博碩士論文 108221008 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:64 、訪客IP:3.238.117.130
姓名 鄭兆傑(Jhao-Jie Jheng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 數學系
論文名稱 藉由電子書學習系統探討學生線上學習準備度、線上學習行為與學習成果之間的關係-以微積分課程為例
相關論文
★ 中小學數學教師創意教學競賽金牌得獎作品可行性分析之個案研究★ 線上問卷調查開發應用與Matlab對於微積分學習成效之探討
★ 探討學生在不同學習環境下、線上學習系統之線上學習行為 與學業成績之間的關係-以微積分課程為例★ 中小學數學創意教學競賽實施之研究
★ 評分者對數學科創意教學觀點之比較 以中小學數學教師創意教學競賽為例★ 小波轉換於圖形比對的一種方法
★ 算術計算中誤解的文字或符號所造成的錯誤及影響★ 相同教學單元之創意作品所著重創意觀點與創意呈現之比較-以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 利用凌波轉換保護影像竄改及偵測還原★ 遊戲方式表現創意的教學策略之探討-以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 國小四、五年級分數運算錯誤類型分析之研究★ 因、倍數創意教學作品分析與比較-以「中小學數學教師創意教學競賽」作品為例
★ On the Positive Solution for Grad-Shafranov Equation★ 從微積分課後輔導,分析學生的數學學習問題:以一個助教的實例作探討
★ 評估學生自願使用e-portfolio對於提高課程表現的成效-以國立中央大學為例★ 線上討論的知識建構模式特徵 -以 批 踢 踢 實 業 坊 的 微 積 分 討 論 為 例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究主要透過電子書學習系統探討學生的「線上學習準備度」、「線上
學習行為」、「學習成果」與「自我評估」之間的相互關係,「線上學習準備度」中包含了電腦/網路的自我效能、自主學習、學習者控制、線上學習的動機、線上交流的自我效能等五個項目。
本研究挑選了中央大學 109 學年度選修微積分課程的部分學生共 429 人作為研究對象,擬制了一份問卷來測量學生的線上學習準備度與自我評估,並於本學期第二次會考時施策。
另外結合 BookRoll線上學習系統的後台數據與問卷的回饋結果,透過統計軟體 SPSS 統整出線上學習準備度、線上學習行為、學習成果與自我評估之間的相互關係。並運用結構方程模型(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)分析學生的線上學習準備度、線上學習行為與學習成果三者之間的架構與關聯性。
研究結果發現,學生的線上學習準備度對於學生的學習成果,為顯著正相
關;學生的線上學習行為對於學業成績,為顯著正相關。因此我們可以藉由學生的線上學習準備度以及在 BookRoll學習系統上的學習行為來預測學生的學習
成效。
摘要(英) The purpose of the research was to identify the relationship among students’
“online learning readiness”, “online learning behavior”, “learning outcomes” and
“self-assessment” through the e-book learning system. "Online learning readiness" includes five items: computer/internet self-efficacy, self-directed learning, learner
control, motivation for online learning, and online communication self-efficacy.
In this study, the 429 students who took the calculus course in the 109th academic year of Central University were selected as the subjects. A questionnaire was drawn up to measure students′ online learning readiness and self-assessment, and the questionnaire was sent during the second examination of this semester.
In addition, combined with the back-end data of the BookRoll online learning
system and the feedback from the questionnaire, the correlation between online learning readiness, online learning behavior, learning outcomes and self-assessment was summarized through the statistical software SPSS. And use structural equation
modeling (SEM) to analyze the structure and correlation between students′ online learning readiness, online learning behavior, and learning outcomes.
The results of the study were that students’ online learning readiness is significantly positively correlated with students’ learning outcomes; students’ online learning behaviors are significantly positively correlated with academic performance.
Therefore, we can predict students′ learning effectiveness based on their online learning readiness and their learning behavior on the BookRoll learning system.
academic year of Central University were selected as the subjects. A questionnaire was drawn up to measure students′ online learning readiness and self-assessment, and
the questionnaire was sent during the second examination of this semester.
In addition, combined with the back-end data of the BookRoll online learning
system and the feedback from the questionnaire, the correlation between online learning readiness, online learning behavior, learning outcomes and self-assessment was summarized through the statistical software SPSS. And use structural equation
modeling (SEM) to analyze the structure and correlation between students′ online learning readiness, online learning behavior, and learning outcomes.
The results of the study were that students’ online learning readiness is significantly positively correlated with students’ learning outcomes; students’ online learning behaviors are significantly positively correlated with academic performance.
Therefore, we can predict students′ learning effectiveness based on their online learning readiness and their learning behavior on the BookRoll learning system.
