博碩士論文 106757009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:11 、訪客IP:3.233.239.20
姓名 劉聖怡(LIU SHENG-YI)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 客家語文暨社會科學學系客家研究碩士在職專班
論文名稱 我國地方政府推廣客家語文模式及其成效之研究:財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會個案分析
(A Study on Mode and Effect of Promoting Hakka Culture and Language of Local Government in Taiwan:The Case Study of the Hakka Culture Foundation in the Taoyuan City)
相關論文
★ 從台灣賄選案件探討政治因素對於司法審判之影響★ 政治因素對於法院審理之影響分析:以台灣選舉誹謗司法案件為例
★ 台灣信仰型非營利組織治理活動與模式之研究-以五個信仰型非營利組織為例★ 政府與非營利組織治理網絡建構之研究:以台北都會區新移民為個案的觀察
★ 族群型代表性行政機關課責之研究 – 以我國中央與地方客家行政機關為例★ 社區治理網絡中非營利組織政策倡議之研究-台北市八頭里仁協會之個案研究
★ 地方政府與第三部門的契約委外關係之研究: 以我國社會福利型非營利組織為例★ 我國客家行政機關代理關係之研究─台北市客家文化基金會個案分析
★ 我國客家事務行政類科考試政策執行之研究★ 我國地方性信仰型非營利組織的策略聯盟之研究— 以「財團法人桃園縣寺廟團體公益慈善基金會」 為個案研究
★ 地方政府契約委外與信仰型非營利組織★ 社會企業之組織運作型態探討 ─以The Big Issue為例
★ 多元文化下社區發展協會政策網絡之研究-以桃園縣新移民關懷服務據點為例★ 臺灣地方客家行政機關契約委外的治理研究:新北市義民祭個案分析
★ 台灣地方政府新移民職業訓練契約委外 之研究:以桃園市為例★ 台灣地方推展志願服務簽約委外之研究:以桃園市志願服務教育訓練為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 我國地方政府推廣客家語文模式及其成效之研究:
財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會個案分析
摘要
近年來我國地方政府致力精進客家語文推廣的施政作為,其中最具效率與效能
的模式就是設置私法人性質的財團法人基金會。本論文的主要研究問題為:桃園市
客家事務局捐助成立的財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會,在推廣客家語言文化傳承
之背景、理由、機制、形式、現狀以及運作模式為何?財團法人桃園市客家文化基
金會推廣客家語言文化之實踐作法及成效為何?本論文就是運用文獻分析法、深入
訪談法以及次級資料分析法等質性研究方法,針對桃園市客家事務局、財團法人桃
園市客家文化基金會、公關公司、客家社團等四個對象進行經驗研究。根據本論文
的研究發現,桃園市客家事務局於2016 年捐助成立財團法人桃園市客家文化基金
會是屬於私部門,在推廣客家語言文化活動時具有彈性,更能夠與民間團體客家社
團及廠商公關公司做最好的溝通公私協力調整配合;設置財團法人桃園市客家文化
基金會最大的成效,就是將原本屬於公部門與私部門之間上對下的層級關係,轉換
成為私部門對等互惠、平等與平行的關係,而本文根據上述研究發現作出具體的研
究建議。
關鍵字:推廣客家語文、財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會、桃園市客家事務局、客
家社團
摘要(英) A Study on Mode and Effect of Promoting Hakka Culture and
Language of Local Government in Taiwan:The Case Study of the
Hakka Culture Foundation in the Taoyuan City
Abstract
In recent years, Taiwan’s local governments have been committed to improving the
promotion of Hakka language, of which the most efficient and effective mode is the
setup of private foundations. The main research problem in this paper is: What is the
background reason, mechanism, form, current status, and operational mode of the
Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation set up and funded by the Department of Hakka
Affairs, Taoyuan City Government in the context of engaged in the promotion of
inheritance of Hakka language and culture? What are the implementation practices and
effectiveness of Hakka language and culture promotion and inheritance undertaken by
the Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation? This paper adopted the literature analysis
method, in-depth interview method, secondary data analysis method, and other
qualitative research methods to carry out empirical studies targeting Department of
Hakka Affairs, Taoyuan City Government, Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation, public
relations companies, and Hakka associations. The research findings in this paper show
that the Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation set up and funded by the Department of
Hakka Affairs Taoyuan City Government in 2016 is a private sector whose promotion of
Hakka culture activities demonstrates flexibility, able to achieve the most effective
communication with private groups, Hakka associations, vendors, and marketing public
relations companies, and adjust and coordinate through public-private partnerships. The
greatest achievement of the Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation is transforming the
top-down hierarchical relationship between the public sector and the private sector into
the reciprocal, equal, and parallel relationship of the private sector. Specific research
recommendations were proposed based on the research findings above
Keywords: Promoting Hakka Language; Taoyuan Hakka Culture Foundation;
Department of Hakka Affairs, Taoyuan City Government; Hakka Associations
關鍵字(中) ★ 推廣客家語文
★ 財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會
★ 桃園市客家事務局
★ 客家社團
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 目 次
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………ⅰ
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………ⅱ
謝辭………………………………………………………………………ⅲ
目次………………………………………………………………………ⅴ
圖目次……………………………………………………………………ⅶ
表目次……………………………………………………………………ⅷ
第一章 緒論………………………………………………….1
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………1
第二節 研究問題與目的……………………………………………7
第三節 研究架構與研究方法………………………………………9
第二章 文獻探討 ……………………………………………15
第一節 公私協力……………………………………………………15
第二節 契約委外……………………………………………………20
第三節 政府捐助之財團法人………………………………………25
第四節 績效評估……………………………………………………33
第三章 桃園市客家文化基金會及個案研究…………………..38
第一節 桃園市客家文化基金會的組織架構與使命………………39
第二節 個案研究:2018 桃園市客家文化節……………………...41
vi
第四章 經驗調查與分析……………………………………..52
第一節 桃園市客家事務局的職能與角色分析…………………...53
第二節 財團法人桃園市客家文化基金會………………………...57
第三節 行銷公關公司:廠商……………………………………...64
第四節 桃園市地方客家社團……………………………………...70
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………..79
第一節 研究發現 …………………………………………………80
第二節 研究建議 …………………………………………………83
參考文獻…………………………………………………………..85
附 錄………………………………………………………………………92
附 錄 深度訪談資料………...…………………………………………..92
參考文獻 參考文獻
壹、 中文部分
王篤強、高迪理、吳秀照,2010,〈台灣社會福利民營化的未預期後果:地方政府
相關人員「官僚自主性」的初步闡釋〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,
14(2):91-146。
王惠盈、2008,「公設財團法人導入公司治理模式之研究:美國沙賓法的借鏡」,
國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
吳英明,1993,〈公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討〉,《中國行政評
論》, 2(3): 1-14。
吳英明,1994,〈公私部門協力推動都市發展-「高雄 21」美國考察報告〉,
《空 間》,56:61-67。
吳英明,1996,《公私部門協力關係之研究:兼論公私部門聯合開發與都市發
展》, 高雄:復文。
吳濟華,1994,〈推動民間參與都市發展:公私部門協力策略之探討〉,《臺灣經
濟》,208:1-15。
呂朝賢,2002,〈非營利組織與政府的關係-以九二一賑災為例〉,《台灣社會福
利學刊》,2:39-77。
李宗勳,2004,〈公私協力與委外化的效應與價值:一項進行中的治理改造工
程〉,《公共行政學報》,12:41-77。
李宗勳,2006,〈歐美委外化治理模式的機會與挑戰-協力夥伴的觀點〉,《警察
行政管理學報》,1:53-80。
李宗勳,2007,《政府業務委外經營-理論、策略與經驗》,臺北:智勝。
林淑馨,2007,〈日本地方政府與非營利組織協力關係之分析:以橫濱市和箕面
市為例〉,《行政暨政策學報》,45:73-114。
林淑馨,2014,〈地方政府與非營利組織協力之初探:以東日本大地震為例〉,
86
《社 區發展季刊》,148:293-302。
林淑馨,2015,〈我國非營利組織與地方政府協力現況之初探與反思:以臺北為
例 〉,《文官制度季刊》,7(2): 17-45。
官有垣、吳芝嫻,2006〈台灣的政府捐資基金會〉,見蕭新煌,江明修,官有垣
(主編),《基金會在台灣:結構與類型》,頁211-246。台北:巨流。
林水波、陳志瑋,2000〈彈性化政府的設計與評估〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》
12(2): 237-280。
孫本初、郭昇勳,2000,〈公私部門合夥理論與成功要件之探討〉,《考銓季刊》,
22:95-108。
孫煒,2004,〈非營利管理的責任問題:政治經濟研究途徑〉,《政治科學論叢》,
20: 141-166。
孫煒,2008,〈民主國家獨立機關的創建理由與制度定位:兼論對於我國政府改造
的啟示〉,《行政暨政策學報》46: 107-150。
孫煒,2012,〈民主治理中準政府組織的公共性與課責性:對於我國政府捐助之
財團法人轉型的啟示〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,第24 卷第4 期,頁
497-528
孫煒,2014,〈台灣地方政府社會福利服務的契約治理〉,載於蘇彩足主編《地方
治理之趨勢與挑戰:臺灣經驗》,頁271-319,台北:臺灣民主基金會。
陳悅宜、傅傳鈞,2011〈政府捐助之財團法人行政監督事宜整體規劃推動情形〉,《研
考雙月刊》35(3): 137-143。
陳敦源,2009,《民主治理:公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和》。台北:五南。
陳金哲,2006,〈準市場機制與區域治理〉,《公共行政學報》,19:91-126。
陳恆鈞、張國偉,2005,〈協力運作模型之初探〉,《法政學報》,19:41-85。
陳敦源、魯炳炎,2008,〈創造共識:民主治理中的政策行銷管理〉,《研考雙月刊》,
264:3-14。
87
陳敦源、張世杰,2010,〈公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉,《文官制度季刊》,2(3):
17-71。
曾冠球,2011,〈協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立〉,《文官制度季刊》,
3(1): 27-52。
彭錦鵬,2008,〈行政法人與政署之制度選擇〉,《考銓季刊》53: 21-36。
彭文賢,1980,《系統研究法的組織理論之分析》,台北:聯經。
楊靜茹,2009,「立法院監督公設財團法人之研究」,國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩
士論文。
詹鎮榮,2010,〈變遷中之行政組織法:從「組織形式選擇自由」到「組織最適誡
命」〉,《中研院法學期刊》6: 1-60。
鄭惠文,2012,「政府捐助財團法人財務課責之研究」,國立台北大學公共行政暨政
策學系博士論文。
鄭惠文、張四明、陳于淇,2011〈我國政府捐助財團法人績效考核制度之建構:層
級分析法應用〉《行政暨政策學報》52: 1-38。
鄧國勝,2001,《非營利組織評估》,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
88
貳、 英文部分
Brinkerhoff, J. M. 2002. “Government–Nonprofit Partnership: A Defining
Framework.” Public Administration and Development, 22(1): 19-30.
Bryson, John M., B. C. Crosby, and M. M. Stone. 2006. “The Design and
Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature.”
Public Administration Review, 66(S1): 44-55.
Brown, Trevor L., Matthew Potoski& David M.VanSlyke. 2006. “Managing Public
Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions and Markets.” Public
Administration Review 66(3): 323-331.
Bertelli, Anthony M.
2006a “The Role of Political Ideology in the Structural Design of New
Governance Agencies,” Public Administration Review 66(4): 583- 595.
2006b “Delegating to the Quango: Ex Ante and Ex Post Ministerial Constraints,”
Governance 19(2): 229-249.
Bevir, Mark
2006 “Democratic Governance: Systems and Radical Perspectives,” Public
Administration Review 66(3): 426-436.
2009 Key Concepts in Governance. Washington, DC: Sage.
Coston, J. M. 1998. “A Model and Typology of Government-NGO Relationships.”
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3): 358-382.
Cameron, K. S. 1981. “Domains of Organizational Effectiveness in Colleges and
Universities.” Academy of Management Journal 24(1): 25-47.
Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, &Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Toward A Stewardship
Theory of Management.”Academy of Management Review 22(1): 20-47.
Gilardi, Fabrizio
2008 Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in
Western Europe. Northampton. MA: Edward Elgar.
89
Greve, Carsten, Matthew Flinders and Sandra Van Thiel
1999 “Quangos: What’s in a Name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative
Perspective,” Governance 12(2): 129-146.
Gazley, B. 2008. “Beyond the Contract: The Scope and Nature of Informal
Government–Nonprofit Partnerships.” Public Administration Review, 68(1):
141-154.
Gidron, L., R. M. Kramer, and L. M. Salamon. 1992. Government and The Third
Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States. California, San Francisco:
Jossey Bass.
Hailey, J. 2000. “NGO Partners-The characteristics of Effective Development
Partnerships.” In S. P. Osborne eds., Public-Private Partners: Theory and
Practice in International Perspective. London: Routledge, 311-324.
Hudson, B., and B. Hardy. 2002. “What Is a ′Successful′ Partnership and How Can It
Be Measured?” In C. Glendinning, M. Powell, and K. Rummery eds.,
Partnerships, New Labour and The Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy
Press, 51-65.
Herman, R. D. and D. O. Renz. 1997. “Multiple Constituencies and the Social
Construction of Nonprofit Effectiveness.” Nonprofit and Voluntary
Sector Quarterly 26(2): 185-207.
Johnson, Jocelyn M. & Barbara S. Romzek. 2010. “The Promises, Performance, and
Pitfalls of Government Contracting.” In Robert F. Durant (ed.) The Oxford
Handbook of American Bureaucracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahkonen, Liisa. 2010. “Competition as a Pressure in Quasi-Markets: Internal
Inefficiency of an Organization.” Public Personnel Management 39(3):
231-242.
Kettl, Donald F. 1988. Government by Proxy: (Mis?)Managing Federal
Programs.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Koven, Steven G.
