||1. Caló, E. and V.V. Khutoryanskiy, Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products. European Polymer Journal, 2015. 65: p. 252-267.|
2. George, J., et al., Neural tissue engineering with structured hydrogels in CNS models and therapies. Biotechnology advances, 2019.
3. Ahmed, E.M., Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of advanced research, 2015. 6(2): p. 105-121.
4. Catoira, M.C., et al., Overview of natural hydrogels for regenerative medicine applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2019. 30(10): p. 115.
5. Hong, W., et al., A theory of coupled diffusion and large deformation in polymeric gels. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2008. 56(5): p. 1779-1793.
6. Hoffman, A.S., Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2012. 64: p. 18-23.
7. Hoare, T.R. and D.S. Kohane, Hydrogels in drug delivery: Progress and challenges. Polymer, 2008. 49(8): p. 1993-2007.
8. Lee, D., et al., Ocular drug delivery through pHEMA-Hydrogel contact lenses co-loaded with lipophilic vitamins. Scientific Reports, 2016. 6: p. 34194.
9. Parente, M., et al., Bioadhesive hydrogels for cosmetic applications. International journal of cosmetic science, 2015. 37(5): p. 511-518.
10. Perera, M.M. and N. Ayres, Dynamic covalent bonds in self-healing, shape memory, and controllable stiffness hydrogels. Polymer Chemistry, 2020. 11(8): p. 1410-1423.
11. Tsou, Y.-H., et al., Hydrogel as a bioactive material to regulate stem cell fate. Bioactive Materials, 2016. 1(1): p. 39-55.
12. Kim, S. and K.E. Healy, Synthesis and characterization of injectable poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogels with proteolytically degradable cross-links. Biomacromolecules, 2003. 4(5): p. 1214-1223.
13. Ko, H.-F., C. Sfeir, and P.N. Kumta, Novel synthesis strategies for natural polymer and composite biomaterials as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010. 368(1917): p. 1981-1997.
14. Liang, Y., et al., Fabrication and characters of a corneal endothelial cells scaffold based on chitosan. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2011. 22(1): p. 175-183.
15. Talebian, S., et al., Self‐Healing Hydrogels: The Next Paradigm Shift in Tissue Engineering? Advanced Science, 2019. 6(16): p. 1801664.
16. Lu, D., C. Xiao, and S. Xu, Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express polymer letters, 2009. 3(6): p. 366-375.
17. Sadr, N., et al., Enhancing the biological performance of synthetic polymeric materials by decoration with engineered, decellularized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials, 2012. 33(20): p. 5085-5093.
18. Billiet, T., et al., A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2012. 33(26): p. 6020-6041.
19. Koetting, M.C., et al., pH-responsive and enzymatically-responsive hydrogel microparticles for the oral delivery of therapeutic proteins: Effects of protein size, crosslinking density, and hydrogel degradation on protein delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, 2016. 221: p. 18-25.
20. Yu, X., et al., Triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion from rationally designed polymeric emitters with tunable inter-chromophore distances. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51(3): p. 588-591.
21. Zhu, Z., et al., Au@ Pt nanoparticle encapsulated target‐responsive hydrogel with volumetric bar‐chart chip readout for quantitative point‐of‐care testing. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2014. 53(46): p. 12503-12507.
22. Bailon, P. and W. Berthold, Polyethylene glycol-conjugated pharmaceutical proteins. Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, 1998. 1(8): p. 352-356.
23. Ronda, L., et al., Ligand reactivity and allosteric regulation of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics, 2008. 1784(10): p. 1365-1377.
24. Hu, W., et al., Advances in crosslinking strategies of biomedical hydrogels. Biomaterials science, 2019. 7(3): p. 843-855.
25. Sung, H.-W., et al., In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 1999. 10(1): p. 63-78.
26. Lee, J.H., Injectable hydrogels delivering therapeutic agents for disease treatment and tissue engineering. Biomaterials research, 2018. 22(1): p. 1-14.
