博碩士論文 108524003 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:147 、訪客IP:18.118.148.178
姓名 劉宸穎(Chen-Ying Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣
(Design and Practice of Betterment-Driven Writing Activity to Enhance Elementary School Students′ Writing Quality and Writing Interest)
相關論文
★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學:透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島:興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園:學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ TTPR:設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙★ 設計與實作數位化教室環境的教室伺服器
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 先前研究透過「興趣驅動創造者理論」(Interest-Driven Creator Theory)的概念,結合先前研究團隊所針對的主題閱讀與自由寫和同儕回應設計「明日寫作」活動與平台,結果指出有助於增進學生寫作品質,但學生在草稿的文章結構不夠清晰且寫作想法不太足夠。為進一步提升學生的寫作品質,許多研究顯示畫心智圖是作為寫作前具有效果的教學策略之一,能增進學生的寫作表現與寫作興趣,且學生對寫作主題的興趣與具備寫作主題的知識背景,可以讓學生的寫作品質更好。因此,本研究延續透過「興趣驅動創造者理論」的概念,設計與實踐「明日寫作」第二版又名為「提升式寫作」 (Betterment-Driven Writing, BDW) 的活動,增加心智圖與閱讀主題文章還有給予學生第二次同儕回應以希望提升學生寫作品質與寫作興趣。本研究為探討學生經過「提升式寫作」活動對學生寫作品質與寫作興趣的影響,將進行「明日寫作」活動的學生(n=24)與進行「提升式寫作」活動的學生(n=29)之文章比較,最後透過興趣問卷探討學生的寫作興趣與探討寫作興趣與寫作品質的相關性,還有透過觀察與訪談瞭解學生真實的想法。
  歸納量化與質性的研究資料發現:「提升式寫作」活動可以幫助學生寫得越來越好且有顯著成長,多了心智圖、閱讀主題文章、第二次同儕回應這幾個步驟有效提升學生在寫作品質的成長,並且透過此活動,學生也會覺得有成就感且越來越喜歡寫作,學生的寫作品質也與寫作興趣有相關。
摘要(英) Previous studies designed the "writing for tomorrow" activity and platform through the concept of "interest driven creator theory" combined with the theme reading and free writing and peer response of previous research team. The results show that it is helpful to improve students′ writing quality, but the students′ writing structure in the draft is not clear enough and their writing ideas are not enough. In order to further improve students′ writing quality. Many studies have shown that mind mapping is one of the effective teaching as a pre-writing strategies, which can enhance students′ writing performance and interest, and students′ interest in writing topics and knowledge background of writing topics can make students′ writing quality better. Therefore, this study continues to design and practice the second edition of "writing for tomorrow", also known as "Betterment-Driven Writing" (BDW), through the concept of "interest driven creator theory", to increase mind mapping and reading topic articles, and to give students a second peer response in the hope of improving their writing quality and interest. In order to explore the influence of students′ "Betterment-Driven Writing" activities on their writing quality and interest, this study compares the articles of students who are engaged in "writing for tomorrow" (n = 24) and those who are engaged in "Betterment-Driven Writing" (n = 29). Finally, through the interest questionnaire, this study explores the relationship between students′ writing interest and writing quality. In addition, through observation and interview to understand students′ real ideas.
  Based on the quantitative and qualitative research data, it is found that the activity of "Betterment-Driven Writing" can help students write better and better and have significant growth. The steps of mind mapping, reading topic articles and second peer response can effectively improve the growth of students′ writing quality. Through this activity, students will also feel a sense of achievement and like writing more and more, Students′ writing quality is also related to their writing interest.
關鍵字(中) ★ 興趣驅動創造者理論
★ 主題閱讀與自由寫
★ 心智圖
★ 同儕回應
★ 寫作品質
★ 寫作興趣
關鍵字(英) ★ Interest-Driven Creator Theory
★ theme-based reading and free writing
★ mind map
★ peer response
★ writing quality
★ writing interest
論文目次 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 IX
表目錄 XII
第一章、緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的 4
1.4 名詞解釋 4
1.4.1 主題閱讀與自由寫 4
1.4.2 心智圖 4
1.4.3 同儕回應 5
1.5 論文架構 5
第二章、文獻探討 7
2.1 讀寫素養 7
2.2 寫作歷程 9
2.2.1 成果導向式寫作 9
2.2.2 過程導向式寫作 10
2.3 寫作鷹架 15
2.3.1 文字鷹架 15
2.3.2 圖形鷹架 16
2.3.3 社會鷹架 17
2.4 寫作興趣 19
第三章、活動與系統設計 23
3.1 理論背景 23
3.1.1 「興趣驅動創造者」理論(Interest-Driven Creator Theory) 23
3.2 活動設計原則 26
3.3 系統設計與開發 29
3.3.1 電腦輔助寫作 29
3.3.2 系統開發與架構 30
3.4 「提升式寫作」(BETTERMENT-DRIVEN WRITING, BDW)活動系統流程功能介紹 31
3.4.1 教師端 31
3.4.2 學生端 39
第四章、研究方法與分析 51
4.1 研究問題 51
4.2 研究對象與環境 51
4.3 研究工具 54
4.3.1 寫作創意評分指標 54
4.3.2 心智圖評分指標 57
4.3.3 同儕回應分析量表 61
4.3.4 寫作興趣問卷設計 63
4.3.5 觀察與訪談 65
4.4 研究流程 66
4.5 資料蒐集、處理與分析 70
4.5.1 資料蒐集過程 70
4.5.2 資料處理過程 70
4.5.3 資料分析方法 72
第五章、研究結果與討論 75
5.1 寫作品質 75
5.1.1 「提升式寫作」各步驟文章分析結果 75
5.1.2 心智圖對寫作品質影響 81
5.1.3 同儕回應內容分析 91
5.2 寫作興趣 93
5.2.1 寫作興趣與寫作品質的相關 94
5.3 教學現場觀察 97
5.4 訪談資料分析 100
第六章 結論與未來展望 109
6.1 結論與討論 109
6.1.1 學生在「提升式寫作」(Betterment-Driven Writing, BDW)活動中每一步驟的寫作品質成效為何? 109
6.1.2 「提升式寫作」(Betterment-Driven Writing, BDW)活動裡增加心智圖步驟之後,對學生寫作品質的影響為何? 110
6.1.3 「提升式寫作」(Betterment-Driven Writing, BDW)活動裡增加名家文章、第二次同儕回應步驟之後,學生的看法為何? 110
6.1.4 學生在「提升式寫作」活動的寫作興趣為何? 111
6.1.5 學生的寫作興趣與學生的寫作品質之間關係為何? 111
6.2 研究限制 112
6.3 未來展望 112
參考文獻 115
中文文獻 115
英文文獻 117
附錄一 125
附錄二 127
參考文獻 Buzan, T. (2018).世界最強的思考武器-心智圖:大腦最愛這樣想事情。15張以上圖解、99項實例應用,從學生考高分,到100強企業,超過百萬人使用(黃貝玲譯).大是文化。(原著出版於2018)
Goldberg, N. (2014).療癒寫作:啟動靈性的書寫秘密(丁凡譯).心靈工坊。(原著出版於2013)
王小萍(2015).高中生寫作表現與作文長度, 寫作創意之研究.資優教育季刊, (136), 25-36。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2015.136.25-38
王振漢(2015).整合式同儕回應對學生寫作之影響:遊戲情境與非遊戲情境[未發表之博士論文].國立中央大學資訊工程研究所。
吳宣宏(2009).國小寫作想法產出之大量閱讀與自由寫數位學習活動設計與探討[未發表之碩士論文].國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
李宜蓁(2013).讀報結合心智圖寫作教學對國小四年級寫作能力與態度影響之研究[未發表之碩士論文].國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
汪慶雲(2005).對國小學生自然領域學習態度與成就影響之研究[未發表之碩士論文].國立高雄師範大學國文學系。
林汶葶(2020).設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現[未發表之碩士論文].國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
林嘉玲(2003).七年級學生健康與體育相關概念之行動研究[未發表之碩士論文].國立體育學院運動科學研究所。
林嘉琪, 黃詩媛, 詹雨臻, & 陳學志(2019).創造思考寫作教學對國中生創造力, 寫作能力之影響.創造學刊,9(2),27-45。
柯華葳(2013).閱讀是新世紀必要的學習管道.人文與社會科學簡訊,14(4),4-11。
柯華葳、張郁雯、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2017).PIRLS 2016 臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養國家報告.桃園:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
孫易新(2014).心智圖法理論與應用.商周出版。
徐仕勳(2014).整合主題閱讀與自由寫之數位寫作環境(何艾模式):從設計到評估 [未發表之碩士論文].國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
莊景益(2007).心智繪圖結合摘要教學法與寫作教學法對國小四年級學生閱讀理解與寫作能力之行動研究[未發表之碩士論文].國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所。
陳弘昌(1999).國小語文科教學研究.五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
陳柏熹(2011).心理與教育測驗: 測驗編製理論與實務.精策教育。
陳鳳如(1999).閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式驗證及其教學效果之研究[未發表之博士論文].國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
陳鳳如(2017).平衡歷程與成果取向之寫作教學的理念與應用.教育研究月刊,(279),15-32。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017070279002
黃一泓, & 王貞雯(2011).以心智圖做為筆記工具對國小五年級學生在數學科的學習成效之研究. 教育科學期刊,10(2),91-114。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201112.0091
廖長彥, 陳秉成, 張菀真, & 陳德懷(2017).透過同儕回應寫作環境培養國小學生的讀者意識.數位學習科技期刊, 9(4),25-51。 https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2017100904002
劉中琪, 廖長彥, & 陳德懷(2013).我的寵物打字: 心流式打字遊戲的設計與評估.數位學習科技期刊,5(2),27-44。https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2013040502002
蔡青橋(2016).國小高年級學生寫作表現與寫作創意相關指標之研究.資優教育季刊,(139),23-33。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2016.139.23-33
錢昭君, & 張世彗(2010).心智圖法寫作教學方案對國小學生創造力及寫作表現之影響.特殊教育學報,(32),79-99。https://doi.org/10.6768/JSE.201012.0079
謝易泰(2013).設計與實踐同儕「聊作品」活動以提升低年級學生塗鴉寫作能力 [未發表之碩士論文].國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
魏靜雯(2004).心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響[未發表之碩士論文].國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
羅吉希(2020). 6+ 1 寫作指標對素養導向寫作評量的啟示與省思.臺灣教育評論月刊,9(6),76-81。
羅秋昭(2009).國小語文科教材教法.台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of educational psychology, 102(2), 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318
Albin, M. L., Benton, S. L., & Khramtsova, I. (1996). Individual differences in interest and narrative writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0024
Al-Zyoud, A. A., Al Jamal, D., & Baniabdelrahman, A. (2017). Mind mapping and students′ writing performance. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3094556
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of second language writing, 9(3), 227-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
Beach, R., & Eaton, S. (1984). Factors influencing self-assessing and revising by college freshmen. New directions in composition research, 149-170.
Benton, S. L., Corkill, A. J., Sharp, J. M., Downey, R. G., & Khramtsova, I. (1995). Knowledge, interest, and narrative writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.66
Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 37(5), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.549204
Brande, D. (1934). Becoming a Writer. Tarcher.
Britton, J. (1978). The composing processes and the functions of writing. Research on composing. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching principles. P. Ed Australia.
Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. Plume.
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2006). The mind map book. Pearson Education.
Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of educational psychology, 100(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.209
Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chang, B., Chen, W., Wong, L. H., Wong, S. L., ... & Chou, C. Y. (2019). IDC theory: creation and the creation loop. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0120-5
Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Wong, L. H., Chang, B., Liao, C. C., ... & Ogata, H. (2018). Interest-driven creator theory: towards a theory of learning design for Asia in the twenty-first century. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 435-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0122-0
Chen, N. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Knowledge infrastructure of the future (Guest Editorial). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 1-4.
Chen, W., Chan, T. W., Wong, L. H., Looi, C. K., Liao, C. C., Cheng, H. N., ... & Pi, Z. (2020). IDC theory: habit and the habit loop. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00127-7
Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students′ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The internet and higher education, 25, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026002143
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1990). Literacy and intrinsic motivation. Daedalus, 115-140.
Csikszentmihályi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Toward a theory of emergent motivation.
Dhindsa, H. S., & Anderson, O. R. (2011). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4
Draper, V. (1979). Formative Writing: Writing to Assist Learning In All Subject Areas. Curriculum Publication No. 3.
Durga, V. S. S., & Rao, C. S. (2018). Developing students’ writing skills in English: A process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-5.
Edwards, J. H., & Liu, J. (2018). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press.
Ekşi, G. Y. (2012). Peer review versus teacher feedback in process writing: How effective. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 13(1), 33-48.
Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford University Press.
Fajri, A. K. (2011). Improving Students’ Writing Skill By Using Mind Maps (A Classroom Action Research At The Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali In The Academic Year 2010/2011).
Fishman, S. M. (1997). Student Writing in Philosophy: A Sketch of Five Techniques. New directions for teaching and learning, 69, 53-66.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British educational research journal, 36(1), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902894070
Goodnough, K., & Long, R. (2002). Mind Mapping: A Graphic Organizer for the Pedagogical Toolbox. Science scope, 25(8), 20-24.
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., ... & Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243-284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Heinemann Educational Books, 4 Front St., Exeter, NH 03833.
Graves, D. H., & Murray, D. M. (1980). Revision: In the writer′s workshop and in the classroom. The Journal of Education, 162(2), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748016200205
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A New Model of Cognition and Affect in Writing. In M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing. Hillsdale, Erlbaum.
Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford university press.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117-136). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational research, 60(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational psychology review, 13(3), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016667621114
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Indirana, P., & Rahman, L. I. (2020). THE USE OF MIND MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT. PIKTORIAL: Journal of Humanities, 1(2), 138-148.
Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Taylor & Francis.
Kennedy, M. L. (1985). The composing process of college students writing from sources. Written Communication, 2(4), 434-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088385002004006
Khudhair, N. K. (2016). The impact of applying mind mapping technique as a pre-writing tool on EFL college students in essay writing. Journal of college of education for women, 27(1).
King, M. L. (1978). Research in composition: A need for theory. Research in the Teaching of English, 12(3), 193-202.
Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and instruction, 15(5), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007
Lam, S. F., & Law, Y. K. (2007). The roles of instructional practices and motivation in writing performance. The journal of experimental education, 75(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.2.145-164
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Cheng, C. C., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Computer-supported cooperative prewriting for enhancing young EFL learners’ writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134-155.
Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000390
Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. Tesol Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.153
Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2016). Exploring the reading–writing connection: A yearlong classroom‐based experimental study of middle school students developing literacy in a new language. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.132
Legum, S. E., & Krashen, S. D. (1972). Conceptual Framework for the Design of a Composition Program.
Li, X., Chu, S. K., & Ki, W. W. (2014). The effects of a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy on writing ability and attitudes among upper primary school students in Mainland China. Computers & Education, 77, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.019
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press.
Mateos, M., & Solé, I. (2009). Synthesising information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at different educational levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178760
Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D., & Kelley, K. (2017). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Routledge.
McCracken, R. A. (1971). Initiating sustained silent reading. Journal of Reading, 14(8), 521-583.
Mermelstein, A. D. (2015). Improving EFL Learners′ Writing through Enhanced Extensive Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 182-198.
Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In Depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques. Analysis. 2nd ed. Longman, Cheshire.
Muflihah, T., & Saputri, T. (2018). MIND MAPPING: A STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’READING SKILLS. In PROCEEDING International Conference Technopreneur and Education 2018 (Vol. 1, No. 1).
Nelson, G. L. (1997). How Cultural Differences Affect Written and Oral Communication: The Case of Peer Response Groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 70, 77-84.
