藉由電子書學習系統探討學生自主學習、學業成績與線上學習行為之間的關係-以微積分課程為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：34

、訪客IP：18.226.222.12

姓名

劉泰佑(LIU,TAI-YU) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

數學系

論文名稱

藉由電子書學習系統探討學生自主學習、學業成績與線上學習行為之間的關係-以微積分課程為例

相關論文

★ 中小學數學教師創意教學競賽金牌得獎作品可行性分析之個案研究	★ 線上問卷調查開發應用與Matlab對於微積分學習成效之探討
★ 探討學生在不同學習環境下、線上學習系統之線上學習行為與學業成績之間的關係－以微積分課程為例	★ 中小學數學創意教學競賽實施之研究
★ 評分者對數學科創意教學觀點之比較以中小學數學教師創意教學競賽為例	★ 小波轉換於圖形比對的一種方法
★ 算術計算中誤解的文字或符號所造成的錯誤及影響	★ 相同教學單元之創意作品所著重創意觀點與創意呈現之比較－以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 利用凌波轉換保護影像竄改及偵測還原	★ 遊戲方式表現創意的教學策略之探討－以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 國小四、五年級分數運算錯誤類型分析之研究	★ 因、倍數創意教學作品分析與比較－以「中小學數學教師創意教學競賽」作品為例
★ On the Positive Solution for Grad-Shafranov Equation	★ 從微積分課後輔導，分析學生的數學學習問題:以一個助教的實例作探討
★ 評估學生自願使用e-portfolio對於提高課程表現的成效－以國立中央大學為例	★ 線上討論的知識建構模式特徵 -以批踢踢實業坊的微積分討論為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究旨在藉由電子書學習系統去探討學生的自主學習能力、線上學習行為、經驗學習與滿意度以及學業成績之間的相互關係，自主學習能力中包含了目標設定、環境結構、學習策略、時間管理、尋求幫助和自我評估。並運用SEM結構方程模型與Amos探討學生的自主學習能力、線上學習行為和學業成績之間的關係。

研究對象為中央大學108學年度大學部有修習微積分課程之學生共91名，以該名學生施測之問卷結果為主要資料。本研究編制一份用於測量學生的自主學習能力和經驗學習與滿意度之問卷於會考時間進行施測。藉由問卷資料和學生在線上學習系統的瀏覽紀錄資料與學業修習狀況進行統計數據分析，統整出自主學習能力、線上學習行為、經驗學習與滿意度和學業成績之間的相互關係。

結果發現，學生的自主學習能力對於學生的線上學習行為和學業成績，為顯著正相關；學生的線上學習行為對於學生的學業成績，為顯著正相關。故我們可以藉由學生的自主學習能力以及學生在BookRoll系統的線上學習行為去預測學生的學習成效。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to explore the interrelationships among students′ self-regulated learning ability, online learning behavior, experience learning and satisfaction, and learning outcomes through the e-book learning system. The self-regulated learning ability includes goal setting, environment structuring, and task strategies, time management, help seeking and self-evaluation. And using SEM structural equation model and Amos to explore the relationship between students′ self-regulated learning ability, online learning behavior and learning outcomes.

The research object is a total of 91 students who have taken calculus courses in the 108th academic year of National Central University. This research compiles a questionnaire for measuring students′ self-regulated learning ability and experience learning and satisfaction to be tested during the examination time. Through the questionnaire data, the student′s online learning system′s browsing record data and academic status for statistical data analysis, the correlation between self-regulated learning ability, online learning behavior, experience learning and satisfaction and learning outcomes is sorted out.

It was found that students′ self-regulated learning ability was significantly positively correlated with students′ online learning behavior and learning outcomes; students′ online learning behavior was significantly positively correlated with student′s learning outcomes. Therefore, we can predict students′ learning effectiveness through students′ self-regulated learning ability and students′ online learning behavior in BookRoll system.

關鍵字(中)

★ 自主學習能力
★ 線上學習行為
★ 學業成績

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要----------------------------------------------------i
Abstract-----------------------------------------------ii
致謝--------------------------------------------------iii
目錄---------------------------------------------------iv
圖目錄--------------------------------------------------v
表目錄-------------------------------------------------vi
第一章
緒論----------------------------------------------------1
第一節研究背景與動機----------------------------------1
第二節研究目的與問題----------------------------------2
第三節名詞定義---------------------------------------3
第四節研究範圍與限制----------------------------------5
第二章
文獻探討------------------------------------------------6
第一節經驗學習------------------------------------------6
第二節自主學習-----------------------------------------12
第三章
研究方法-----------------------------------------------19
第一節研究架構--------------------------------------19
第二節研究對象--------------------------------------20
第三節學習活動流程----------------------------------20
第四節研究工具--------------------------------------21
第五節蒐集資料--------------------------------------26
第六節研究流程--------------------------------------28
第四章
研究結果與分析------------------------------------------30
第一節自主學習、學業成績以及線上學習行為三者間的關係----30
第二節經驗學習與學生滿意度和線上學習行為、學業成績之關係-38
第三節結構方程模型分析-------------------------------40
第五章
結論與建議---------------------------------------------59
第一節問題與討論-------------------------------------59
第二節結論------------------------------------------61
第三節建議------------------------------------------62
參考文獻-----------------------------------------------63
附錄---------------------------------------------------67

參考文獻

1.Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 25–29.
2.Alcota, M., Munoz, A., & Gonzalez, F. E. (2011). Diverse and participative learning methodologies: A remedial teaching intervention for low marks dental students in Chile.
3.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13.
6.Chee Leong Lim, Habibah Ab Jalil, Aini Marina Ma′rof, Wan Zuhainis Saad. (2020). Peer Learning, Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement in Blended Learning Courses: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach, 15(3), 110-125.
7.Chen, N.-S., Wei, C.-W., & Liu, C.-C. (2011). Effects of matching teaching strategy to thinking style on learner’s quality of reflection in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 53-64.
8.Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17.
9.Connor, K., Newman, D., & Deyoe, M. M. (2014, June). Flipping a classroom: A continual process of refinement. Proceedings of the ASEE annual conference and exposition, Indianapolis, IN.
10.Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty: a study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York, NY: Minton, Balch & Company.
11.Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
12.Dewey, J. (1977). The bearing of pragmatism upon education. In A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John dewey. 1899-1924 (Vol. 4, pp. 125-142).
13.Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
14.Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.Im, K. S., & Grover, V. (2004). The use of structural equation modeling in IS research. In M. E. Whitman, & A. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 44-65). Hershey, PA: Idea group publishing.
16.J. A. Gay-Fern´andez, M. G. S´anchez, I. Cui˜nas and A. V. Alejos. (2010).Propagation analysis and deployment of a wireless sensor network in a forest. Progress in electromagnetics research, 106, 121-145.
17.J.Broadbent, W.L.Poon. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
18.Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 125–142.
19.Kizilcec, R. F., Perez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2016). Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC.
20.Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., & Lehtovaara, J. (2014). Experiential learning in foreign language education. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.Kolb, D, A., & Wolfe, D. M. (1981). Professional education and career development: A cross sectional study of adaptive competencies in experimental learning.
22.Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.Kolb, D. A. (1985). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
24.Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24−33.
25.Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218−230.
26.Lan, W. Y. (1996). The effects of self-monitoring on students′ course performance, use oflearning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 101−115.
27.Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A Case study of the blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873.
28.Lucy Barnard, William Y.Lan, Yen M.To, Valerie OslandPaton, Shu-Ling Lai. (2008). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1-6.
29.Meilun Shih, Jyh-Chong Liang& Chin-Chung Tsai. (2019). Exploring the role of university students’online self-regulated in the flipped classroom: a structural equation model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27:8, 1192-1206.
30.Orange, C. (1999). Using peer modeling to teach self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(1), 21−39.
31.Oxley, J., & Ilea, R. (Eds.) (2015). Experiential learning in philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.René F.Kizilcec, Mar Pérez-Sanagustín& Jorge J.Maldonado. (2016). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33.
33.Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self- regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 125–152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Self-regulation of learningand performance: Issues and educational applications. NJ: LEA.
35.Sims, R. R. (2002). Organizational success through ef ective human resources management. Westport, CT: Greenwood publishing group.
36.Smith, D., & Kolb, D. A. (1985). User guide for the learning-style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.
37.Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S., & Tsai, M.-J. (2001). Developing an internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers & Education, 37(1), 41-51.
38.Zhai, X., Gu, J., Liu, H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom context. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 198–210.
39.Zhai,X., Gu,J., Liu,H., Liang,J.-C., & Tsai,C.-C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students′ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom context. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 198-210.
40.Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A Social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
41.Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura(Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 73–86.
43.Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective(P75). Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86.
44.Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boeakaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.
46.毛國楠、程炳林（1993），「目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響」。教育心理學報，26期，85-106，82年。
47.朱耀明(2011)，「動手做的學習意涵分析-杜威的經驗學習觀點」，生活科技教育月，第四十四卷，第二期，32-43頁，100年3月。
48.吳木崑(2009)，「杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示」，臺北市立教育大學學報，第40卷，第一期，35-54頁，98年5月。
49.李金泉，「非同步式網路輔助教學之研究─以技職校院工業安全課程為例」，國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系，博士論文，民國90年。
50.高申春，人性輝煌之路-班杜拉的社會學習理論，台北:貓頭鷹出版社，民國90年。
51.張玉山、莊孟蓉(2009)，「經驗學習理論的教學應用-以紙機械單元為例」，科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集，102-109頁，98年9月。
52.張景媛（1992），「自我調整、動機信念、選題策略與作業表現關係的研究暨自我調整訓練課程效果之評估」。教育心理學報，25期，201-243，81年。
53.梁雲霞(2006)，「從自主學習理論到學校實務－概念架構與方案發展」，當代教育研究，第14卷，第4期，171-206頁，95年12月。
54.許家驊（2010），「國小學生運作記憶、自我調節表現與數學解題能力關係之研究」。教育研究學報，44（2），55-84，99年10月。
55.陳明照、黃德祥(2000)。自我調節學習的理論與應用。教育改革與教育發展，132-158頁。
56.彭文松，「認知風格、學習風格與思考風格之區辨研究」，國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商研究所，碩士論文，民國94年。
57.曾冠維，「大一新生自主學習能力、自我效能與學業成就相關之研究-以中央大學微積分聯合教學為例」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國107年。
58.黃國禎、朱蕙君、陳佐霖、王姿婷、曾秋蓉、黃國豪（2007），「線上自律學習輔助系統之研究與實證」，科學教育學刊，第十五卷，第三期，317-334頁，96年6月。
59.趙珮晴、余民寧(2012)，「自律學習策略與自我效能、學習興趣、學業成就的相關研究」，教育研究集刊，第五十八輯，第三期，1-32頁，101年9月。
60.趙偉順、張玉山(2011)，「經驗學習理論在生活科技課程的教學應用-以扭轉乾坤曲柄玩具為例」，生活科技教育月刊，第四十四卷，第六期，1-21頁，100年12月。
61.謝志偉(2003)，「自我調節學習理論之探究」。課程與教學季刊，6 (3)，147-168頁，92年7月。

指導教授

蕭嘉璋

審核日期

2020-7-28

推文