||Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis(2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.|
Beşevli, C., Salman, E., Goksun,T., Urey, H., & Özcan, O. (2019). MaR-T: Designing a Projection-Based Mixed Reality System for Nonsymbolic Math Development of Preschoolers: Guided by Theories of Cognition and Learning. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ′19)(pp. 280-292). New York: ACM.
Booker, G., Swan, P., Bond, D., Sparrow, L., & Swan, P. (2014). Teaching primary mathematics(5th ed.). Melbourne: Pearson Australia.
Brizuela, B. M. (2006). Young Children′s Notations for Fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 281-305.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Ed.). (pp. 189-194). London: Taylor & Francis.
Cramer, K., Post, T., & DelMas, R. (2002). Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth-and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111-144.
David, A. B. (2011). Mobile Application Testing: Best Practices to Ensure Quality. experience success. amdocs.
DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and Meta-Affect in Mathematical Problem Solving: a Representational Perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147.
Empson, S. B. (2003). Low-Performing Students and Teaching Fraction for Understanding: An Interactional Analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 305-343.
Fessakis, G., Karta, P., & Konstantinos, K. (2018). Designing Math Trails for Enhanced by Mobile Learning Realistic Mathematics Education in Primary Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 8(2), 49-63.
Gao, M., Kortum, P., & Frederick, O. (2018). Psychometric Evaluation ofthe USE (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use) Questionnaire for Reliability and Validity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), pp. 1414–1418.
Giardini, E. (2016). Mathematical learning with a purpose. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 6(1), 13-18.
Goldin, G. A. (2014). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (Mathematical Representation).(S. Lerman, Ed.) Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Google LLC. (2019). Google Maps Education. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from Google Maps: https://www.google.com/help/maps/education/learn/
Hall, S. (1997). Representation Curtular Representation and Signifying Practices.London: Sage.
Hannich, L. (2009). Why Are Fractions so Important?International Learning Corporation.
Hasemann, K. (1981). On difficulties with fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(1), 71–87.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Hitt, F. (Ed.). (2002). Representations and Mathematics Visualization. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education North American Chapter and Cinvestav-IPN. Mexico.
Horn, M. B. (2018, May 14). Why Google Maps—notNetflix or Amazon—Points to the Future of Education. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from EdSurge: https://www.edsurge.com/news/2018-05-14-why-google-maps-not-netflix-or-amazon-points-to-the-future-of-education
Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 79-102.
Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Tseng, C. W., & Huang, Y. M. (2015). Exploring Effects of Multi-Touch Tabletop on Collaborative Fraction Learning and the Relationship of Learning Behavior and Interaction with Learning Achievement. Educational, 18(4), 459–473.
Hwang, W.-Y., Su, J.-H., Huang, Y.-M., & Dong, J.-J. (2009). A Study of Multi-Representation of Geometry Problem Solving with Virtual Manipulatives and Whiteboard System. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 229-247.
Kara, F., & Incikabi, L. (2018). Sixth Grade Students’ Skills of Using Multiple Representations in Addition and Subtraction Operations in Fractions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 463-474.
Kieren, T. E. (1988). Personal knowledge of rational numbers: its intuitive and formal development. In Number concepts and operations in the middle grades.(H. J., & B. M., Eds.) Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kirakowski, J., & Corbett, M. (1993). SUMI: the Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 210-212.
Koh, N. K., & Low, H. K. (2010). Learning mathematical concepts through authentic learning. 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Incorporated (MERGA 2010) on “Shaping the future of mathematics education”.Western Australia: Fremantle.
Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2003). A graphical partitioning model for learning common fraction: designing affordances on a web-supported learning environment. Computers & Education, 40(2), 137-155.
Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability Ratings for Everyday Products Measured With the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(2), 67-76.
Lam, T. T. (2014). Meaningful Learning Experience for Problem Solving and Mathematics Competition Questions. Mathematical Medley, 40(2), 1-10.
Learning Maths Outside the Classroom. (2008, April 28). Retrieved June 19, 2019, from National Center for Excellence in the Teaching Mathematics: https://www.ncetm.org.uk/resources/9268
Levenberg, I., & Patkin, D. (2014). Promoting meaningful learning-Studying mathematics with traffic signs. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4, 1-8.
Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57-78.
Li, H. C. (2006). A comparative analysis of Taiwanese and English students′ conceptual and procedural knowledge of fractions at ages 12 and 13. Cambridge, University of Cambridge.
Lortie-Forgues, H., Tian, J., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Why is learning fraction and decimal arithmetic so difficult? Developmental Review, 38, 201-221.
Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3-6.
Lund, A. M. (2001). USE Questionnaire: Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from USE Questionnaire: Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use: https://garyperlman.com/quest/quest.cgi?form=USE
Lutes, K. D., Chang, K., & Baggili, I. M. (2006). Diabetic e-Management System (DEMS). Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG′06).IEEE.
Marichal, S., Rosales, A., Sansone, G., Pires, C., Bakala, B., Perilli, F. G., & Blat, J. (2017). CETA: open, affordable and portable mixed-reality environment for low-cost tablets. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ′17).New York: ACM.
Maxwell, R. (2015, April 20). Using Google Earth to Teach Math. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from Geolounge: https://www.geolounge.com/using-google-earth-to-teach-math/
(2014). MINISTRY OF EDUCATION IN TAIWAN.MINISTRY OF EDUCATION IN TAIWAN.
Nakahara, T. (2007). Cultivating Mathematical Thinking through Representation: Utilizing the Representational System. Retrieved from http://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/math/apec/apec2008/papers/PDF/1.Keynote(Dec.9)_Tadao_Nakahara_Japan.pdf
Ni, Y. J. (2001). Semantic domains of rational numbers and the acquisition of fraction equivalence. ontemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 400–417.
Novak, J. D. (1994). A view on the current status of Ausubel’s assimilation theory of learning. CADMO: Giornale Italiano di Pedagogia, Sperimentale, Didattica, Docimologia. Tecnologia dell’instruzione, 2(4), 7-23.
Ofsted. (2008). Learning outside classroom.London: Alexandra House.
OpenCV. (2019). About. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from OpenCV: https://opencv.org/about/
Panko, R. (2018, July 10). The Popularity of Google Maps: Trends in Navigation Apps in 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from THE MANIFEST: https://themanifest.com/app-development/popularity-google-maps-trends-navigation-apps-2018
Pearce, S. (2016). e-teaching:: management strategies for the classroom; Authentic Learning: what, why, how?Retrieved 07 19, 2019, from ACEL: http://www.acel.org.au/acel/ACEL_docs/Publications/e-Teaching/2016/e-Teaching_2016_10.pdf
Pohl, M., Wallner, G., & Kriglstein, S. (2016). Using lag-sequential analysis for understanding interaction sequences in visualizations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 96, Pages 54-66.
Purdue University. (n.d.). Meaningful Learning. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from Meaningful Learning: https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~rallrich/learn/mean.html
Reddy, L., & Bruyns, J. (2016). THE EFFECT OF AN AUTHENTIC LEARNING ACTIVITY ON THE PERFORMANCE AND GRATIFICATION OF FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS. (pp. 36-47). SemanticScholar.
Relojo, D. (2019, October 9). 5 Ways To Make Learning More Meaningful To Students. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from American Psychological Associations: PSYCH LEARNING CURVE: https://psychlearningcurve.org/learning-more-meaningful/
Relojo-Howell, D. (2017, October 9). 5 Ways To Make Learning More Meaningful To Students. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from American Psychological Association;s: PSYCH LEARNING CURVE: http://psychlearningcurve.org/learning-more-meaningful/
Reys, R. E., & Yang, D. C. (1998). Relationship between computational performance and number sense among sixth-and eighth-grade students in Taiwan. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(2), 225-237.
Siegler, R.S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., . . . Meichu, C. (2012). Early Predictors of High School. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697.
Siegler, R. S., Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 13-19.
Siegler, R., & Braithwaite, D. W. (2017). Numerical Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 187-213.
Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. (T. M. Duffy, & D. H. Jonassen, Eds.) Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, 57-75.
Suh, J. M., & Moyer, P. S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students’ learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, pp. 297-304.
Taylor, J. (2015, January 22). What is Authentic Context. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from https://prezi.com/hgc6v6bhuidn/what-is-authentic-context/
TechTarget. (2013). Google Maps. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from WhatIs.com: https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/Google-Maps
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). NATIONAL MATHEMATICS ADVISORY PANEL.U.S. Department of Education.
Van de Walle, S. (2008). Comparing the performance of national public sectors: conceptual problems. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(4), 329-338.
Van, W., & Folk, S. (2008). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally.Toronto: Pearson.
Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & De Smedt, B. (2012). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning.(N. M. Seel, Ed.) Boston, MA: Springer.
Widhitama, Y. N., Lukito, A., & Khabibah, S. (2008). Problem Solving-based Learning Materials on Fraction for Training Creativity ofElementary School Students. Journal of Physic: Conference Series.