以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：5

、訪客IP：3.147.89.24

姓名	樹瑪雅(Siti Any Maya Shulhah)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱	Examining Teachers’ Online Video-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development Regarding Guided-Discovery Learning Instruction (Examining Teachers’ Online Video-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development Regarding Guided-Discovery Learning Instruction)
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	在職教師必須掌握在教學中使用各種策略和方法的教學知識和技能，並通過持續的反思性練習來專業地提高他們的表現。 這個多案例研究的目的是描述印度尼西亞的在職教師在針對其專業發展進行指導，發現學習指導的反思實踐中的本質。 iCRT在線視頻系統被用來支持三個階段的反思活動，包括自我反思，協作反思和後設反思。 從印度尼西亞的三所不同職業高中中挑選了六名學員，並將他們配對為三組不同主題課程。通過分析選擇性注意力與基於知識的推理之間的動態相互作用，檢驗了他們進行反思活動的本質（framework adapted from Sherin, 2007）。 這一發現表明，在反思活動中，教師更關注自己和他們在教學中的行為作為關注的對象。在提供引導式發現教學的同時，由於該過程涉及大多數教師干預引導學生並引導他們發現正確的知識概念作為學習成果，因此腦力激盪過程最受關注。然而，教學實踐經驗的改進可以從教師在教學現場的一些反應來看，譬如教師自己發現教學上哪個部分是需要被改進的。另一個結果是，協作反思對於支持反思的客觀性很重要，並且可以作為參考點。它還加強了教師的專業改進，並使教師在實踐中認識到他們的缺點。此外，後設反思過程已經能夠推斷教學成績已經達到的改進程度。
摘要(英)	It is important for in-service teachers to master pedagogical knowledge and skills of using various strategies and methods in teaching as well as professionally improving performance through continuous reflective practice. The purpose of this multiple-case study was to describe Indonesian in-service teachers’ nature in performing reflective practice regarding guided-discovery learning instruction for professional development. The iCRT online video-based system was employed to support three stages of reflection activities consisting of self-reflection, collaborative reflection, and meta reflection. Six participants were selected from three different vocational high schools in Indonesia and they were paired into three groups of subject lessons. Their nature in performing reflection activities was examined by analyzing the dynamic interaction between selective attention and knowledge-based reasoning (framework adapted from Sherin, 2007). The finding identified that in reflection activities, teachers were more focused on their self and their actions in teaching as the object of attention. While in providing guided discovery instruction, the brainstorming process has taken the most noticed in view of the fact that the process involved most of teachers′ intervention in guiding students and lead them to discover the right concept of knowledge as the learning outcomes. However, the improvement of teaching practice can be seen from how teachers reasoned on the selective part of the teaching scene which needed to be improved. Another result was that collaborative reflection is important to support the objectivity of reflection and serves as a reference point. It also strengthens teachers on their professional development and leads teachers to recognize their shortcomings in practice. In addition, the meta-reflection process has been able to infer the extent to which improvements in teaching performance have been achieved.
