董監事海外學歷對台灣上市櫃公司ESG績效的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：13.59.36.203

姓名

陳禹鑫(Yu-Hsin Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

董監事海外學歷對台灣上市櫃公司ESG績效的影響
(The Impact of Returnee Directors and Supervisors on ESG Performance in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 越南台商融資模式之研究	★ 官股企業的ESG績效
★ 新冠肺炎對財富管理資產配置之影響	★ 勞工失業保險與公司創新
★ 台灣加權指數與證券商市占率關聯性之研究	★ 瓶裝飲料對食品業經營績效之探討
★ 房貸逾放風險的影響因子探討-以F銀行為例	★ 參與都市更新對建設業績效之探討
★ ETF運用於存股策略之探討	★ 波羅的海綜合指數對台灣房價之影響
★ 傳統銀行面對純網銀之競爭策略分析- 以第一商業銀行為例	★ 情緒指標與費城半導體指數之研究
★ 銀行併購案-以C銀行及D銀行為例	★ 恐怖活動對避稅行為的影響
★ 台股動能投資策略：以 0050成分股為例	★ ESG對現金持有及現金價值的影響 —以台灣上市上櫃公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2028-7-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

本研究主要探討董監事海外學歷與台灣上市櫃公司ESG績效的關係，由於企業社會責任(CSR)起源於歐美國家再推廣至全世界，逐步將其融入台灣教育體系，故海外求學者應會更注重衡量CSR的ESG標準。本文資料庫使用台灣經濟新報(TEJ)，樣本期間為2014年至2019年，共1,717 家上市公司去組成的9,044筆樣本數。我們分別討論 ESG 的三個方面，從中發現海外學歷對ESG的影響：在環境方面，董監事海外學歷對碳排放有負向顯著影響，對水的回收率有正向顯著影響；在社會方面，董監事海外學歷在員工流動率、違反勞基法有負向顯著影響，對平均薪資有正向顯著影響；在公司治理方面，董監事海外學歷對公司治理評鑑等級、是否採用四大會計事務所和薪酬委員會的開會次數上皆有正向顯著影響。董監事海外學歷確實對企業ESG績效有好的影響，能兼顧對企業社會責任的重視帶領公司成長。

摘要(英)

In this paper, we mainly examine the relationship between returnee directors and supervisors and environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance of listed companies in Taiwan. Because Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) originated from European and American countries and was gradually added to the Taiwanese education system, returnees who study abroad put more emphasis on ESG, which is a standard for evaluating CSR. The sample of this paper consists of 9,044 observations across 1,717 listed companies between 2014 and 2019 from Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ). We discuss the three aspects of ESG separately. In terms of E, returnees have a negatively significant impact on carbon emissions and a positively significant impact on water recovery. In terms of S, returnees have a negatively significant impact on turnover and violations of Labor law and a positively significant impact on average salary. In terms of G, returnees show a positively significant relation with corporate governance evaluation, auditing by the Big Four firms, and the number of compensation committee meetings. From the empirical results, we find that returnees have a good impact on corporate ESG performance. It is very important that companies continually grow and contribute to society at the same time.

關鍵字(中)

★ 海外學歷
★ 董監事
★ ESG

關鍵字(英)

★ Returnee
★ Directors
★ Supervisors
★ ESG

論文目次

摘要.............................................................i
Abstract........................................................ii
Table of Contents..............................................iii
List of Tables..................................................iv
1. Introduction.............................................1
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses.........................6
2.1 Literature Review........................................6
2.1.1 The Importance of CSR to Business........................6
2.1.2 The Connection between CSR and Educational Background....6
2.1.3 The Relationship between Returnees and ESG...............7
2.2 Hypotheses...............................................8
3. Data and Methodology....................................11
3.1 Data Sources and Sample.................................11
3.2 Main Dependent Variables................................11
3.3 Main Independent Variables..............................14
3.4 Control Variables.......................................15
3.5 Methodology.............................................16
4. Empirical Results.......................................18
4.1 Summary Statistics and Correlations.....................18
4.2 Environment (E) Dimension...............................19
4.3 Social (S) Dimension....................................20
4.4 Governance (G) Dimension................................22
4.5 Robustness Check........................................23
5. Conclusion..............................................25
Reference.......................................................26
Appendix........................................................47

參考文獻

Aguinis, H., and Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don′t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Bantel, K. A., and Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
Bauer, R., Guenster, N. and Otten, R. (2004). Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe: The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5(2), 91-104.
Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., and Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37-44.
Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., Chen, L., and Nguyen, N. H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 409-422.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
Carnahan, S., Kryscynski D., and Olson, D. (2017). When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1932-1962.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Chan, M. C., Watson, J., and Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59-73.
Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., and Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics 73(4), 347-368.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312-322.
Doda, B., Gennaioli, C., Gouldson, A., Grover, D., and Sullivan, R. (2016). Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 23(5), 257-270.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., and Sen, S. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, multi-faceted job-products, and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 319-335.
Giannetti, M., Liao, G., and Yu, X. (2015). The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. Journal of Finance, 70(4), 1629-1682.
Godos-Díez, JL., Cabeza-García, L., Alonso-Martínez, D., and Fernández-Gago, R. (2018). Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 229-253.
Hambrick, D. C., and Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Han, Q., Jennings, J. E., Liu, R., and Jennings, P. D. (2019). Going home and helping out? Returnees as propagators of CSR in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(6), 857-872.
Haniffa, R. M., and Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24 (5), 391-430.
Ho, F. N., Wang, H. M. D., and Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 423-433.
Hu, Y., Chen, S., Shao, Y., and Gao, S. (2018). CSR and firm value: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(12), 4597.
Ison, R., Röling, N., and Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 499-511.
Jo, H., and Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
Kim, H. L., Woo, E., Uysal, M., and Kwon, N. (2018). The effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on employee well-being in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1584-1600.
Lambooy, T. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: sustainable water use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8), 852-866.
Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., and Dowell, G. W. S. (2014). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 712-722.
Lin, C. J., and Lin, H. L. (2009). Auditor size, brand name reputation, market competition and audit fees: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting Studies, 49, 35-72.
Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
Luo, J., Chen, D., & Chen, J. (2016). Coming back and giving back: Returnee directors and corporate donations. 76th Annual meeting of the academy of management, AOM, 219–224.
Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419-438.
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., and Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695-724.
McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., and Rodrigues, L. L. (2018). The engagement of auditors in the reporting of corporate social responsibility information. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 26(1), 46-56.
Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., and Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to CSR: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543.
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931.
Shiue, M. J., Yeh, S. L., Chiou, Y. Y., Chiang, P. T. (2018). Corporate governance evaluation and stock returns. Taiwan Accounting Review, 14(2), 261-289.
Stanwick, P. A., and Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195-204.
Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391-402.
Vitaliano, D. F. (2010). CSR and labor turnover. Corporate Governance, 10(5), 563-573.
Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Wally, S., and Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 932-956.
Wang, M., Qiu, C., and Kong, D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, investor behaviors, and stock market returns: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 127-141.
Wen, W., Song, J. (2017). Can returnee managers promote CSR performance? Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 11(12), 1-26.
Wiersema, M. F., and Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 91-121.
Yu, X. (2008). Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labor standards: A case study of Reebok′s athletic footwear supplier factory in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 513-529.
Zhang, L., Xu, Y. and Chen, H. (2021). Do returnee executives value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.

指導教授

何柏欣(Po-Hsin Ho)

審核日期

2022-6-20

推文