Nicolaidou, I. (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students′ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education, 68, 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.004
Nielsen, K. (2014). Self‐assessment methods in writing instruction: a conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01533.x
Noonan, M. (2013). Mind maps: Enhancing midwifery education. Nurse education today, 33(8), 847-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.02.003
Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written communication, 6(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088389006001005
Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 392-412.
O’Connor, R. (2011). The use of mind maps as an assessment tool. In International Conference on Engaging Pedagogy 2011 (ICEP11) NCI, Dublin, Ireland (pp. 1-14).
Patterson, N. (2006). Computers and writing: The research says yes!. Voices from the Middle, 13(4), 64.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. (1995). Cognition, teaching, and assessment. HarperCollins College Publishers.
Ritchie, S. J., Della Sala, S., & McIntosh, R. D. (2013). Retrieval practice, with or without mind mapping, boosts fact learning in primary school children. PloS one, 8(11), e78976. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078976
Rohman, D. G. (1965). Pre-writing the stage of discovery in the writing process. College composition and communication, 16(2), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.2307/354885
Rosciano, A. (2015). The effectiveness of mind mapping as an active learning strategy among associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.01.003
Saed, H. A., & Al-Omari, H. A. (2014). The effectiveness of a proposed program based on a mind mapping strategy in developing the writing achievement of eleventh grade EFL students in Jordan and their attitudes towards writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(18), 88-110.
Sarhady, T. (2015). The effect of product/process-oriented approach to teaching and learning writing skill on university student performances. International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 7-12.
Schriver, K. A. (1990). Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods. Technical Report No. 41.
Shanahan, T. (2016). Relationships between reading and writing development. Handbook of writing research, 194-207.
Sheen, Y. (2010). Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in second language acquisition, 32(2), 169-179.
Silvernail, D. L., & Gritter, A. K. (2007). Maine’s middle school laptop program: Creating better writers. Gorham, ME: Maine Educational Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in education and teaching international, 39(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
Somers, M. J., Passerini, K., Parhankangas, A., & Casal, J. (2014). Using mind maps to study how business school students and faculty organize and apply general business knowledge. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2013.11.001
Somerville, E. M., & Crème, P. (2005). ‘Asking pompeii questions’: a co-operative approach to Writing in the disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305507
Stein, M., Dixon, R., & Barnard, S. (2001). What research tells us about writing instruction for students in the middle grades. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1(2), 107-116.
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender′s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and instruction, 20(4), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
Tiedt, I. M. (1989). Writing:Form topic to evaluation. Allyn and Bacon.
Tompkins, G. E. (2012). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into practice, 48(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K. (2003). Progress towards understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children. Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale, 275-298.
Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
Vanett, L., & Jurich, D. (1990). A context for collaboration: Teachers and students writing together. Students and teachers writing together: Perspectives on journal writing, 49-62.
Wachholz, P. B., & Etheridge, C. P. (1996). Writing self-efficacy beliefs of high-and low-apprehensive writers. Journal of Developmental Education, 19(3), 16.
Wahyu, W. (2019). Students’ Engagement and Interest in Learning Writing through Mind Mapping Technique. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i2.1039
Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.005
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
Wolfe, E. W., & Manalo, J. R. (2004). Composition medium comparability in a direct writing assessment of non-native English speakers. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10125/25229
Wong, L. H., Chan, T. W., Chen, W., Looi, C. K., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C., ... & Wong, S. L. (2020). IDC theory: interest and the interest loop. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-0123-2
Wu, T. T., & Chen, A. C. (2018). Combining e-books with mind mapping in a reciprocal teaching strategy for a classical Chinese course. Computers & Education, 116, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.012
Young, R. (2019). What is it ‘Writing For Pleasure’teachers do that makes the difference. The Goldsmiths’ Company and The University of Sussex.
Zhao, H. (2018). New insights into the process of peer review for EFL writing: A process-oriented socio-cultural perspective. Learning and Instruction, 58, 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.010
指導教授 陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan) 審核日期 2021-8-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明