摘要(英) |
In recent years, Ministry Of Education in Taiwan has promoted 108 syllabus, and we have seen more and more literacy-oriented question types in Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students, CAP. Therefore, students’ mathematical "metacognitive ability” and "problem solving process" are also extremely important. In order to ensure that the students in the school are not left behind, the teaching methods of "mathematical modeling" and "technology-assisted" were used to plan the research framework of this experiment, hoping to improve the students′ dilemma of mathematical problem solving.
The purpose of this research was to combine "mathematical modeling" and "metacognitive ability", and use "technology-assisted" mathematics teaching, to explore whether junior high school students in eighth grade can use this kind of teaching to improve mathematics metacognitive ability and mathematical problem solving course. We used “Schoenfeld′s problem of mathematical problem-solving process” as "mathematical modeling" method and compiled the problems of each process, and provided students with problem-solving practice and post-testing of mathematical problem-solving performance. In addition, explanation videos were used as a technological aid for students to understand the questions at home. The research objects were two classes in the school, the experimental group (9 people) and the control group (11 people). The total number of lessons were 13 and each one was 45 minutes. The research data contained quantitative data and value data, which were separately "metacognitive scale" for pre-teaching and post-teaching tests, and "post-tests of performance in mathematics problem solving (geometric series and arithmetic series) " for post-test questions. After the research data was processed and analyzed, the research results are as follows:
1. "Emphasizing the influence of metacognitive Technology-assisted modeling-based math instruction teaching" enhances students′ mathematical “metacognitive ability”.
2. "Emphasizing the influence of metacognitive Technology-assisted modeling-based math instruction teaching" can significantly improve students′ mathematics “metacognitive ability”.
3. Compared to “General mathematics problem solving teaching”, "Emphasizing the influence of metacognitive Technology-assisted modeling-based math instruction teaching" can significantly improve students′ mathematics “problem-solving process”.
Finally, the researcher also makes suggestions for future related research based on the research results, and teaching practices are also discussed. |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
中文文獻
李東澤(2013)。應用網路教學影片之教學鷹架對數學學習成效之研究。虎尾科技大學資訊管理研究所在職專班學位論文,1-87。
吳勇賜(2007)。數學解題的研究。福營國中,新北市。
吳慧珉(2019)。2018-2022年國家教育研究院研究計畫期中進度報告。子計畫7:第四學習階段數學素養長期追蹤研究。
李宗薇(1994)。教學媒體的運用。技術及職業教育,10-13。
周永正(2010)。數學建模。同濟大學出版社。
林清山和張景媛(1993)。國中生後設認知,動機信念與數學解題策略之關系研究。教育心理學報,(26),53-74。
林清山和張景媛(1993)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關系研究。教育心理學報,(26),53-74。
林雅柔(2016)。大台中地區國中三年級學生二次數學文字題的解題歷程分析。國立中興大學,未出版,台中市。
林福來(2011)。數學閱讀、猜想與建模。國立科學工業園區實驗高級中學之演講,新竹市。
凃金堂(2015)。數學後設認知量表之發展與信效度考驗。教育心理學報,47(1), 109-131.
莊裕庭(2002)。國二高低數學成就學生解題之後設認知個案研究.。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。
陳李綢(2000)。後設認知知識。教育大辭書。Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1307398/
陳怡靜和劉祥通(2013)。國中數學解題能力量表編製之理念。科學教育,(357),29-37。
陳哲仁(2003)。九年一貫國二學生解一元二次方程式應用問題歷程之分析研究。國立高雄師範大學,未出版,高雄市。
曾瑞譙(2009)。電腦輔助教學軟體使用後之效益分析-科技接受模式的觀點與應用。新竹教育大學教育學報,26(2),127-163。
黃美鳳(2004)。電腦多媒體輔助學習對保母人員技能檢定成效之研究。屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
楊湘琳(2011)。教學影片結合網路學習平台的數學補救教學成效。臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系在職進修碩士班學位論文,1-80。
楊凱琳(2013)。國民中學教師閱讀教學增能計畫(數學科)研習手冊。教育部。
楊凱琳和林福來(2006)。探討高中數學教學融入建模活動的支撐策略與促進參與教師反思的潛在機制。科學教育學刊,14(5),517-543。
楊凱琳、林福來和蕭志如(2012)。數學建模評量規準之研究。科學教育學刊,20(4),319-342。
劉錫麒(1997)。數學思考教學研究。臺北市:師大書苑。
鄭文彬(2003)。英語實驗班之數學解題歷程分析研究。國立高雄師範大學,未出版,高雄市。
謝亞倫和陳昌盛(2013)運用數位資源輔助分組合作學習對國民中學數學科學習成效之行動研究 (Doctoral dissertation)。
英文文獻
Anderson, M. A. (1986). Protocol analysis: A methodology for exploring the information processing of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 28-32.
Blum, W. (2002). ICMI study 14: Applications and modeling in mathematics education-discussion document. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(1),149-171.
Charles, R. I. (1985). The role of problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher.32(6) 48-50.
Kaiser, G. (2005). Mathematical modelling in school–Examples and experiences. Mathematikunterricht im Spannungsfeld von Evolution und Evaluation. Festband für Werner Blum. Hildesheim: Franzbecker, 99-108. (pp.99-108).Hildesheim:Franzbecker.
Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & cognition, 28(1), 92-107.
Kilpatrick, J. (1969). 10: Problem solving in mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 39(4), 523-534.
Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 1-15.
Ku, H-Y, & Lohr, L. L. (2003). A case study of Chinese students′ attitudes toward their first online learning experience. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(3), 95-102.
Lesh, R. A., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modeling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 5(2-3), 109-129.
Lester, F. K. (1980). Research on mathematical problem solving. Research in mathematics education, 286.
Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113-142.
Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery, 1962.
Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Vol. 85). Princeton university press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27(3), 293-309.
Veenman, M. V., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and individual differences, 15(2), 159-176. |