參考文獻 |
1. Zandalinas, S.I., F.B. Fritschi, and R. Mittler, Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends in Plant Science, 2021. 26(6): p. 588-599.
2. Johnsson, F., J. Kjärstad, and J. Rootzén, The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels. Climate Policy, 2019. 19(2): p. 258-274.
3. Kardooni, R., S.B. Yusoff, F.B. Kari, and L. Moeenizadeh, Public opinion on renewable energy technologies and climate change in Peninsular Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 2018. 116: p. 659-668.
4. Ali, A.H., S. Kapoor, and S.K. Kansal, Studies on the photocatalytic decolorization of pararosanilne chloride dye and its simulated dyebath effluent. Desalination and Water Treatment, 2011. 25(1-3): p. 268-275.
5. Omrania, N., A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieha, and M. Alizadehb, Brief study on the kinetic aspect of photodegradation of sulfasalazine aqueous solution by cuprous oxide/cadmium sulfide nanoparticles. Catalyst, 2019. 17: p. 24.
6. Rani, A., K. Singh, A.S. Patel, A. Chakraborti, S. Kumar, et al., Visible light driven photocatalysis of organic dyes using SnO2 decorated MoS2 nanocomposites. Chemical Physics Letters, 2020. 738: p. 136874.
7. Fujishima, A., X. Zhang, and D.A. Tryk, Heterogeneous photocatalysis: from water photolysis to applications in environmental cleanup. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007. 32(14): p. 2664-2672.
8. Han, H. and R. Bai, Buoyant photocatalyst with greatly enhanced visible-light activity prepared through a low temperature hydrothermal method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009. 48(6): p. 2891-2898.
9. Fujishima, A. and K. Honda, Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972. 238(5358): p. 37-38.
10. Olah, G.A., Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2005. 44(18): p. 2636-2639.
11. Yang, C.-J. and R.B. Jackson, China′s growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment. Energy Policy, 2012. 41: p. 878-884.
12. Millar, G.J. and M. Collins, Industrial production of formaldehyde using polycrystalline silver catalyst. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017. 56(33): p. 9247-9265.
13. Gesesse, G.D., C. Wang, B.K. Chang, S.-H. Tai, P. Beaunier, et al., A soft-chemistry assisted strong metal–support interaction on a designed plasmonic core–shell photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nanoscale, 2020. 12(13): p. 7011-7023.
14. Liu, Q., J. Huang, H. Tang, X. Yu, and J. Shen, Construction 0D TiO2 nanoparticles/2D CoP nanosheets heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution activity. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2020. 56: p. 196-205.
15. Wang, Y., M. Zu, X. Zhou, H. Lin, F. Peng, et al., Designing efficient TiO2-based photoelectrocatalysis systems for chemical engineering and sensing. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020. 381: p. 122605.
16. Zhang, W., Y. Tian, H. He, L. Xu, W. Li, et al., Recent advances in the synthesis of hierarchically mesoporous TiO2 materials for energy and environmental applications. National Science Review, 2020. 7(11): p. 1702-1725.
17. Cai, R., K. Hashimoto, K. Itoh, Y. Kubota, and A. Fujishima, Photokilling of malignant cells with ultrafine TiO2 powder. Bulletin of The Chemical Society of Japan, 1991. 64(4): p. 1268-1273.
18. Nakata, K., T. Ochiai, T. Murakami, and A. Fujishima, Photoenergy conversion with TiO2 photocatalysis: new materials and recent applications. Electrochimica Acta, 2012. 84: p. 103-111.
19. Zhang, J., P. Zhou, J. Liu, and J. Yu, New understanding of the difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and brookite TiO2. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014. 16(38): p. 20382-20386.
20. Vequizo, J.J.M., H. Matsunaga, T. Ishiku, S. Kamimura, T. Ohno, et al., Trapping-induced enhancement of photocatalytic activity on brookite TiO2 powders: comparison with anatase and rutile TiO2 powders. ACS Catalysis, 2017. 7(4): p. 2644-2651.
21. Kočí, K., K. Matějů, L. Obalová, S. Krejčíková, Z. Lacný, et al., Effect of silver doping on the TiO2 for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2010. 96(3-4): p. 239-244.
22. Umar, M. and H.A. Aziz, Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water. Organic Pollutants-Monitoring, Risk and Treatment, 2013. 8: p. 196-197.
23. Alberico, E. and M. Nielsen, Towards a methanol economy based on homogeneous catalysis: methanol to H2 and CO2 to methanol. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51(31): p. 6714-6725.
24. Chang, C.D. and A.J. Silvestri, The conversion of methanol and other O-compounds to hydrocarbons over zeolite catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 1977. 47(2): p. 249-259.
