The Effect s of Video-based Reflection on Preservice Teachers′ Micro Teaching Focusing on Meaningful Learning with ICT

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：5

、訪客IP：18.227.0.192

姓名

拉克斯(Keith Francis Ratumbuisang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

(The Effect s of Video-based Reflection on Preservice Teachers′ Micro Teaching Focusing on Meaningful Learning with ICT)

相關論文

★ 支援國小科展探究教與學之網路科展探究系統的開發與評估	★ 教師科展專業知識分享社群平台系統開發與評估
★ 科學小論文寫作平台的建置與評估	★ 「探究教學線上教師社群平台」之建置與評估:以知識管理理論為基礎
★ 科學閱讀平台之發展與評估	★ 以鷹架為基礎之科展探究系統平台之開發與評估
★ Improving Novice Teachers’ Instructional Practice Through Online Multilevel Reflection: The Role of Novice Teachers’ Beliefs	★ Examining Teachers’ Online Video-Based Reflective Practice for Professional Development Regarding Guided-Discovery Learning Instruction
★ 數位教育遊戲之開發與評估：以「Mr.道耳頓的奇幻歷險」為例	★ 應用自然語言處理技術開發基於知識翻新理論之線上非同步合作論證平台與平台初步評估
★ 同步討論與反思系統（SDRS）對小學生知識建構學習環境感知和學習成果的影響	★ 具有集成設計框架的同步在線論證系統用戶界面：重新設計和評估
★ 科學探究學習系統之開發與評估	★ 支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估
★ 線上合作共同備課平台：開發與評估	★ 歷史影音學習平台之開發與評估

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

摘要
本研究試圖通過使用名稱為自我評估反思教學系統（iCRT），來分析基於視頻的反思和基於紙本的反思的傳統方式再加入教師教育計劃，分析職前教師在教學實踐中的表現。本研究的對像是在美娜多州立大學(Manado State University)，工程學院，信息通信與技術系的教育部門(Department Education of Information Communication and Technology) 中擔任教師教育計劃第三年的職前教師。共有60名職前教師被分配到兩組，其中30人是基於視頻的反思組（VB），30人是基於紙本的反思組（PB）。 VB反思組使用了iCRT的反思系統，PB反思組使用傳統基於紙本的反思。
結果表明，這兩個群體在使用ICT框架進行有意義的學習時，從第一輪到第三輪的反思（自我反思，同伴反思和後設反思）方面存在顯著差異。這一發現表明，基於視頻的反思小組中的職前教師比紙本反思小組中的職前教師反思更多。此外，從第1輪，第2輪和第3輪的自我反思到職前教師教學實踐表現的分析結果，VB反思組顯示出極大的正面變化相較於PB反思組只有微小的變化。研究顯示，同儕的反應有助於鼓勵教師在課堂教學中改變自己的意識，讓自己的教學技能更好。因此，強烈建議將iCRT系統用於教師教育項目，尤其是微型教學課程，以提高反思的數量和質量，以便培養準備好面對教學真實情況的合格準教師
關鍵字 : 教學實踐，基於視頻的反思，基於紙本的反思，職前教師，使用ICT的有意義學習

摘要(英)

Abstract
This study tried to analyze the preservice teacher performance in teaching practice while joining the teacher education program using developed system called i-Critical Reflection on Teaching (iCRT) video-based reflection and using traditional way which is paper-based reflection. The objects of this research are preservice teachers in Manado State University, Faculty of engineering, department education of information communication and technology who are in the third year of the teacher education program. Quasi-experiment method was used in this study. Totally, 60 preservice teachers were assign and they were divided into two groups, 30 preservice teachers in video-based (VB) reflection (experiment group) and 30 preservice teachers in paper-based (PB) reflection (control group). The VB-Reflection group was used iCRT reflection system and paper-based reflection used by PB-Reflection group.
The result show that, there were significant differences between these two group in terms of how they doing the reflection (Self-Reflection, Peer-Reflection and Meta-Reflection) from round one to round three using meaningful learning with ICT framework. This finding indicated that preservice teacher in video-based reflection group contribute more reflection than preservice teacher in paper-based reflection. In addition, the analysis result of preservice teacher teaching practice performance from self-reflection during round 1, round 2 and round 3, there were extremely positive changes showed in VB-Reflection group as well as those in paper-based reflection group with small changes. It also noticed that peer responses helped to encourage the growing awareness of teacher to change themselves in classroom teaching to be better. Therefore, it strongly recommends that the iCRT system use in teacher education program especially in micro teaching course to enhance the quantity and quality of reflection in order to produce qualified prospective teachers who are ready to face the real situation of teaching.
Keywords: Teaching Practice, Video-based Reflection, Paper-based Reflection, Preservice Teacher, Meaningful Learning with ICT.

關鍵字(中)

★ 教學實踐
★ 基於視頻的反思
★ 基於紙本的反思
★ 職前教師
★ 使用ICT的有意義學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Teaching Practice
★ Video-based Reflection
★ Paper-based Reflection
★ Preservice Teacher
★ Meaningful Learning with ICT

論文目次

TABEL OF CONTENTS
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IV
TABEL OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF TABLES IX
LIST OF APPENDIX X
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1-1 Research Background 1
1-2 Problem Identification 4
1-3 Problem Scope 4
1-4 Problem Statement 5
1-5 Research Purpose 5
1-6 Research Benefit 6
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2-1 Theoretical Review 7
2-1-1 Meaningful Learning with ICT 7
2-1-2 Teacher Reflection and Teacher Education 11
2-1-3 Video-based in Teacher Education 19
2-2 Relevant Research 23
2-3 Conceptual Framework 24
2-4 Hypothesis 24
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 26
3-1 Type of Research 26
3-2 i-Critical Reflection on Teaching (iCRT) System 27
3-3 Place and Time of Study 29
3-4 Population and Sample 31
3-5 Research Variable 32
3-6 Operational Definition 33
3-7 Technique of Data Collection 33
3-8 Technique of Data Analyzing 35
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION 39
4-1 First Round of Preservice Teachers’ Reflection 39
4-1-1 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Self-Reflection on Teaching Practice 40
4-1-2 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Comment Giving on Teaching Practice 41
4-1-3 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Meta-Reflection on Teaching Practice 42
4-2 Second Round of Preservice Teachers’ Reflection 43
4-2-1 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Self-Reflection on Teaching Practice 43
4-2-2 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Comment Giving on Teaching Practice 44
4-2-3 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Meta-Reflection on Teaching Practice 45
4-3 Third Round of Preservice Teachers’ Reflection 46
4-3-1 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Self-Reflection on Teaching Practice 46
4-3-2 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Comments Giving on Teaching Practice 47
4-3-3 The Effect of Preservice Teacher Meta-Reflection on Teaching Practice 48
4-4 Implication of Three Round of Preservice Teacher Reflections 48
4-5 Analysis of Preservice Teacher Performance in Teaching Practice with Professional Vision 51
5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGESSTIONS 55
5-1 Conclusions 55
5-2 Suggestions 56
BIBLIOGRAPHIES 59

