使用序列分群法揭示學生學習策略並探討其與認知負荷及學習成效之相關性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：3.137.214.219

姓名

康景翔(Ching-Hsiang Kang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

使用序列分群法揭示學生學習策略並探討其與認知負荷及學習成效之相關性
(Using Sequence Clustering to unveil students’ learning strategies and explore their relationship with Cognitive Load and Learning Performance)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-6-29以後開放)

摘要(中)

學生在測量認知負荷程度時必須使用問卷進行測量，而認知負荷問卷實務上需要間隔兩周至三周一次進行施測，頻繁地施測也會造成學生的問卷疲勞，且收集問卷後還需要進行統計分析，以至於導師在得知學生的認知負荷負載程度時往往已近學期尾聲，許多干預或輔導措施已不具即時性，難以再進行拯救輔導等等相關措施。除此之外，一些與時間性有關的題目，可能會因為學生在反思過程中記憶模糊或主觀意識影響導致作答有誤，其答案的正確性若能透過線上系統的日誌分析，則會更加精確且可靠。換句話說，如果能夠從學生操作學習管理系統(Learning Management System, LMS)的learning logs就揭露學生認知負荷(cognitive load)的狀況，對於認知負荷的測量是十分即時且快速，且對於教師授課內容的調整、預防以及者干預措施也可獲得即時性的效益。
本研究收集了113位大學生在LMS留下的learning logs，並將learning logs編碼成序列以保持學習歷程的完整性，並將類似的序列分群以檢測學生的學習策略。
分析的結果一共得到五種常見的線上學習策略，並找到一種學習策略可以替代測量(proxy measure)學生的認知負荷程度，本研究同時驗證了學生學習策略與學習成效之間的關聯性，結果表明部分學習策略與學習成效具有正向且顯著的關聯。最後我們得知，學生想要獲得較佳的學習成效，如何正確搭配教材影片是不可或缺的一環，研究發現觀看影片以及做線上測驗的順序是非常重要的，若學生跳過影片直接進行線上測驗，表示學生在課堂中已經累積過多的認知負荷，需要進行即時的調整，反之，若學生正確的使用課程的教材搭配影片學習，循序理解教材內容，對學習是有正向助益的。

摘要(英)

Cognitive load must be measured with a questionnaire, but the questionnaire measurement can only conduct once every two or three weeks in practice, and frequent measuring will also cause students are aware of questionnaire fatigue. After collecting the response of the questionnaire, it takes time to perform a statistical test for understanding students′ real reflection. Therefore, when teachers know the degree of cognitive load of the students, the semester is almost at the end. Teachers have difficulty giving timely interventions for counseling accordingly. Besides, for some questions related to time in the questionnaire, if students answer through reflection, may lead to wrong answers because of the recall process or subjective consciousness. However, it is more reliable and real-time if we could unveil students′ cognitive load by using learning logs generated from the learning management system, and the adjustment of teaching content, interventions and counseling accordingly can also obtain immediate benefits.
In this study, we conducted a system programming course with 113 college students and collected students′ learning logs from a learning management system. We encode learning logs into sequences to maintain the integrity of the learning process, and cluster similar learning sequences to detect patterns in students′ learning strategies.
Adopting a sequence cluster analysis, we extracted five learning strategies from the collected learning logs. Moreover, experimental results demonstrated that those learning strategies could unveil the degree of cognitive load of students. This study also estimated the correlation relationships between students′ learning performance and students′ learning strategies. The results present two factors that are under a positive and significant relationship. Furthermore, if students want to get better learning performance, how to properly match the course materials and videos is very important. The study found that the order that students watch videos and take quizzes is a critical factor. Students who skip the videos and take quizzes directly with higher cognitive load in the classroom, and it needs to give intervention immediately. On the contrary, if students correctly use the course materials and videos to learn, and understand the teaching content step by step, it will be of positive help to learning.