27. Chung, H.J., Y. Lee, and T.G. Park, Thermo-sensitive and biodegradable hydrogels based on stereocomplexed Pluronic multi-block copolymers for controlled protein delivery. Journal of controlled release, 2008. 127(1): p. 22-30.
28. Xu, J., et al., The role of chemical and physical crosslinking in different deformation stages of hybrid hydrogels. European Polymer Journal, 2018. 100: p. 86-95.
29. Jiang, S.Y. and Z.Q. Cao, Ultralow-Fouling, Functionalizable, and Hydrolyzable Zwitterionic Materials and Their Derivatives for Biological Applications. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(9): p. 920-932.
30. Beltrán-Osuna, A.n.A., et al., New antifouling silica hydrogel. Langmuir, 2012. 28(25): p. 9700-9706.
31. Dundua, A., S. Franzka, and M. Ulbricht, Improved antifouling properties of polydimethylsiloxane films via formation of polysiloxane/polyzwitterion interpenetrating networks. Macromolecular rapid communications, 2016. 37(24): p. 2030-2036.
32. Hu, G. and T. Emrick, Functional choline phosphate polymers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016. 138(6): p. 1828-1831.
33. Diao, W., et al., Highly stretchable, ionic conductive and self‐recoverable zwitterionic polyelectrolyte‐based hydrogels by introducing multiple supramolecular sacrificial bonds in double network. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019. 136(29): p. 47783.
34. He, H., et al., Simple Thermal Pretreatment Strategy to Tune Mechanical and Antifouling Properties of Zwitterionic Hydrogels. Langmuir, 2018. 35(5): p. 1828-1836.
35. Erathodiyil, N., et al., Zwitterionic polymers and hydrogels for antibiofouling applications in implantable devices. Materials Today, 2020.
36. Hawkins, A.M., et al., Tuning biodegradable hydrogel properties via synthesis procedure. Polymer, 2013. 54(17): p. 4422-4426.
37. Ozcelik, B., Degradable hydrogel systems for biomedical applications, in Biosynthetic Polymers for Medical Applications. 2016, Elsevier. p. 173-188.
38. Hamid, Z.A., et al., Epoxy-amine synthesised hydrogel scaffolds for soft-tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2010. 31(25): p. 6454-6467.
39. Wachiralarpphaithoon, C., Y. Iwasaki, and K. Akiyoshi, Enzyme-degradable phosphorylcholine porous hydrogels cross-linked with polyphosphoesters for cell matrices. Biomaterials, 2007. 28(6): p. 984-993.
40. West, J.L. and J.A. Hubbell, Polymeric biomaterials with degradation sites for proteases involved in cell migration. Macromolecules, 1999. 32(1): p. 241-244.
41. Almany, L. and D. Seliktar, Biosynthetic hydrogel scaffolds made from fibrinogen and polyethylene glycol for 3D cell cultures. Biomaterials, 2005. 26(15): p. 2467-2477.
42. Ahearne, M., Introduction to cell–hydrogel mechanosensing. Interface focus, 2014. 4(2): p. 20130038.
43. Banerjee, A., K. Chatterjee, and G. Madras, Enzymatic degradation of polymers: a brief review. Materials Science and Technology, 2014. 30(5): p. 567-573.
44. Zhu, J. and R.E. Marchant, Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert review of medical devices, 2011. 8(5): p. 607-626.
45. Nicodemus, G.D. and S.J. Bryant, Cell encapsulation in biodegradable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2008. 14(2): p. 149-165.
46. Liu, J., et al., Fast-degradable microbeads encapsulating human umbilical cord stem cells in alginate for muscle tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2012. 18(21-22): p. 2303-2314.
47. Giraud, M.N., et al., Hydrogel‐based engineered skeletal muscle grafts normalize heart function early after myocardial infarction. Artificial organs, 2008. 32(9): p. 692-700.
