併購活動對專利數量與專利品質的影響-以台灣電子業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：14

、訪客IP：3.143.168.172

姓名

黃柏凱(Po-Kai Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

併購活動對專利數量與專利品質的影響-以台灣電子業為例

相關論文

★ 研發費用、專利權與市場佔有率之關聯性- 以台灣化粧品上市公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在知識經濟的現代社會中，企業常透過併購活動，取得技術與資產，進而增進企業本身的研發能力，本研究使用 Ahuja and Katila (2001) 的研究方法，對台灣2002年至2014年的併購活動進行研究，研究樣本包含94間台灣電子業公司，共有138件併購事件，探討併購活動對併購後的專利數量與專利品質的影響。

結果發現非技術性併購對併購後的專利數量有負向的影響，對專利品質則無顯著的影響力。目標公司的知識品質對併購後的專利數量及專利品質皆有正向的影響，目標公司的知識相對規模對併購後的專利數量及專利品質皆有負向的影響，最後雙方的技術相關性與併購後的專利數量和專利品質皆為一個倒U字型的非線性關係。

摘要(英)

In a knowledge-based economy, companies often acquire technology and assets through M&A activities, thereby enhancing their own R&D capabilities. This study uses the research method of Ahuja and Katila (2001) to analyze Taiwan’s M&A activities from 2002 to 2014. Conducted a research, the research sample included 94 Taiwan electronics companies, a total of 138 mergers and acquisitions, to explore the impact of M&A on the quantity and quality of patents after M&A.

It was found that non-technical M&A had a negative impact on the quantity of patents after M&A, but had no significant influence on the quality of patents. The knowledge quality of the acquired company has a positive impact on the quantity of patents and patent quality after M&A. The relative size of the acquired company′s knowledge has a negative impact on the quantity of patents and the quality of patents after M&A. In the end, the technical relevance of both parties have a non-linear U-shaped relationship on the quantity of patents and the quality of patents after M&A

關鍵字(中)

★ 併購
★ 技術性併購
★ 專利數量
★ 專利品質

關鍵字(英)

★ M&A
★ technical M&A
★ patent quantity
★ patent quality

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VI
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機 1
1.3研究流程 3
第二章文獻回顧 5
第三章資料與變數 9
3.1 資料來源 9
3.2 變數設定 10
3.2.1 應變數 10
3.2.2 自變數： 11
3.2.3 控制變數： 12
3-3 敘述統計 14
第四章研究方法 18
4.1 模型建構 18
4.1.1 追蹤資料迴歸模型（panel data regression model） 18
4.1.2 卜瓦松迴歸模型（Poisson Regression Model） 19
4.1.3 負二項迴歸模型 (Negative Binomial Regression Model) 20
4.2 實證模型 21
4.2.1 模型一：併購活動與專利數量 21
4.2.2 模型二：併購活動與專利品質 21
第五章實證分析結果 23
5.1 模型一：併購活動與專利數量 23
5.2 模型二：併購活動與專利品質 24
第六章結論 28
6.1結論 28
6.2研究限制 29
參考文獻 30

參考文獻

中文文獻

阮明淑與梁峻齊 (2009)，「專利指標發展研究」，《圖書館學與資訊科學》, 35(2) , 88-106。
邱奕嘉與曾為國 (2014)，「技術相關程度對技術併購影響之研究」，《管理與系統》, 21(2) , 187-222。
翁鶯娟與張紹基 (2017)，「併購與策略聯盟在公司理財文獻之回顧與展望: 亞洲市場之研究」，《臺大管理論叢》, 27(3) , 163-214。
陳豐年 (2011)，「專利權之歷史溯源與利弊初探」。
曾真真 (2008)，「M&A 與 R&D: 研發存量, 技術相似性與併購績效之關係」，《管理評論》, 27(4) , 59-77。

英文文獻

Ahuja, G. & Katila, R. (2001), “Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring.firms: A longitudinal study,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220.
Cassiman, B., Colombo, M. G., Garrone, P. & Veugelers, R. (2005), “The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness,” Research Policy, 34(2), 195-220.
Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J. & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006), “Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries,” Research Policy, 35(5), 642-654.
Colombo, M. G. & Rabbiosi, L. (2014), “Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions,” Research Policy, 43(6), 1039-1054.
Desyllas, P. & Hughes, A. (2010), “Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? ,” Research Policy, 39(8), 1105-1121.
Federico, G., Langus, G. & Valletti, T. (2017), “A simple model of mergers and innovation,” Economics Letters, 157, 136-140.
Gantumur, T. & Stephan, A. (2012), “Mergers & acquisitions and innovation performance in the telecommunications equipment industry,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(2), 277-314.
Hagedoorn, J. & Duysters, G. (2002), “External sources of innovative capabilities: the preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions,” Journal of management studies, 39(2), 167-188.
Hagedoorn, J. & Duysters, G. (2002), “The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment,” Technology Aanalysis and Strategic Management, 14(1), 67-85.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M. & Vopel, K. (2003), “Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights,” Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
Haucap, J., Rasch, A. & Stiebale, J. (2019), “How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 283-325.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Ireland, R. D. & Harrison, J. S. (1991), “Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs,” Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693-706.
Katila, R. (2000), “Using patent data to measure innovation performance,” International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2(1), 180-193.
Moser, P. (2005), “How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world′s fairs,” American Economic Review, 95(4), 1214-1236.
Ornaghi, C. (2006), “Mergers and innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry,”
Rodrıguez, G. (2013), “Models for count data with overdispersion,” Add. WWS 509 Notes, 672-677.
Valentini, G. (2012), “Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality,” Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 336-346.

指導教授

陳忠榮王明禮(Jong-Rong Chen Ming-Li Wang)

審核日期

2020-7-23

推文