關於公司決策同儕效應的兩篇論文

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：47

、訪客IP：3.149.28.134

姓名

阮胡義(Nguyen Huu Nghia) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

關於公司決策同儕效應的兩篇論文
(Two Essays on Peer Effects on Corporate Decisions)

相關論文

★ 半導體產業購併對股東財富效果之影響-以聯發科公司為例	★ 區塊鏈技術應用於金融科技公司企業資金電子調撥系統實作與驗證
★ 金融科技浪潮下銀行分行經營績效之探討－以個案銀行為例	★ 收購案後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問之間開始合作原因之探討
★ 併購交易完成後，主併公司與目標公司財務顧問延續合作之因素探討	★ 產品組成變動與公司投資決策
★ CEO年齡與選擇併購目標公司之偏好	★ 外部董事產業經驗對於併購的影響
★ 目標公司執行長年齡與併購決策	★ 企業生命週期轉變對股利變化的影響
★ 經理人文化認同形成對風險承擔行為之影響 -以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ 併購如何創造綜效──以台灣與韓國為例
★ CEO文化認同與債務期限選擇	★ 台灣上市櫃公司撰寫CSR報告書與公司價值之相關性探討
★ 經理人文化認同與公司CSR政策執行之關聯性-以S&P500指數上市公司為例	★ COVID-19疫情對全球航空產業營運之影響–以中華航空為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-1-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

本論文共兩章。第一章研究機構投資人與公司股利同儕效應的關係。我們發現相較於長期機構投資人，短期機構投資人對於隨著產業同儕一起增加股利有正向且顯著的影響。上述對股利同儕效應的效果較可能來自於短期機構投資人針對預期股利增加的交易行為，特別是對股價中資訊的反應。此外，短期機構投資人對於小型、沒有信用評等，或有較高資訊不確定性的公司的股利同儕效應有較強的效果。最後，我們在大幅股利增加有類似的效果，但對於股利減少以及股利改變期間沒有效果。本文的結果在使用不同方法估計機構投資人投資期間以及考慮同儕效應以及機構投資人持股的內生性下仍然穩健。
第二章研究越南此一新興市場中的公司現金政策，並發現一反向的同儕效應，亦即公司的現金持有與其產業同儕的現金持有為負相關。此一反向的同儕效應在競爭壓力與無形資產比率較低的公司更強。由於相較於已開發經濟體如美國來說越南市場整體有較低的競爭程度與創新投資，我們發現支持競爭與創新投資對於公司現金政策的重要性，也對於聚焦在已開發經濟體的相關文獻做了補充。我們的結果也支持同儕效應在不同國家應有相異的效果，也對越南市場的公司現金政策文獻有所貢獻。

摘要(英)

This dissertation comprises two chapters. The first chapter examines the association between institutional investors and dividend peer effects. We find that the presence of short-term institutional investors positively relates to changes in dividend payments in response to firms′ peers, whereas long-term institutional investors have no impact. The former′s impact on dividend mimicking connects more to trading on their expectation of a dividend increase. In particular, short-term investors facilitate the dividend peer effects through a trading channel of stock price informativeness. Our findings on these investors′ facilitation towards the peer effects extend to large dividend increases, but not for dividend decreases and time to change. Our results are robust against different definitions of investor horizons as well as endogeneity concerns on both peer effects and institutional holding.
The second chapter examines cash holdings in Vietnam, an emerging market, and finds reverse peer effects on them - that is, a firm′s level of cash holdings negatively relates to those of its peers. We also note the reverse peer effects are stronger for firms facing less competition and with low intangibility. Because the Vietnam market has noticeably lower competition and investment in innovation than in developed economics like the U.S., our evidence supports the role of competition and innovation investment in driving cash holdings′ peer effects and complements the literature that mostly focuses on developed economies. Our findings also support heterogeneity across countries in peer mimicking behavior and contribute to the cash holdings literature for the Vietnam market.

