CSR績效對CSR揭露量之影響：以社會參與面向為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：18.119.107.161

姓名

周宇生(Yu-Shen Chou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

CSR績效對CSR揭露量之影響：以社會參與面向為例
(The Impacts of CSR Performance on Quantity of CSR Disclosure: The Empirical Evidence of Social Participation)

相關論文

★ 利害關係人包容性：企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討	★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例	★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響	★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性	★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素	★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例	★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響：以企業社會責任願景為調節變數	★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果	★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇：選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究之目的在於探討企業在社會責任領域之績效表現將如何影響其企業社會責任（Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR）報告書中資訊揭露量，以及CSR治理措施在其中的調節效果。本研究以2014年至2019年間天下企業公民獎獲獎之國內企業為樣本，挑選企業在社會參與構面之得分衡量其社會績效。以自願性揭露理論及合法性理論為基礎，預期CSR績效分別會正負向影響企業所揭露之CSR資訊量。研究結果顯示，社會參與績效較高的企業為表明自身績效之優越性，因此傾向揭露較多相關領域之資訊，而對於非社會參與相關資訊之揭露量則無影響。除此之外，當企業之CSR治理越佳，亦即當企業有召開CSR專題會議或企業內負責CSR事務之單位或人員有直接向董事會報告其推動情形時，表示企業將CSR事務視為重要議題，此時社會參與績效對社會參與資訊揭露量之影響程度將因此增強。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to explore how a company’s performance in the field of social responsibility will affect the quantity of information disclosed in its corporate social responsibility (CSR) report; and to test whether CSR governance perform a moderating effect on the link. The sample of this study is the domestic companies that have won the Excellent in Corporate Social Responsibility Award from 2014 to 2019, the scores of companies in the social participation dimension are selected to measure their social performance. Based on voluntary disclosure theory and legality theory, it is expected that CSR performance will positively and negatively affect the quantity of CSR information disclosed by the company. The empirical results of the study show that companies with higher social participation performance are to show the superiority of their own performance, so they tend to expose more information in related fields, but have no effect on the quantity of non-social participation related information. In addition, when a company holds a CSR conference or the committee or manager responsible for CSR affairs in the company directly reports its promotion to the board of directors, it means that the company regards CSR affairs as an important topic. The impact of social participation performance on the quantity of social information disclosure will therefore increase.

關鍵字(中)

★ CSR揭露量
★ CSR治理
★ CSR績效
★ 社會參與

關鍵字(英)

★ CSR Disclosure Quantity
★ CSR Governance
★ CSR Performance
★ Social Participation

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
圖目錄 iv
表目錄 v
第一章緒論 1
第二章假說發展 3
第一節制度背景 3
第二節文獻與假說 4
第三章研究方法 10
第一節樣本選取與資料來源 10
第二節實證模型 13
第三節變數衡量 16
第四章實證結果 24
第一節敘述性統計 24
第二節相關性檢定 26
第三節迴歸結果與討論 28
第四節穩健性測試 35
第五章結論與建議 39
第一節研究結論 39
第二節研究貢獻 39
第三節研究限制與建議 40
參考文獻 41
附錄 45

參考文獻

吳幸蓁與廖蕙儀，2017，自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果，中山管理評論，第25卷第1期：13-62。（Wu, Shing-Jen and Hui-Yi Liao. 2017. The determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure. Sun Yat-sen Management Review 25(1):13-62.）
祝道松、盧正宗、洪晨桓與楊秀萍，2008，環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響，當代會計，第9卷第2期：237-270。（Zhu, Dauw Song, Cheng Tsung Lu, Chen Huan Hong and Xiu Ping Yang. 2008. The effect of environmental performance on environmental disclosure and economic performance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting 9(2):237-270.）
張元、涂峻瑋與許敏政，2017，社會責任表現較佳的公司有較低的股價崩盤風險嗎?—來自上海證券交易所的證據，兩岸金融季刊，第5卷第2期：23-66。（Chang, Yuan, Chun-Wei Tu and Ming-Cheng Hsu. 2017. Does social responsibility help decreasing stock price crash risk?— evidence from listed companies on Shanghai Stock Exchange. Cross-Sreait Banking and Finance 5(2):23-66.）
黃瓊瑤、張瑞元與林金賢，2014，企業社會責任揭露對權益資金成本之影響，臺灣企業績效學刊，第7卷第2期：103-124。（Huang, Chung-Yao, Ruei-Yuan Chang and Chin-Shien Lin. 2014. The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on the cost of equity capital. Taiwan Bussiness Performance Journal 7(2):103-124.）
劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿，2014，企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究，2014 第 17 屆科際整合管理研討會論文集：17-30。（Liu, Mei-Ying, Pi-Hui Ting and Huan-Yu Chu. 2014. A study of the relationship among corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and corporate performance. 2014 The 17th Conference on Interdisciplinary and Multifunctional Business Management 17-30.）
Abu Qa’dan, M. B., and M. S. Suwaidan. 2019. Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal 15(1): 28–46.
Akhtaruddin, M., and H. Haron. 2010. Board ownership, audit committees’ effectiveness, and corporate voluntary disclosures. Asian Review of Accounting 18(3): 245–259.
Al-Gamrh, B. A. 2016. Firm characteristics and corporate social responsibility disclosure in Saudi Arabia. International Business Management 10(18): 4283-4291.
Ali, W., J. G. Frynas, and Z. Mahmood. 2017. Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review: determinants of CSR disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24(4): 273–294.
Appuhami, R., and S. Tashakor. 2017. The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review 27(4): 400–420.
Barako, D. G., and A. M. Brown. 2008. Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management & Governance 12(4): 309–324.
Bednárová, M., R. Klimko, and E. Rievajová. 2019. From environmental reporting to environmental performance. Sustainability 11(9): 2549.
Birjandi, H., B. Hakemi, and M. M. M. Sadeghi. 2015. The study effect agency theory and signaling theory on the level of voluntary disclosure of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 6(1), 174-185.
Bueno, G., R. Marcon, A. L. Pruner-da-Silva, and F. Ribeirete. 2018. The role of the board in voluntary disclosure. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 18(5): 886–910.
Chan, M. C., J. Watson, and D. Woodliff. 2014. Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 125(1): 59–73.
Cho, C. H., R. P. Guidry, A. M. Hageman, and D. M. Patten. 2012. Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(1): 14–25.
Cho, C. H., and D. M. Patten. 2007. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7–8): 639–647.
Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23(3): 70.
Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D. Richardson, and F. P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4–5): 303–327.
Clarkson, P. M., M. B. Overell, and L. Chapple. 2011. Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus 47(1): 27–60.
De Villiers, C., and A. Marques. 2016. Corporate social responsibility, country-level predispositions, and the consequences of choosing a level of disclosure. Accounting and Business Research 46(2): 167–195.
Deegan, C. 2002. Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(3): 282–311.
Doan, M. H., and R. Sassen. 2020. The relationship between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 24(5): 1140–1157.
Elmaghrabi, M. E. 2021. CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
Gamerschlag, R., K. Möller, and F. Verbeeten. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science 5(2–3): 233–262.
Giannarakis, G. 2014. The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management 56(5): 393–416.
Hassan, A., and X. Guo. 2017. The relationships between reporting format, environmental disclosure and environmental performance: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 18(4): 425–444.
Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics 31(1-3): 405-440.
Hummel, K., and C. Schlick. 2016. The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(5): 455–476.
Jensen, C., and H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jizi, M. I., A. Salama, R. Dixon, and R. Stratling. 2014. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics 125(4): 601–615.
Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto. 2011. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 103(3): 351–383.
Johl, S. K., S. Kaur, and B. J. Cooper. 2015. Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian public listed firms. Journal of Economics, Business and Management 3(2): 239–243.
Kauffeld, S., and N. Lehmann-Willenbrock. 2012. Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research 43(2): 130–158.
Khan, A., M. B. Muttakin, and J. Siddiqui. 2013. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics 114(2): 207–223.
Khan, H. 2010. The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management 52(2): 82–109.
Laksmana, I. 2008. Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(4): 1147–1182.
Lang, M., and L. Stice-Lawrence. 2015. Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60(2–3): 110–135.
Lock, I., and P. Seele. 2016. CSR governance and departmental organization: A typology of best practices. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 16(1): 211–230.
Lubis, H., K. Pratama, I. Pratama, and A. Pratami. 2019. A systematic review of corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 6(9): 415-428.
Luong, A., and S. G. Rogelberg. 2005. Meetings and more meetings: The relationship between meeting load and the daily well-being of employees. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 9(1): 58–67.
Nazari, J. A., K. Hrazdil, and F. Mahmoudian. 2017. Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 13(2): 166–178.
Nguyen, T. H. H., M. H. Elmagrhi, C. G. Ntim, and Y. Wu. 2021. Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Nilipour, A., T.A. De Silva, &, X. Li. 2020. The readability of sustainability reporting in New Zealand over time. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal 14(3): 86–107.
Omair Alotaibi, K., and K. Hussainey. 2016. Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: Evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 13(4): 364–393.
Patten, D. M. 1992. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5): 471–475.
Patten, D. M. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(8): 763–773.
Pham, H. S. T., and H. T. Tran. 2020. CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. Journal of Business Research 120: 127–136.
Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., and I. Gallego‐Álvarez. 2019. An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(3): 612–627.
Reverte, C. 2009. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics 88(2): 351–366.
Saeed, A., U. Noreen, A. Azam, and M. Tahir. S. 2021. Does CSR governance improve social sustainability and reduce the carbon footprint: International evidence from the energy sector. Sustainability 13(7): 3596.
Van Buskirk, A. 2012. Disclosure frequency and information asymmetry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 38(4): 411–440.
Veliyath, R. 1999. Top management compensation and shareholder returns: Unravelling different models of the relationship. Journal of Management Studies 36(1): 123–143.
Wang, Z., and J. Sarkis. 2017. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 1607–1616.
Zhai, J., and Y. Wang. 2016. Accounting information quality, governance efficiency and capital investment choice. China Journal of Accounting Research 9(4): 251–266.

指導教授

陳建中(Chien-Chung Chen)

審核日期

2021-7-8

推文