25. Ilias, S. and A. Bhan, Mechanism of the catalytic conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons. ACS Catalysis, 2013. 3(1): p. 18-31.
26. Nuhu, A., J. Soares, M. Gonzalez-Herrera, A. Watts, G. Hussein, et al., Methanol oxidation on Au/TiO2 catalysts. Topics in Catalysis, 2007. 44(1): p. 293-297.
27. Wang, M., D.-j. Guo, and H.-l. Li, High activity of novel Pd/TiO2 nanotube catalysts for methanol electro-oxidation. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2005. 178(6): p. 1996-2000.
28. Drew, K., G. Girishkumar, K. Vinodgopal, and P.V. Kamat, Boosting fuel cell performance with a semiconductor photocatalyst: TiO2/Pt− Ru hybrid catalyst for methanol oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2005. 109(24): p. 11851-11857.
29. Maldonado, C., J. Fierro, G. Birke, E. Martinez, and P. Reyes, Conversion of methanol to formaldehyde on TiO2 supported Ag nanoparticles. Journal of The Chilean Chemical Society, 2010. 55(4): p. 506-510.
30. Nalajala, N., K.N. Salgaonkar, I. Chauhan, S.P. Mekala, and C.S. Gopinath, Aqueous methanol to formaldehyde and hydrogen on Pd/TiO2 by photocatalysis in direct sunlight: structure dependent activity of Nano-Pd and atomic Pt-coated counterparts. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2021. 4(11): p. 13347-13360.
31. Setvin, M., X. Shi, J. Hulva, T. Simschitz, G.S. Parkinson, et al., Methanol on anatase TiO2 (101): mechanistic insights into photocatalysis. ACS catalysis, 2017. 7(10): p. 7081-7091.
32. Walenta, C.A., C. Courtois, S.L. Kollmannsberger, M. Eder, M. Tschurl, et al., Surface species in photocatalytic methanol reforming on Pt/TiO2 (110): learning from surface science experiments for catalytically relevant conditions. ACS Catalysis, 2020. 10(7): p. 4080-4091.
33. Pipornpong, W., R. Wanbayor, and V. Ruangpornvisuti, Adsorption CO2 on the perfect and oxygen vacancy defect surfaces of anatase TiO2 and its photocatalytic mechanism of conversion to CO. Applied Surface Science, 2011. 257(24): p. 10322-10328.
34. Liu, J.-Y., X.-Q. Gong, and A.N. Alexandrova, Mechanism of CO2 photocatalytic reduction to methane and methanol on defected anatase TiO2 (101): a density functional theory study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019. 123(6): p. 3505-3511.
35. Vijayalakshmi, R. and V. Rajendran, Synthesis and characterization of nano-TiO2 via different methods. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res, 2012. 4(2): p. 1183-1190.
36. Meng, A., L. Zhang, B. Cheng, and J. Yu, Dual cocatalysts in TiO2 photocatalysis. Advanced Materials, 2019. 31(30): p. 1807660.
37. Nolan, M., Electronic coupling in iron oxide-modified TiO2 leads to a reduced band gap and charge separation for visible light active photocatalysis. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2011. 13(40): p. 18194-18199.
38. Finazzi, E., C. Di Valentin, A. Selloni, and G. Pacchioni, First principles study of nitrogen doping at the anatase TiO2 (101) surface. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007. 111(26): p. 9275-9282.
39. Hashimoto, K., H. Irie, and A. Fujishima, TiO2 photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2005. 44(12R): p. 8269.
40. Lazzeri, M., A. Vittadini, and A. Selloni, Structure and energetics of stoichiometric TiO2 anatase surfaces. Physical Review B, 2001. 63(15): p. 155409.
41. Nolan, M., A. Iwaszuk, A.K. Lucid, J.J. Carey, and M. Fronzi, Design of novel visible light active photocatalyst materials: surface modified TiO2. Advanced Materials, 2016. 28(27): p. 5425-5446.
42. Tada, H., Q. Jin, A. Iwaszuk, and M. Nolan, Molecular-scale transition metal oxide nanocluster surface-modified titanium dioxide as solar-activated environmental catalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2014. 118(23): p. 12077-12086.
43. Li, C., R. Requist, and E. Gross, Density functional theory of electron transfer beyond the Born-Oppenheimer approximation: case study of LiF. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2018. 148(8): p. 084110.
44. Slater, J.C., A simplification of the Hartree-Fock method. Physical Review, 1951. 81(3): p. 385.
45. Blöchl, P.E., O. Jepsen, and O.K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Physical Review B, 1994. 49(23): p. 16223.
46. Payne, M.C., M.P. Teter, D.C. Allan, T. Arias, and a.J. Joannopoulos, Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total-energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1992. 64(4): p. 1045.
47. Furthmüller, J., J. Hafner, and G. Kresse, Ab initio calculation of the structural and electronic properties of carbon and boron nitride using ultrasoft pseudopotentials. Physical Review B, 1994. 50(21): p. 15606.
48. <Materials Studio Overview_2020EDCTecnologia.>
49. Clark, S.J., M.D. Segall, C.J. Pickard, P.J. Hasnip, M.I. Probert, et al., First principles methods using CASTEP. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials, 2005. 220(5-6): p. 567-570.
50. Burdett, J.K., T. Hughbanks, G.J. Miller, J.W. Richardson Jr, and J.V. Smith, Structural-electronic relationships in inorganic solids: powder neutron diffraction studies of the rutile and anatase polymorphs of titanium dioxide at 15 and 295 K. Journal of The American Chemical Society, 1987. 109(12): p. 3639-3646.
51. Zhang, H., W. Wang, H. Zhao, L. Zhao, L.-Y. Gan, et al., Facet-dependent interfacial charge transfer in Fe (III)-grafted TiO2 nanostructures activated by visible light. ACS Catalysis, 2018. 8(10): p. 9399-9407.
52. Barone, V., M. Casarin, D. Forrer, M. Pavone, M. Sambi, et al., Role and effective treatment of dispersive forces in materials: polyethylene and graphite crystals as test cases. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2009. 30(6): p. 934-939.
53. Ma, J., H. He, and F. Liu, Effect of Fe on the photocatalytic removal of NOx over visible light responsive Fe/TiO2 catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015. 179: p. 21-28.
54. Xu, C., Y. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Lin, X. Zhang, et al., Enhanced mechanism of the photo-thermochemical cycle based on effective Fe-doping TiO2 films and DFT calculations. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017. 204: p. 324-334.
55. Chen, Q.L., B. Li, G. Zheng, K.H. He, and A.S. Zheng, First-principles calculations on electronic structures of Fe-vacancy-codoped TiO2 anatase (101) surface. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2011. 406(20): p. 3841-3846.
56. Matar, S.F., R. Weihrich, D. Kurowski, and A. Pfitzner, DFT calculations on the electronic structure of CuTe2 and Cu7Te4. Solid State Sciences, 2004. 6(1): p. 15-20.
57. Bennett, J.W., B.G. Hudson, I.K. Metz, D. Liang, S. Spurgeon, et al., A systematic determination of hubbard U using the GBRV ultrasoft pseudopotential set. Computational Materials Science, 2019. 170: p. 109137.
58. Noodleman, L. and D.A. Case, Density-functional theory of spin polarization and spin coupling in iron—sulfur clusters, in advances in inorganic chemistry. 1992, Elsevier. p. 423-470.
59. Zeller, R., Spin-polarized dft calculations and magnetism. Computational Nanoscience: Do It Yourself, 2006. 31: p. 419-445.
60. Shao, G., Red shift in manganese-and iron-doped TiO2: a DFT+ U analysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009. 113(16): p. 6800-6808.
61. Gong, J., C. Yang, J. Zhang, and W. Pu, Origin of photocatalytic activity of W/N-codoped TiO2: H2 production and DFT calculation with GGA+ U. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014. 152: p. 73-81.
62. Gurkan, Y.Y., E. Kasapbasi, and Z. Cinar, Enhanced solar photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by selenium (IV) ion-doping: characterization and DFT modeling of the surface. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013. 214: p. 34-44.
63. Henderson, M.A., A surface science perspective on TiO2 photocatalysis. Surface Science Reports, 2011. 66(6-7): p. 185-297.
64. Modak, B., K. Srinivasu, and S.K. Ghosh, A hybrid DFT based investigation of the photocatalytic activity of cation–anion codoped SrTiO3 for water splitting under visible light. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014. 16(44): p. 24527-24535.
65. Wang, F., C. Di Valentin, and G. Pacchioni, Doping of WO3 for photocatalytic water splitting: hints from density functional theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012. 116(16): p. 8901-8909.
66. Di Valentin, C., F. Wang, and G. Pacchioni, Tungsten oxide in catalysis and photocatalysis: hints from DFT. Topics in Catalysis, 2013. 56(15): p. 1404-1419.
67. McNellis, E.R., J. Meyer, and K. Reuter, Azobenzene at coinage metal surfaces: role of dispersive van der Waals interactions. Physical Review B, 2009. 80(20): p. 205414.
68. Govind, N., M. Petersen, G. Fitzgerald, D. King-Smith, and J. Andzelm, A generalized synchronous transit method for transition state location. Computational Materials Science, 2003. 28(2): p. 250-258.
69. Hare, S.R. and D.J. Tantillo, Post-transition state bifurcations gain momentum–current state of the field. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2017. 89(6): p. 679-698. |