關鍵字(中)

★ 股利政策
★ 投資期間
★ 同儕效應
★ 現金持有
★ 越南

關鍵字(英)

★ Dividend Policy
★ Investor Horizons
★ Peer Effects
★ Cash Holdings
★ Vietnam

論文目次

Chinese Abstract i
English Abstract ii
Acknowledgments iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
Chapter I: Institutional investors and dividend peer effects 1
1-1 Introduction 2
1-2 Related studies and hypotheses′ development 7
1-3 Data and methodology 9
1-3-1 Data sources 9
1-3-2 Measure of investor horizons and dividend peer effect 10
1-3-2-1 Measure of investor horizons 10
1-3-2-2 Measure of dividend peer effect 11
1-3-3 Identification equations 12
1-3-4 Summary statistics 16
1-4 Empirical results 17
1-4-1 Baseline association between the dividend peer effect and institutional ownership 17
1-4-2 Addressing endogeneity concerns for short-term ownership and long-term ownership 20
1-5 Extended tests 22
1-5-1 Comparison of CR-SIO after firms do not follow or do follow peers 22
1-5-2 Heterogenous effects: trading channel of stock price informativeness 23
1-5-3 Heterogenous effects: learning motive 26
1-5-4 Association between peer effect on other dividend decisions and short-term ownership 27
1-6 Robustness results through using alternative instrument and controlling for blockholder ownership 29
1-7 Valuation implication 31
1-8 Conclusion 33
Bibliography 35
Appendix 1-A Variable definitions 53
Chapter II: Peer effects on corporate cash holdings: evidence from Vietnam 56
2-1 Introduction 57
2-2 Literature review and hypotheses′ development 61
2-3 Methodology and data 64
2-3-1 Empirical model specification 64
2-3-2 Data and summary statistics 66
2-4 Empirical results 69
2-4-1 Characteristics of the Vietnam market 69
2-4-2 Association between a firm′s own cash holdings and peer firms′ cash holdings 70
2-4-3 The effects of competitiveness in Vietnam 72
2-4-4 The effect of intangibility in Vietnam 74
2-4-5 The role of financial constraints 75
2-5 Conclusion 76
Bibliography 79
Appendix 2-A Variable definitions 93

參考文獻

Adhikari, B.K., Agrawal, A., 2018. Peer influence on payout policies. Journal of Corporate Finance 48, 615-637.
Allen, F., Michaely, R., 2003. Chapter 7 - Payout Policy, in: Constantinides, G.M., Harris, M., Stulz, R.M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Elsevier, pp. 337-429.
Amihud, Y., 2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5, 31-56.
Amin, A.S., Dutta, S., Saadi, S., Vora, P.P., 2015. Institutional shareholding and information content of dividend surprises: Re-examining the dynamics in dividend-reappearance era. Journal of Corporate Finance 31, 152-170.
Appel, I.R., Gormley, T.A., Keim, D.B., 2016. Passive investors, not passive owners. Journal of Financial Economics 121, 111-141.
Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., 2013. Institutional investment horizons and the cost of equity capital. Financial Management 42, 441-477.
Bernardo, A.E., Welch, I., 2004. Liquidity and financial market runs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 135-158.
Billett, M. T., Xue, H., 2007. The takeover deterrent effect of open market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance 62, 1827-1850.
Bolton, P., Scharfstein, D.S., 1990. A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. The American Economic Review, 93-106.
Boone, A.L., White, J.T., 2015. The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. Journal of Financial Economics 117, 508-533.
Brav, A., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., Michaely, R., 2005. Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 483-527.
Bushee, B.J., 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 305-333.
Bushee, B.J., 2001. Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research 18, 207-246.
Bushee, B.J., Noe, C.F., 2000. Corporate disclosure practices, institutional investors, and stock return volatility. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 171-202.
Bustamante, M.C., Frésard, L., 2021. Does firm investment respond to peers’ investment? Management Science 67, 4643-5300.
Campbell, J.Y., Lettau, M., Malkiel, B.G., Xu, Y., 2001. Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. The Journal of Finance 56, 1-43.
Cella, C., Ellul, A., Giannetti, M., 2013. Investors′ Horizons and the Amplification of Market Shocks. Review of Financial Studies 26, 1607-1648.
Chang, Y.-C., Hong, H., Liskovich, I., 2015. Regression Discontinuity and the Price Effects of Stock Market Indexing. Review of Financial Studies 28, 212-246.
Chen, X., Harford, J., Li, K., 2007. Monitoring: Which institutions matter? Journal of Financial Economics 86, 279-305.
Chen, Y.-W., Chan, K., Chang, Y., 2019. Peer effects on corporate cash holdings. International Review of Economics & Finance 61, 213-227.
Cheng, T.-C., Lai, H.-N., 2021. Improvements in estimating the probability of informed trading models. Quantitative Finance 21, 771-796.
Cremers, M., Pareek, A., Sautner, Z., 2020. Short-Term Investors, Long-Term Investments, and Firm Value: Evidence from Russell 2000 Index Inclusions. Management Science 66, 4359-4919.
De Cesari, A., Huang-Meier, W., 2015. Dividend changes and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance 35, 1-17.
DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., Stulz, R. M., 2006. Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics 81, 227-254.
Edmans, A., Manso, G., 2011. Governance Through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders. Review of Financial Studies 24, 2395-2428.
Fama, E. F., French, K. R., 2002. Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. The Review of Financial Studies 15, 1-33.
Foucault, T., Fresard, L., 2014. Learning from peers′ stock prices and corporate investment. Journal of Financial Economics 111, 554-577.
Fracassi, C., 2016. Corporate Finance Policies and Social Networks. Management Science 63, 2420-2438.
Frankfurter, G.M., Wood Jr, B.G., 1997. The evolution of corporate dividend policy. Journal of Financial Education 23, 16-33.
Gaspar, J.-M., Massa, M., Matos, P., 2005. Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 76, 135-165.
Grennan, J., 2019. Dividend payments as a response to peer influence. Journal of Financial Economics 131, 549-570.
Grinstein, Y., Michaely, R., 2005. Institutional holdings and payout policy. The Journal of Finance 60, 1389-1426.
Grullon, G., Larkin, Y., Michaely, R., 2019. Dividend policy and product market competition. Available at SSRN 972221.
Guttman, I., Kadan, O., Kandel, E., 2010. Dividend stickiness and strategic pooling. The Review of Financial Studies 23, 4455-4495.
Harris, M., Raviv, A., 1991. The theory of capital structure. The Journal of Finance 46, 297-355.
Hartzell, J.C., Starks, L.T., 2003. Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation. The Journal of Finance 58, 2351-2374.
Hoberg, G., Prabhala, N.R., 2009. Disappearing Dividends, Catering, and Risk. Review of Financial Studies 22, 79-116.
Leary, M.T., Roberts, M.R., 2014. Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy? The Journal of Finance 69, 139-178.
Li, K., Zhao, X., 2008. Asymmetric Information and Dividend Policy. Financial Management 37, 673-694
Lieberman, M.B., Asaba, S., 2006. Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other? Academy of Management Review 31, 366-385.
Lin, Y., Mao, Y., Wang, Z., 2018. Institutional ownership, peer pressure, and voluntary disclosures. The Accounting Review 93, 283-308.
Lintner, J., 1956. Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review 46, 97-113.
Manski, C.F., 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60, 531-542.
Maug, E., 1998. Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off between Liquidity and Control? The Journal of Finance 53, 65-98.
Myers, S.C., 1984. The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance 39, 574–592.
Parrino, R., Sias, R.W., Starks, L.T., 2003. Voting with their feet: institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 68, 3-46.
Piotroski, J.D., Roulstone, D.T., 2004. The Influence of Analysts, Institutional Investors, and Insiders on the Incorporation of Market, Industry, and Firm-Specific Information into Stock Prices. The Accounting Review 79, 1119-1151.
Roll, R., 1988. R2. The Journal of Finance 43, 541-566.
Scharfstein, D.S., Stein, J.C., 1990. Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 465-479.
Shefrin, H.M., Statman, M., 1984. Explaining investor preference for cash dividends. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 253-282.
Shue, K., 2013. Executive Networks and Firm Policies: Evidence from the Random Assignment of MBA Peers. Review of Financial Studies 26, 1401-1442.
Stein, J.C., 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 655-669.
Adhikari, B. K., & Agrawal, A. (2018). Peer influence on payout policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 615-637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.010
Barker, T., & Üngör, M. (2019). Vietnam: The Next Asian Tiger?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 96-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.11.010
Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why Do U.S. Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985-2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
Benoit, J.-P. (1984). Financially Constrained Entry in a Game with Incomplete Information. The RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 490-499. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555520