參考文獻

BIBLIOGRAPHIES
Alsaleh et al.2017. Impact of peer coaching strategy on preservice teachers’ professional development growth in Kuwait. Kuwait: International Journal of Educational Research86hal. 36–49Elsevier Ltd
Afolabi, S.O. (1999). The philosophy of supervision in education. Journal of Kwara State College of Education, 4(1), 39–48.
Areglado, N. (1999). I became convinced. Journal of Staff Development, 20(1), 35e37.
Ausubel, D.P (1960). The use of advance organizers in learning and retention of meaningful material. Journal of Education Psychology, 52, 262-272.
B. ed. Bloom. Taxonomy of educational objectives, Vol. 1: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay. 1956.
Bell, M. (2005). Peer observation partnerships in higher education. NSW, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Inc
Biscarri, J. 1993. La formación permanente de los profesores: Motivaciones y condicionantes. [Teachers continuing education: Motivations and conditioning] Lleida: Institut d’Estudis Ilerdencs.
Capizzi, A. M., Wehby, J., & Sandmel, K. (2010). Enhancing Mentoring of Teacher Candidates Through Consultative Feedback and Self-Evaluation of Instructional Delivery. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(3), 191-212.
C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University Clearinghouse on Higher Education. Archived at
Champbell, D. T. 1963. Experimental & Quasi Experimental Designs for Research. London, Houghton Mi in Company
Chan, C. (2010). Assessment: Evaluating Your Own Teaching. Hong Kong: Assessment Resources@HKU.
Colen, M.T., and O. Defis. 1997. La formación permanente del profesorado de educación infantil como punto de partida de la formación inicial. [Continuing education for early childhood education teachers as the first step in initial training].
Daramola, S.O. (1991). Teaching practice and university admissions for NGE graduates Ilorin Journal of Education, 2(1), 88-94.
D. H. Jonassen, J. L. Howland, J. L. Moore and R. M. Marra. (2003) Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Eilam, B., & Poyas, Y. (2006). Promoting awareness of the characteristics of classrooms’ complexity: A course curriculum in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education.
Esteve, O. 2004. Nuevas perspectivas en la formación de profesorado de lenguas: Hacia el aprendizaje reflexivo o aprender a través de la práctica, a VV.AA. Actas I Jornadas Didácticas de Español y Alemán como Lenguas Extranjeras [New perspectives in language teacher education: Towards reflexive learning or learning through practice]. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.
Finn, L. (2002, March). Using video to reflection on curriculum. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 72-74.
Fleck, R., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2006). Supporting collaborative reflection with passive image capture. Supplementary Proceedings of COOP ’06, Carryle-Rouet, France. pp.41-48.
Flecknoe, M. 2002. Measuring the impact of teacher professional development: Can it be done? European Journal of Teacher Education 25, nos. 2–3: 119–32.
Frederiksen, J. R., Sipusic, M. Sherin, M., & Wofle, E. W. (1998). Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing functions of teaching. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 255-297.
Fullerton, H. (1999) Observation of teaching, in: H. Fry, S. Ketteridge & S. Marshall (Eds) A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education (London, Kogan Page).
Goldman, R. (2007). Video representations and the perceptivity framework: epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383e 395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
J. Herrington and R. Oliver. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 ,23– 48. 2000.
J. L. Howland, D. H. Jonassen, and R. M. Marra. Meaningful Learning with Technology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson. 2012.
Kavaliauskiené, G., L. Kaminskiené, and L. Anusiené. 2007. Reflective practice. Assessment of assignments in English for Specific Purposes. Ibérica 14: 149–66.
Keller, C. L., Brady, M., & Taylor, R. (2005). Using Self Evaluation to Improve Student Teacher Interns′ Use of Specific Praise. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 368-376.
Kiliq, Elif Dogan. 2007. Measure for university student’ Attitude towards peer assessment. Sanliurfa: Harran University
Kleinknecht, M., Schneider J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education. (14 – 23).
Kirkpatrick, James. 2005. Transferring learning to behavior. Training and Development 59, no. 4: 19.
Le Fevre, D. M. (2004). Designing for teacher learning: video-based curriculum design. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10 (pp. 235e258). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lee, G. G., & Wu, C.-C. (2006). Enhancing the Teaching Experience of Preservice Teachers Through the Use of Videos in Web-Based Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 369-380.
Lisle, Angela. 2006. Maintaining interaction at the zone of proximal development through reflexive practice and action research. Teacher Development 10, no. 1: 117–43
M. M. Lombardi. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. 2007.
Mayer, R.E. (1999). The promise of educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Mayer, R.E (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226-232.
Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: what makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321e334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Miyata, H. (2002, December). A study of developing reflective practices for preservice teachers through a web-based electronic teaching portfolio and video-on-demand assessment program. Proceedings of the International Conference of Computers in Education, December 3-6, 2002. 1039-1043.
Moon, J. 2005. Guide for Busy Academics No. 4; Learning Through Reflection. Higher Education Academy.
Nulty, Duncan. 1991. A Guide to Peer and Self-Assessment Approaches and Practice Strategies for Academics, (Griffit University).
Ohansson, Inge., Anette Sandberg, and Tuula Vuorinen. 2007. Practitioner-oriented research as a tool for professional development. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 15, no. 2: 151–66.
Orland-Barak, L., & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: what student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 957e969.
Orsmond, P. (1993) Peer observation of teaching, The New Academic.
Parsons, M., and M. Stephenson. 2005. Developing reflective practice in student teachers: collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching 11, no. 1: 95–116.
Perraton, H. (2007) Teacher Education: The Role of Open and Distance Learning, London: Routledge.
Peter J. Rich Michael, Hannafin. (2009) Video Annotation Tools; Technologies to Scaffold, Structure, and Transform Teacher Reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 52 – 60.
Pineda, P, X. Ucar, V. Moreno, E. Belvis, V. Garrido, A. Forés, S. Roig, F. Ferrer, and E. Vilaplana. 2007. Evaluación de la calidad de la formación continua en el sector de la educación infantil: Informe ejecutivo. [Quality assessment in continuing training in the area of early childhood education: Executive report]. Barcelona.
R. C. Schank. Goal-based scenarios. In R. C. Schank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1994.
Repetto, J.B. (1995). Curriculum Beyond School Walls: Implications of Transition Education. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3), 125-140.
Repetto, K. J., & Chen, C. (2007, April). Teacher learning from video cases of science teaching: A conceptual framework. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA.
Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education. Advances in research on teaching, Vol. 10 (pp. 1e27). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1).
Soisangwarn, et al. 2014. Promoting the Reflective Teacher through Peer Coaching to Improve Teaching Skills. Thailand: Journal Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences 116hal. 2504–2511Elsevier Ltd.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualititif dan R&D [Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods]. Bandung. Alfabeta.
Swanson, R.A. 1996. Evaluation systems in HRD. PLS evaluation system: Sales communication case study. In Proceedings of the Symposium Evaluation Systems in HRD, Minneapolis, 718–25.
Tripp, T. (2009). Understanding the use of video analysis tools to facilitate reflection among preservice teachers. Unpublished Master’s thesis.
Tonya, R. Peter J. The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Journal of Teacher and Teacher Education.
UNESCO. (2002). Teacher education guidelines: using open and distance learning – technology, curriculum, cost, evaluation. Paris: UNESCO.
Wang, J. & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11 (1), 105-138.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 2, 231–250.
Wright, G. A. (2008). How does video analysis impact teacher reflection-for-action? Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Yang, W. M., & Xu, X. Z. (2008). Self-assessment in second language learning. US-China Foreign Language, 6(5), 63-77.

指導教授

吳穎沺、Herman Dwi Surjono(Ying-Tien Wu Herman Dwi Surjono)

審核日期

2018-7-9

推文