博碩士論文 110430002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:45 、訪客IP:3.215.16.238
姓名 陳怡瑄(Yi-Hsuan Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 公司規模與年齡對 CSR 揭露不真實的影響- 以台灣上市公司之年報為例
(The Impacts of Firm Size and Age on the Inauthenticity of CSR Disclosures – A Study of Annual Reports of Listed Companies in Taiwan)
相關論文
★ 利害關係人包容性:企業社會責任報告書揭露內容個案探討★ 盈餘目標的誘因對成本不對稱性之影響 -以母公司單獨報表與合併報表分析
★ 銷管費用的成本結構-以台灣公司為例★ 代理問題、公司治理與銷管費用僵固性
★ 差異化策略對成本不對稱性之影響★ 前期銷貨變動方向對成本習性及不對稱性之影響—營運成本之組成份分析
★ 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性★ 公司治理、公司避稅與現金持有
★ 台灣企業社會責任報告書自願性揭露之影響因素★ 企業社會責任與成本僵固性之關聯性-以台灣公司為例
★ 企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例★ 企業社會責任活動與成本僵固性之關聯──以台灣編製企業社會責任報告之公司為例
★ 企業社會責任活動對股東權益報酬率、資產報酬率及股價報酬率之影響:以企業社會責任願景為調節變數★ 企業社會責任願景對會計績效之影響:企業社會責任績效之中介效果
★ 企業社會責任治理績效與財務績效之雙向因果關係-以無形資產為中介效果★ 企業社會責任報告書確信提供者之選擇:選擇現任財簽會計師事務所與否之影響因素
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 近年來,全球發生了一系列的企業醜聞、金融弊案、勞資衝突、環境污染等 負面議題,這些議題不僅影響了企業的形象和聲譽,更凸顯了企業須對其社會負 責的重要性。在這樣的背景下,企業社會責任(CorporateSocialResponsibility,CSR) 的理念逐漸獲得了大眾的關注和企業的認同,政府單位也越來越重視永續發展, 許多企業開始自願性揭露其 CSR 之作為,以贏取公眾和利害關係人之信任。然 而,在這樣的制度背景下,有些公司可能會過度宣揚其 CSR 績效,以提升其社 會合法性,這也會使企業 CSR 揭露的質量和完整性存在問題。
本文以 CSR 揭露不真實的角度出發,探討公司規模及年齡對於 CSR 揭露不 真實之影響。以我國 2014 年至 2021 年年報中有履行社會責任情形表格之上市公 司為樣本,共計 7,289 筆觀察值,實證結果顯示公司規模越大,公司越不容易有 CSR 揭露不真實之現象;企業年齡越大,公司越不容易有 CSR 揭露不真實之現 象。另外,本研究額外分析之實證結果發現,相對於敏感產業,在一般產業中, 公司規模和 CSR 揭露不真實之關係有更明顯的反向關係。
本研究之結果,能股東及利害關係人在評估企業價值及進行投資或經濟決策 時作參考,亦能供立法者思考對於年報中應記載推動永續發展執行情形及與上市 上櫃公司永續發展實務守則差異情形及原因揭露事項段是否應設置更詳細與嚴 格的標準,進而達到其內容的完整性及真實性。
摘要(英) In recent years, a series of corporate scandals, financial fraud, labor disputes, environmental pollution and other negative issues have occurred globally. These issues not only affect the image and reputation of corporations, but also highlight the importance of corporate accountability to society. Against this backdrop, the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has gradually garnered attention from the public and recognition from corporations. Government bodies are also increasingly focusing on sustainable development, and many corporations have voluntarily disclosed their CSR practices to win the trust of the public and stakeholders. However, under such a system, some companies may overemphasize their CSR performance to enhance their social legitimacy, which could also compromise the quality and completeness of their CSR disclosure.
This paper sets out to explore the influence of company size and age on the truthfulness of CSR disclosure from the perspective of false CSR disclosure. Our sample consists of listed companies in our country that have fulfilled social responsibility as reported in their annual reports from 2014 to 2021, totaling 7,289 observations. The empirical results show that the larger the company, the less likely it is to have false CSR disclosures; the older the company, the less likely it is to have false CSR disclosures. In addition, the supplementary empirical analysis of this study found that, relative to sensitive industries, the correlation between company size and the truthfulness of CSR disclosure is more noticeably inverse in general industries.
The results of this study can serve as references for shareholders and stakeholders in evaluating corporate value and making investment or economic decisions. It could also provide legislators with insights into whether more detailed and stricter standards should be established for reporting on the implementation of sustainable development and the discrepancies between the practical code of sustainable development of listed companies in their annual reports, thereby ensuring the completeness and authenticity of its content.
