經濟全球化對公司成長之影響-以台灣製造業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：63

、訪客IP：18.117.104.56

姓名

劉安淇(An-Chi Liu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

經濟全球化對公司成長之影響-以台灣製造業為例

相關論文

★ 中國出口對鄰近東亞國家之影響	★ 貿易自由化對中國對外出口之影響
★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效	★ 出口、外人直接投資與勞動產出份額：中國的實證研究
★ 技術變動對薪資影響之研究－以臺灣製造業為例	★ 高等教育投資值得嗎? 研究所教育報酬之探討
★ 中國旅遊需求分析：世界遺產的影響	★ 中國銀行效率分析
★ 遠來的和尚會念經？NBA球員之薪資與效率分析	★ 開放政策，人力資本與區域經濟發展─越南的實證研究
★ 環境管制、研發與生產力:台灣製造業實證研究	★ 國際經濟學的三篇實證研究
★ 國家研發效率與生產力之分析	★ 外人援助，貪污，與經濟成長：門檻迴歸模型的應用
★ Three essays on China's regional economic analysis	★ 要素配置、結構調整和生產力動態 —印尼製造業的研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著經濟全球化的興起，台灣與國際之間的貿易與投資往來日益緊密。然而，全球化究竟對於公司的成長是一個動力抑或是阻力?本論文使用台灣自1990年至2018年間上市櫃製造業進行實證分析。研究結果發現出口對公司銷售成長有正向顯著的影響，但對就業成長則無顯著影響。相對的對外直接投資對母公司就業成長以及對母公司銷售成長皆為負向顯著影響。至於其他變數的影響，本論文發現：無論是從公司就業成長或銷售成長的來看，公司規模愈小則公司成長愈快，拒絕Gibrat’s law的規模與公司成長無關之論點；而公司年齡愈小則公司成長愈快，且隨著年齡增加，成長幅度會趨緩，此結果支持動態學習效果假說；最後，發現資本密集度對於公司成長的影響為顯著正相關，表示資本密集度愈高的公司呈現較高的成長。

摘要(英)

Along with the emergence of economic globalization, the activities of international trade and investment become prevailing in Taiwanese firms. Crucially, how economic globalization affects firms’ growth? Is it promoting or retarding firm growth? Using a panel dataset of manufacturing firms listed on Taiwan’s stock exchange market for the 1990-2018 period, this thesis examines the relationship between economic globalization, in terms of exports and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI), and firm growth. Empirical results find that exports are positively related to sale growth, whereas there is no significant relationship between exports and employment growth. Correspondingly, OFDI exhibits a significantly negative influence on sale growth and employment growth. Regarding other covariates, this thesis finds that small firms grow faster in terms of sale growth and employment growth, rejecting the Gibrat’s law that firm size is irrelevant to growth. Younger firms are found to grow faster, supporting the hypothesis of dynamic learning effect. We also find that capital intensity is positively related to firm growth.

關鍵字(中)

★ 公司成長

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機與目的 2
第三節研究方法 5
第四節章節與架構 5

第二章文獻回顧 7
第一節公司成長相關文獻 7
第二節全球化與公司成長相關文獻 9
第三節台灣的公司成長相關文獻 11

第三章資料說明與實證模型 13
第一節資料說明 13
第二節實證模型與有關變數 15
第三節估計方法 24

第四章實證結果與分析 27
第一節公司就業成長之實證結果 27
第二節公司銷售成長之實證結果 33

第五章結論 38

參考文獻 39

參考文獻

陳忠榮與楊志海 (1999), 台灣對外直接投資的決定因素－擴張型與防禦型的比較, 經濟論文叢刊, 27:2, 頁215-240。
Adamou,A and Sasidharan,S.(2007). The Impact of R&D and FDI on Firm Growth in Emerging-Developing Countries: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing Industries.
Bai,T. , Du,J., and Solarino,A.M.(2018) Performance of foreign subsidiaries “in” and “from” Asia: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, 35(3), 607-638.
Belderbos, R., and Zou, J. (2007). On the growth of foreign affiliates: Multinational plant networks, joint ventures, and flexibility. Journal of International Business Studies,38,1095-1112.
Blonigen, B. A,.and Tomlin, K (2001). Size and growth of Japanese plants in the United States. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier,19(6), 931-952.
Chen,T.J., and Ku,Y.H. (2000). The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Firm Growth: The Case of Taiwan′s Manufacturers. Japan and the World Economy 12(2),153-172.
Chiao, Y., Yu, C. J., Li, P., & Chen, Y.,(2008)Subsidiary Size, Internationalization, Product Diversification, and Subsidiary Performance in an Emerging Market,International Marketing Review.International Marketing Review, 25(6),612-633.
Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Coad,A., and Tamvada,J. P. (2008).The Growth and Decline of Small firms In Developing Countries. Papers on Economics and Evolution, 0808.
Daunfeldt, S. O., and Elert, N. (2013). When is Gibrat’s law a law? Small Business Economics, 41(1), 133–147.

Del Monte,A and Papagni,E(2003). R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003-1014.
Gibrat,R. (1931). Les Inégalitéséconomiques. Paris: Librairie du ReceuilSirey
Grazzi,M., and Moschella, D. (2018). Small, young, and exporters: new evidence on the determinants of firm growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 125–152.
Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., and Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates job? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 347–361.
Hsu,C.W.,Chen,H.,andCaskey,D.(2017). Local conditions,entry timing, and foreign subsidiary performance. International Business Review,26(3),544-554.
Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649–670.
Kafouros, M and Aliyev, M (2016). Institutional development and firm profitability in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 51 (3). 369-378.
Kwon,Y.C.(2010). Market orientation of Korean MNC subsidiaries and their performance in the Chinese and Indian markets. International Marketing Review, 27(2), 179 – 199.
Liu,J.T.,Tsou,M.W., and Hammitt,J(1999). Do small plants grow faster? Evidence from the Taiwan electronics industry. Economics Letters, 65(1), 121-129.
Mudambi,R., and Zahra,S.A.(2007). The survival of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies ,38, 333–352.
Park, Y., Shin, J., and Kim, T. (2010). Firm size, age, industrial networking, and growth: a case of the Korean manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 153–168.
Yang, C.H.,and Huang, C.H. (2005). R&D, size and firmgrowth in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Small Business Economics, 25(5), 477–487.
Yang,C.H, and Tsou,M.W. (2019). Globalization and firm growth: does ownership matter? Small Business Economics, forthcoming.
Zhang,H. (2005).Why does so much FDI from Hong Kong and Taiwan go to Mainland China? China Economic Review, 16(3), 293-307.

指導教授

楊志海

審核日期

2020-7-15

推文