明日閱讀2.0：發展成就目標系統並初步評估對學生閱讀廣度與數量之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：105

、訪客IP：18.190.160.235

姓名

許喬珉(HSU,CHIAO-MIN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

明日閱讀2.0：發展成就目標系統並初步評估對學生閱讀廣度與數量之影響
(Reading for Tomorrow 2.0: Developing Achievement Goal System and Initial Assessment of Its Impact on Students′ Reading Breadth and Volume)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-9-30以後開放)

摘要(中)

在臺灣，兒童閱讀長期受到各界重視，各地區多所學校也不遺餘力地推動閱讀相關活動。明日閱讀計畫自從多年前開始實踐以來，已成功推動了台灣中小學校園進行閱讀活動，幫助學生養成閱讀的興趣與習慣，並取得了卓越成果。有鑑於此，明日閱讀為了更進一步的發展，同時也考量在明日閱讀的基礎上提供更全面的支持。提出明日閱讀2.0，以「廣博閱讀」、「大量閱讀」和「登台」三個主要推動方向為基礎。
為支持明日閱讀2.0的目標，本研究主要專注於提升學生的閱讀廣度和數量，為此開發了一個「百閱」成就目標系統，為了顯示學生的閱讀廣度，設計閱讀儀表板，讓學生能夠清晰地了解自己的閱讀書籍種類與數量等。為了幫助學生能閱讀更廣更多的書籍，系統設計100個閱讀關卡，這些關卡提供不同種類與難度的書籍給學生選擇，學生需選擇關卡中的書籍進行閱讀，讀完才算過關，這些關卡設計了不同程度的過關條件，根據閱讀量有分成基本數量、超額數量與超級數量三個等級。除了閱讀關卡，系統提供各書籍類型的成就獎章，讓學生在閱讀完某一類書籍特定本數後可以獲得相對應的成就獎章。此外，系統加入榮譽榜的機制，每週選出在各領域閱讀量前3名的學生，將他們的閱讀表現呈現在「百閱榜」上，作為其他學生的典範。這些功能鼓勵學生持續閱讀各關卡的書籍，增加閱讀廣度與閱讀量。
本研究屬於設計研究，主要以系統設計為主要的研究方向，目標是開發或設計系統解決現有問題或滿足特定需求，將對所設計之系統進行初步的測試與觀察。研究中會讓少量的受試者使用系統功能，針對使用者回饋，增修系統設計或功能。
本研究的評估對象為實驗教育機構的二跟三年級兩個班級的學生，總共30人。研究結果顯示，學生使用系統後，願意嘗試不同領域書籍。學生的閱讀總本數也有成長，且會主動追蹤自己的閱讀數量、閱讀書籍種類、閱讀書籍難度等資訊。成就目標系統設計的功能，主要目的是希望學生能讀更廣更多的書，以支持明日閱讀2.0的發展。

摘要(英)

In Taiwan, children′s reading has been regarded as important by all sectors of the community, and many schools had made an effort to promote reading-related activities. Reading for Tomorrow project has been implemented many years ago, it successfully encouraged reading activities in primary and secondary school in Taiwan, helping students develop an interest and habit of reading. Now, it enters a new phase of project development, aiming to provide more comprehensive support for the future of Reading for Tomorrow. Reading for Tomorrow 2.0 is based on three main directions: " Breadth Reading", " Quantity Reading", and " Staging." To help students enhance their reading breadth and quantity, this research has developed an achievement goal system, providing students with comprehensive reading support. The system records and tracks students′ reading progress and presents reading information in an intuitive visual manner, allowing students to have a clear understanding of their reading situation.
This research belongs to the design research, with a primary focus on system design. It aims to develop or design systems to address existing problems or meet specific needs. The system will do preliminary testing and observation. A small number of participants will be invited to use the system, and based on user feedback, the system design will be improved accordingly.
The participants are from two classes, consisting of second and third-grade students from an experimental educational institution, totaling 30 participants. The study results indicate that after using the system, students are willing to explore books from various fields. There has been an increase in the total number of books read by students, and they proactively track information such as their reading quantity, types of books read, and the difficulty level of books. The primary objective of designing the achievement-oriented system is to encourage students to read a wider range and greater quantity of books, thereby supporting the development of Reading for Tomorrow 2.0.

關鍵字(中)

★ 閱讀廣度
★ 大量閱讀
★ 目標設定
★ 遊戲化

關鍵字(英)

★ Breadth reading
★ Quantity reading
★ Goal setting
★ Gamification

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-1-1 明日閱讀1.0 1
1-1-2 明日閱讀2.0 2
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究問題 4
1-4 名詞解釋 5
第二章、文獻探討 7
2-1 閱讀相關研究 7
2-1-1 閱讀重要性 7
2-1-2 身教式持續安靜閱讀(Modeled Sustained Silent Reading) 7
2-1-3 明日閱讀相關研究 8
2-2 遊戲化融入閱讀學習 10
2-2-1 遊戲化的定義 10
2-2-2 教育遊戲化研究的發現 10
2-2-3 遊戲化在教學中的應用 11
2-3目標設定理論 12
2-3-1 目標設定理論概述 12
2-3-2 目標設定的運行機制 12
2-3-3 目標設定對學習之影響 13
第三章、系統設計與介紹 15
3-1 系統設計階段與目的 15
3-1-1階段一：閱讀歷程視覺化 15
3-1-2階段二：閱讀目標遊戲化 16
3-1-3階段三：系統提醒機制 17
3-2 「百閱」成就目標系統 18
3-3 支持「廣博閱讀」之系統功能 19
3-3-1 閱讀儀表板 19
3-3-2 閱讀成就獎章 20
3-4 支持「大量閱讀」之系統功能 23
3-4-1 閱讀關卡 23
3-5 提供舞台之系統功能 27
3-5-1 週紀錄 27
第四章、研究方法 29
4-1 研究對象 29
4-2 研究工具 29
4-2-1閱讀興趣問卷 29
4-2-2半結構性訪談 30
4-3 評估流程 31
4-4 資料蒐集與處理 32
4-4-1 問卷調查 32
4-4-2 學生訪談 35
4-4-3 系統log紀錄 36
第五章、研究結果與討論 37
5-1 學生閱讀書籍數據 37
5-1-1 閱讀總本數 37
5-1-2 各領域閱讀本數 38
5-2 成就目標系統之成效 42
5-2-1 閱讀關卡完成數 42
5-2-2 閱讀成就獎章數量 43
5-3 閱讀興趣問卷 43
5-3-1 整體閱讀興趣 44
5-3-2 引趣與好奇心 45
5-3-3 入趣與心流 47
5-3-4 延伸興趣 48
5-3-5 個人閱讀興趣的發展階段 49
5-4 訪談資料 51
5-4-1 概念性編碼 51
5-4-2 訪談對象編碼 53
5-4-3 訪談編碼統計 54
第六章、研究討論與結論 57
6-1 討論 57
6-1-1 百閱成就目標系統是否會影響學生的「廣博閱讀」？ 58
6-1-2 百閱成就目標系統對學生「大量閱讀」有何影響？ 58
6-1-3 如何透過百閱成就目標系統，幫助學生進行「登台」？ 59
6-1-4 目標設定對學生閱讀數量有何影響？ 59
6-1-5 學生對系統的感想為何？ 60
6-2 結論 61
6-2-1 學生各階段的閱讀本數有提升 61
6-2-2 學生的各領域閱讀本數上升 61
6-2-3 學生會為了登上百閱榜而提升閱讀表現 61
6-2-4 成就目標系統對學生閱讀廣度與數量有幫助，但是對閱讀興趣影響有限 62
6-2-5　學生對於系統功能的感受 62
6-3 研究限制 63
6-4 未來展望 64
參考文獻 67
附錄 72
附錄一、閱讀興趣問卷 72
附錄二、自主閱讀問卷 74
附錄三、第一次訪談大綱 76
附錄四、第二次訪談大綱 77
附錄五、第三次訪談大綱 78
附錄六、第四次訪談大綱 79
附錄七、訪談文件編碼 80

參考文獻

丁延欣（2022）。促進教師成為閱讀個人教練之初步模式設計與系統開發。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
王姿文（2016）。桃園市國小典範教師實施 MSSR (身教式持續安靜閱讀) 之研究〔碩士論文〕。中原大學教育研究所。
吳訂宜、王就貞（2017）。身教式持續安靜晨讀對國小四年級學童閱讀理解能力與閱讀態度影響之研究。科學與人文研究，4(2)，86-102。
巫武勳（2015）。以科技接受模式探討智慧型手機社群型應用程式之使用行為〔碩士論文〕。義守大學資訊管理研究所。
周郁凱（2017）。遊戲化實戰全書：遊戲化大師教你把工作、教學、健身、行銷、產品設計……變遊戲，愈好玩就愈有吸引力！。商業週刊。
柯華葳（2006），教出閱讀力，初版，親子天下，台北市。
唐寓琳（2021）。身教式持續安靜閱讀對於國小五年級學童閱讀動機與閱讀習慣影響之研究〔碩士論文〕。國立政治大學圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班。
徐詩惠（2020）。運用身教式持續安靜閱讀及其延伸方案對國中生閱讀興趣及閱讀理解影響之研究〔碩士論文〕。慈濟大學教育研究所。
徐銘駿（2020）。具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖和溫福星（2011）。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響：以 PIRLS 2006 為例。教育科學研究期刊，56(2)，69-105頁。
張鐵懷、陳斐卿（2021）。再遊戲化能力初探：以小學生玩家在教育遊戲平臺為例，數位學習科技期刊，13(2)， 1-26頁。
郭雨鑫（2019）。透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
陳欣琳（2020）。身教式持續安靜閱讀對於臺灣孩童之英語閱讀動機及閱讀理解之影響〔碩士論文〕。國立臺中科技大學英語學系。
陳詩妤（2020年11月2日）。PISA首次國際素養評測台灣全球第5，新加坡稱冠。親子天下教育現場。
https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5087770
陳德懷（2016）。明日閱讀：明日主題學習的基礎。天下雜誌。
測驗及評量研究中心（2020年1月）。臺灣閱讀表現上升，高於OECD平均。國家教育研究院電子報。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?eg_name=%E6%B4%BB%E5%8B%95%E5%A0%B1%E5%B0%8E&edm_no=191&content_no=3398
賴瑞霖（2021）。閱讀島：應用數位閱讀歷程擴大學生閱讀舒適圈及提升閱讀動機之系統設計〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所。
Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. M. (2021). Reading volume and reading achievement: A review of recent research. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S231-S238.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., & Garrison, D. R. et al.(2001). Assessing Teaching Presence in a ComputerConferencing Context[J]. Journal of Asynchronous LearningNetworks, 5(2):1-17.
Arnesen, A., Braeken, J., Ogden, T., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2019). Assessing children’s social functioning and reading proficiency: A systematic review of the quality of educational assessment instruments used in Norwegian elementary schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(3), 465-490.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 38(1), 92-113.
Bishop, R. S. (1994). Kaleidoscope: A Multicultural Booklist for Grades K-8. NCTE Bibliography Series. National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 25433-3050; $10.95 members, $14.95 nonmembers).
Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2016). SMILI☺: A framework for interfaces to learning data in open learner models, learning analytics, and related fields. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 293-331.
Chan, T. W., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Wong, L. H., Chang, B., Liao, C. C. Y., Ogata, H. (2018). Interest-Driven Creator Theory: Towards a Theory of Learning Design for Asia in the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 435-461.
Chen, W., Chan, T. W., Wong, L. H., Looi, C. K., Liao, C. C., Cheng, H. N., ... & Pi, Z. (2020). IDC theory: habit and the habit loop. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1-19.
Chien, T. C., Chen, Z. H., Ko, H. W., Ku, Y. M., & Chan, T. W. (2015). My-Bookstore: using information technology to support children′s classroom reading and book recommendation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 455-474.
Dicheva, D., Irwin, K., & Dichev, C. (2017). OneUp learning: A course gamification platform. In Games and Learning Alliance: 6th International Conference, GALA 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, December 5–7, 2017, Proceedings 6 (pp. 148-158). Springer International Publishing.
Domínguez, C., Garcia-Izquierdo, F. J., Jaime, A., Pérez, B., Rubio, A. L., & Zapata, M. A. (2021). Using process mining to analyze time distribution of self-assessment and formative assessment exercises on an online learning tool. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(5), 709-722.
Fulmer, S. M., D′Mello, S. K., Strain, A., & Graesser, A. C. (2015). Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 98-110.
Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2020). Diverse books for diverse children: Building an early childhood diverse booklist for social and emotional learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1468798420901856.
Gasser, L., Dammert, Y., & Murphy, P. K. (2022). How Do Children Socially Learn from Narrative Fiction: Getting the Lesson, Simulating Social Worlds, or Dialogic Inquiry?. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1445-1475.
Gioia, D. (2007). Preface. In National Endowment for the Arts, To read or not to read: A question of national consequence (Research Report No. 47, pp. 5–6). Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
Grolig, L. (2020). Shared storybook reading and oral language development: A bioecological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1818.
