應計品質、不動產持有與企業融資

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：18.191.202.72

姓名

謝栯家(Yu-Chia Shieh) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系在職專班

論文名稱

應計品質、不動產持有與企業融資
(Accrued Quality, Real Estate Holdings, and Debt Financing)

相關論文

★ 董事會性別多樣性與現金持有比例之關聯性－以上市公司為例	★ 外匯避險策略探討－以個案公司為例
★ 探討員工提案採納之特性-以A銀行為例	★ 銀行辦理新冠肺炎疫情紓困案之研究-以A銀行某分行為例
★ 信用風險加權風險性資產、風險權數與銀行經營項目之關係	★ 分行盈餘之決定因素：以T銀行之個案分析為例
★ 台灣上市公司股利政策與經濟景氣循環之關係	★ 從以房養老到房貸資產活化－以個案分析為例
★ 台灣LED未上市企業評價之個案研究	★ 留房安養財富傳承—以香港中產夫婦個案分析為例
★ 信託行為規劃與租稅效益之個案分析	★ 臺灣上市櫃公司不動產持有程度之影響因素
★ Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Taiwan	★ 東協國家匯率變動對赴當地投資台商公司績效之影響
★ 會計穩健性、不動產持有與企業債務資金成本	★ 低利率環境下銀行之經營績效與風險承擔－本國銀行的實證研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究採用Francis et al（2005）提出之應計品質模型作為財務報表中應計品質的衡量指標，以 2006 年至 2016 年期間，台灣上市櫃公開發行公司為研究對象，利用普通最小平方法迴歸分析，探討財務報表之應計品質優劣、及公司持有不動產價值兩項變數，與對企業融資成本之影響。
以往相關文獻如莊盛杰(2005)、陳天欣(2006)曾探討台灣資本市場應計品質對資金成本的影響，然而與國外文獻相異；本文獻則以較新資料區間同時探討應計品質及持有不動產資產對債務資金成本之影響，並獲得具統計顯著性之結果，得以補足以往文獻之不足。
本研究的實證結果如下：第一，應計品質較佳的公司對外取得之借款利率較低，亦即應計品質較佳可顯著降低債務資金成本；第二，探討當應計品質與不動產持有兩項變數同時存在時，僅有較佳應計品質降低債務資金成本，反之持有不動產比例則無顯著影響。本研究的結果隱含台灣企業債權融資成本和財務報表應計品質更為相關，亦即債權人非僅重視借款企業可能作為抵押品之不動產資產價值。

摘要(英)

This study explores how the accrued quality and real estate holdings affect the corporate financing costs. We use the accrual quality model proposed by Francis et al (2005) to measure the accrual quality of companies’ financial statements. Our sample is sourced from publicly listed stocks on Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE) from 2006 to 2016.
The extant literature in Taiwan such as Jhuang Shen-Jie (2005) and Chen Tien-Hsin (2006) have discussed how companies’ accrual quality affect their costs of capital, however their results are opposite to most findings of the main stream of literature which focuses on the study of the U.S. listed companies. In contrast, by using a more recent sample period, this study finds how accrued quality and real estate asset holdings affect companies’ costs of the debt, which is in line with the main stream literature.
Our results show that companies with better accrued quality or with greater real estate holdings can on average borrow at lower interest rate. In addition, when considering the impacts from both the accrued quality and real estate holdings, the latter variable losses its significance, which implies that the accrued quality can more effectively decrease the costs of corporate debt financing. Our findings suggest that in Taiwan, when coming to the decision regarding the lending rates, creditors tend to consider the accrual quality as a more important factor, as compared to the tangibility of companies.
Key word: Accrued Quality，Cost of Debt， Real Estate holdings

關鍵字(中)

★ 應計品質
★ 不動產
★ 債務資金成本

關鍵字(英)

★ Accrued Quality
★ Real Estate holdings
★ Cost of Debt

論文目次

摘　　　要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
表　目　錄 iv
圖　目　錄 v
一、緒　論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究架構 4
二、文獻探討及研究假設 5
2-1 文獻探討 5
2-2 研究假說 10
三、研究方法 11
3-1 資料來源及樣本選擇 11
3-2 變數衡量、變數定義及實證模型設計 13
3-3 實證模型 19
四、研究結果 22
4-1 敘述性統計分析 22
4-2 相關係數矩陣分析 25
4-3 有息負債率、應計品質與不動產三者關聯性 27
4-4 迴歸分析 29
五、結論與建議 34
5-1 研究結論 34
5-2 研究建議 36
參考文獻 37

