| 摘要(英) |
The Taiwan Stock Exchange established the Securities Borrowing and Lending System in June 2003, and participants are limited to domestic and foreign legal entities, In June 2007, the competent authority opened securities dealers and securities companies to conduct securities lending business, and ordinary investors were able to participate in securities lending transactions. Because domestic scholars mostly use the stock exchange information provided by stock exchanges as research data to explore the impact of stock exchange transactions on the overall stock market on stock prices, this study , I obtained the securities borrowing demand table as a sample through the domestic J securities I work for, and explored the relationship between the securities lending transactions in the decentralized securities lending market and the stock return.
In this study, the average cumulative abnormal return rate before and after the securities lending event is used to examine the impact of the securities lending event on the stock return rate, and the regression analysis is used to explore the company′s market value and the cumulative abnormal return rate over the 30 days before the securities lending event. The relationship between the rate of borrowing fee, the market value of the company, the cumulative abnormal return rate 30 days before the securities lending event and the cumulative abnormal return rate after the securities lending event. The following empirical results are found:
1. The impact of stock price returns before and after the securities lending event
The stock price returns before the securities lending event is positive. Since most of the stock targets are small and medium-sized stocks, the degree of information asymmetry is high, and the stock price may be overvalued. The internal reversal is a positive return, showing that the lending transaction helps to return the overvalued stock price to fundamentals and improve market efficiency.
2. Correlation between the rate of borrowing fee and the company′s market value and the stock return rate of the previous period of the securities lending event
The company′s market value is significantly negative for the borrowing fee. The larger the company′s size, the greater the number of shares in circulation, and the greater the number of stocks available for lending, resulting in a lower borrowing fee rate; The cumulative abnormal return rate in the 30 days before the securities lending event is significantly positive for the borrowing fee rate. The better the stock price return performance in the early period of the securities lending event, the stock price is likely to be overvalued, and the greater the demand for the loan, which leads to the borrowing fee rate increase.
3. The effect of securities lending variables on stock returns after securities lending
The borrowing fee, company size, and cumulative abnormal return rate 30 days before the securities lending event are significantly negative for the cumulative abnormal return rate after the securities lending event. The company′s market value increases as the stock price rises, when the stock price rises more, the stock price may be overvalued, along with the greater demand for borrowing securities, increases the rate of borrowing fee, and the poor performance of stock price returns after the securities lending event.
Keywords：Securities Lending、Borrowing Fee、Cumulative Abnormal Return |
| 參考文獻 |
中文文獻
1. 李志宏、徐政義（2013），「我國證券借貸相關制度對集中市場之
影響」，國立政治大學，臺灣證券交易所委託研究計畫期末報告。
2. 李志宏、徐政義、馬瑞辰、魏慧珊（2017），「借券賣出交易對股
票報酬率之影響」，證券市場發展季刊，第29卷第2期。
3. 李志宏、徐政義、黃國峯（2016），「我國有價證券借貸市場參與
者競爭動態分析及建議」，國立政治大學，臺灣證券交易所委託研究
計畫期末報告。
4. 李甜琇（2017），「臺灣有價證券借貸交易市場借券成交與借券賣
出對股價變化之影響」，國立臺北大學統計學系，碩士論文。
5. 林崇英（2010），「我國證券借貸與信用交易制度概述」，證交資
料599期，頁47-51。
6. 張尹亭（2015），「借券交易對台股股價之影響」，國立臺北大學國
際財務金融碩士在職專班，碩士論文。
7. 張文毅（2013），「有價證券借貸之釋疑、啟示及建議」，證券暨期
貨月刊，第31卷第3期。
8. 陳建宏（2011），「借券交易對股價變化影響研究」，國立臺灣大學
社會科學院經濟學系，碩士論文。
9. 陳家祥（2016），「淺談擴大券源後「證券商辦理有價證券借貸業
務」規範重點」，證券暨期貨月刊，第34卷第7期。
10.陳家懿（2012），「借券賣出與股價報酬率之實證研究」，國立中
央大學財務金融學系，碩士論文。
11.曾郁芳（2010），「證券借貸市場借券費率決定因子：以台灣借券資
料之實證」，國立中央大學財務金融學系，碩士論文。
12.黃執敬（2009），「台灣證券借貸市場借券費率之實證研究」，國立
中央大學財務金融學系，碩士論文。
13.黃意詞（2017），「探討借券交易資訊的變化與負面新聞之相關
性」，國立臺灣師範大學管理學院管理研究所，碩士論文。
14.臺灣證券交易所（2014），「世界主要證券市場相關制度」，研究報
告。
15.臺灣證券交易所（2017），「有價證券借貸制度及實務作業介紹」。
16.臺灣證券交易所（2018），「證券商辦理有價證券借貸課程訓練」，
頁32-33。
17.臺灣證券交易所（2019），「投資人證券借貸暨款項借貸宣導」。
18.賴冠文（2016），「臺灣借券市場發展與放空交易管理」，臺灣證券
交易所，證券服務第653期，頁33-44。
英文文獻
1. Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., Zhang, X.,（2008）,“Which
shorts are informed ?,”Journal of Finance 63, 491-527.
2. D’Avolio, Gene.（2002）,“The market for borrowing
stock,”Journal of Financial Economics 66, 271-306.
3. Diether, K. B., Lee, K. H., Werner, I. M.,（2008）,
“Short-sale strategies and return predictability,”
Review of Financial Studies ,Vol. 22 Issue 2 Pp, 575-
607.
4. Diamond, D.W. and R.E.Verrecchia（1987）,“Constraints
on short-selling and asset price adjustment to private
information,” Journal of Financial Economics 18, 277-
312.
5. Figlewski, S .,（1981）,“The informational effects of
restrictions on short sales: some empirical evidence,”
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 16,
463-476.
6. Hong, H., Stein, J.,（2003）,“Differences of opinion,
short -sales constraints, and market crashes,” Review
of Financial Studies , 19, 487-525.
7. Jones, C. M., and Owen A. Lamont（2002）,“Short sale
constraints and stock returns,” Journal of Financial
Economics, 66, 207-239.
8. Jegadeesh, N., Titman, S.,（1993）,“Returns to buying
winners and selling loser：implications for stock
market efficiency,”Journal of Financial 48, 93-130.
9. Miller, E.M.,（1977）,“Risk, uncertainty, and
divergence of opinion,” Journal of Finance 32, 1151-
1168. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit