主管與部屬在威權領導期待的一致性對於部屬行為之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：21

、訪客IP：3.14.70.203

姓名

林雅苓(Ya-Ling Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

主管與部屬在威權領導期待的一致性對於部屬行為之影響
(The Effect of the Consistency of Expectations of Supervisors and Subordinates in Authoritarian Leadership on Subordinates’ Behavior)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

威權領導在實證研究中有其負面影響，但依舊為華人企業組織下所廣泛運用的領導風格，本研究旨在了解主管對於自我威權領導的個人期待與部屬對主管威權領導的個人期待的一致對部屬工作行為的影響程度，雙方的個人期望一致程度是否影響部屬在適應性績效及任務性績效的工作行為表現，以及高低顯著的關聯性。
本研究以主管及部屬的配對進行兩階段的問卷調查，對台灣企業發放紙本或電子線上問卷，共回收了167份有效配對問卷，根據多項式迴歸分析及反應曲面分析的結果發現：（1）主管對自我威權領導的個人期待與部屬對主管威權領導個人期待的一致低適配關係，對於部屬有較高適應性績效行為影響；（2）主管對自我威權領導的個人期待與部屬對主管威權領導個人期待的一致低適配關係，對於部屬有較高任務性績效行為影響；（3）主管對自我威權領導的個人期待低與部屬對主管威權領導個人期待高的不一致適配關係，對於部屬行為有較高適應性績效行為影響。
本研究建議主管的威權領導行為是可以建立在雙方期待一致的關係下，維持良好的組織互動，並在工作行為上發揮其正向影響力，最終締造組織、主管與部屬三贏的存在價值。

摘要(英)

Authoritarian leadership has its negative effects in empirical research, but it is still a leadership style widely explore in Eastern corporate organizations. This study aims to understand how the supervisor’s personal expectations of self-authoritarian leadership and subordinates’ personal expectations of supervisory authoritarian leadership are consistent with each other.
In this study was found that：(1) The supervisor’s personal expectation of self-authoritative leadership is consistent with the subordinate’s personal expectation of the supervisor’s authoritarian leadership, which has a higher impact on subordinates’ adaptive performance behavior；(2) The supervisor’s personal expectation of self-authoritarian leadership is consistent with the subordinate’s personal expectation of the supervisor’s authoritarian leadership. It has a higher impact on subordinates’ task performance behavior；(3) The low personal expectations of supervisors for self-authoritarian leadership are inconsistent with the high personal expectations of subordinates for supervisory authoritarian leadership, which have a higher adaptive performance behavior impact on subordinates′ behavior.
This research suggests that the authoritative leadership behavior of supervisors can be established under the relationship of mutual expectations, maintain good organizational interaction, and exert their positive influence on work behavior, and ultimately create the existence value of a win-win-win for organizations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 威權領導
★ 威權領導期望的一致性
★ 威權領導期望的不一致性
★ 適應性績效
★ 任務性績效
★ 多項式迴歸分析

關鍵字(英)

★ authoritarian leadership
★ consistency of authoritarian leadership
★ inconsistency of authoritarian leadership
★ adaptive performance
★ task performance
★ polynomial regression analysis

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i
英文摘要 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ii
誌謝 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii
目錄 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iv
圖目錄 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------vi
表目錄 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------vii
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
二、文獻探討與假設 5
2-1 家長式領導 5
2-2 工作績效 6
2-2.1 適應性績效 6
2-2.2 任務性績效 7
2-3 主管與部屬個人期待的一致性 8
2-4 領導行為與主管部屬個人期待一致性之影響 9
2-4.1 當主管對自我威權領導的個人期待與部屬對主管威權領導的個人期待一致之影響 10
2-4.2 當主管對自我威權領導的個人期待與部屬對主管威權領導的個人期待不一致之影響 11
三、研究方法 13
3-1 研究樣本與程序 13
3-2 研究工具 13
3-2.1威權領導 13
3-2.2工作績效 14
3-3 資料分析與統計方法 15
四、研究結果 17
4-1 研究來源與樣本特性 17
4-2 信度分析 17
4-3 驗證性因素分析 18
4-4 相關分析 20
4-5 顯著差異樣本數比例 21
4-6 假設檢定 21
五、研究討論 29
5-1 研究結果與發現 29
5-2 研究貢獻 30
5-3 管理意涵 31
5-4 研究限制與未來建議 33
六、參考文獻 34