Hinze, A., McKay, D., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., & Cunningham, S. J. (2012, June). Book selection behavior in the physical library: implications for ebook collections. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 305-314).
Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers & education, 154, 103878.
Huang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2015, November). Do points, badges and leaderboard increase learning and activity: A quasi-experiment on the effects of gamification. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computers in education (pp. 275-280). Hangzhou, China: Society for Computer in Education.
Karlen, Y., Hirt, C. N., Liska, A., & Stebner, F. (2021). Mindsets and self-concepts about self-regulated learning: Their relationships with emotions, strategy knowledge, and academic achievement. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 661142.
Kocadere, S. A., & Çağlar, Ş. (2018). Gamification from player type perspective: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 12-22.
Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C., & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(1), 49-63.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current directions in psychological science, 15(5), 265-268.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological bulletin, 90(1), 125.
Mak, M.T.F., Wang, M., & Chu, S.K.W. (2019). Effects of a Gamified Learning Platform on Elementary School Students’ Flow Experiences in Leisure Reading. Paper presented at the ASIS&T 2019 Annual Meeting, Melbourne, Australia.
Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021). Between level up and game over: A systematic literature review of gamification in education. Sustainability, 13(4), 2247.
McCracken, R. A., & McCracken, M. J. (1978). Modeling is the Key to Sustained Silent Reading, The Reading Teacher, 31(4), 406-408.
McCracken, R. A., & McCracken, M. J. (1987). Reading is only the tiger′s tail: A language arts program (12th ed). Portage & Main Press.
McGeown, S. P., Johnston, R. S., Walker, J., Howatson, K., Stockburn, A., & Dufton, P. (2015). The relationship between young children’s enjoyment of learning to read, reading attitudes, confidence and attainment. Educational Research, 57(4), 389-402.
Nurmi, J., Knittle, K., Ginchev, T., Khattak, F., Helf, C., Zwickl, P., ... & Haukkala, A. (2020). Engaging users in the behavior change process with digitalized motivational interviewing and gamification: development and feasibility testing of the precious app. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(1), e12884.
Pilgreen, J. L. (2000). The SSR handbook: How to organize and manage a sustained silent reading program. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Rahmahani, D. (2020). The Effect Of Gamified Student Response System on Students′ Perception and Achievement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 10(2).
Rahmahani, D., Suyoto, S., & Pranowo, P. (2020). The Effect Of Gamified Student Response System On Students’ Perception and Achievement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 10(2), pp. 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i2.11698
Reuter, K., & Druin, A. (2004). Bringing together children and books: An initial descriptive study of children′s book searching and selection behavior in a digital library. Proceedings of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 41(1), 339-348.
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in human behavior, 69, 371-380.
Schucan Bird, K., & Pitman, L. (2020). How diverse is your reading list? Exploring issues of representation and decolonisation in the UK. Higher Education, 79(5), 903-920.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. Handbook of motivation at school, 35, 54.
Sezgin, S., Bozkurt, A., YILMAZ, E. A., Van der Linden, N., & Learning, P. (2020). Gamification, education and theoretical approaches: Motivation, engagement and sustainability in learning processes.
Smith, K. G., Locke, E. A., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(1), 118-134.
Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420-456.
Wang, Y. F., Hsu, Y. F., & Fang, K. (2021). The Key Elements of Gamification in Corporate Training – The Delphi Method. Entertainment Computing, 40, 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100463
Wong, L. H., Chan, T. W., Chen, W., Looi, C. K., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C., King, R. B. & Wong, S. L. (2020). IDC theory: interest and the interest loop. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1-16.
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. " O′Reilly Media, Inc.".

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2023-8-14

推文