Bigelli, M., & Sánchez-Vidal, J. (2012). Cash holdings in private firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(1), 26-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.06.004
Binh, Q. M. Q., & Tung, L. T. (2020). The Effect of R&D Expenditure on Firm Output: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(6), 379-385. doi: https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.379
Bolton, P., & Scharfstein, D. S. (1990). A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting. The American Economic Review, 80(1), 93-106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006736
Bustamante, M. C. (2015). Strategic investment and industry risk dynamics. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 297-341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu067
Bustamante, M.C., & Frésard, L. (2021). Does firm investment respond to peers’ investment? Management Science, 67(8), 4643-5300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3695
Campello, M. (2006). Debt financing: Does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets? Journal of Financial Economics, 82(1), 135-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.04.001
Chen, Y.-W., Chan, K., & Chang, Y. (2019). Peer effects on corporate cash holdings. International Review of Economics & Finance, 61, 213-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.02.008
Denis, D. J., & Sibilkov, V. (2010). Financial Constraints, Investment, and the Value of Cash Holdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 247-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp031
Faulkender, M., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1957-1990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00894.x
Foucault, T., & Fresard, L. (2014). Learning from peers′ stock prices and corporate investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(3), 554-577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.11.006
Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., & Kostova, G. L. (2016). When do peers matter?: A cross-country perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance, 69, 364-389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.009
Fresard, L. (2010). Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings. The Journal of Finance, 65(3), 1097-1122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01562.x
Giroud, X., & Mueller, H. M. (2011). Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 66(2), 563-600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01642.x
Grennan, J. (2019). Dividend payments as a response to peer influence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 549-570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.01.012
Gyimah, D., Machokoto, M., & Sikochi, A. (2020). Peer influence on trade credit. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101685. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101685
Hadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J. R. (2010). New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909-1940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009
Hubbard, R. G. (1998). Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 193-225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564955
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789
Joo, C., Yang, I., & Yang, T. (2016). Peer Group Effect in Firm Cash Holding Policy: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(4), 535-573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12138
Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169-215. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951280
Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2014). Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy? The Journal of Finance, 69(1), 139-178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12094
Lee, D. (2020). The role of R&D and input trade in productivity growth: innovation and technology spillovers. The Journal of Technology Transfer 45, 908-928. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09717-0
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), 107-138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366-385. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208686
Liu, Y., & Mauer, D. C. (2011). Corporate cash holdings and CEO compensation incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 183-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.008
Lou, K. R., Lu, Y. K., & Shiu, C. Y. (2020). Monitoring role of institutional investors and acquisition performance: Evidence from East Asian markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 59, 101244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.101244
Lyandres, E., & Palazzo, B. (2016). Cash Holdings, Competition, and Innovation. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(6), 1823-1861. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109016000697
Machokoto, M., Chipeta, C., & Ibeji, N. (2021). The institutional determinants of peer effects on corporate cash holdings. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 101378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101378
Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531-542. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
Peters, R. H., & Taylor, L. A. (2017). Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 251-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.011
Pinkowitz, L. E. E., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2006). Does the Contribution of Corporate Cash Holdings and Dividends to Firm Value Depend on Governance? A Cross-country Analysis. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2725-2751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01003.x
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015). The World in 2050. Will the Shift in Global Economic Power Continue? https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/the-economy/assets/world-in-2050-february-2015.pdf
Riddick, L. A., & Whited, T. M. (2009). The Corporate Propensity to Save. The Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1729-1766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01478.x
Schroth, E., & Szalay, D. (2010). Cash Breeds Success: The Role of Financing Constraints in Patent Races. Review of Finance, 14(1), 73-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfp020
Seo, H. (2021). Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(1), 101364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101364
Tran, Q. T. (2020). Monetary loosening and cash holdings: Evidence from an emerging market. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101312
Tung, L. T., & Binh, Q. M. Q. (2021). The impact of R&D expenditure on firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from the Vietnamese listed companies. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.1897470
UNCTAD (2017). Trade and Development Report, 2017: Beyond austerity: Towards a Global new Deal. Chapter VI, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York, USA. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdr2017_en.pdf
Vo, X. V. (2018). Foreign Ownership and Corporate Cash Holdings in Emerging Markets. International Review of Finance, 18(2), 297-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12130

指導教授

李韋憲(Wei-Hsien Li)

審核日期

2022-6-6

推文