博碩士論文 107457021 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:17 、訪客IP:18.215.185.97
姓名 劉佩如(Pei-Ju Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 教育訓練投入對員工留任意願的影響-以學習意願和組織認同為中介
(The impact of education and training investment on employees′ willingness to stay -with by willingness to learn and organizational identity as mediators)
相關論文
★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究以遠程中介之研究架構,以「社會認同理論」(Social Identity Theory)觀點切入,社會認同係指個人認知自己屬於一個社會類別或群體(1988),同時也是意識到身為群體成員為帶給自己的情感及個人價值意義,延伸至個人在企業組織群體中的認同。因應現今產業環境變化快速情況下,在組織管理策略及組織發展中,如何留住員工是首要面對的課題,然而以員工而言,對於組織的認同程度,影響其在工作中願意付出程度,同時在組織中能學習專業、受培訓的機會,以及個人學習意願,是否影響留任在組織之要素。本研究探討教育訓練投入是否對留任意願的影響,以學習意願與組織認同在教育訓練投入與組織成員留任意願的序列中介效果。本研究以生技製藥產業之員工為研究對象,透過網路平台(Survey Cake)雲端收集問卷,合計回收有效問卷共計116份。以描述性統計分析、信度分析、探索性因素分析、相關係數分析以及迴歸分析之等方法進行資料結果分析及假設驗證,結果顯示:(1)實際參與訓練與組織認同對教育訓練投入與留任意願間具有中介效果。(2)參與訓練意願與組織認同對教育訓練投入與留任意願間中介效果不存在。
摘要(英) This research is based on the research framework of remote mediators and the concept of "Social Identity Theory". Social identity refers to the individual′s knowledge that he belongs to a social category or group (1988), and the recognition that being a part of a group would bring meaning to and individual’s emotion and personal value, which would extend to the corporate organization. In response to the rapid changes in the industrial environment today, in organizational management strategies and organizational development, how to retain people is the primary issue. However, in terms of employees, the degree of recognition for the organization affects the willingness to commit themselves to the job. At the same time, whether an employee can learn expertise, receive adequate training and be willing to learn will also affect his / her willingness to stay on the job. This study explores whether investment of impact of education and training would impact employees’ willingness to stay, in which the willingness to learn and organization identity play the mediating role. In this study, employees in the biotechnology pharmaceutical industry were involved as the research objects. Questionnaires were collected through the cloud survey on the Internet platform (Survey Cake). A total of 116 valid questionnaires were recovered. Descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, correlation coefficient analysis and regression analysis were used to analyze the data results and verify hypothesis. The results showed that: (1) actual participation in training and organizational identity play a mediating role between investment in training and willingness to stay. (2) The willingness to participate in training and organizational identity do not play a mediating role between investment in training and willingness to stay.
關鍵字(中) ★ 教育訓練投入
★ 學習意願
★ 組織認同
★ 留任意願
關鍵字(英) ★ Investment in training
★ Willingness to learn
★ Organizational identification
★ Intention to stay
論文目次 中文摘要...................................................................i
Abstract ..................................................................ii
致謝詞......................................................................iv
目 錄......................................................................v
圖 目 錄.....................................................................vi
表 目 錄.....................................................................vi
一、緒論....................................................................1
1-1 研究背景與動機....................................................1
1-2 研究目的.............................................................3
二、文獻探討與假設...................................................4
2-1 教育訓練投入和留任意願的關係...........................4
2-2 教育訓練投入、學習意願和留任意願的關係..........5
2-3 教育訓練投入、組織認同和留任意願的關係..........6
2-4 學習意願、組織認同和留任意願的關係.................8
三、研究方法............................................................10
3-1 研究架構............................................................10
3-2 研究參與者........................................................10
3-3 研究工具............................................................11
3-4 統計分析方法.....................................................14
四、研究結果與分析...................................................16
4-1 樣本特性.............................................................16
4-2 信度與效度分析..................................................21
4-3 各變項之敍述性統計分析....................................30
4-4 相關係數分析.....................................................31
4-5 迴歸分析............................................................33
第五章 結論與建議.....................................................41
5-1 假說結果分析.......................................................41
5-2 理論與實務意涵...................................................42
5-3 研究限制與未來研究建議......................................43
參考文獻.....................................................................45
附 錄........................................................................50
參考文獻 1. 吳萬益, 林志成, & 傅貞夙. (2006). 領導型態與組織文化對組織承諾與組織績效影響之研究-以台灣不同國籍製藥廠為例. 企業管理學報(71), 35-76.
2. 黃英忠, & 溫金豐. (1995). 外在經營環境與企業教育訓練實施及經營績效關係之研究. In: 人力資源學報.
3. 劉平青, 趙雪雲, & 李靜. (2012). 內部行銷對新員工留任意願的影響-以員工關係為中介變數. [The Effects of Internal Marketing on Newcomers, Intention to Stay-A Mediating Approach of Employee Relations]. 中原企管評論, 10(1), 35-49. doi:10.30104/cymr.201204.0002
4. 劉靜文, & 徐作聖. (2002). 台灣生技製藥產業創新需求與創新政策之研究.
5. Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers′ turnover intentions. Personality and Social psychology bulletin, 24(10), 1027-1039.
6. Acton, T., & Golden, W. (2003). Training the knowledge worker: a descriptive study of training practices in Irish software companies. Journal of European Industrial Training.
7. Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of management Perspectives, 24(2), 48-64.
8. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
9. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39.
10. Baldwin, T. T., & Magjuka, R. J. (1997). Training as an organizational episode: Pretraining influences on trainee motivation. Improving training effectiveness in work organizations, 3, 99-127.
11. Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of management journal, 27(1), 95-112.
12.Blau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 7, 452-457.
13. Buchanan, B. (1974). Government managers, business executives, and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 339-347.
14. Buckley, R., & Caple, J. (2009). The theory and practice of training: Kogan Page Publishers.
15. Bulut, C., & Culha, O. (2010). The effects of organizational training on organizational commitment. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(4), 309-322.
16. Bushardt, S. C., Fretwell, C., & Cumbest, P. B. (1994). Continuous improvement through employee training. The Learning Organization.
17. Chiang, C.-F., Back, K.-J., & Canter, D. D. (2005). The impact of employee training on job satisfaction and intention to stay in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 4(2), 99-118.
18. Cohen, D. J. (1990). What motivates trainees? Training & Development Journal, 44(11), 91-94.
19. Cotton, J. L., & Tuttle, J. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of management review, 11(1), 55-70.
20. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
21. Eaglen, A., Lashley, C., & Thomas, R. (2000). The benefits of training in leisure retailing: a case study of McDonald′s restaurants. Strategic Change, 9(6), 333.
22. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 500.
23. Elnaga, A., & Imran, A. (2013). The effect of training on employee performance. European journal of Business and Management, 5(4), 137-147.
24. Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative science quarterly, 176-190.
25.Hanaysha, J. (2016). Examining the effects of employee empowerment, teamwork, and employee training on organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229(298-306), 298-306.
26. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. In: University of Kansas, KS.
27. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes.
28. Horn, P., & Griffeth, R. (1995). Employee Turnover, Cincinnati. OH: South-Western Publishing.
29. Ji, L., Huang, J., Liu, Z., Zhu, H., & Cai, Z. (2012). The effects of employee training on the relationship between environmental attitude and firms′ performance in sustainable development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(14), 2995-3008.
30. Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of management review, 19(1), 51-89.
31. Lowry, D. S., Simon, A., & Kimberley, N. (2002). Toward improved employment relations practices of casual employees in the New South Wales registered clubs industry. Human resource development quarterly, 13(1), 53-70.
32. Lyons, T. F. (1971). Role clarity, need for clarity, satisfaction, tension, and withdrawal. Organizational behavior and human performance, 6(1), 99-110.
33. Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of management journal, 35(4), 828-847.
34. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
35. Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 64(5), 509.
36. Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 189-246.
37. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237.
38. Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 63(4), 408.
39. Naim, M. F., & Lenkla, U. (2016). Knowledge sharing as an intervention for Gen Y employees’ intention to stay. Industrial and Commercial Training.
40. Ng, T. W., Butts, M. M., Vandenberg, R. J., DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2006). Effects of management communication, opportunity for learning, and work schedule flexibility on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 474-489.
41. Noe, R. A. (2002). Employee Training and Development.
42. Noe, R. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel psychology, 39(3), 497-523.
43. Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the factors that influence employees′ participation in development activities. Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 291.
44. Nunnally, J. Psychometric methods. 1978. In: New York: McGraw-Hill.
45. Oosterbeek, H. (1998). Unravelling supply and demand factors in work-related training. Oxford economic papers, 50(2), 266-283.
46. Owens Jr, P. L. (2006). One more reason not to cut your training budget: The relationship between training and organizational outcomes. Public personnel management, 35(2), 163-172.
47. Patchen, M. (1970). Participation, achievement, and involvement on the job.
48. Pate, J., Martin, G., Beaumont, P., & McGoldrick, J. (2000). Company‐based lifelong learning: what’s the pay‐off for employers? Journal of European Industrial Training.
49. Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational behavior and human performance, 15(1), 87-98.
50. Pratt, M. G. (1998). Central questions in organizational identification. Identity in organizations, 24(3), 171-207.
51. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover: Iowa State Press.
52. Redding, J. C., & Catalanello, R. F. (1994). Strategic readiness: The making of the learning organization: Jossey-Bass.
53. Reyes, A. G. (1990). Petrology of Philippine geothermal systems and the application of alteration mineralogy to their assessment. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 43(1-4), 279-309.
54. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Organizational behavior, 14/E. E: Pearson Education India.
55. Romanowska, J. (1993). Employee development through education liaison. Education+ Training.
56. Steers, R. M., Mowday, R., & Porter, L. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic.
57. Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
58. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
59. Van de Wiele, P. (2010). The impact of training participation and training costs on firm productivity in Belgium. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(4), 582-599.
60. Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., . . . Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351-360.
61. Vasudevan, H. (2014). Examining the relationship of training on job satisfaction and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 4(3), 185-202.
62. Vidal‐Salazar, M. D., Cordón‐Pozo, E., & Ferrón‐Vilchez, V. (2012). Human resource management and developing proactive environmental strategies: The influence of environmental training and organizational learning. Human Resource Management, 51(6), 905-934.
Wentland, D. (2003). The strategic training of employees model: Balancing organizational constraints and training content. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 68(1), 56.
63. Whyte Jr, W. (1956). The Organization Man, Garden City, New York (Doubleday Anchor Books) 1956.
指導教授 陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen) 審核日期 2020-7-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明