伊斯蘭教義、所有權結構與成長機會對公司風險承擔影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：3.147.8.214

姓名

孫丕和(Pi-Ho Sun) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

伊斯蘭教義、所有權結構與成長機會對公司風險承擔影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例

相關論文

★ 宗教對公司治理及投資的影響--以印尼上市公司為例	★ 伊斯蘭教義公司治理與成長機會對公司風險承擔影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例
★ 伊斯蘭教義、公司治理與成長機會對資本結構影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例	★ 營運資金、固定資產投資與公司績效的關係－以印尼上市公司為例
★ 伊斯蘭教義、公司治理與成長機會對投資現金流量敏感度影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例	★ 伊斯蘭教義對資本結構與績效的影響 -以印尼公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文主要探討伊斯蘭教義、所有權結構與成長機會對公司風險承擔之影響，並以2012年至2019年印尼398間上市公司為樣本，共2262個觀察值進行實證分析。本文所有權結構分為內部人持股、政府持股、國內機構投資人持股與國外機構投資人持股進行分析討論。實證研究結果發現遵循伊斯蘭教義的公司有較低的風險承擔，但在所有權結構與遵循伊斯蘭教義交互作用上，僅有機構投資人持股比例越高對風險承擔越高，而國內機構投資人持股比例與風險承擔有顯著負相關。本文進一步分析成長機會的影響，發現高成長機會下，國外機構投資人持股比例與伊斯蘭教義對風險承擔有正向影響。顯示不同所有權身分對於成長機會所創造的經濟租追求會有不同的考量。越績效導向的所有權結構例如外資持股，越能中和保守的伊斯蘭教義對風險承擔的影響。本文在管理實務上有貢獻，亦即內隱的宗教信仰與外顯的公司治理機制是影響公司風險承擔的重要因素，投資人在制定投資決策時須加以權衡考量。

摘要(英)

This paper mainly discusses how Shariah (Islamic law), ownership structure, and growth opportunity affect the level of corporate risk taking, and uses 398 listed companies in Indonesia from 2012 to 2019 with a total of 2262 observations as sample for empirical analysis. This paper divided ownership structure into insider ownership, government ownership, Indonesian local institutional ownership and foreign institutional ownership for discussion. The empirical results found that companies that follow the Shariah (Islamic law) have lower risk-taking, but among the interaction between the ownership structure and the Shariah(Islamic law), only higher institutional ownership ratio have higher level of risk-taking, while Indonesian domestic institutional ownership ratio hold a significant negative correlation with risk taking. This article further analyzes the impact of growth opportunity and finds that under high growth opportunities, the foreign institutional ownership ratio and Shariah (Islamic law) have a positive impact on risk-taking. Shows that different type of ownership structure will have different considerations for the pursuit of economic rent which been created by growth opportunities. The more performance-oriented ownership structure, such as foreign shareholding, more able to neutralize the influence of conservative Shariah (Islamic law) on risk-taking. This paper contributes to management practices, that is, implicit religious beliefs and explicit corporate governance mechanisms are important factors that affect the company′s risk-taking. Investors must measure and consider when making investment decisions.

關鍵字(中)

★ 伊斯蘭教義
★ 所有權結構
★ 機構投資人、
★ 成長機會
★ 風險承擔

關鍵字(英)

★ Shariah (Islamic law)
★ Ownership structure
★ Institutional ownership
★ Growth opportunity
★ Risk-taking

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
第一章緒論 1
1-1研究目的與動機 1
1-2 論文架構 7
第二章文獻探討與研究假說 8
2-1伊斯蘭教義和風險承擔間的關係 8
2-2伊斯蘭教義與所有權結構對於風險承擔之間關係 9
2-2-1伊斯蘭教義與內部持股對風險承擔的影響 10
2-2-2伊斯蘭教義與政府持股對風險承擔的影響 11
2-2-3伊斯蘭教義與機構投資人持股對風險承擔的影響 13
2-2-4伊斯蘭教義與國內及國外機構投資人持股對風險承擔的影響 14
2-3 成長機會的影響 16
第三章研究方法 17
3-1資料來源與篩選 17
3-2模型建立 17
3-3 變數定義 18
第四章實證結果與分析 20
4-1 敘述性統計分析 20
4-2 迴歸分析 26
4-2-1 伊斯蘭教義對公司風險承擔之影響 26
4-2-2 伊斯蘭教義與內部人持股對公司風險承擔之影響 27
4-2-3 伊斯蘭教義與政府持股對公司風險承擔之影響 29
4-2-4 伊斯蘭教義與機構投資人持股對公司風險承擔之影響 30
4-2-5 伊斯蘭教義與國內機構投資人持股對公司風險承擔之影響 32
4-2-6 伊斯蘭教義與國外機構投資人持股對公司風險承擔之影響 33
4-2-7 成長機會的影響 35
4-3 穩健性分析 38
第五章結論與建議 48
5-1 結論 48
5-2 管理意涵與研究限制 49
參考文獻 50

參考文獻

1. Abdullah, N. A. I. N., Ali, M. M. and Haron, N. H. (2017). Ownership structure, firm value and growth opportunities: Malaysian evidence. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7378– 7382
2. Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M. and Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 154-181.
3. Al-Bassam, W.M. and Ntim, C.G. (2017). The Effect of Islamic Values on Voluntary Corporate Governance Disclosure: The Case of Saudi Listed Firms, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(2), 182-202.
4. Alonso, P. A., Iturriaga, F. J. L. and Sanz, J. A. R. (2005) Financial decisions and growth opportunities: a Spanish firm’s panel data analysis. Financial Economics, 15, 391–407
5. Ang, J. S. and Ding, D. K. (2006). Government ownership and the performance of government-linked companies: The case of Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 16, 64–88.
6. Barry, T. A., Lepetit, L. and Tarazi, A. (2011). Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks, Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(5), 1327-1340.
7. Berle, Adolf. A. and Means, Gardiner. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property
8. Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., and Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641-658.
9. Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O. and Hossain, M. (2020). Post-privatization state ownership and bank risk-taking: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, (forthcoming)
10. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1996). A Theory of Privatization”, Economic Journal, 106, 309-319.
11. Callen, J. L., and Fang, X. (2015). Religion and Stock Price Crash Risk, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50, 169-195.
12. Chaganti, R., and Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 479-491
13. Chen, J. Y., Huang, C. W., Chiu, C. H., Huang, Y. T., Wu, W. W. (2015). Switching kinetic of VCM-based memristor: evolution and positioning of nanofilament. Adv. Mater, 27, 5028-5033
14. Chevalier, A., Prasetyantoko, A. and Rokhim R. (2006). Foreign Ownership and Corporate Governance Practices in Indonesia, Mondialisationetre composition des gouvernances
15. Chun, S. E., & Lee, M. H. (2017). Corporate ownership structure and risk taking: Evidence from Japan, Journal of Governance and Regulation, 6(4), 39-52.
16. Denis, Diane K., and John J. McConnell. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 1–38
17. Derigs, U., and Marzban, S. (2008). Review and Analysis of Current Shariah-compliant Equity Screening Practices, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1, 285-303.
18. Díez-Esteban, J. M., Farinha, J. B., and García-Gómez, C. D. (2018). Are religion and culture relevant for corporate risk-taking? International evidence. Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 36-55.
19. Ernst & Young (2013) World Islamic banking competitiveness report 2012–2013: the transition begins.
20. Ferreira, M.A. and Matos, P. (2008). The colors of investors’ money: The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 499-533.
21. Firdaus, L. M. and Adhariani, D. (2017). Board of directors’ gender, managerial ownership and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(S), 281-297
22. Gugler, K., Mueller, D., and Yurtoglu, B. (2004). Corporate governance and globalization.Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 21-155.
23. Hasan, M., and Dridi, J. (2011). The effects of the global crisis on Islamic and conventional banks: A comparative study. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 2(2), 163-200.
24. Hayat, R., and Hassan, M. K. (2017). Does an Islamic label indicate good corporate governance?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 159-174.
25. Heaton, J. B., (2002). Managerial Optimism and Corporate Finance, Financial Management, 31, 3-45
26. Hilary, G., and Hui, K. W. (2009). Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? Journal of Financial Economics, 93(3), 455-473.
27. Huang, S. Y., Chung, Y. H., Chiu, A. A., and Chen, Y. C. (2015). Growth opportunity and risk: empirical investigation on earnings management decision. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(1-2), 299-309.
28. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
29. Jiambalvo, J., Rajgopal, S. and Venkatachalam, M. (2002). Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19 (1), 117–145
30. John, K., Litov, L., and Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk‐taking. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679-1728.
31. Kane, G. D. and Velury, U. (2004) The role of institutional ownership in the market for auditing services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 976-983.
32. King, T. H. D. and Wen, M. M. (2011) Shareholder governance, bondholder governance, and managerial risk-taking, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(3), 512-531.
33. Lee, E. J., Chae, J. and Lee, Y. K. (2018). Family ownership and risk taking, Finance Research Letters, 25, 69-75
34. Lee, S. (2002), Insider ownership and risk-taking behaviour at bank holding companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(7&8), 989–1005
35. Li, K., Griffin, D., Yue, H. and Zhao, L. (2013). How does Culture Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?, Journal of Corporate Finance, 23, 1-22.
36. Lin, S. L. and Lu, J. (2019). Institutional Investors and Corporate Performance: Insights from China. Sustainability, 11, 6010.
37. Mollah, S., Hassan, K., Al-Farooque, O., and Mobarek, A. (2017). The governance, risk-taking, and performance of Islamic banks, Journal of Financial Services Research, 51, 195–219
38. Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315
39. Najid, N. A. and Abdul Rahman, R. A. (2011). Government ownership and performance of Malaysian government-linked companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 61, 42–56.
40. Rhoades, D. L. and Rechner, P. L. (2001). The role of ownership and corporate governance factors in international entry mode selection. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(4), 309-326.
41. Safieddine, A. (2009). Islamic financial institutions and corporate governance: new insights for agency theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 142-158.
42. Sakawa, H.; Watanabel, N.; Duppati, G. and Faff, R. (2021). Institutional ownership and corporate risk-taking in Japanese listed firms. Appl. Econ, 53, 1899-1914.
43. Shin, I. and Park, S. (2020). Role of foreign and domestic institutional investors in corporate sustainability: Focusing on R & D investment. Sustainability, 12, 8745.
44. Volonté, C. (2015). Culture and corporate governance: The influence of language and religion in Switzerland, Management International Review, 55(1), 77-118.
45. Wright, P., Ferris, S. P., Sarin, A. and Awasthi, V. (1996). Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking, Acad. Management, 39(2), 441-463.
46. Zhu, W. Y. and Yang, J. W. (2016). State ownership, cross-border acquisition, and risk-taking: Evidence from China’s banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 71, 133-153.
47. Zouari, S. B. S.; Taktak, N. B. (2012). Ownership structure and financial performance in Islamic banks: Does bank ownership matter?. Economic Research Forum, 25-27

指導教授

洪榮華林翠蓉(Jung-Hua Hung Tsui-Jung Lin)

審核日期

2021-7-16

推文