2009 “Bureaucracy, Democracy, and the New Public Management,” pp.
90
139-154 in Ali Farazmand (ed.), Bureaucracy and Administration.
New York: CRC Press.
Lamothe, Meeyoung& Scott Lamothe. 2010. “Relational Versus Formal Contracting:
Do Contracting Governments Adhere to Economic Wisdom?”Paper prepared for
presentation at the 2010 Western Political Science Association Annual
Conference, April 1-3, 2010, C.A.: San Francisco.
Lewis, Jane, Penny Bernstock, Virginia Bovell& Fiona Wookey. 1996. “The
Purchaser/Provider Split in Social Care: Is It Working?” Social Policy &
Administration 30(1): 1-19.
Linden, R. M. 2002. Working Across Boundaries: Making Collaboration Work in
Government and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-
Bass.
Marvel, Mary K. & Howard P. Marvel. 2008. “Government-To-Government
Contracting: Stewardship, Agency, and Substitution.” International Public
Management Journal 11(2): 171-192.
Meier, Kenneth J. and Laurence J. O’Toole Jr.
2006 Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective.
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Martin, L. L. and P. M. Kettner. 1996. Measuring the Performance of
Human Service Programs. Newbury Park, California: SAGE
Publications, Inc.
Najam, A. 2000. “The Four C’s of Government Third Sector-Government Relations.”
Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10(4): 375-396.
O′Connor, Daniel & Suzan Ilcan. 2005. “The Folding of Liberal Government:
Contract Governance and the Transformation of the Public Service in
Canada.”Alternatives 30: 1-23.
OECD
2002 Distributed Public Government: Agencies, Authorities and Other
Government Bodies. Paris: OECD.
91
Peters, B. G. 1997. “‘With a Little Help from Our Friends’: Public-Private
Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments.” In J. Pierre ed., Partnerships in
Urban Governance: European and American Experiences. Basingstoke,
Hampshire: Macmillan Press, 11-33.
Peters, B. G. 1998. “Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Coordination.”
Public Administration, 76(Summer): 295-311.
Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre. 1998. “Governance without Government? Rethinking
Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,
8(2): 223-243.
Powell, M., and C. Glendinning. 2002. “Introduction.” In C. Glendinning, M.
Powell, and K. Rummery eds., Partnerships, New Labour and The
Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press, 1-14.
Pierre, Jon and B. Guy Peters
2005 Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios. Basingstocke:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollitt, Christopher
2009 “Decentralized Management: Agencies and ‘Arm’s-length’ Bodies,” pp.
249-260 in Tony Bovaird & Elke Loffler (eds.), Public Management and
Governance. New York: Routledge.
Quinn, R. E. and J. Rohr Baugh, 1983. “A Spatial Model of Effectiveness
Criteria: Towards A Competing Values Approach to Organizational
Analysis.” Management Science 29(3): 363-377.
Reeves, Eoin. 2008. “The Practice of Contracting in Public Private Partnerships:
Transaction Costs and Relational Contracting in the Irish Schools Sector.” Public
Administration 86(4): 969–986.
Strom, Kaare
2000 “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies,”
European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 261-290.
92
Stone, M. M. and S. Culcher-Gershenfeld. 2002. “Challenges of Measuring
Performance in Nonprofit Organizations.” In Measuring the Impact of
The Nonprofit Sector, eds. P. Flynn and A. Hodgkinson. New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Thompson, James R. 2000. “Quasi-Markets and Strategic Change in Public
Organizations.” In Jeffrey L. Brudney, Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr. & Hal G. Rainey
(ed.)Advancing Public Management: New Development in Theory, Methods,
and Practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black
Box.” Public Administration Review, 66(S1): 20-31.
Vigoda, E. 2002. “From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and
the Next Generation of Public Administration.” Public Administration
Review, 62(5): 527-540.
Van Slyke, David M. 2007. “Agents or Stewards: Using Theory to Understand the
Government-Nonprofit Social Service Contracting Relationship.” Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory 17: 157-187.
Van Thiel, Sandra
2001 Quangos: Trends, Causes and Consequences. England, Aldershot: Ashgate.
2004 “Trends in the Public Sector: Why Politicians Prefer Quasi-Autonomous
Organizations,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16(2): 175-201.
Waterman, Richard W. & Kenneth J. Meier. 1998. “Principal-Agent Models: An
Expansion?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8: 173-202.
Yang, Kaifeng, Jun Yi Hsieh & Tzung-Shiun Li. 2010.“Evaluating Contracting-out
Performance in Taiwan: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Private
Contractors.” Public Administration Quarterly34(1): 76-108.
指導教授 孫煒 審核日期 2019-8-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明