關鍵字(中)	★ 反思實踐 ★ 引導式發現教學 ★ 基於視頻的反思 ★ 專業發展 ★ 反思	關鍵字(英)	★ reflective practice ★ guided-discovery instruction ★ video-based reflection ★ professional development ★ reflection
論文目次	中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1-1 Background 1 1-2 Identification of the Problem 5 1-3 Focus and Research Questions 6 1-4 Objectives of the Study 6 1-5 Benefits of the Study 6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2-1 Guided Discovery 8 2-1-1 Definition of Guided Discovery 8 2-1-2 Instructional Features of Guided Discovery 11 2-2 Reflective Practice for Teachers’ Professional Development 13 2-2-1 Definition of Reflection 14 2-2-2 Reflection Viewed from the Perspective of Process 15 2-2-3 Reflection Viewed from the Perspective of Critical Analysis 18 2-2-4 Reflective practice for teachers’ professional development in Indonesia 19 2-3 Technology Supported Reflective Practice 20 2-3-1 Video Annotation Tool for Reflective Practice 22 2-3-2 The Effect of Video Viewing on Teachers’ Professional Vision 28 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 31 3-1 Type of the Research 31 3-2 Participants of the Research 32 3-3 Research Design 34 3-3-1 Study Questions 34 3-3-2 Study Propositions 34 3-3-3 Units of analysis 35 3-3-4 Linking data to propositions 37 3-3-5 Criteria for interpreting a study’s findings 38 3-4 The Data Collection Technique 38 3-4-1 Observations 39 3-4-2 Interviews 39 3-4-3 Documentation 39 3-5 The Credibility of the Research 39 3-6 The iCRT Online Video-Based Reflective Practice System 40 3-6-1 iCRT System Features 40 3-6-2 Reflection Process supported by iCRT System 44 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 48 4-1 Teachers’ nature in performing self-reflection regarding guided-discovery approach 48 4-1-1 Teachers more focus on their actions in providing guided-discovery instruction 49 4-1-2 In provision of guided-discovery instruction, teachers put the attention more on brainstorming activity 51 4-1-3 The teachers’ changes can be found in the interaction between selective attention and knowledge-based reasoning 53 4-1-4 Teachers also noticed to other aspects of learning events outside of guided-discovery 57 4-2 Teachers’ Engagement in Collaborative Reflection 58 4-2-1 Collaborative reflection reinforces teachers′ belief in the positive aspects of their pedagogical practices 60 4-2-2 Collaborative reflection leads teachers to more critically recognize weaknesses in their teaching practices 66 4-3 The role of meta-reflection in the iCRT System 72 4-3-1 Meta-reflection supported teachers to give an overall insight regarding their professional practice performance 72 4-3-2 Meta reflection as a promising feature in the iCRT System 75 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 77 5-1 Conclusions 77 5-2 Suggestions 78 REFERENCES 80 APPENDIX 1. Letter of Permission 86 APPENDIX 2. Research Proposal for Teachers 87 APPENDIX 3. Research Schedule 91 APPENDIX 4. Interview Questions 1 93 APPENDIX 5. Interview Questions 2 94 APPENDIX 6. List of Research Activity 95
參考文獻	Anastasiow, N. J., Sibley, S. A., Leonhardt, T. M., & Borich, G. D. (1970). A comparison of guided discovery, discovery and didactic teaching of math to kindergarten poverty children. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 493–510. Bruner, J. (1961) The act of discovery. Harvard educational review, 31, pp.21-32. Bruner, J. S. (1977). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 51 Bowman, B. (1989). Self-reflection as an element of professionalism. In The Teachers College Record, Vol. 90 (3), 107-128 C. J. Shieh & L. Yu. (2016). Discovery Instruction towards students’ learning achievement and learning retention. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(4), 833-842. Cheng, G. & Chau, J. (2009). Digital video for fostering self‐reflection in an ePortfolio environment. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 34 (4), 337-350. Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E., (2008). e-Learning and the science of instruction, 2nd Ed. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Colasante, Meg. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 27 (1), 66-88. Collins, J. L., Cook-Cottone, C. P., Robinson, J. S., & Sullivan, R. R. (2004). Technology and New Directions in Professional Development: Applications of Digital Video, Peer Review, and Self-Reflection. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(2), 131-146. DeJong, T. (2005). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: The Cambridge University Press. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Learning and teaching: research-based methods (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc., 306-335 Fonseca, D. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of Research on Applied E-Learning in Engineering and Architecture Education. IGI Global. Gaudein, C. & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Journal of Educational Research Review, Vol 16, 41-67 Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher education, 13(4), 451-458. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, Vol. 96 (3), 606-633. Grossman, P. L. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education teacher education (pp. 425-476). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Government Regulation Number 19 of 2017 (Republic of Indonesia), s.1 preamble Hawkins, Susan & Rogers, Meredith Park. (2016), Tools for Reflection: Video-Based Reflection Within a Preservice Community of Practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vo. 27, 415-437 Hewitt, J., Pedretti, E., Bencze, L., Vaillancourt, B.D., & Yoon, S. (2003). New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 11 (4), 483-500. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15. Jay, J. K. & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol 18, 73-77. Jones, Mellita. (2014). Reflective practice in the online space. In Jones, M. & Ryan, J. (Eds.), Successful teacher education: Partnership, reflective practice and the place of technology. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, 153-173. Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 33(1), 13-23. Kleinknecht, M., & Gröschner, A. (2016). Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online-and video-based intervention study. Teaching and Teacher Education, (59), 45-56. Knowles, J.G & Cole. A.L. (1994). Teacher educators reflecting on writing in practice. In Russell, T. dan Korthagen, F (Ed.). Teachers who Teach Teacher: Reflections on Teacher Education. (71-94). Ontario: Routledge. Lavine, Robert A., (2012). Guided Discovery Learning. In Norbert M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer US, 1402-1403. Levin, Barbara. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers′ thinking about cases. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol 11 (1), 63-79. Lee, H. J. (2005). Understanding and assessing pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education. Vol. 21, 699-715. Lodico, M. G. et al. (2006). Methods in educational research. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 265-267. Loughran, John. (2005). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: The Falmer Press, 4 Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saljana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd Ed). Los Angeles: Sage Inc., p. 9 Ministry of Education and Culture. (2007). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2007 Concerning Teacher Competence and Academic Qualification Standardized, p. 5-31. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 22 of 2016 Concerning Primary and Secondary Education, p. 3 Moore, Kenneth D. (2015). Effective instructional strategies: from theory to practice (4th ed.). California: Sage Publications, 294-298 Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saljana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd Ed). Los Angeles: Sage Inc., p. 9 Pea, Roy & Hoffert & Erick. (2007). Video workflow in the learning sciences: Prospects of emerging technologies for augmenting work practices. In Goldman, et al., Video Research in the Learning Science. Mahwah, New Jersey: Routledge, 427-460. Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Capturing and assessing evidence of student teacher inquiry: A case study. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1426-1440. Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Decisions and reasons: examining preservice teacher decision-making through video self-analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1), 62-94. Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52-67. Rich, P. J., & Trip, T. (2011). Ten essential questions educators should ask when using video annotation tools. TechTrends, Vol. 55 (6), 16-24. Sachs, Judyth. (2003). Teacher professional standards: Controlling or developing teaching? Journal of Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, Vol 9 (2), 175-186. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston: Pearson. Seidel, et al. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 27, 259-267. Sherin, M. G., & Van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491. Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. L. (2005) Instructional Design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 19-21, 227-228, 247 Sherin, Mirriam G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In Goldman, et al., Video Research in the Learning Science. Mahwah, New Jersey: Routledge, 383-395. Suratno, S. & Iskandar, S. (2010). Teacher reflection in Indonesia: Lessons learnt from a lesson study program. US-China Education Review, Vol 7 (12), 39-48 Teacher and Lecturer Law Number 14 of 2005 (Republic of Indonesia) s. 5.4, s. 10.1 Tripp, R. T., & Rich, J. R. 2011. Using video to analyze one′s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678-704. Tripp, R. T., & Rich, J. R. 2012. The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 728-739. Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflection in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 67–88. van Es, E. A. & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers′ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 10 (4), 571-596. Westwood, Peter. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press, 28-30 Wilkins, E. A., Shin, E. K., & Ainsworth, J. (2009). The effects of peer feedback practices with elementary education teacher candidates. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 79-93. Yin, Robert K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed). California, US: Sage Inc.
指導教授	吳穎沺 Sugito(Ying-Tien Wu Sugito)	審核日期	2018-7-9
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare