以人工智慧方法建立雷射切割薄型矽鋼片之品質預測與最佳化模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：22

、訪客IP：18.216.93.2

姓名

羅曼努(Muhamad Nur Rohman) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

機械工程學系

論文名稱

以人工智慧方法建立雷射切割薄型矽鋼片之品質預測與最佳化模型
(Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Predicting and Optimizing Cut Quality in Laser Cutting of Thin Electrical Steel Sheet)

相關論文

★ 晶圓針測參數實驗與模擬分析	★ 車銑複合加工機床面結構最佳化設計
★ 精密空調冷凝器軸流風扇葉片結構分析	★ 第四代雙倍資料率同步動態隨機存取記憶體連接器應力與最佳化分析
★ PCB電性測試針盤最佳鑽孔加工條件分析	★ 鋰-鋁基及鋰-氮基複合儲氫材料之製程開發及研究
★ 合金元素(錳與鋁)與球磨處理對Mg2Ni型儲氫合金放電容量與循環壽命之影響	★ 鍶改良劑、旋壓成型及熱處理對A356鋁合金磨耗腐蝕性質之影響
★ 核電廠元件疲勞壽命模擬分析	★ 可撓式OLED封裝薄膜和ITO薄膜彎曲行為分析
★ MOCVD玻璃承載盤溫度場分析	★ 不同環境下之沃斯回火球墨鑄鐵疲勞裂縫成長行為
★ 不同環境下之Custom 450不銹鋼腐蝕疲勞性質研究	★ AISI 347不銹鋼腐蝕疲勞行為
★ 環境因素對沃斯回火球墨鑄鐵高週疲勞之影響	★ AISI 347不銹鋼在不同應力比及頻率下之腐蝕疲勞行為

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

雷射加工技術已成為切割薄型矽鋼片，提供高性能疊片鐵心的替代方案，本研究對使用脈衝光纖雷射進行薄型矽鋼片直線與曲線切割之品質進行探討。首先，藉由隨機森林演算法(RFM)和響應表面演算法(RSM)確認輸入雷射加工參數對切割品質的影響；接著，開發人工智慧(AI)模型，以預測和優化切割品質的各種特性。在預測切割品質方面，本研究開發了更可靠的高效能深度神經網路(DNN)模型。此外，還提出了新的最佳化方法，可以在給定的初始實驗製程參數範圍之外找到最佳的雷射加工參數。
在第一部分中，本研究使用DNN和基因演算法(GA)進行尺寸品質的預測和優化，包括圓形切割的真圓度與方形切割的切口寬度。首先確認三個加工參數，即雷射功率、雷射脈衝頻率和切割速度，是對幾何尺寸品質有很大的影響，從而適當地運用在預測模型的輸入參數中。接著使用GA來選定最優的DNN架構，而最終的DNN模型是透過預先訓練和微調的過程取得。依此建立的DNN模型在真圓度和切口寬度的預測中具有良好的表現，不管在資料訓練集、驗證集及測試集的預測上，皆具有極低的絕對百分比誤差(MAPE)和非常高的絕對變異分數值(R2)。此外，此DNN模型的表現更優於其他基於AI的模型，包括隨機向量功能連結(RVFL)與支援向量迴歸(SVR)。最後，利用DNN-GA結合模型所找出的最佳製程參數，進行實際實驗驗證，確認所產出的真圓度及切口寬度為最小值，即為最佳幾何品質。
本研究的第二部分，係利用DNN與改進的灰狼優化器(I-GWO)，預測並優化在不同環境下雷射切割工件的殘渣，工作環境包括油、酒精及空氣，所考慮的加工品質有真圓度、上表面的殘渣高度、下表面的殘渣高度、上表面的殘渣寬度及下表面的殘渣寬度。所考慮的雷射切割製程參數，即工作環境、雷射功率、脈衝頻率及切割速度，皆對工件上殘渣的形成有相當大的影響，在油中切割所形成的殘渣會比酒精及空氣中來的更少。在模型訓練方面，透過堆疊自動編碼器方法與多目標灰狼最佳化工具相結合，先產生預先訓練的DNN，隨後進行微調以獲得最終的DNN。之後，利用I-GWO找出產生最少殘渣加工品質的最佳加工參數組合。依此所開發的DNN模型效能優於RVFL及SVR的效能。由上述DNN和I-GWO演算法所預測的最佳加工參數經過實驗驗證，確實能產生最少殘渣的最佳加工品質。
在第三部分曲線雷射切割中，實驗在油中進行，考慮雷射功率、雷射脈衝頻率、切割速度及曲率半徑作為可控的輸入加工參數，輸出品質特性包括切口寬度、內熱影響區、外熱影響區及再熔接的部分，所選定的輸入參數確實都會影響輸出品質特性。在DNN模型建構方面，是先使用平衡最佳化工具(EO)訓練及優化，再經過微調求得一個具有五層隱藏層的最終DNN模型。該DNN模型的表現優於淺神經網絡(SNN)、廣義迴歸神經網路(GRNN)及自適應神經模糊推理系統(ANFIS)模型。此外，此部分研究亦改良了EO優化器，並結合上述DNN模型，找出可產出最佳輸出品質特徵的最佳加工參數組合。實驗結果證明本研究所開發模型的有效性及穩健性，確實能產生最佳曲線雷射切割的品質，大幅提升每一個品質指標的質量；同時，與其他研究所開發的模型相比較，本研究所開發的預測及最佳化模型，亦具有相對的優越性。

摘要(英)

The laser machining technique has become a promising alternative for cutting thin electrical steel sheets to provide high-performance laminated cores. In this work, the use of pulsed fiber laser was investigated for straight and curved cutting of thin non-oriented electrical steel sheets. The significant effects of the input parameters on cut quality were confirmed via random forest method (RFM) and response surface method (RSM). Artificial intelligence (AI)-based models were developed for predicting and optimizing various characteristics of cut quality. New methods to obtain deep neural network (DNN) models with reliable performance in predicting cut quality were proposed in this study. In addition, new improved optimization methods were also proposed. Based on the results obtained, the optimal laser process parameters were found beyond the process window of the initially given experiments.
In Part I, prediction and optimization of geometrical qualities, namely roundness of circular cut and kerf width of square cut, were performed using DNN and genetic algorithm (GA). Three process parameters, namely laser power, laser pulse frequency, and cutting speed, were considered to experimentally investigate their effects on geometrical quality. All the process parameters significantly affected the cut quality and were properly used as input variables in the prediction models. A real-coded GA was employed to determine the optimal DNN architecture, and the final DNN models were obtained through pre-training and fine-tuning processes. The developed DNN models showed great ability in prediction of roundness and kerf width, as demonstrated by a very low mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and a very high absolute fraction of variation (R2) for training, validation, and testing datasets. In addition, the performance of the DNN models were better that that of other AI-based models, namely random vector functional link (RVFL) and support vector regression (SVR). The predicted optimal geometrical qualities of the DNN-GA models were verified by validation experiments in which a combination of the smallest roundness and kerf width was generated.
In Part II, dross formation of laser cutting in different environments, namely oil, alcohol, and air, was predicted and optimized using a DNN and an improved grey wolf optimizer (I-GWO), respectively. Five quality indices were used to define the dross formation, namely roundness, dross height on top side, dross height on bottom side, dross width on top side, and dross width on bottom side. The laser cutting process parameters, namely working environment, laser power, pulse frequency, and cutting speed, had a significant influence on the dross formation. In addition, cutting in oil led to less dross formation than in alcohol and air. A stacked autoencoder method combined with a multi-objective GWO was employed to generate a pre-trained DNN, followed by a fine-tuning process to obtain the final DNN. The I-GWO was used to determine the optimal combination of process parameters for minimum dross formation. The performance of the developed DNN model was higher than that of RVFL and SVR. The predicted optimal process parameters by the DNN and I-GWO algorithms were verified by validation experiments in which the minimum dross formation was generated.
In Part III, the experiments of curved cutting were performed in oil, considering laser power, laser pulse frequency, cutting speed, and curvature radius as the controllable input parameters. The output quality characteristics included kerf width, inner heat affected zone, outer heat affected zone, and rewelded portion. All the input parameters significantly affected the cut quality. A 5-hidden-layer DNN model was obtained by pre-training using an equilibrium optimizer (EO), followed by a fine-tuning process. The performance of the 5-hidden-layer DNN outperformed the shallow neural network (SNN), generalized regression neural network (GRNN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models. A new, modified EO was developed and employed with the DNN to determine the optimal laser process parameters for the optimal cut quality. The results of the validation experiments proved the robustness of the models developed in this study, where the best cut quality was generated and a considerable improvement was found for each quality index. A comparative analysis supported the superiority of the developed models over those in other studies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雷射切割
★ 薄型矽鋼片之
★ 以人工智

關鍵字(英)

★ Laser cutting
★ Thin electrical steel sheet
★ artificial intelligence

論文目次

ABSTRACT I
TABLE OF CONTENTS VIII
LIST OF TABLES XI
LIST OF FIGURES XIII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XVI
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Literature Review 3
1.3 Purpose and Scope 6
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 10
2.1 Materials and Laser Cutting System 10
2.2 Experimental Setup 10
2.3 Design of Experiment 11
2.4 Measurement of Cut Quality 12
2.4.1 Geometrical quality 12
2.4.2 Dross formation 13
2.4.3 Curved-cut quality 14
3. AI-BASED MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION 17
3.1 Development of AI-Based Models 17
3.1.1 Dataset pre-processing 17
3.1.2 Shallow neural network and deep neural network 18
3.1.3 Support vector regression 23
3.1.4 Random vector functional link network 23
3.1.5 Generalized regression neural network 23
3.1.6 Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system 24
3.1.7 Performance evaluation of the developed AI-based models 24
3.2 Binary-Coded GA for optimization of Geometrical Quality 25
3.3 Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer for Optimization of Dross Formation 27
3.3.1 Modification of the “a” formula 28
3.3.2 Avoiding and handling of boundary constraint violation 28
3.3.3 Hierarchical operator 29
3.4 Modified Equilibrium Optimizer for Optimization of Curved-Cut Quality 32
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 34
4.1 Modeling and Optimization of Geometrical Quality 34
4.1.1 Experimental results 34
4.1.2 Effect of laser process parameters on geometrical quality 36
4.1.3 Prediction results of AI-based models 40
4.1.4 Optimal geometrical quality and experimental validation 47
4.2 Modeling and Optimization of Dross Formation 49
4.2.1 Experimental results 49
4.2.2 Effect of laser process parameters on dross formation 51
4.2.3 Prediction results of AI-based models 55
4.2.4 Optimal dross formation and experimental validation 57
4.3 Modeling and Optimization of Curved-Cut Quality 60
4.3.1 Experimental results 60
4.3.2 Effect of laser process parameters on cut quality 62
4.3.3 Prediction results of AI-based models 64
4.3.4 Optimal cut quality and experimental validation 66
5. CONCLUSIONS 72
6. FUTURE WORK 76
REFERENCES 77
APPENDIX. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS 89

參考文獻

1. D. You and H. Park, “Developmental Trajectories in Electrical Steel Technology Using Patent Information,” Sustainability, Vol. 10, 2728, 2018.
2. Y. Oda, M. Kohno, and A. Honda, “Recent Development of Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheet for Automobile Electrical Devices,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 320, pp. 2430-2435, 2008.
3. Y. X. Zhang, M. F. Lan, Y. Wang, F. Fang, X. Lu, G. Yuan, R. D. K. Misra, and G. D. Wang, “Microstructure and Texture Evolution of Thin-Gauge Non-Oriented Silicon Steel with High Permeability Produced by Twin-Roll Strip Casting,” Materials Characterization, Vol. 150, pp. 118-127, 2019.
4. R. Siebert, J. Schneider, and E. Beyer, “Laser Cutting and Mechanical Cutting of Electrical Steels and its Effect on the Magnetic Properties,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 50, 2001904, 2014.
5. Y. Kurosaki, H. Mogi, H. Fujii, T. Kubota, and M. Shiozaki, “Importance of Punching and Workability in Non-Oriented Electrical Steel Sheets,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 320, pp. 2474-2480, 2008.
6. J. Füzer, S. Dobák, I. Petryshynets, P. Kollár, F. Kováč, and J. Slota, “Correlation between Cutting Clearance, Deformation Texture, and Magnetic Loss Prediction in Non-Oriented Electrical Steels,” Materials, Vol. 14, 6893, 2021.
7. M. Bali and A. Muetze, “The Degradation Depth of Non-Grain Oriented Electrical Steel Sheets of Electric Machines due to Mechanical and Laser Cutting: A State-of-the-Art Review,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 55, pp. 366-375, 2019.
8. H. Lee and J. T. Park, “Effect of Cut-Edge Residual Stress on Magnetic Properties in Non-Oriented Electrical Steel,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 55, pp. 18-21, 2019.
9. N. B. Dahotre and S. P. Harimkar, Laser Fabrication and Machining of Materials, 1st Ed., Springer, New York, US, 2008.
10. A. Saleem, N. Alatawneh, T. Rahman, D. A. Lowther, and R. R. Chromik, “Effects of Laser Cutting on Microstructure and Magnetic Properties of Non-Orientation Electrical Steel Laminations,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 56, 6100609, 2020.
11. A. Hasçalik and M. Ay, “CO2 Laser Cut Quality of Inconel 718 Nickel-Based Superalloy,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 48, pp. 554-564, 2013.
12. T.-H. Nguyen, C.-K. Lin, P.-C. Tung, N.-V. Cuong, and J.-R. Ho, “Artificial Intelligence-Based Modeling and Optimization of Heat-Affected Zone and Magnetic Property in Pulsed Laser Cutting of Thin Nonoriented Silicon Steel,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 113, pp. 3225-3240, 2021.
13. M. Schleier, B. Adelmann, C. Esen, and R. Hellmann, “Image Processing Algorithm for In Situ Monitoring Fiber Laser Remote Cutting by a High-Speed Camera,” Sensors, Vol. 22, 2863, 2022.
14. A. Sharma and V. Yadava, “Experimental Analysis of Nd-YAG Laser Cutting of Sheet Materials - A Review,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 98, pp. 264-280, 2018.
15. H. Hamzehbahmani, P. Anderson, J. Hall, and D. Fox, “Eddy Current Loss Estimation of Edge Burr-Affected Magnetic Laminations Based on Equivalent Electrical Network—Part II: Fundamental Concepts and FEM Modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 29, pp. 642-650, 2014.
16. Ş. Bayraktar and Y. Turgut, “Effects of Different Cutting Methods for Electrical Steel Sheets on Performance of Induction Motors,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 232, pp. 1287-1294, 2018.
17. H. Wang and Y. Zhang, “Modeling of Eddy-Current Losses of Welded Laminated Electrical Steels,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, pp. 2992-3000, 2017.
18. D.-T. Nguyen, J.-R. Ho, P.-C. Tung, and C.-K. Lin, “An Improved Real-Time Temperature Control for Pulsed Laser Cutting of Non-Oriented Electrical Steel,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 136, 106783, 2021.
19. A. Riveiro, F. Quintero, J. del Val, M. Boutinguiza, R. Comesaña, F. Lusquiños, and J. Pou, “Laser Cutting Using Off-Axial Supersonic Rectangular Nozzles,” Precision Engineering, Vol. 51, pp. 78-87, 2018.
20. L. Orazi, M. Darwish, and B. Reggiani, “Investigation on the Inert Gas-Assisted Laser Cutting Performances and Quality Using Supersonic Nozzles,” Metals, Vol. 9, 1257, 2019.
21. A. Alizadeh and H. Omrani, “An Integrated Multi Response Taguchi-Neural Network- Robust Data Envelopment Analysis Model for CO2 Laser Cutting,” Measurement, Vol. 131, pp. 69-78, 2019.
22. T. Sibalija, S. Petronic, and D. Milovanovic, “Experimental Optimization of Nimonic 263 Laser Cutting Using a Particle Swarm Approach,” Metals, Vol. 9, 1147, 2019.
23. K. A. Ghany and M. Newishy, “Cutting of 1.2 mm Thick Austenitic Stainless Steel Sheet Using Pulsed and CW Nd:YAG Laser,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 168, pp. 438-447, 2005.
24. P. K. Shrivastava and A. K. Pandey, “Parametric Optimization of Multiple Quality Characteristics in Laser Cutting of Inconel-718 by Using Hybrid Approach of Multiple Regression Analysis and Genetic Algorithm,” Infrared Physics and Technology, Vol. 91, pp. 220-232, 2018.
25. T.-H. Nguyen, “Experimental Study on Pulsed Laser Cutting of Thin Non-Oriented Silicon Steel and Quality Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence,” Ph.D. Dissertation, National Central University, Taiwan, 2021.
26. A. G. Demir and B. Previtali, “Dross-Free Submerged Laser Cutting of AZ31 Mg Alloy for Biodegradable Stents,” Journal of Laser Applications, Vol. 28, 032001, 2016.
27. N. Muhammad, D. Whitehead, A. Boor, and L. Li, “Comparison of Dry and Wet Fibre Laser Profile Cutting of Thin 316L Stainless Steel Tubes for Medical Device Applications,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 210, pp. 2261-2267, 2010.
28. J. D. Kechagias, A. Tsiolikas, M. Petousis, K. Ninikas, N. Vidakis, and L. Tzounis, “A Robust Methodology for Optimizing the Topology and the Learning Parameters of an ANN for Accurate Predictions of Laser-Cut Edges Surface Roughness,” Simulation Modelling Practice, Vol. 114, 102414, 2022.
29. L. Lazov, V. Nikolić, S. Jovic, M. Milovančević, H. Deneva, E. Teirumenieka, and N. Arsic, “Evaluation of Laser Cutting Process with Auxiliary Gas Pressure by Soft Computing Approach,” Infrared Physics and Technology, Vol. 91, pp. 137-141, 2018.
30. H. Ding, Z. Wang, and Y. Guo, “Multi-Objective Optimization of Fiber Laser Cutting Based on Generalized Regression Neural Network and Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm,” Infrared Physics and Technology, Vol. 108, 103337, 2020.
31. A. H. Elsheikh, T. A. Shehabeldeen, J. Zhou, E. Showaib, and M. Abd Elaziz, “Prediction of Laser Cutting Parameters for Polymethylmethacrylate Sheets Using Random Vector Functional Link Network Integrated with Equilibrium Optimizer,” Journal of Intelligence Manufacturing, Vol. 32, pp. 1377-1388, 2021.
32. S. Vagheesan and J. Govindarajalu, “Hybrid Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm for the Optimization of Quality Characteristics During CO2 Laser Cutting of Aluminium Alloy,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 41, 328, 2019.
33. S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 69, pp. 46-61, 2014.
34. M. A. Al-Betar, M. A. Awadallah, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, and A. I. Hammouri, “Natural Selection Methods for Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Expert System with Applications, Vol. 113, pp. 481-498, 2018.
35. A. Faramarzi, M. Heidarinejad, B. Stephens, and S. Mirjalili, “Equilibrium Optimizer: A Novel Optimization Algorithm,” Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 191, 105190, 2020.
36. Y. Yongbin, S. A. Bagherzadeh, H. Azimy, M. Akbari, and A. Karimipour, “Comparison of the Artificial Neural Network Model Prediction and the Experimental Results for Cutting Region Temperature and Surface Roughness in Laser Cutting of AL6061T6 Alloy,” Infrared Physics and Technology, Vol. 108, 103364, 2020.
37. S. Chaki, D. Bose, and R. N. Bathe, “Multi-Objective Optimization of Pulsed Nd: YAG Laser Cutting Process Using Entropy-Based ANN-PSO Model,” Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, Vol. 7, pp. 88-110, 2020.
38. J. Mathew, J. Griffin, M. Alamaniotis, S. Kanarachos, and M. E. Fitzpatrick, “Prediction of Welding Residual Stresses Using Machine Learning: Comparison Between Neural Networks and Neuro-Fuzzy Systems,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 70, pp. 131-146, 2018.
39. L. Yang and A. Shami, “On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practice,” Neurocomputing, Vol. 415, pp. 295-316, 2020.
40. A. Solati, M. Hamedi, and M. Safarabadi, “Combined GA-ANN Approach for Prediction of HAZ and Bearing Strength in Laser Drilling of GFRP Composite,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 113, pp. 104-115, 2019.
41. C. Xia, Z. Pan, J. Polden, H. Li, Y. Xu, and S. Chen, “Modelling and Prediction of Surface Roughness in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Using Machine Learning,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 33, pp. 1467-1482, 2021.
42. S. Feng, H. Zhou, and H. Dong, “Using Deep Neural Network with Small Dataset to Predict Material Defects,” Materials and Design, Vol. 162, pp. 300-310, 2019.
43. G. Liu, H. Bao, and B. Han, “A Stacked Autoencoder-Based Deep Neural Network for Achieving Gearbox Fault Diagnosis,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2018, 5105709, 2018.
44. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning Long-Term Dependencies with Gradient Descent is Difficult,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5, pp. 157-166, 1994.
45. A. Khamparia, G. Saini, B. Pandey, S. Tiwari, D. Gupta, and A. Khanna, “KDSAE: Chronic Kidney Disease Classification with Multimedia Data Learning Using Deep Stacked Autoencoder Network,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol. 79, pp. 35425-35440, 2020.
46. B. S. Yilbas, A. F. M. Arif, and B. J. Abdul Aleem, “Laser Cutting of Sharp Edge: Thermal Stress Analysis,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 44, pp. 10-19, 2010.
47. S. Mirjalili, S. Saremi, S. M. Mirjalili, and L. D. S. Coelho, “Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer: A Novel Algorithm for Multi-Criterion Optimization,” Expert System with Applications, Vol. 47, pp. 106-119, 2016.
48. R. Kumar and N. R. J. Hynes, “Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness in Thermal Drilling Using Integrated ANFIS and GA Approach,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 30-41, 2020.
49. Y. Nukman, M. A. Hassan, and M. Z. Harizam, “Optimization of Prediction Error in CO2 Laser Cutting Process by Taguchi Artificial Neural Network Hybrid with Genetic Algorithm,” Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 363-370, 2013.
50. J. Prakash and P. K. Kankar, “Health Prediction of Hydraulic Cooling Circuit Using Deep Neural Network with Ensemble Feature Ranking Technique,” Measurement, Vol. 151, 107225, 2020.
51. M. M. Bejani and M. Ghatee, “A Systematic Review on Overfitting Control in Shallow and Deep Neural Networks,” Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 54, pp. 6391-6438, 2021.
52. N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 15, pp. 1929-1958, 2014.
53. S. Salman and X. Liu, “Overfitting Mechanism and Avoidance in Deep Neural Networks,” arXiv:1901.06566, pp. 1-8, 2019.
54. B. Ghojogh and M. Crowley, “The Theory Behind Overfitting, Cross Validation, Regularization, Bagging, and Boosting: Tutorial,” arXiv:1905.12787, pp. 1-23, 2019.
55. S.-J. Kang, J.-H. Fan, W. Mao, Q. Wu, J. Feng, and Y. Yin, “Evaluating the Optical Classification of Fermi BCUs Using Machine Learning,” The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 872, 189, 2019.
56. R. R. Picard and R. D. Cook, “Cross-Validation of Regression Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 17, pp. 575-583, 1984.
57. F. Jafarian, H. Amirabadi, and J. Sadri, “Integration of Finite Element Simulation and Intelligent Methods for Evaluation of Thermo-Mechanical Loads During Hard Turning Process,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 227, pp. 235-248, 2013.
58. K. Venkata Rao and P. B. G. S. N. Murthy, “Modeling and Optimization of Tool Vibration and Surface Roughness in Boring of Steel Using RSM, ANN and SVM,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 29, pp. 1533-1543, 2018.
59. M. V. Suganyadevi and C. K. Babulal, “Support Vector Regression Model for the Prediction of Loadability Margin of a Power System,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 24, pp. 304-315, 2014.
60. M. Liu, K. Luo, J. Zhang, and S. Chen, “A Stock Selection Algorithm Hybridizing Grey Wolf Optimizer and Support Vector Regression,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 179, 115078, 2021.
61. S. Jović, A. Radović, Ž. Šarkoćević, D. Petković, and M. Alizamir, “Estimation of the Laser Cutting Operating Cost by Support Vector Regression Methodology,” Applied Physics A, Vol. 122, 798, 2016.
62. R. Katuwal and P. N. Suganthan, “Stacked Autoencoder Based Deep Random Vector Functional Link Neural Network for Classification,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 85, 105854, 2019.
63. A. Uncini and S. Scardapane, “Node Estimate for Sparse Random Vector Functional-Link Networks,” International Journal of Machine Intelligence and Sensory Signal Processing, Vol. 1, pp. 341-352, 2016.
64. D. Rajamani, M. Siva Kumar, E. Balasubramanian, and A. Tamilarasan, “Nd: YAG Laser Cutting of Hastelloy C276: ANFIS Modeling and Optimization Through WOA,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 36, pp. 1746-1760, 2021.
65. I. Shivakoti, G. Kibria, P. M. Pradhan, B. B. Pradhan, and A. Sharma, “ANFIS Based Prediction and Parametric Analysis During Turning Operation of Stainless Steel 202,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 34, pp. 112-121, 2019.
66. K. F. Tamrin, Y. Nukman, I. A. Choudhury, and S. Shirley, “Multiple-Objective Optimization in Precision Laser Cutting of Different Thermoplastics,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering,” Vol. 67, pp. 57-65, 2015.
67. I. G. Escamilla-Salazar, L. M. Torres-Treviño, B. González-Ortíz, and P. C. Zambrano, “Machining Optimization Using Swarm Intelligence in Titanium (6Al 4V) Alloy,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 67, pp. 535-544, 2013.
68. A. Sharma and V. Yadava, “Modelling and Optimization of Cut Quality During Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Cutting of Thin Al-Alloy Sheet for Curved Profile,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Vol. 51, pp. 77-88, 2013.
69. C. Lu, L. Gao, and J. Yi, “Grey Wolf Optimizer with Cellular Topological Structure,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 107, pp. 89-114, 2018.
70. A. A. Heidari and P. Pahlavani, “An Efficient Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer with Lévy Flight for Optimization Tasks,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 60, pp. 115-134, 2017.
71. N. Mittal, U. Singh, and B. S. Sohi, “Modified Grey Wolf Optimizer for Global Engineering Optimization,” Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, Vol. 2016, 7950348, 2016.
72. S. Saremi, S. Z. Mirjalili, and S. M. Mirjalili, “Evolutionary Population Dynamics and Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 26, pp. 1257-1263, 2015.
73. L. Rodríguez, O. Castillo, J. Soria, P. Melin, F. Valdez, C. I. Gonzalez, G. E. Martinez, and J. Soto, “A Fuzzy Hierarchical Operator in the Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 57, pp. 315-328, 2017.
