員工知覺主管轉換型、交易型領導風格 對離職傾向之影響—以工作動機為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：97

、訪客IP：3.135.206.240

姓名

連怡琇(Yi-Hsiu Lien) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

員工知覺主管轉換型、交易型領導風格對離職傾向之影響—以工作動機為中介變項
(Work motivation as a mediator of the relationship between employee-perceived transformational, transactional leadership and turnover intention.)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來轉換型領導於管理領域中備受推崇，觀察發現在以獲利為目標的企業環境下，交易型領導對部屬亦具相當的激勵效果，因此本研究以台灣企業為研究對象，探討員工知覺主管轉換型領導、交易型領導風格對於工作動機，與離職傾向的影響，提供領導者選擇領導方式的參考，以期在管理實務上有所幫助。
本研究以台灣的企業員工為樣本蒐集309份有效問卷，研究結果顯示對金融業務從業人員而言，交易型領導對於工作動機有顯著的影響效果。交易型領導，可經由增加外在工作動機的影響，獲得減少部屬離職傾向的效果，外在工作動機的中介效果成立。交易型領導無法經由內在工作動機，影響離職傾向。轉換型領導對「外在工作動機-薪酬」，有低度顯著負影響效果。轉換型領導，無法經由工作動機的影響，獲得減少部屬離職傾向的效果。

摘要(英)

Transformational leadership style has been highly practiced in the field of management over the past decades. It has been observed that transactional leadership style would also enhance employee motivations effectively within profit-oriented organizations. This study examines profit-oriented Taiwanese companies, and the purpose of this research is to explore the motivational effects of both two leadership styles, transformational leadership and transactional leadership, on employees. Also try to find out whether work motivation has a significant impact on turnover intention or not. This study is of vital importance for the management to better understand the importance of motivation in employees and to reduce their turnover.
Using a questionnaire survey, with Taiwanese employees as the research object, a total of 309 valid questionnaires were obtained. The research results indicate that transactional leadership has a significant effect on work motivation in the field of financial industry. Extrinsic motivation mediated the effect of transaction leadership on turnover intention. Transformational leadership has a significant negative effect on the "external motivation-salary" motivation. Work motivation does not mediate the effects of transformational leadership on turnover intention. Transformational leadership does not reduce turnover intention through the impact on work motivation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 金融業
★ 轉換型領導領導
★ 交易型領導
★ 工作動機
★ 離職傾向

關鍵字(英)

★ financial industry work motivation,
★ transformational leadership
★ transactional leadership
★ work motivation
★ turnover intention.

論文目次

摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
致謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 2
二、文獻探討 3
2-1轉換型領導 4
2-2交易型領導 5
2-3工作動機 6
2-3-1 需求層次理論 6
2-3-2 雙因子理論 7
2-3-3 期望理論 7
2-3-4 公平理論 7
2-3-5 內、外在工作動機理論 8
2-4 離職傾向 10
2-4-1員工離職決策過程模式 10
2-5 研究假說 10
2-5-1 轉換型領導、交易型領導與內、外在工作動機之間關係 11
2-5-2 內、外在工作動機與離職傾向之間的關係 11
三、研究方法 13
3-1 研究架構 13
3-2 變項衡量及問卷設計 13
3-2-1 轉換型領導 13
3-2-2 交易型領導 14
3-2-3 內在工作動機、外在工作動機 15
3-2-4 離職傾向 17
3-2-5 控制變項 17
3-3 資料蒐集與分析方法 17
3-3-1 資料蒐集方法 17
3-3-2 資料分析方法 17
四、研究結果 19
4-1 敘述性分析 19
4-2 信度和效度分析 21
4-3 相關分析 24
4-4假說驗證分析 26
五、結論與建議 28
5-1 研究結論 28
5-2 管理意涵 29
5-3 研究限制 30
六、參考文獻 31

