摘要(英) |
By referring to the research results of previous scholars, this study focuses on the listed companies that issued convertible bonds(CBs) in the domestic market from 2010 to 2017. Using event study methodology, the announcement date of the issuance of CBs (ie the day of the board of directors) is regarded as an event day. We study the short-term- three days before and after the event day, and the long-term: the average abnormal returns(AAR) and the cumulative average abnormal returns around three years after the event day. Apart from renewing the announcement effect of domestic issuance of CBs, More importantly, we want to find out the reliable signals by checking the characteristic of CBs, the financial ratios of issue companies, and the changes in shareholding of stakeholders. It hopes to find out some reliable signal that could help investors to choose which CBs worthy to buy or not. By classification will be carried out, and the classification results will be analyzed whether the results of the announcement of the issuance of convertible bonds are significantly different for each group. The signal can be used as a judgment factor for market investors to choose when facing the issue of convertible bonds.
This study has shown that the announcement effect of CBs issue to whole sample companies in the short run, It has a significant positive cumulative average abnormal return, which is different from the conclusions of most foreign studies. But in the long run, the effect of CB’s announcement effect has a significant negative correlation with the cumulative average abnormal return effect, which is the same as most domestic and foreign research results.
The study discovers a significantly negative abnormal return in stock price reaction to the changes of insider’s shareholding in the short-term and long-term.
As oppose to we believe, when stakeholder increase his shares of stock before event day, it might decrease the abnormal return in stock. It is speculated that the reason to create a short-term rise in the stock price might make the value of CB’s conversion right increase. And once investors buy it, the stock price will fall. There is a very different relationship, in which capital expenditure and bank loan repayment represent the company′s future growth expectations and the purpose of improving the company′s financial crisis, respectively. During the long-term event period, there is a significant positive cumulative average abnormal return from half a year to one year. But when keep holding more then the three-years, the cumulative return reversed. Finally, a variable with a more consistent conclusion is that the issuer has a lower base period of financial indicators, such as Tobin′Q, a lower issue size or the company′s total assets, etc., and the accumulated average abnormal return in the long-term has a better return. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文部分
1. 張志向,〈影響可轉換公司債發行宣告效果的因素-長期與短期股價效果之實證研究〉,《輔仁管理評論期刊》,第十三卷第二期,2006年,頁99-140。
2. 孫梅瑞、陳珈琪,〈台灣可轉換公司債之發行、轉換與公司經營績效〉,《台灣金融財務季刊》,第十一輯第四期,2010年,頁105-132。
3. 張千雲、張眾卓、周建新,〈以套利與避險觀點探討可轉換公司債發行之資訊內涵〉,《證券市場發展季刊》,25(3),2013年,頁41-93。
4. 曹文馨:〈可轉債發行條件對股價行為及營運績效之影響探討〉。碩士論文,國立台北商業大學,民國108年6月。
5. 李岳霖:〈轉換公司債健全管理措施〉,《證券暨期貨月刊》,35(12),2017,頁38-47。
6. 吳明政、蔡幼群、林佳錡:〈可轉換公司債宣告贖回對股票報酬影響與成因之探討〉,《企業管理學報》,第69期,95年6月,頁135-168。
7. 周建新、張簡榮奮、王朝仕:〈可轉換公司債宣示效果之再驗證〉,《經營管理論叢》,1(2),2005年,頁1-22。
8. 邱智謀:〈企業如何善用公司債籌資以強化財務結構〉,《證券暨期或月刊》,29(4),2011,頁5-23
9. 林靜容:〈我國可轉換公司債發行之決定因素及其影響公司價值之實證研究〉,碩士論文,國立中央大學,民國79年6月。
10. 莊忠柱、王秋寶:〈發行國內可轉換公司債宣告效果之研究--以臺灣上市公司為例〉,《臺灣土地金融季刊》,38(1),2001,頁51-68。
11. 詹曙銘:〈可轉換公司債發行宣告對長、短期股價報酬的影響〉,碩士論文,私立朝陽大學,民國91年6月。
二、英文部分
1. Myers, Stewart C. and Majluf, Nicholas S., "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investor Do Not Have", Journal of Financial Economics, (13),1984, page.187-221.
2. Jeremy C. Stein , "Convertible bonds as a backdoor equity financing", Journal of Financial Economics,(32),1992,page.3-21.
3. Dann, L. Y. and W. H. Middelson, "Convertible Debt Issuance, Capital Structure Change and Financing Related Information", Journal of Financial Economics, (13), 1984,page 157-186
4. Mikkelson, W.H.and M.M. Partch, "Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and the Issuance Process",Journal of Financial Economics, (15),1986,page.31-60.
5. Hillion, P. and T. Vermaelen, "Death Spiral Convertibles, "Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2),2004, 381-415.
6. Spiess, D. K. and J. Affleck-Graves, "The Long-run Performance of Stock Returns Following Debt Offerings, " Journal of Financial Economics,(38),1999,page. 45-73.
7. Jensen M. C. and W. H. Meckling , "Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure," Journal of Financial Economics, "(3),1976, 305-360.
8. Wolfe, S., S. Daliakopoulos and O. A. P. Gwilym, " Equity Effects of the Issuance of Convertible Bonds:U.K. Evidence, " Journal of Fixed Income, (9),1999, 7-18.
9. Jenson, M. C., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, "The American Economic Review, 76(2),1986,page.323-329.
10. Green,R., "Investment incentives,debt and warrant., "Journal of Financial Economics, 13(1),1984,page.115-136. |