74. S. C. Chelgani, S. S. Matin, and J. C. Hower, “Explaining Relationships Between Coke Quality Index and Coal Properties by Random Forest Method,” Fuel, Vol. 182, pp. 754-760, 2016.
75. A. Sharma and V. Yadava, “Modelling and Optimization of Cut Quality During Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Cutting of Thin Al-Alloy Sheet for Straight Profile,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 44, pp. 159-168, 2012.
76. S. Oh, I. Lee, Y.-B. Park, and H. Ki, “Investigation of Cut Quality in Fiber Laser Cutting of CFRP,” Optics and Laser Technology, Vol. 113, pp. 129-140, 2019.
77. A. H. Hamad, “Effects of Different Laser Pulse Regimes (Nanosecond, Picosecond and Femtosecond) on the Ablation of Materials for Production of Nanoparticles in Liquid Solution,” High Energy Short Pulse Lasers, pp. 305-325, 2016.
78. B. S. Yilbas and B. J. Abdul Aleem, “Dross Formation During Laser Cutting Process,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 39, pp. 1451-1461, 2006.
79. S. Haykin, Neural Networks and Learning Machines, 3rd Ed., Pearson, New Jersey, US, 2008.
80. A. Riveiro, F. Quintero, F. Lusquiños, R. Comesaña, J. Del Val, and J. Pou, “The Role of the Assist Gas Nature in Laser Cutting of Aluminum Alloys,” Physics Procedia, Vol. 12, pp. 548-554, 2011.
81. W. Charee, V. Tangwarodomnukun, and C. Dumkum, “Laser Ablation of Silicon in Water Under Different Flow Rates,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 78, pp. 19-29, 2015.
82. S. Darwish, N. Ahmed, A. M. Alahmari, and N. A. Mufti, “A Comparison of Laser Beam Machining of Micro-Channels Under Dry and Wet Mediums,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 83, pp. 1539-1555, 2016.
83. R. Rodnight, “Manometric Determination of the Solubility of Oxygen in Liquid Paraffin, Olive Oil and Silicone Fluids,” Biochemical Journal, Vol. 57, pp. 661-663, 1954.
84. S. A. Shchukarev and T. A. Tolmacheva, “Solubility of Oxygen in Ethanol-Water Mixtures,” Journal of Structural Chemistry, Vol. 9, pp. 16-21, 1968.
85. R. Eberhart and J. Kennedy, “New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory,” In MHS’95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan, October 4-6, 1995.
86. Y. Zhou, N. Wang, and W. Xiang, “Clustering Hierarchy Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks Using an Improved PSO Algorithm,” IEEE Access, Vol. 5, pp. 2241-2253, 2017.
87. A. K. Pandey and G. D. Gautam, “Grey Relational Analysis-Based Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Electrical Discharge Drilling of Nimonic-90 Superalloy,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 40, 117, 2018.
88. P. Sheng and L. H. Cai, “Predictive Process Planning for Laser Cutting,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 17, pp. 144-158, 1998.
89. D. Yang, Q. Guo, Z. Wan, Z. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Surface Roughness Prediction and Optimization in the Orthogonal Cutting of Graphite/Polymer Composites Based on Artificial Neural Network,” Processes, Vol. 9, 1858, 2021.
90. M. S. Alajmi and A. M. Almeshal, “Prediction and Optimization of Surface Roughness in a Turning Process Using the ANFIS-QPSO Method,” Materials, Vol. 13, 2986, 2020.
91. Stator & Rotor Laminations. https://www.cdz-gmbh.com/en/produkte/stator-rotor-laminations, accessed on 21 November, 2022.
92. S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, “A Survey on Transfer Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 22, pp. 1345-1359, 2010.
93. S. Shen, M. Sadoughi, M. Li, Z. Wang, and C. Hu, “Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Ensemble Learning and Transfer Learning for Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries,” Applied Energy, Vol. 260, 114296, 2020.

指導教授

林志光(Chih-Kuang Lin)

審核日期

2023-1-10

推文