關鍵字(中)

★ 認知負荷
★ 序列分析
★ 學習策略
★ 學習成效

關鍵字(英)

★ Cognitive Load
★ Sequence Clustering
★ Learning Strategy
★ Learning Performance

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
一、緒論 1
1.1 問卷調查分析 1
1.2 學習策略分析 1
二、文獻探討 3
2.1 問卷與認知負荷 3
2.2 學習策略 4
三、研究方法與實驗 5
3.1 研究對象 5
3.2 問卷設計 5
3.3 學習策略探勘(MINING STUDENTS’ LEARNING STRATEGY) 6
3.3.1 資料收集 6
3.3.2 資料前處理及序列化 7
3.3.2.1 分類事件類別 7
3.3.2.2 定義序列時間 8
3.3.2.3 加入章節資訊並合併 8
3.3.2.4 連續且相同事件類別合併 9
3.3.2.5 去除離群值 9
3.3.3 序列分群(Sequence Clustering) 10
3.3.3.1 聚合式階層分群法(Agglomerative hierarchical clustering) 10
3.3.3.2 連結演算法(Linkage algorithm) 10
3.3.3.3 序列的相異性度量(Sequence dissimilarity measures) 13
3.3.3.4 評估指標 13
3.4 相關性分析與差異性分析 14
3.4.1 斯皮爾曼等級相關係數(Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient) 14
3.4.2 獨立樣本t檢定(Independent Sample t test) 15
四、結果及討論 16
4.1 研究問題1 18
4.2 研究問題2 27
4.3 研究問題3 28
五、結論與未來研究 32
六、研究限制 33
七、參考文獻 34
附錄A 37

參考文獻

Akçapinar, G., Chen, M.-R. A., Majumdar, R., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2020). Exploring student approaches to learning through sequence analysis of reading logs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge.
Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students′ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and learning, 9(2), 161-185. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000340669000005
Brinton, C. G., Buccapatnam, S., Chiang, M., & Poor, H. V. (2016). Mining MOOC Clickstreams: Video-Watching Behavior vs. In-Video Quiz Performance. Ieee Transactions on Signal Processing, 64(14), 3677-3692. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000377370500010
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual review of applied linguistics, 25, 112-130.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Dawson, R. (2011). How significant is a boxplot outlier? Journal of Statistics Education, 19(2).
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Studer, M., & Müller, N. S. (2009a). Extracting and rendering representative sequences. Paper presented at the International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering, and Knowledge Management.
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Studer, M., & Müller, N. S. (2009b). Mining sequence data in R with the TraMineR package: A user’s guide. Geneva: Department of Econometrics and Laboratory of Demography, University of Geneva.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1996UL99100005
Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of computing in higher education, 29(1), 6-27.
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 33(4), 74-85.
Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of participant behavior in a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(6), 1-18.
Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Hatala, M., & Adesope, O. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74-89.
Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R. F., Morales, N., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2018). Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 179-196.
Mayer, R. E. (1988). Learning strategies: An overview learning and study strategies. Edited by CE Weinstein, ET Goetz and PE Alexander. Newyork: academic Pres, Inc.
Murtagh, F. (1983). A survey of recent advances in hierarchical clustering algorithms. The computer journal, 26(4), 354-359.
Neuville, S., Frenay, M., & Bourgeois, E. (2007). Task value, self-efficacy and goal orientations: Impact on self-regulated learning, choice and performance among university students. Psychologica Belgica, 47(1-2), 95-117. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000250483400007
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4), 429.
Paas, F. G. W. C., Vanmerrienboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional-Research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 419-430. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1994PJ03800012
Pask, G., & Scott, B. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 217-253.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E., & Weitzer, W. H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New directions for institutional research, 2004(121), 63-73.
Steif, P. S., & Dollár, A. (2009). Study of usage patterns and learning gains in a web‐based interactive static course. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 321-333.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296.
Tuan*, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students′ motivation towards science learning. International journal of science education, 27(6), 639-654.
Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 5-17.

指導教授

楊鎮華

審核日期

2020-6-30

推文