參考文獻

〔1〕王安智（2015）。東西方的適配：探索華人的個人與環境適配模型。美國管理學會期刊。
〔2〕周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝（2014）。威權領導：概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。中華心理學刊，56（2），165-189。
〔3〕吳宗祐（2008）。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，（30），3-63。
〔4〕吳宗祐、徐瑋伶與鄭伯壎（2002）。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲：華人企業主管威權領導與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究，（18），3-49.
〔5〕李佳燕（2001）。直屬主管情緒表現與部屬工作態度：部屬情緒感受與情緒感染性的不同效果〉。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版。
〔6〕林姿葶、姜定宇、蕭景鴻與鄭伯壎（2014）。家長式領導效能：後設分析研究。本土心理學研究，（42），181-249。
〔7〕陳嵩、李佩芬、陳光偉（201）。輔仁管理評論。
〔8〕莊璦嘉、林惠彥（2005）。個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響。台灣管理學刊，5，123-148。
〔9〕曾碧娟（2019）。組織變革中領導者的角色—以某預防醫學機構落實組織文化為例。臺灣大學財務金融組學位論文。
〔10〕許金田、胡秀華、淩孝綦、鄭伯壎與周麗芳（2004）。家長式領導與組織公民行為的關係：上下關係品質之中介效果。交大管理學報，2，119-149。
〔11〕游嘉瑩（2007）。威權領導與員工個人創新行為：員工內在動機與負向情緒感受的中介以及兩階段的調節效果。中原大學心理學研究所學位論文。
〔12〕鄭伯壎（1995）。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。
〔13〕鄭伯壎（1996）。家長權威與領導行為之關係探討（二）。國家科學委員會專題研究報告（報告編號：NSC85-2413-H002-005）。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
〔14〕鄭伯壎、姜定宇（2000）。華人組織中的主管忠誠：主位與客位概念對部屬效能的效果。本土心理學研究，14，65-113。
〔15〕鄭伯壎、黃敏萍與周麗芳（2002）。家長式領導及其效能：華人企業團隊的證據。華人心理學報，3（1），85-112。
〔16〕鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清（2003）。家長式領導的三元模式：中國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究，20，209-250。
〔17〕鄭伯壎、林姿葶、鄭弘岳、周麗芳、任金剛與樊景立（2010）。家長式領導與部屬效能：多層次分析觀點。中華心理學刊，52（1），1-23。
〔18〕樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）。華人組織的家長式領導一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究 ( 126-180）
〔19〕趙安安、高尚仁（2005）。台灣地區華人企業家長式領導風格與員工壓力之關聯。應用心理研究 ( 111-131）。
〔20〕羅世芳. (2007). 直屬主管的領導風格對業務人員工作績效之影響 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者).
〔21〕羅奉文 (2001)。勞動市場彈性化之研究－以部份工時為例。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
〔22〕Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R., Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions., Sage., London, 1996.
〔23〕Allworth, E.,Hesketh, B.(1999).Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Allport, G. W. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality (Vol. 20). Yale University Press.
〔24〕Ashkanasy, N. M., & O′connor, C. (1997). Value congruence in leader-member exchange. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(5), 647-662. Journal of Selection and Assessment,7(2),97-111.
〔25〕Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
〔26〕Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 192-221.
〔27〕Bandura, A. (1965). Aggression : A social learning analysis. Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.
〔28〕Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836
〔29〕Bass, B. M., ＆ Avolio, B. J. (1989). Potential biases in leadership measures: how prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to rating and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 509-527.
〔30〕Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Redwood City: Mind Garden.
〔31〕Blau, H. M., & Webster, C. (1981). Isolation and characterization of human muscle cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 78(9), 5623-5627.
〔32〕Borman, W. C.,Motowidlo, S. J.,N. Schmitt,W. Borman (Eds.)(1993).Personnel selection in organizations. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
〔33〕Borman, W. C.,White, L. A.,Dorsey, D. W.(1995).Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1),168-177.
〔34〕Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
〔35〕Byrne, D. , Baskett, G.D. & Hodges, L. (1971) `Behavioral Indicators of Interpersonal Attraction′, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1: 137-149.
〔36〕Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel psychology, 43(2), 313-575
〔37〕Carsten, Melissa K.; Uhl-Bien, Mary; West, Bradley J.; Patera, Jaime L.; and McGregor, Rob, (2010). "Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study" Leadership Institute Faculty Publications. 20.
〔38〕Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
〔39〕Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. (2013). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates′ organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 108-128.
〔40〕Chan, S. C., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. K. J. J. o. O. B. (2013b). The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates′ organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. 34(1), 108-128.
〔41〕Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796-819.
〔42〕Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. J. A. J. o. S. P. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. 7(1), 89-117.
〔43〕Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
〔44〕Deal, T. E. (1982). Kennedy (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading, MA: Addison.
〔45〕DL Bradford, AR Cohen - Training & Development Journal (1984).
