面,內部利害關係人的員工角度來看,員工對於公司舉辦企業社會責任活動的看法為何?是真心的推動,還是為了賺取利潤、形象而行的漂綠行為?員工與企業契合程度是否影響員工選擇參與投入企業社會活動?因而本研究欲了解個人組織適配是否會影響員工對其企業執行企業社會責任的動機做歸因,並進而影響員工對於企業社會責任活動的參與,而員工對其企業社會責任的歸因理論是否有中介效果。
本次研究問卷採「雪球抽樣(snowball sampling)」方式,以詢問公司有投入企業社會責任活動的公司之員工為研究對象,用線上問卷進行無記名方式填寫,共回收184份問卷,透過SPSS之分析,結果如下:

1.個人與組織適配程度與個人參與企業社會責任有正向顯著關係。
2.個人對企業社會責任之內在歸因可中介個人與組織適配對其參與之影響有正向顯著關係。
3.個人對企業社會責任之外在歸因可中介個人與組織適配對其參與之影響無顯著相關。



關鍵字:個人與組織適配程度、企業會社會責任歸因、企業社會責任參與
摘要(英) How corporates engage in CSR activities is still an important topic. From employees who is one of the primary stakeholders’ perspective, what are employees′ views on corporate social responsibility activities? Does the corporate invest the CSR activities from its original intention? or just behave as greenwashing for profit or try to gain the reputation? Whether employees’ compatibility between people and organizations, which people may fit or misfit, it will affect employees′ CSR participation. Therefore, this study intends to find out whether person-organization fit can affect employees to concern what motivate companies to conduct CSR, and it is further impact on employees’ CSR participation. In addition, we also investigate the moderating effect of employees’ CSR attribution.

This study was adopted the questionnaire survey and distributed on-line with 18 questionnaires by snowball sampling method in this research. The survey is focusing on the employees whose companies involved in CSR participation. A total of 184 valid questionnaires were collected. According to the statistic outcomes, this study confirms that:
1. There is a significant positive correlation between person-organizational fit and CSR participation;
2. The employees’ internal CSR attribution will be mediated positive and significant relationship between person-organization fit and its participation;
3. There is no significant correlation between person-organizational fit and CSR participation with moderating effect of employees’ CSR external attribution.



Key Word: Person- Organization Fit, CSR participation, CSR Attributions
關鍵字(中) ★ 個人與組織適配程度
★ 企業會社會責任歸因
★ 企業社會責任參與
關鍵字(英) ★ Person- Organization Fit
★ CSR Participation
★ CSR Attributions
論文目次 目錄
摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
一、 緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 3
二、 文獻探討 5
2-1 公司企業社會責任活動參與 5
2-2 個人組織適配 16
2-3 企業社會責任歸因 19
2-4 假設推導 22
三、 研究方法 26
3-1 研究架構 26
3-2 研究假設 26
3-3 樣本概述與資料蒐集 27
3-4研究變項與研究工具 27
3-5 資料分析方法 29
四、 研究結果 32
4-1 樣本描述 32
4-2 信度分析 34
4-3 探索性因素分析 34
4-4相關分析 35
4-5迴歸分析 38
五、 結論與建議 42
5-1研究結論 42
5-2管理意涵 44
5-3 研究限制與對未來研究的建議 45
參考文獻 47
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文部分:
1. 王郁民(2009),公司治理與財務績效:企業社會責任之角色,東海大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
2. 石雅智(2010),員工對企業公益活動之參與意願研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 李佩容(2009),員工企業社會責任知覺對組織承諾與離職傾向影響之實證研究,國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
4. 吳承訓(2010),企業志工與非企業志工之工作滿意度、組織承諾與組織公民行為之比較研究,中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
5. 吳思穎(2015),員工心理契約對其企業社會責任活動參與之影響─以歸因為中介變數,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
6. 吳惠珍(2016),組織文化對社福型非營利組織專職人力管理之影響,社區發展季刊,第153期:454-469。
7. 吳萬益(2008),企業研究方法第3版,華泰文化出版。
8. 余佳玲(2012),旅館業個人-組織契合度對組織認同之影響-招募管道的調節效果,南台科技大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文
9. 別蓮蒂、游舒惠 (2002),企業贊助公益活動之動機、決策與影響因素,廣告學研究,國立政治大學,18集,53-95。
10. 林淑姬. (1992),薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究. 國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11. 施欣怡(2013),企業社會責任員工與員工幸福感之關聯性研究,國立中山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
12. 負責任商業聯盟(RBA), http://www.responsiblebusiness.org/
13. 高子倫(2008),轉換型領導的效果:歸因的中介效果分析,國立屏東科技大學企業管理系所碩士論文。
14. 翁慧圓(2009),社會福利機構運用企業資源與挑戰,社區發展季刊126 期。
15. 陳威翰(2010),台中縣屯區社會大學志工參與動機與持續參與因素之研究,亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理研究所碩士論文。
16. 陳靜儀(2007),個人與組織契合度、工作壓力與組織承諾關聯性之研究-以基隆市各區公所為例,國立政治大學行政管理研究所碩士論文。
17. 莊璦嘉與林惠彥(2005),個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響,臺灣管理學刊,123 – 148。
18. 黃正忠(2011),實踐與本業結合的社會責任,證券櫃檯月刊,151 期,154-155。
19. 黃蒼進(2003),台灣企業公益行為之研究-以金融業之銀行為例,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
20. 曾麗嫻(2012),組織社會化與個人-組織契合度對工作投入之影響,新竹教育大學人力資源發展研究所碩士論文。
21. 楊雅智(2015),淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況,證券暨期貨月刊,第三十三卷,第一期。
22. 趙義隆(1990),大型企業贊助公益活動之研究,台北:行政院國科會科資中心。
23. 劉正祺(2013),企業社會責任實踐與員工心理契約之關聯,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
24. 劉念琪、江欣諭、吳奇聯與黃鈺婷。探討企業與員工之社會參與,國立中央大學人力資源研究所第十七屆人力資源管理實務與研究成果發表會。
25. 蔡佩君、連雅慧(2011),相似配適高就好嗎?探討個人-組織配適雙構面對知識分享與創意行為之影響,輔仁管理評論,18(3),75-94。
26. 蔡幸芸(2008),個人工作價值觀與個人與組織契合及組織公民行為間關係之研究,國立臺灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
27. 聯合國的世界企業永續發展委員會(World Business Council for Sustainable Development,WBCSD),http://www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx
28. 聯合國「全球盟約」(The UN Global Compact),https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
29. 薛承泰(2017),社會參與:緊扣社會脈動,做出「深、廣、高」影響力,天下雜誌。

英文部分:
1. Adetunji, J. O., Ogbonna, I. G. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Recruitment Strategy by Organisations. International Review of Management, 2(2), 313-319.
2. Aguinis, H. & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus Peripheral Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological Foundation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, in press.
3. Argyris, C. (1958). Creating Effective Research Relationships in Organizations. Human Organization: Spring 1958, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 34-40.
4. Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A. & Heine, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness.
5. Barley, S.R., Meyer, G.W. & Gash, D.C. (1983). Cultures of Culture: Academics, Practitioners and the Pragmatics of Normative Control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 24-60.
6. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman, New York: Harper& Row.
7. Branco, M. C. and Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132
8. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
9. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34,39-48.
10. Catano, V. M., & Morrow Hines, H. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility, psychologically healthy workplaces, and individual values in attracting millennial job applicants. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 48(2), 142-154.
11. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333-349.
12. Chuang, A., Shen, C. T., & Judge, T. A. (2016). Development of a multidimensional instrument of person-environment fit: The Perceived Person-Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65, 66-98.
13. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.
14. Deckop, J., Mangel, R., &Cirka, C. (1999). Getting more than you pay for: Organizational citizenship behavior and pay-for-performance plans. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 420–428.
15. Donia, M. B. L., Tetrault Sirsly, C.-A., & Ronen, S. (2016). Employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic: Validation of a measure. Applied Psychology. 66 (1), 103–142
16. Ehrhart, K. H., Ziegert, J. C. (2005). Why Are Individuals Attracted to Organizations? Journal of Management, 31(6), 901-919.
17. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36, 90-100.
18. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Time Magazine.
20. Harris, S.G. & Mossholder, K.W. (1996), The Affective Implications of Perceived Congruence with Culture Dimensions during Organizational Transformation. Journal of Management 22(4):527-547.
21. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Responsiveness in an era of inequality The case of the U.S. senate. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 585-599.
22. Im, S., Chung, Y. W. and Yang, J. Y. (2016). Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit. Sustainability, 9(1), 28, 2016.
23. Jones, D.A., Willness, C.& Macneil, S. (2009). Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings 2009(1):1-6.
24. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of experimental social psychology, 3(1), 1-24.
25. Kelley H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 14, 192-241.
26. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution, American, Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
27. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
28. Kristof, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual′s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
29. Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. (2008). Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. New York: McGraw Hill.
30. Lin, J. W. (2016). Exploring the Relationships among Firms’ CSR Practices, Employees’ Organizational Identification, and CSR Perceptions: Employees’ CSR-Induced Attributions as Mediators
31. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. O′Reilly III, C.A., Chatman, J. & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit. The Academy of Management Journal 34(3):487-516.
33. Pondy, L., & Mitroff, I. (1979). Beyond open systems models of organization. In L.L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (ed.). Research in organization behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34. Porter, M., &Kramer, M. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.
35. Sannwald, W. W. (2000). Understanding organizational culture. Library Administration & Management, 14(1), 8-14.
36. Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., & McKENNA, J. F. (1987). REFERENT SELECTION IN DETERMINING EQUITY PERCEPTIONS: DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS ON BEHAVIORAL AND ATTITUDINAL OUTCOMES. Personnel Psychology, 40(1), 113–124.
37. Schein, E. H. (1965, 1980). Organizational psychology, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hal.
38. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
39. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-358.
40. Sutarjo (2011). Ten Ways of Managing Person-Organization Fit (P-O Fit) Effectively: A Literature Study. "International Journal of Business and Social Science", Special Issue, Vol. 2, pp. 226-233.
41. Vlachos P. A. et al. (2013). Causal Attributions and Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 334-337.
42. Wang, L. (2011). Factors affecting perceptions of corporate social responsibility implementation: an emphasis on values. University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences. Dissertationes, forestales 130.
43. Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of Motivation: From Mechanism to Cognition, Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
44. Weiner, B. (1979). Theory of Motivation for Some Classroom Experience, Journal of Educational psychology, 71(1), 3-25.
45. Williams, L. J., &Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
46. Winters, B. (2015).PERSON-CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FIT: CONSIDERING THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE VALUES ON FIT WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION, . Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. Paper 255.
47. Zhang, L. & Gowan, M. A. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility, Applicants’ Individual Traits, and Organizational Attraction: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology,27,345–362
指導教授 劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu) 審核日期 2019-7-4
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明