參考文獻

中文部份：
〔1〕張天惠，「擔保品價值與企業借款－個體配合借貸資料的分析」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文, 民國93年。
〔2〕吳玉菁，「貸款利率、擔保品與借款者型態之關係－商業銀行個案研究」，私立中原大學，碩士論文，民國96年。
〔3〕游采熒，「盈餘品質與資金成本之關連性」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文，民國94年。
〔4〕陳天欣，「應計品質與資金成本之關聯性」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文，民國95年。
〔5〕陳玉霖：「高貸超搬空銀行資產手法大公開」。105年3月，取自網址http://www.reaa.org.tw/news_detail.php?NsId=QD48PyomJTY1QCgrIyVeKw==。
〔6〕陳錦村與葉雅薰，「公司改組、監督機制與盈餘管理之研究」，會計評論，第34卷，頁1-29，民國91年。
〔7〕盧佩玉，「應計項目品質與公司現金持有之關聯性研究」，國立政治大學，碩士論文，民國99年。
〔8〕林玲吟，「盈餘管理、企業社會責任和債務資金成本的關連性」，國立成功大學，碩士論文，民國107年。
〔9〕林嬋娟、洪櫻芬、薛敏正，「財務困難公司之盈餘管理實證研究」，管理學報，14 卷 1 期，頁 15-38，民國86年。
〔10〕莊盛杰，「應計品質與資金成本關係之研究」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文，民國96年。
〔11〕黃麗惠、沈中華，「盈餘管理對銀行債務資金成本之影響－信用評等觀點」，管理學報； 26卷6期，頁599–623，民國98年12月。
〔12〕劉政准、劉若蘭和劉京姐，「導入國際會計準則對負債資金成本之影響－以歐盟及中國為例」，會計與公司治理，11卷1期，頁27-50，民國105年6月。

英文部份:
〔1〕 Ahmed, A.S., B.K. Billings, R.M. Morton, and M.S. Harris. (2002). “The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-conflicts over divi-dend policy and in reducing debt costs”. The Accounting Review 77: 867-890.
〔2〕 Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., and LaFond, R. (2006). “The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings”. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (1/2): 203-243.
〔3〕 Bester H.（1985），”Screening vs.Rationing in Credit Markets With
Imperfect Information,＂American Economic Review 57,850-855.
〔4〕 Bester H. (1987)，”The Role of Collateral in Markets with Imperfect Infor-mation,”Europenan Economic Review 31,pp.887-899.
〔5〕 Booth, J. R. (1992). Contract costs, bank loans, and the cross-monitoring hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics, 31, 25-41.
〔6〕 DeAngelo, L. E. (1981).“Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation”. Journal of Accounting and Economics：113-27.
〔7〕 DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). ”Auditor Size and Audit Quality”. Journal of Ac-counting and Economics：183-99.
〔8〕 DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner.,(1994). “Accounting Choice in Trouble Companies”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, pp. 113-144.
〔9〕 Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney.,(1995). “Detecting Earnings Man-agement”, The Accounting Review, 70, pp. 193-225.
〔10〕 Dechow,P.M., and I.D.Dichev(2002),”The quality of accruals and earn-ings:The role of accrual estimation errors”, The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement) pp.35-39
〔11〕 Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. (1983). “Separation of ownership and control”. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
〔12〕 Fisher, F. M. and J. J. McGowon (1983), “On the Misuse of Accounting Rate of Return to Infer Monopoly Profit”, American Economic Review, 73, 82-97.
〔13〕 Francis, Jennifer；LaFond, Ryan；Olsson, Per；Schipper, Katherine.(2005). “The Marker Pricing of Accruals Quality”. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 39(2)：295-327.
〔14〕 Griffin, J.J.,J.F Mahon., (1997). “The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incompara-ble Research”. Business and Society,36(1),5-31.
〔15〕 Haribar,P.,and D. Nichols(2007),”The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management”, Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5)pp.1017-1053.
〔16〕 Hall.Toutsoura, M., (2004). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”. Working Paper.
〔17〕 Hargraves，M.（1990）,”Borrowing and lending with private information and collateral constraints”, Brown University Working Paper NO.90-91.
〔18〕 Liow, K. H. (2004). “Corporate Real Estate and Stock Market Performance”. The journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(1), 119-140.
〔19〕 Marsh , P. (1982), “The Choice Between Equity and Debt: An Empirical Study”, Journal Finance.
〔20〕 Martin,R.E.,and D.J.Smyth,(1991),”Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard Ef-fects in the Mortgage Market:An Empirical analysis”, Southern Economic Journal 57,1071-1084.
〔21〕 Menkhoff, L., and Neuberger, D., and Suwanaporn, C., (2005),”Collateral-Based Lending in Emering Markets：Evidence from Thailand”, Journal Banking and Finance 30, 1-21.
〔22〕 Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.Vishny (1988), “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.20., 293-315.
〔23〕 Myers, S.C(1984),“The Capital Structure Puzzle”, Journal of Finance.
〔24〕 Norton ,E.(1989),“Determinants of Capital Structure: A Survey” , JAI Press Inc.
〔25〕 Patton, A.,and J. C. Baker. (1987). “Why won’t directors rock the boat? “Harvard Business Review 65: 10-18.
〔26〕 Petersen, M.A., and R.G. Rajan. (1994). “The benefits of lending relation-ships: evidence　from small business data”. Journal of Finance 49: 3-37.
〔27〕 Schipper, K., （1989）. “Commentary on Earnings Management”, Accounting Horizons, 3, pp. 91-102.
〔28〕 Scott, W. R., （2003）.” Financial Accounting Theory”. Third Edition Pren-tice.
〔29〕 Sengupta, P..（1998）.” Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt”. The Accounting Review 73(4): 459-474.
〔30〕 Seiler, M. J., Chatrath, A., & Webb, J. R. (2001). “Real Asset Ownership and the Risk and Return to Stockholders”. Journal of Real Estate Research, 22(1), 199-212.

指導教授

李丹(Tan Lee)

審核日期

2019-7-25

推文