48. Boontheekul, T., H.-J. Kong, and D.J. Mooney, Controlling alginate gel degradation utilizing partial oxidation and bimodal molecular weight distribution. Biomaterials, 2005. 26(15): p. 2455-2465.
49. Chatterjee, S. and P.C.-l. Hui, Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels: An Interdisciplinary Overview, in Hydrogels-Smart Materials for Biomedical Applications. 2018, IntechOpen.
50. Kloxin, A.M., et al., Tunable hydrogels for external manipulation of cellular microenvironments through controlled photodegradation. Advanced materials, 2010. 22(1): p. 61-66.
51. Tibbitt, M.W., et al., Controlled two-photon photodegradation of PEG hydrogels to study and manipulate subcellular interactions on soft materials. Soft matter, 2010. 6(20): p. 5100-5108.
52. Brown, T.E., I.A. Marozas, and K.S. Anseth, Amplified Photodegradation of Cell‐Laden Hydrogels via an Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer Reaction. Advanced Materials, 2017. 29(11): p. 1605001.
53. Kirschner, C.M., et al., Clickable, photodegradable hydrogels to dynamically modulate valvular interstitial cell phenotype. Advanced healthcare materials, 2014. 3(5): p. 649-657.
54. GRIFFIN, D.R., et al., Synthesis of Photodegradable Macromers for Conjugation and Release of Bioactive Molecules. Biomacromolecules, 2013. 14(4): p. 1199-1207.
55. Ooi, H., et al., Hydrogels that listen to cells: a review of cell-responsive strategies in biomaterial design for tissue regeneration. Materials Horizons, 2017. 4(6): p. 1020-1040.
56. Houk, J. and G.M. Whitesides, Structure-reactivity relations for thiol-disulfide interchange. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1987. 109(22): p. 6825-6836.
57. Lees, W.J. and G.M. Whitesides, Equilibrium constants for thiol-disulfide interchange reactions: a coherent, corrected set. The Journal of organic chemistry, 1993. 58(3): p. 642-647.
58. Kar, M., et al., Poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels with cell cleavable groups for autonomous cell delivery. Biomaterials, 2016. 77: p. 186-197.
59. Singer, S. and G.L. Nicolson, The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Membranes and Viruses in Immunopathology; Day, SB, Good, RA, Eds, 1972: p. 7-47.
60. Ishihara, K., Phospholipid polymers. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology. 2012, New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
61. Zwaal, R., P. Comfurius, and L. Van Deenen, Membrane asymmetry and blood coagulation. 1977.
62. Daemen, F., et al., Activity of Synthetic Phospholipid in Blood Coagulation. Thrombosis et diathesis haemorrhagica, 1965. 13: p. 194.
63. Jiang, S. and Z. Cao, Ultralow‐fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(9): p. 920-932.
64. Zwaal, R. and H.C. Hemker, Blood cell membranes and haemostasis. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, 1982. 11(1): p. 12-39.
65. Ishihara, K., et al., Modification of polysulfone with phospholipid polymer for improvement of the blood compatibility. Part 2. Protein adsorption and platelet adhesion. Biomaterials, 1999. 20(17): p. 1553-1559.
66. Kojima, M., et al., Interaction between phospholipids and biocompatible polymers containing a phosphorylcholine moiety. Biomaterials, 1991. 12(2): p. 121-124.
67. Wu, L., et al., Synthesis of a zwitterionic silane and its application in the surface modification of silicon-based material surfaces for improved hemocompatibility. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2010. 2(10): p. 2781-2788.
68. Ishihara, K., T. Ueda, and N. Nakabayashi, Preparation of phospholipid polymers and their properties as polymer hydrogel membranes. Polym J, 1990. 22(5): p. 355-360.
69. Kadoma, Y., et al., Synthesis and hemolysis test of polymer containing phosphorylcholine groups. Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 1978. 35(7): p. 423-427.