關鍵字(中) ★ 線上學習準備度
★ 線上學習行為
★ 自主學習
關鍵字(英) ★ Learning readiness
★ Online learning behavior
★ Self-directed learning
論文目次 中文摘要......................................................................................................................... i
Abstract .......................................................................................................................... ii
致謝.............................................................................................................................. iii
目錄............................................................................................................................... iv
圖目錄............................................................................................................................ v
表目錄........................................................................................................................... vi
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................................. 1
第一節 研究背景及動機.......................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的與問題.......................................................................................... 2
第三節 名詞定義與說明.......................................................................................... 3
第四節 研究範圍與限制.......................................................................................... 6
第二章 文獻探討.......................................................................................................... 7
第一節 線上學習準備度.......................................................................................... 7
第二節 線上學習...................................................................................................... 8
第三節 自主學習...................................................................................................... 9
第三章 研究方法與內容............................................................................................ 11
第一節 研究架構.................................................................................................... 11
第二節 研究對象.................................................................................................... 12
第三節 研究工具.................................................................................................... 12
第四節 研究流程.................................................................................................... 24
第四章 研究結果與分析............................................................................................ 25
第一節 「線上學習準備度」與「學習成果」之關係........................................ 26
第二節 「線上學習行為」與「學習成果」之關係............................................ 27
第三節 「線上學習準備度」與「線上學習行為」之關係................................ 33
第四節 「自我評估」與「學習成果」之關係.................................................... 37
第五節 結構方程模型............................................................................................ 38
第五章 結論與建議.................................................................................................... 47
第一節 問題與討論................................................................................................ 47
第二節 結論............................................................................................................ 51
第三節 建議............................................................................................................ 52
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 53
附錄.............................................................................................................................. 56
參考文獻 1. Shu-ShengLiaw, Hsiu-Mei Huang (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived
usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation
in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, Volume 60, Issue 1, 14-24.
2. Min-Ling Hung, Chien Chou, Chao-Hsiu Chen, Zang-Yuan Own (2010). Learner
readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions.
Computers & Education, Volume 55, Issue 3, 1080-1090.
3. Chin-His Lin, Yining Zhang, Binbin Zheng (2017). The roles of learning
strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation
modeling analysis. Computers & Education, Volume 113, 75-85.
4. Manuela Paechter, Brigitte Maier, Daniel Macher (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and
course satisfaction. Computers & Education, Volume 54, Issue 1, 222-229.
5. Jin-Young Kim (2010). A study on learners’ perceptional typology and
relationships among the learner’s types, characteristics, and academic achievement in a blended e-Education environment. Computers & Education,
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 304-315.
6. Waiman Cheung, Eldon Y. Li, Lester W. Yee (2003). Multimedia learning system and its effect on self-efficacy in database modeling and design: an exploratory
study. Computers & Education, Volume 41, Issue 3, 249-270.
7. Nixon, Martine, McKeown, & Ranson (2019). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Pages 49-50.
8. Rensis Likert, (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psychology. Pages 1-55.
9. Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of –fit in
the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. Pages 88, 588-606.
10. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their
invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin. Pages 97, 562-582.
11. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in
confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin.
Pages 103, 391-410.
12. Akpinar, Y., & Hartley, J. R. (1996). Designing interactive learning
environments. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 12(1), 33–46.
13. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.
14. Neyman, J. (1923). Sur les applications de la thar des probabilities aux
experiences Agaricales: Essay des principle. Excerpts reprinted (1990) in English
(D. Dabrowska and T. Speed, translators) in Statistical Science 5, 463-472.
15. 柴康偉(2011),探討學習動機、學習策略及學習滿意度對服務教育課程之
影響(The Study of Learning Motivations, Learning Strategies and Learning
Satisfactions of Service Education),遠東學報,第二十八卷第四期。
16. 許錫銘(1998),我國試辦綜合高中學生學習滿意度之研究,國立彰化師範
大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
17. 梁雲霞(2006),從自主學習理論到學校實務-概念架構與方案發展,當代
教育研究,第十四卷第四期,頁 171-206。
18. 張偉豪、鄭時宜 (2012),與結構方程模型共舞:曙光初現,前程文化。
19. 陳寬裕、王正華 (2011),論文統計分析實務/SPSS 與 AMOS 的運用
/Advanced statistical analysis using SPSS and AMOS,五南。
20. 吳明隆 (2011),SPSS 統計應用學習實務/問卷分析與應用統計,易習。
21. 林心茹譯(2003)。自律學習(譯自:B. J. Zimmerman, S. Bonner, R. Kovach: Developing Self-Regulated Learners.)。台北,遠流出版社。
22. 程炳林、林清山(2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研
究。中國 測驗學會測驗年刊,48(1),頁 1-41。
23. 程炳林(2002)。大學生學習工作動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教
育心理 學報,33(2), 頁 79-102。
24. 梁雲霞(2006)。從自主學習理論到學校實務:概念架構與方案發展,當代教
育研究, 14(4),171-206。
25. 陳品華(2004)。融入式介入方案對技職大學生自我調整學習之影響研究。
教育與心理 研究,27(1),159-180。
26. 劉佩雲(2000)。自我調整學習模式之驗證。教育與心理研究,23,173-
206。
27. 龐維國、薛慶國(2001)。中國古代的自主學習思想探析。心理科學,
24(1),59-62。
28. 陳茂祥(2001)。自我導向學習理論及其在成人教育上的啟示。朝陽學報,
6,65-89。
29. 教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
30. 黃曉梅(2017)。高中生英語自主學習、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以
桃園市為例(碩士論文)。
指導教授 蕭嘉璋 審核日期 2021-7-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明