| 摘要(英) |
For e-learning generation, students are able to obtain their required knowledge and information from online learning platform at anytime and anywhere. In addition to the scores in traditional exam, teachers could use the learning log of online learning platform to analyze their learning situation on this course and try to further improve students’ academic performance. This work applied three questionnaires to measure students′ self-regulated learning, learning strategies and self-efficacy. We also used the online learning platform BookRoll to collect students′ reading logs and analyze two courses with different learning activities to observe that would the applied learning activities impact students′ reading logs, learning skills and academic performance. The study is divided into three main research directions. The first one is correlation analysis, which explores the correlation between academic performance, reading logs, self-adapted learning, learning strategies, and self-efficacy. The second is differential analysis, which explores the difference on academic performance, reading logs, self-adapted learning, learning strategies, and self-efficacy after applying learning activities. The final one explores how to use correlation and differential analysis results to design learning activities for improving academic performance.
The experimental result shows that there are obvious differences in the analysis results of the two courses with different learning activities, and found that although the courses are applied innovative teaching mode with online learning platform, the traditional process of previewing and reviewing is still the key to the academic performance. However, helping students improve their self- regulated learning, learning strategies and self-efficacy, does not enhance the students′ enthusiasm for the use of BoolRoll. Finally, we also found from the experiment that the students′ ability on goal setting in the preparation of the preview and reflection report are important for improving academic performance. This thesis applies data analysis technology, not only analyzes the data of the two courses in detail but also deeply explores the significance of the experimental result. With the result of this work, students can capture their insufficient learning ability, and teachers is able to design learning activities to for improving academic performance in the innovative teaching mode.
|
| 參考文獻 |
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The internet and higher education, 12(1), 1-6.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(3), 245-281.
Chen, C. S. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 20(1), 11-25.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2).
Oi, M., Yamada, M., Okubo, F., Shimada, A., & Ogata, H. (2017). Finding Traces of High and Low Achievers by Analyzing Undergraduates′ E-book Logs. In MMLA-CrossLAK@ LAK (pp. 15-22).
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Sun, Z., Xie, K., & Anderman, L. H. (2018). The role of self-regulated learning in students′ success in flipped undergraduate math courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 41-53.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit