摘要(英) |
Dip slope stability analysis is extremely important due to the huge potential losses caused by dip slope sliding disasters. In this research, the geological model (i.e., weak plane distribution) with the ground model (mechanical properties of the weak planes) were assumed to explore the effect of weak plane distribution and mechanical properties on the failure mechanisms (Geotechnical Model) of dip slopes. To analyze the stability of dip slopes, besides the limit equilibrium method and two-dimensional numerical analysis (Slice method, etc.), it is also possible to adapt the 3D numerical analysis to analyze the overall stability of the slopes. In addition, typical dip slope sliding could occur along a given sliding plane. However, based on rock core information and boring logs, various fissures in a thick rock layer that are parallel to the potential sliding plane may be connected and form a potential sliding plane in the sliding mass.
In this research, we take the dip slope in Yang-Ming campus of National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University as an example, and the three-dimensional distinct analysis software 3DEC was employed to analyze the overall stability of the dip slope. First of all, the 3D numerical models were generated with the digital elevation model (DEM) derived by LiDAR. Secondly, the simplified geological model with the discrete fracture network (DFN) was established in the numerical model based on the boring logs, rock core information, and field survey. Finally, various sliding scenarios corresponding to different potential sliding planes with different strength parameters were analyzed (weakening with ratios of 10%, 50%, and 100%, respectively).
Numerical analysis results show that the dip slope is relatively stable under the current situation. However, if the mechanical strength weakened up to 100%, the slope at the playground and tennis court produces larger displacement in all of the potential sliding scenarios. When comparing with the field investigation information, some tension cracks were also found here, and the area where the displacement occurred partially overlaps with the area with a higher risk in the slope analysis report provided by CECI. Hence, the dip slope may require more monitoring systems, especially for high-risk areas. |
參考文獻 |
1. Burland, J. B. (1987). The teaching of soil mechanics-a personal view. Proc. 9th ERCSMFE, Dublin, 1987, 1, 1427-1447.
2. ISRM (1981) Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring (ISRM Suggested Methods).
3. Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope movement types and processes. Special report, 176, 11-33.
4. Wyllie, D. C., & Mah, C. (2004). Rock slope engineering. CRC Press.
5. Christian, J. T., Ladd, C. C., & Baecher, G. B. (1994). Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12), 2180-2207.
6. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2003). 3 Dimensional Distinct Element Code User’s Guide. Minneapolis, MN: Itasca Consulting Group Inc.
7. Wyllie, D. C., & Mah, C. (2004). Rock slope engineering. CRC Press.
8. Li, Y., Mo, P. (2019). A unified landslide classification system for loess slopes: A critical review. Geomorphology, 340, pp. 67-83
9. Stead, D., Eberhardt, E., Coggan, J. S. (2006) Developments in the characterrization of complex rock slope deformation and failure using numerical modelling techniques. Engineering Geology, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 217-235
10. Hayati N. (2021) A Review Study for Rock Slope Stability Assessments and Stabilization Methods. Journal of Geotechnical Geology, Vol 17 (2), pp. 487-493
11. Yeh, C. H., Dong, J. J., Khoshnevisan, S., Juang, C. H., Huang, W. C., & Lu, Y. C. (2021). The role of the geological uncertainty in a geotechnical design–A retrospective view of Freeway No. 3 Landslide in Northern Taiwan. Engineering Geology, 291, 106233.
12. Yang, C. M. (2017). Applications of velocity-dependent friction law on catastrophic plane failure and accretionary wedge. National Central University.
13. Ching, J., Li, K. H., Phoon, K. K., Weng M. C. (2018) Generic transformation models for some intact rock properties. Canadian Geotechnical Journal.
14. 台灣世曦工程顧問股份有限公司(2020),109年山坡地總體檢及設施檢測委託技術服務案期末報告書。國立陽明交通大學委託之山坡地總體檢期末報告。國立陽明交通大學。
15. 董家鈞等人(2023),地質與地層模型不確定性之量化及其應用之整合型研究期中報告,行政院國家科學與技術委員會。
16. 經濟部中央地質調查所地質資料整合查詢系統。https://gis3.moeacgs.gov.tw/gwh/gsb97-1/sys8/t3/index1.cfm
17. 黃鑑水(1988),臺灣地質圖說明圖幅第四號-臺北,經濟部中央地質調查所。
18. 翁作新,「淺談岩石邊坡分析」,地工技術雜誌,第十九期,第19-25頁(1987)
19. 洪如江,「順向坡之破壞與穩定」,地工技術,第九十四期,第5-18頁(2002)
20. 魏倫瑋、黃韋凱、黃春銘、李璟芳、林聖琪、紀宗吉,「蘇迪勒颱風於臺灣北部之山崩至災機制初探」,中華水土保持學報,第四十六卷,第四期,第223-232頁(2015)
21. 詹佩臻、林銘郎、張國楨,「順層岩坡滑動破壞面之粗糙度特徵與尺寸效應」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第二十八卷,第二期,第129~137頁(2016)
22. 蔡立盛(2006),砂岩依時性力學特性研究及應用。國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。
23. 翁正學(2017),向上裂隙水對順向坡穩定性及破壞行為之影響。國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。
24. 陸安(2018),向上滲流水對順向節理岩體邊坡可滑動體形成之影響。國立臺灣大學土木工程學系。
25. 鄭鈺翰(2022),探討順向坡滑動機率與塊體運移特性受地質模型不確定性影響-以2010年國道三號3.1k崩塌事件為例。國立中央大學土木工程學系。
26. 葉芷辰(2023),探討地質參數不確定性對邊坡滑動風險之影響-以陽明交大-陽明校區之籃球場邊坡為例。國立中央大學土木工程學系 |