關鍵字(中) ★ CSR 揭露不真實
★ 公司規模
★ 企業年齡
★ CSR 揭露真實性
關鍵字(英) ★ CSR Disclosure Inauthenticity
★ Firm Size
★ Firm Age
★ CSR Disclosure Authenticity
論文目次 摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究結果與貢獻 2
二、文獻探討與假說發展 3
2-1 CSR揭露不真實 3
2-2公司規模與CSR揭露不真實 4
2-3企業年齡與CSR揭露不真實 5
三、研究設計 6
3-1 變數衡量 6
3-2 研究模型 11
3-3 樣本選取 13
四、實證結果 15
4-1 敘述性統計 15
4-2 相關性分析 17
4-3 主要迴歸結果 19
五、結論與建議 28
5-1 研究結論與貢獻 28
5-2 研究限制與建議 29
參考文獻 30
參考文獻 甄友薇,2015,CSR揭露、公司特性與財務績效之關聯性研究-以台灣上市公司為例,管理學報,32(1):1-22。
Al-Gamrh, B., and R. Al-dhamari. 2016. Firm characteristics and corporate social responsibility disclosure in Saudi Arabia. International Business Management 10(18): 4283-4291.
Al-Khater, K., and K. Naser. 2003. Users′ perceptions of corporate social responsibility and accountability: Evidence from an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(6/7): 538-548.
Alabdullah, T. T. Y., E. R. Ahmed, and M. Muneerali. 2019. Effect of board size and duality on corporate social responsibility: what has improved in corporate governance in Asia? Journal of Accounting Science 3(2): 121-135.
Barako, D. G., and A. M. Brown. 2008. Corporate social reporting and board representation: evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance 12(4): 309-324.
Činčalová, S., and V. Hedija. 2020. Firm characteristics and corporate social responsibility: The case of czech transportation and storage industry. Sustainability 12(5): 1992.
Cho, C. H., M. Laine, R. W. Roberts, and M. Rodrigue. 2015. Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting Organizations and Society 40: 78-94.
Cho, C. H., R. P. Guidry, A. M. Hageman, and D. Patten. 2012. Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting Organizations and Society 37(1): 14-25.
Christensen, L. T., M. Morsing, and O. Thyssen. 2013. CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 20(3): 372-393.
Delmas, M. A., and V. C. Burbano. 2011. The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review 54(1): 64-87.
Dewi, D. M. 2014. CSR effect on market and financial performance. El Dinar 1(2): 198-216.

Doyle, J., W. Ge, and S. McVay. 2007. Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review 82(5): 1141-1170.
Forker, J. J. 1992. Corporate governance and disclosure quality. Accounting and Business Research 22(86): 111-124.
García-Sánchez, I. M., N. Hussain, S. A. Khan, and J. Martínez-Ferrero. 2021b. Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29(1): 89-106.
Gull, A., N. Hussain, S. A. Khan, Z. Khan, and A. Saeed. 2022. Governing corporate social responsibility decoupling: The effect of the governance committee on corporate social responsibility decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics 185:1-26
Hawn, O., and I. Ioannou. 2016. Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal 37(13): 2569-2588.
Hummel, K., and C. Schlick. 2016. The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(5): 455-476.
Jamali, D. 2010. MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics 95: 617-640.
Khan, A., M. B. Muttakin, and J. Siddiqui. 2013. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics 114(2): 207-223.
Khan, H. 2010. The effect of corporate governance elements on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: Empirical evidence from private commercial banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Law and Management 52(2): 82-109.
MacLean, T. L., and M. Behnam. 2010. The dangers of decoupling: The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Academy of Management Journal 53: 1499-1520.
Michelon, G., S. Pilonato, and F. Ricceri. 2015. Corporate social responsibility reporting practices and quality of disclosure: An Empirical Analysis. Critical Perspective on Accounting 33: 59-78.
Patten, D. M. 2012. White tigers, zoos and sustainability reporting: A cynical refection. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 32(1): 17-25.
Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., and I. Gallego‐Álvarez. 2019. An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26(3): 612-627.
Roberts, R. W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting Organizations and Society 17(6): 595-612.
Tashman, P., V. Marano, and T. Kostova. 2019. Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies 50(2): 153-171.
Trencansky, D., and D. Tsaparlidis. 2014. The effects of company´s age, size and type of industry on the level of CSR: The development of a new scale for measurement of the level of CSR., Master Thesis, Umeå University.
Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 658-672.
Waluyo, W. 2017. Firm size, firm age, and firm growth on corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: The case of real estate companies. European Research Studies Journal 20(4A): 360-369.
指導教授 陳建中(Chien-Chung CHEN) 審核日期 2023-6-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明