〔46〕Edward, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. L. Cooper & L. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, New York : Wiley.
〔47〕Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E., “On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations as an Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research”, Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577-1613, 1993.
〔48〕EK Pellegrini, TA Scandura - Journal of international business studies, (2006).
〔49〕-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84-127).
〔50〕Farh, J. L., Chen, B. S., Chou, L.-F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and Benevolence: employees’ responses to paternalistic Leadership in China. China′s Domestic Private Firms: Multidisciplinary Perspectives On Management Performance. New York: ME Sharpe.
〔51〕Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171-205): Cambridge University Press.
〔52〕Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of management journal, 50(2), 327-347.
〔53〕Hamilton, J. D. (1990). Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of econometrics, 45(1-2), 39-70.
〔54〕Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management Organizational behavior, 10(4), 15-41.
〔55〕Herrmann, S., Kleinsteuber, S., Chatzinotas, A., Kuppardt, S., Lueders, T., Richnow, H. H., & Vogt, C. (2010). Functional characterization of an anaerobic benzene‐degrading enrichment culture by DNA stable isotope probing. Environmental Microbiology, 12(2), 401-411.
〔56〕Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.
〔57〕Hunter, J. R., Bond, J. M., Smith, A. N., Batey, C. E., Jesch, J., & Morris, C. D. (1993). Some aspects of early Viking settlement in Orkney. The Viking Age in Caithness, Orkney and the North Atlantic.
〔58〕Ilgen, D. R. & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal : A process focus. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.). Research in Organization Behavior, 5, 141-197. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
〔59〕Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-343.
〔60〕Lam, S. S., Schaubroeck, J., & Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national study. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 1-18.
〔61〕Leiter, M. P. (1988). Burnout as a function of communication patterns: A study of a multidisciplinary mental health team. Group & organization studies, 13(1), 111-128.
〔62〕Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of applied psychology, 74(3), 424.
〔63〕Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of management, 24(3), 351-389.
〔64〕O′Reilly III, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative science quarterly, 21-37.
〔65〕Peng, M. W., Lu, Y., Shenkar, O., & Wang, D. Y. (2001). Treasures in the China house: A review of management and organizational research on Greater China. Journal of Business Research, 52(2), 95-110.
〔66〕Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 612.
〔67〕Pye, L. W.(1981).Dynamics of Chinese politics. Cambridge, MA:OG & H.
〔68〕Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: a powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554.
〔69〕Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
〔70〕Redding, S. G. (1996). Weak organizations and strong linkages: managerial ideology and Chinese family business networks. Asian business networks, 27-41.
〔71〕Redding, S. G., Norman, A., & Schlander, A. (1994). The nature of individual attachment to the organization: A review of East Asian variations. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 4, 647-688.
〔72〕Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership Third edition. Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., Taylor, S., & Fleenor, J. (1998). Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 462.
〔73〕Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises (No. 62). Harvard Univ Asia Center.
〔74〕Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and inter group behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
〔75〕Van Scotter, J. R.,Motowidlo, S. J.,Cross, T. C.(2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4),526-535.
〔76〕Van Vianen, A. E., Shen, C. T., & Chuang, A. (2011). Person–organization and person–supervisor fits: Employee commitments in a Chinese context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 906-926.
〔77〕Wexley, K. N., Alexander, R. A., Greenawalt, J. P., & Couch, M. A. (1980). Attitudinal congruence and similarity as related to interpersonal evaluations in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of management Journal, 23(2), 320-330.
〔78〕Westwood, R. I., & Chan, A. (1992) Headship and leadership, In Westwood, R. I.(Ed.) Organizational Behavior. Southeast Asian Perspectives, pp.118-43, Longman Asia, Hong Kong.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2020-7-28

推文