參考文獻

一、英文文獻
〔1〕 Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
〔2〕 Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human resource management review, 3(3), 185-201.
〔3〕 Avolio, J. B., & Bass, M. B. (2002). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sample set. Mind garden..
〔4〕 Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.
〔5〕 Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
〔6〕 Barbuto Jr, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
〔7〕 .Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
〔8〕 Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
〔9〕 Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
〔10〕 Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press.
〔11〕 Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. sage
〔12〕 Burns, J. M. G. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
〔13〕 Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. J. M. b. r. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. 40(2), 235-259.
〔14〕 De Charms, R. (2013). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior: Routledge
〔15〕 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Intrinsic motivation. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-2.
〔16〕 Deci, E. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational behavior and human performance, 8(2), 217-229.
〔17〕 Fernandez, S., Cho, Y. J., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 308-323.
〔18〕 Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS. MCGRAW-HILL SERIES IN MANAGEMENT.
〔19〕 George, L., & Sabhapathy, T. (2010). Work Motivation of Teachers: Relationship with Transformational and Transactional Leadership Behavior of College Principals. Academic Leadership Journal, 8(2), 201-207.
〔20〕 Guzzo, R. A. (1979). Types if rewards, cognitions, and work motivation. Academy of Management, 4(1), 75-86.
〔21〕 Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159.
〔22〕 Holland, B. K. (1989, September-October). Motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Property Management, 54(5), 32-36.
〔23〕 House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: Sage publications.
〔24〕 Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (January 01, 2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 5, 755-68.
〔25〕 Kamery, R. H. (2004). Employee motivation as it relates to effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, and performance. In Proceedings of the Academy of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues (Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 139-144).
〔26〕 Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of educational psychology, 97(2), 184.
〔27〕 Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(4), 408.
〔28〕 Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237.
〔29〕 Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization science, 11(5), 538-550.
〔30〕 Pintrich, R. P., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation In Education. Theory, Research, and Application. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
〔31〕 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers′ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
〔32〕 Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
〔33〕 Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover James L. Price. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press..
〔34〕 Reid, W. M., & Dold, C. J. (2018). Burns, Senge, and the Study of Leadership. Open Journal of Leadership, 7, 1, 89-116.
〔35〕 Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of general psychology, 8(3), 179-193..
〔36〕 Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (Vol. 4): New Jersey: Pearson Education.
〔37〕 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
〔38〕 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
〔39〕 Schaffer, B. (2008). Leadership and motivation. Supervision, 69(2), 6.
〔40〕 Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research.
〔41〕 Williams, L. J., & O′Boyle Jr, E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233-242.
〔42〕 White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297.
〔43〕 Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human relations, 43(10), 975-995.

二、中文文獻

〔1〕方慈霞（2011)。領導風格、工作動機對工作投入之影響-以組織公平為調節變項（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
〔2〕吳治勳、陳慶餘、許志成、吳英璋（2016)。臺灣老化態度量表之編製與心理計量特性。中華心理衛生學刊，29(2)，159-186。
〔3〕房美玉（2002)。台灣半導體產業之組織文化對於內外工作動機與工作績效及工作滿意度間關連性的影響。管理評論，21(3)，69-96。
〔4〕彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
〔5〕彭慧純（2011)。人力資源專業人員之專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之關係探討（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學
〔6〕黃英忠、董玉娟、林義屏（2006)。台商派駐大陸已婚員工離開現職傾向之研究：工作－家庭衝突理論之觀點。管理評論，20(3)，85-122。
〔7〕施妤璇（2006）。轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向之研究-以組織承諾為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學。
〔8〕張偉豪，鄭時宜（2012），與結構方程式模型共舞－曙光初現，新北市，前程文化。
〔9〕蔡培村、武文英（2013)。領導學-理論、實務與研究。高雄市：麗文文化。
〔10〕賴秋芬（2014) 組織鑲嵌及主管領導風格對組織承諾及行員創新行為的影響-以台北地區某銀行為例（未出版之碩士論文)。經國管理暨健康學院。

指導教授

陳明園

審核日期

2021-7-2

推文