70. Iwasaki, Y., et al., Behavior of blood cells in contact with water‐soluble phospholipid polymer. Journal of biomedical materials research, 1999. 46(3): p. 360-367.
71. Nakaya, T., H. Toyoda, and M. Imoto, Polymeric Phospholipid Analogues XIII. Synthesis and Properties of Vinyl Polymers Containing Phosphatidyl Choline Groups. Polymer journal, 1986. 18(11): p. 881-885.
72. Lewis, A.L. and A.W. Lloyd, Biomedical Applications of Biomimetic Polymers: The Phosphorylcholine‐Containing Polymers. Biomimetic, Bioresponsive, and Bioactive Materials: An Introduction to Integrating Materials with Tissues, 2012: p. 95-140.
73. Tsuruta, T., Biomedical applications of polymeric materials. 1993: CRC.
74. Ishihara, K., Revolutionary advances in 2‐methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymers as biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2019. 107(5): p. 933-943.
75. Ishiyama, N., et al., Reduction of Peritendinous adhesions by hydrogel containing biocompatible phospholipid polymer MPC for tendon repair. JBJS, 2011. 93(2): p. 142-149.
76. Islam, M.M., et al., Functional fabrication of recombinant human collagen–phosphorylcholine hydrogels for regenerative medicine applications. Acta biomaterialia, 2015. 12: p. 70-80.
77. Liu, X., J.M. Holzwarth, and P.X. Ma, Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromolecular bioscience, 2012. 12(7): p. 911-919.
78. Freed, L.E., et al., Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bio/technology, 1994. 12(7): p. 689-693.
79. Hutmacher, D.W., Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues—state of the art and future perspectives. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 2001. 12(1): p. 107-124.
80. Becker, G. and F.R. Wurm, Breathing air as oxidant: Optimization of 2-chloro-2-oxo-1, 3, 2-dioxaphospholane synthesis as a precursor for phosphoryl choline derivatives and cyclic phosphate monomers. Tetrahedron, 2017. 73(25): p. 3536-3540.
81. Patai, S. and Z. Rappoport, The Chemistry of The Thiol Group. Handbook of Chemistry and Pysics, 1972.
82. Sorensen, H., et al., Chromatography and capillary electrophoresis in food analysis. 2007: Royal Society of Chemistry.
83. Yoshii, E., Cytotoxic effects of acrylates and methacrylates: relationships of monomer structures and cytotoxicity. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials and The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, 1997. 37(4): p. 517-524.
84. Zhou, Y., et al., A super-stretchable, self-healing and injectable supramolecular hydrogel constructed by a host–guest crosslinker. Biomaterials Science, 2020.
85. Yang, J., et al., Simple one pot preparation of chemical hydrogels from cellulose dissolved in cold LiOH/Urea. Polymers, 2020. 12(2): p. 373.
86. Kowalski, G., et al., Synthesis and effect of structure on swelling properties of hydrogels based on high methylated pectin and acrylic polymers. Polymers, 2019. 11(1): p. 114.
87. Kryscio, D.R. and N.A. Peppas, Surface imprinted thin polymer film systems with selective recognition for bovine serum albumin. Analytica chimica acta, 2012. 718: p. 109-115.
88. Ishihara, K., et al., Why do phospholipid polymers reduce protein adsorption? Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and the Australian Society for Biomaterials, 1998. 39(2): p. 323-330.
89. Kuo, Z.K., et al., Hydrophilic films: How hydrophilicity affects blood compatibility and cellular compatibility. Advances in Polymer Technology, 2018. 37(6): p. 1635-1642.
90. Kwon, D.H., et al., Glutathione induced immune-stimulatory activity by promoting M1-like macrophages polarization via potential ROS scavenging capacity. Antioxidants, 2019. 8(9): p. 413.
91. Wang, Y., et al., PHEMA hydrogel films crosslinked with dynamic disulfide bonds: synthesis, swelling-induced mechanical instability and self-healing. Polymer Chemistry, 2019. 10(35): p. 4844-4851.