| 摘要(英) |
Recently as the rising of Industry 4.0 with the rapidly improvement of hardware and software, the smart factory becomes reality. Most manufacturing industry are willing to implement the core system of the smart factory, Manufacturing Execution System (MES), to manage the production capacity, improve product quality by understanding the real-time status of the production line. It can response market with small and diverse demands today to increase the competitiveness of company and bring more revenue to stand firmly in the global market.
The manufacturing industry understands that MES is the core of the operation of the smart factory to be important and must be imported, but still feel strange to it. In the past, many companies successfully implemented MES but more companies failed. The reason is that the MES implementation is complicated with multi-faceted. If we want to do it successfully, many key factors need to be considered. Enterprise culture, company background, organization, and situation in the moment are all different which also affects the key factors to the success of MES implementation.
This research is based on grounded theory, through in-depth interviews with consultants of MES to understand the actual process of the MES implementation project. Repeatedly organizes and analyzes the information collected by those interviews, then summarizes the key successful factors of the MES implementation to come out the proposition of this research.
The key successful factors of MES implementation include the following:
(1) Company support with ”high-level determination and support”, ”project success or failure is related to performance” and ”dedicated full-time unit”.
(2) User-side Project Manager capabilities: including ”Familiarity with production process”, ”Familiarity with MES system”, ”Project execution ability”.
(3) The cooperation degree of production line on testing time.
(4) System test completeness.
(5) The cooperation degree of the equipment supplier.
(6) The delivery or modification of the equipment must be completed within reasonable time.
This research proposes following propositions:
(1) Proposition 1: People in the production line of traditional industries rejected the MES more than people of other industries.
(2) Proposition 2: High-level determination and support are highly related to the system test completed within reasonable time.
(3) Proposition 3: Company supporting higher, the probability of project success is higher.
(4) Proposition 4: Capability of the enterprise Project Manager is more professional, the system test completeness is more solid.
(5) Proposition 5: The enterprise scale is larger, more chance the automated integration testing phase be completed within reasonable time.
Wish the findings of this research can provide more hints of key successful factors to those companies or manufacturers who want to implement MES. As a reference by analyzing the key successful factors, they can understand the background reasons, influences and scope of these key factors and adjust them properly by company actual conditions to increase the probability of successful MES implementation project. |
| 參考文獻 |
中文部分
1. 李之傑，「半導體封裝、測試產業製造執行系統知識管理之探討－以T公司為例」，私立中原大學資訊管理學系研究所，碩士論文，2005。
2. 李銘祥，「企業導入製造執行系統關鍵因素之研究－以半導體產業為例」，國立中正大學會計與資訊課技研究所，碩士論文，2014。
3. 李智偉，「架構導向小尺寸面板代工MES模型之研究」，國立中山大學資訊管理碩士在職專班，碩士論文，2011。
4. 邢季恆，「房仲業者從事土地開發業務之關鍵成功因素之研究」，義守大學管理學院管理碩士在職專班，碩士論文，2015。
5. 周甫亮，「青少年在網咖中的次文化認同建構初探」，世新大學傳播研究所，碩士論文，2002。
6. 金純瑩，「ERP系統與MES系統整合之研究－以某光電公司為例」，中華大學資訊管理學系，碩士論文，2010。
7. 邱永青，「物聯網與製造執行系統整合運用之研究－以太陽能晶片製造廠為例」，元智大學資訊管理學系碩士班，碩士論文，2014。
8. 郭明哲，「中小企業製造執行系統導入之個案研究」，國立清華大學，碩士論文，2012。
9. 黃茹鈺，「MES系統運用於收集工時之改善－以手工具產業R公司為例」，逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班，碩士論文，2009。
10. 黃智聖，「企業知識社群之研究」，國立中山大學，企業管理學系，碩士論文，2001。
11. 陳裕任，「光電產業製造執行系統採用雲端運算提昇效能之設計與探討」，南臺科技大學資訊管理研究所，碩士學位論文，2015。
12. 連卜慧，「2002-2010年台灣主要報紙對客家桐花報導之研究」，國立中央大學客家政治經濟研究所，碩士論文，2011。
13. 甯安泰，「LED產業導入製造執行系統關鍵失敗因素之研究」，國立彰化師範大學資訊管理學系，碩士論文，2009。
14. 廖年琛，「半導體封裝業MES導入成功因素之探討」，國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班，碩士論文，2009。
15. 鄭名哲，「食品業導入製造執行系統之效益研究－以X 企業麵包廠為例」，南華大學資訊管理學系，碩士論文，2017。
16. 劉盈盈，「運動休閒產業整合行銷傳播個案分析－以台北小巨蛋鐘樓怪人劇為例」，國立臺灣師範大學，大眾傳播研究所，碩士論文，2005。
17. 盧筱柔，「陸軍基層連隊志願役士兵無延役意願分析之紮根理論研究－以新竹某軍事單位為例」，明新科技大學管理研究所，碩士學位論文，2018。
18. 蘇信州，「TFT-LCD 面板製造廠CIM客服中心之案例式推理模式建立」，國立成功大學工業與資訊管理碩士在職專班，碩士論文，2009。
19. 胡幼慧，姚美華，一些質性方法上的思考，載於胡幼慧(主編），質性研究，台北：巨流圖書公司，141-158頁，1996。
20. 徐宗國，質性研究概論，台北巨流，1997。
21. 曹衡康，MES進階實務，商周出版，6-8頁，2001。
22. 黃政傑，質的教育研究：方法與實例，台北：漢文，1998。
23. 張俊彥，積體電路製造及設備技術手冊，中華民國產業科技發展協進會，2002。
24. 王守玉，「簡介紮根理論研究法」，護理雜誌，59卷，1期，91-95頁，台灣護理學會，2012。
25. 谷中昭，「電腦整合自動化技術專輯」，機械工業雜誌，225期，77-79頁，2001。
26. 徐宗國，「紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術與涵義」，香港社會科學學報(4），194-221頁，1994。
27. 陳昺麟，「社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹」，勤益學報，第十九期，327-342頁，2001。
28. 萬文隆，「深度訪談在質性研究中的應用」，生活科技教育月刊，第4卷，第37期，17-23頁，2004。
英文部分
1. Clark, A. E. (2003）. Situational Analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction,26(4）, pp. 553-576.
2. Merriam, S. B. & Associates. (2002）. Qualitative Research in Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. MESA International,(1997）,“Execution-Driven Manufacturing Management for Competitive Advantage” , MESA International White Paper No.5.
4. MESA International,(1997）,“MES explained: A high level vision”, MESA International White Paper No. 6.
5. MESA International, (1997）,“The Benefits of MES: A Report from the Field”, MESA International White Paper No.1.
6. MESA International,(1997）, “MES Functionalities & MRP to MES Data Flow Possibilities”, MESA International White Paper No.2.
7. Rice, P. L., and Ezzy, D.,(1999）, Qualitative research method: A hearth focus. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
8. Scheer, A.W.(1991),CIM: computer integrated manufacturing : towards the factory of the future, New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. SEMATECH(1998）,CIM Framework Specification Version 2.0,Taxas:SEMATECH.
10. Seidman, I.,(1998）, Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1990）. Basics of Qualitative Research：Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Strauss, A & Corbin, J. (1998）. Basics of Qualitative Research：Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Streubert-Speziale, H. J. & Carpenter, D, R. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (3rd ed.）. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
14. Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000）. Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6）, pp. 1485-1492. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit