摘要(英) |
With the popularization of higher education in Taiwan, whether can education improves intergenerational mobility and enable children to develop their careers more successful in the future. This article uses the data from the "Social Stratification" questionnaire of the Taiwan Social Change Survey to analysis. The main purpose of the research is to explore whether the expansion policy of higher education helps the intergenerational social classes move upward. Considering the importance of family background to personal class acquisition, this article also explores the influence of parental education to intergenerational upward mobility under the expansion of higher education. First, this research uses probit model to estimate the probability of higher education expansion policy to the intergenerational upward mobility of social classes. Three variables are selected to measure the expansion of higher education, including the number of universities, the period of higher education expansion, and multiple entrance program. Then, we decompose samples into two groups by parental education level, lower than senior high school degree (lower education group) and senior high school degree or above (higher education group). Finally, this study analyzes observation’s subjective classes, objective classes and monthly income deeply under higher education expansion by using the Ordinary Least Squares method.
The empirical results show that the expansion of higher education basically can positively affect intergenerational upward mobility. Moreover, the effects of higher education policies which implied before 1985 is more significant. However, the multiple entrance program causes a negative downward mobility. Families with parents of lower education makes the effect of upgrading offspring’s class more significant under the higher education expansion policy, also avoiding class reproduction. The complex multiple entrance program makes observation’s class be more unfavorable to move upward with lower education level families. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
王宏仁 (1999)。〈一九五○年代的台灣階級結構與流動初探〉。台灣社會研究季刊(36),1-35。
田弘華、田芳華 (2008)。〈大學多元入學制度下不同入學管道之大一新生特性比較〉。人文及社會科學集刊,20(4),481-511。
田芳華、傅祖壇 (2009)。〈大學多元入學制度:學生家庭社經背景與學業成就之比較〉。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),209-233。
吳乃德 (1997)。〈檳榔和拖鞋,西裝及皮鞋:台灣階級流動的族群差異及原因〉。臺灣社會學研究,137-167。
李浩仲、李文傑、連賢明 (2016)。〈多「錢」入學?從政大學生組成看多元入學〉。經濟論文,44(2),207-250。
林宗弘 (2007)。〈城市中國的無產化:中國城鎮居民階級結構的轉型與社會不平等,1979-2003〉。台灣社會學,101-153。
張宜君、林宗弘 (2015)。〈台灣的高等教育擴張與階級複製:混合效應維續的不平等〉。台灣教育社會學研究,15(2),85-129。
張苙雲 (2016)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2007第五期第三次問卷:階層組 (C00155_1)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00155_1-1
張瀞云 (2013)。〈台灣高等教育政策調整對社會公平面的影響〉。經濟論文叢刊, 41(4),443-484。
章英華 (2016)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2012第七期第二次:社會階層組 (C00223_1)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00223_1-1
莊奕琦、陳晏羚 (2011)。〈紈袴子弟與流氓教授:台灣的教育與階級流動〉。人文及社會科學集刊,23(1),61-91。
許嘉猷 (1989)。〈台灣代間社會流動初探:流動表的分析〉。伊慶春、朱瑞玲(編),台灣社會現象的分析,中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊,517-549。
許嘉猷、黃毅志 (2002)。〈跨越階級界限?:兼論「黑手變頭家」的實證研究結果及與歐美社會之一些比較〉。臺灣社會學刊,1-59。
郭祐誠、陶宏麟 (2013)。〈高中職多元入學管道選擇與家庭背景及學習表現之關係——兼論多元入學的公平與效率〉。人文及社會科學集刊,25(3),421-456。
陳舜芬 (1991)。〈光復後台灣地區高等教育設校政策之探討〉,載於賴澤涵(主編),光復後臺灣地區發展經驗,205-237,臺北市: 中央研究院社科所。
傅仰止 (2019)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2017第七期第三次:社會階層組 (C00339_1)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00339_1-3
彭莉惠、熊瑞梅、紀金山 (2011)。〈臺灣高等教育擴張對職業成就的影響:世代、性別、性別化科系與初職社經地位的取得〉。台灣教育社會學研究,11(2),47-85。
黃銘福、黃毅志 (2014)。〈臺灣地區出身背景、國中學業成績與高中階段教育分流之關聯〉。教育實踐與研究,67-98。
葉高華 (2018)。〈大學多元入學是否有利「家境好」的學生?〉。臺灣社會學刊,171-195。
蔡淑鈴 (2004)。〈高等教育的擴展對教育機會分配的影響〉。台灣社會學,47-88。
蔡瑞明 (1999)。〈台灣、美國與日本社會流動的結構分析〉。臺灣社會學刊,83-125。
鄭英耀、方德隆、莊勝義、陳利銘、劉敏如 (2015)。〈大學經濟弱勢學生入學及就學扶助政策分析與建議〉。教育科學研究期刊,1-19。
駱明慶 (2018)。〈誰是臺大學生?(2001~2014)——多元入學的影響〉。經濟論文叢刊,47-95。
藍佩嘉 (2014)。〈做父母、做階級:親職敘事、教養實作與階級不平等〉。台灣社會學,97-140。
二、英文部分
Carmichael, F. (2000). “Intergenerational mobility and occupational status in Britain.” Applied Economics Letters, 7(6), 391-396.
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., Saez, E., & Turner, N. (2014). “Is the United States still a land of opportunity? Recent trends in intergenerational mobility.” American Economic Review, 104(5), 141-47.
Corak, M., Lindquist, M. J., & Mazumder, B. (2014). “A comparison of upward and downward intergenerational mobility in Canada, Sweden and the United States.” Labour Economics, 30, 185-200.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). “Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden.” The British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415-441.
Ganzeboom, H. B., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). “Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.” Social science research, 25(3), 201-239.
Hendrickx, J. (2002). “ISCO: Stata module to recode 4 digit ISCO-68 occupational codes.” Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s425801
Lichtenstein, J. (2014). “Demographic characteristics of business owners.” Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, Issue Brief,(2).
Long, J., & Ferrie, J. (2013). “Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850.” American Economic Review, 103(4), 1109-37.
Long, J., & Ferrie, J. (2018). “Grandfathers matter (ed): occupational mobility across three generations in the US and Britain, 1850–1911.” The Economic Journal, 128(612), F422-F445.
Lucal, B. (1994). “Class Stratification in Introductory Textbooks: Relational or Distributional Models?” Teaching Sociology, 139-150.
Majumder, R. (2010). “Intergenerational mobility in educational and occupational attainment: A comparative study of social classes in India.” Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 4(4), 463-494.
Maoz, Y. D., & Moav, O. (1999). “Intergenerational mobility and the process of development.” The Economic Journal, 109(458), 677-697.
Schuetze, H. J. (2015). “Self-employment and retirement in Canada: The labour force dynamics of older workers.” Canadian Public Policy, 41(1), 65-85.
Stevens, G. (1986). “Sex-differentiated patterns of intergenerational occupational mobility.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 153-163. |