企業發生負面事件與其企業社會責任之關聯

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：27

、訪客IP：18.118.9.7

姓名

賈廣晧(Kuang-Hao Chia) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

企業發生負面事件與其企業社會責任之關聯

相關論文

★ 電動車產業之經營策略研究－以F公司為例	★ 機車製造廠於新產品開發之過程管制探討-以Y公司為例
★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析	★ 以均值回歸特性探討分析師個人評價產生之長短期預測不一致
★ 產業差異對於分析師目標價與推薦門檻影響之探討	★ 分析師營收預測與油價變動關聯性之探討
★ 分析師多年期預測與其預測能力之探討	★ 探討分析師對盈餘成份認定與其對資本市場之影響
★ 探討企業未來性資產對分析師盈餘預測與推薦不一致之影響	★ 以中國新財富票選探討擇時能力對成為明星分析師之影響
★ 分析師觀點建構過度投資指標	★ 公司財務限制與企業社會責任之關聯-以現金股利及庫藏股買回為指標
★ 探討分析師資本支出預測之資訊意涵	★ 過度投資與球場因素對美國職棒關係之研究
★ 探討分析師推薦是否能區別高階經理人為過度自信之研究	★ 過度自信與資訊不對稱對CEO的債務融資偏好之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究旨在探討當企業面臨負面事件時，其企業社會責任的反應，以及盈餘管理程
度較高之企業會不會在遇到負面事件時，刻意提升企業社會責任，同時加入對構面的探討，本研究以2017 年到2018 年收錄於MSCI ESG 中所有美國公司為樣本，期望能夠藉由過去盈餘管理程度較高之企業與盈餘管理程度較低之企業，在投資企業社會責任上的差異，來探討企業社會責任分數增加的原因，以及他們針對何種構面進行提升。研究結果顯示，當企業面臨負面事件時，企業社會責任分數會顯著下降；但盈餘管理程度較高之企業相比於較少使用盈餘管理之公司，其企業社會責任分數會相對較高；也因此本研究進一步比較了兩者在構面的差異性，雖然實證結果在比較兩者從事企業社會責任構面上並沒有顯著，但透過其敘述性統計，仍發現盈餘管理程度較高的企業會投入相對較少的資源於環境構面中，並投入相對較多的資源於治理構面當中，因為在面臨負面事件時，公司的信用及聲譽受到衝擊，其資源及獲利都會減少，因此要將資源花在較能見效急速的構面上，使公司的企業社會責任分數上升並掩蓋其內部不良的情況，整體而言，本研究之實證結果對於在發生負面事件的時候，過去盈餘管理程度較高之企業與其企業社會責任之關聯，以及其對於構面的關係，有著管理意涵及其貢獻。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to explore the response of CSR scores of companies when they face negative events, and whether the earnings management is related to CSR scores. At
the same time, we also discusses the CSR aspects. This study takes all US companies included in MSCI ESG from 2017 to 2018 as samples, hoping to use earnings management to understand the reasons why CSR scores increase instead of decreasing when companies face negative events, and what aspect they invest in. The research results show that when companies are faced with negative events, CSR score will decrease significantly. However, a company that has used
earnings management for a long period of time will have relatively higher CSR scores than that used earnings management less frequently. Therefore, this study also compares the differences between these two aspects, and finds that companies with earnings management will invest
relatively less resources in the environmental aspect and relatively more resources in the governance aspect. In face of negative events, the company’s credit and reputation will be reduced. Therefore the resources should be spent on more effective and rapid aspects, so that the company’s CSR scores will be increased and the bad situation in the company will be covered up. Overall, the empirical results of this study have management and practical implications and contributions to the relationship between earnings management and the manipulation of CSR scores as well as their relationship to the CSR aspects when the companies
face the negative events.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 負面事件
★ 盈餘管理
★ 企業社會責任構面

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要 ......................................................................... i
Abstract .................................................................... ii
致謝辭 ..................................................................... iii
目錄 ........................................................................ iv
第一章緒論 .................................................................. 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 ............................................................. 1
1-2 本論文架構 ................................................................ 4
第二章文獻探討與研究假說 .................................................... 5
2-1 企業社會責任 .............................................................. 5
2-2 財務限制與盈餘管理 ........................................................ 8
2-3 企業社會責任構面與企業社會責任績效 ........................................ 10
2-4 假說發展 .................................................................. 12
第三章研究方法 ............................................................ 15
3-1 資料來源與樣本選擇 ....................................................... 15
3-2 實證模型 ................................................................. 15
3-3 變數定義 ................................................................. 17
3-4 敏感性分析 ............................................................... 24
第四章實證結果與分析 ........................................................ 25
4-1 敘述性統計分析 ........................................................... 25
4-2 迴歸分析 ................................................................. 31
4-3 敏感性分析 ............................................................... 37
第五章結論與建議............................................................ 40
5-1 研究結論 ................................................................. 40
5-2 研究建議與限制 ........................................................... 42
參考文獻 .................................................................... 43

參考文獻

1. Ait Sidhoum, A., & Serra, T. (2018). Corporate sustainable development. Revisiting the
relationship between corporate social responsibility dimensions. Sustainable
Development, 26(4), 365-378.
2. Brower, J., & Dacin, P. A. (2020). An Institutional Theory Approach to the Evolution of
the Corporate Social Performance–Corporate Financial Performance
Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 805-836.
3. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate
performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
4. Chan, C. Y., Chou, D. W., & Lo, H. C. (2017). Do financial constraints matter when firms
engage in CSR?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 39, 241-259.
5. Chih, H. L., Shen, C. H., & Kang, F. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, investor
protection, and earnings management: Some international evidence. Journal of business
ethics, 79(1-2), 179-198.
6. Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Real and accrual-based earnings management
in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 757-787.
7. Crisóstomo, V. L., de Souza Freire, F., & de Vasconcellos, F. C. (2011). Corporate social
responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social Responsibility
Journal, 2(7), 295-309.
8. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings
management. Accounting review, 193-225.
9. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards
create or destroy market value?. Management Science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
10. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The
environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
11. Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. J. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible
assets across institutional environments. Academy of management Review, 31(2), 329-346.
12. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate
social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management
hypothesis. Strategic management journal, 30(4), 425-445.
13. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of
corporate financial reporting. Journal of accounting and economics, 40(1-3), 3-73.
14. Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of
corporate eco‐efficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679-704.
15. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2012). Financial constraints on corporate
goodness (No. w18476). National Bureau of Economic Research.
16. Kang, J. (2016). Labor market evaluation versus legacy conservation: What factors
determine retiring CEOs′ decisions about long‐term investment?. Strategic Management
Journal, 37(2), 389-405.
17. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary
accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.
18. Minutolo, M. C., Kristjanpoller, W. D., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring environmental,
social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business
Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083-1095.
19. Nollet, J., Filis, G., & Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400-407.
20. Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially
responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a Neo ‐ Institutional
framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(5), 468-494.
21. Oeyono, J., Samy, M., & Bampton, R. (2011). An examination of corporate social
responsibility and financial performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 1(2), 100-112.
22. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial
performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
23. Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial
performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52-72.
24. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior
financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
25. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities
manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370.
26. Sauerwald, S., & Su, W. (2019). CEO overconfidence and CSR decoupling. Corporate
Governance: An International Review, 27(4), 283-300.
27. Shiu, Y. M., & Yang, S. L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility
provide strategic insurance‐like effects?. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455-470.
28. Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility
engagement strategy moderates the CSR–financial performance relationship. Journal of
Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.
29. Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). “Too good to be true!”. The effectiveness of CSR
history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273-283.

指導教授

黃承祖

審核日期

2020-7-28

推文