博碩士論文 87124002 詳細資訊


姓名 高宇成(Yu-Chen Kao)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 哲學研究所
論文名稱 隱私(權)議題中化約主義與功能主義之探究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本文的主旨在於深入探討現代社會中「隱私(權)」議題的哲學性論述,所謂「隱私(權)」議題,即是包含「隱私」和「隱私權」兩個概念的議題,上述兩種概念雖然不是完全相等的概念,但卻有著密不可分的關係。
在「隱私(權)」的哲學性論述上,「化約主義」與「功能主義」是極為重要的
兩種不同主張,這兩種論述幾乎針鋒相對的原因在於:目前對於「隱私」和「隱私
權」概念的定義都是有缺漏的;此外這兩種主義深受美國「憲法」與「侵權法」的
法律背景影響,而採取兩個不同的法律立場來論述。
除了深入探討這兩種主義的論證之外,本文也經由這兩種主義的對話,進一步
瞭解、比較兩者的關係;並且本文要透過現代社會中已經漸漸產生變化的「隱私(權)」內涵來進一步評估這兩者未來對「隱私(權)」詮釋的發展性與可能面臨的問題。
本文在「隱私(權)」議題上所得到的結論,或許與一般人的直覺或大多數學者
的功能主義觀點不同,但是卻更多考慮到現代社會中「隱私(權)」內涵的變化,期待能為「隱私(權)」議題,提供一個更新的哲學性論述思考方向。
關鍵字(中) ★ 自我意識
★ 自我反思
★ 人際關係
★ 人格
★ 個體性
★ 尊嚴
★ 人格的不可侵犯
★ 自身權
★ 社會文化的風俗習慣
★ 功能主義
★ 憲法
★ 侵權法
★ 化約主義
★ 隱私權
★ 隱私
★ 近用
關鍵字(英) ★ self-consciousness
★ self-reflexivity
★ human relationship
★ personhood
★ individuality
★ social culture convention
★ access
★ tort law
★ constitutional law
★ functionalism
★ reductionism
★ privacy
★ the right to privacy
★ diginity
★ the inviolate personality
★ the right over the per
論文目次 目錄…………………………………………………………...Ⅰ
第一章 序論…………………………………………………1
前言………………………………………………………..1
第一節 本文架構…………………………………………6
第二節 問題源起與問題意識…………………………..13
第三節 文獻探討………………………………………..19
第二章 隱私(權)的化約主義論述……………………..62
第一節 隱私沒有普遍性準則…………………………..67
第二節 隱私的負面影響………………………………..75
第三節 以新權利取代隱私權…………………………..85
第四節 透明社會的方向………………………………108
第三章 隱私(權)的功能主義論述……………………124
第一節 人格保障理論…………………………………127
第二節 人格促進理論…………………………………140
第三節 人際關係理論…………………………………153
第四節 隱私(權)的其它功能性……………………163
第四章 結論………………………………………………170
第一節 隱私(權)內涵的變化………………………174
第二節 以隱私(權)新內涵評估化約主義與功能主義之發展性…………………………………………186
第三節 總結……………………………………………200
參考書目……………………………………………………207
參考文獻 引用資料:
Alfino, Mark, and Mayes, G. Randolph. “Reconstructing the Right to Privacy.” Social Theory and Practice. 29.1 (2003): 1-18
Allen, Anita L. Uneasy Access. New Jersey:Rowman&Littlefield, Publishers, 1988.
Benn, Stanley I. “Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Person.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 223-244
Bloustein, Edward J. “Privacy as An Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 156-202
Boling, Patricia. Privacy And the Politics of Intimate Life. Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press, 1996.
Brin, David. The Transparent Society:Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom?. Addison-Wesiey:Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 1998.
Bronski, Michael. The Pleasure Principle. New York:St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
Castiglione, Robert I. “Paul, Weiss-Privacy the Rediscovery of Human Being” Philosophy Today 28(1984): 20-35
Coleman, Craig Stuart. Privacy And Property: A Reexamination of The Right to Private Property. Madison: Thesis(Ph.D), The University of Wisconsin, 2000.
Cooke, Maeve. ”A Space of One's Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25.1 (1999): 23-53
Engstrom, Timothy H. “Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public Spheres.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997): 239-252
Etzioni, Amitai. “Medical Records: Enhancing Privacy, Preserving the Common Good” Hastings-Center-Report 29.2 Mr-Ap (1999): 14-23
Fried, Charles. “Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 203-222
Gavison, Ruth. “Privacy and The Limits of Law.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 346-402
Gerber, Scott D. “Privacy and Constitutional Theory.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 165-185
Gerstein, Robert S. “Intimacy and Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 265-271
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1991.
Hasian, Marouf Jr. ”Vernacular legal discourse: Revisiting the public acceptance of the "right to privacy" in the 1960s.” Political Communication 18.1 (2001): 89-105
Inness, Julie C. Privacy Intimacy And Isolation. New York:Oxford University Press, 1992.
Johnson, Jeffery L. ”A Theory of the Nature and Value of Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 6.3 (1992): 271-288
Johnson, Jeffery L. “Constitutional Privacy.” Law and Philosophy 13.2 (1994): 161-193
Posner, Richard A. “An Economic Theory of Privacy.” Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 333-345
Prosser, William L. ” Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology.
Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
104-155
Rachels, James. “Why Privacy Is Important.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy:
An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1984. 290-299
Reiman, Jeffrey H. “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.” Philosophical Dimensions
of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. by Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1984. 300-316
Schoeman, Fredinand David. Ed. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984.
‧‧‧. Privacy And Social Freedom. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA:Cambridge University Press, 1992 .
Soifer, Eldon and Szabados, Bela. “Hypocrisy and Privacy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 27 (2002): 601-618
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. ”The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 272-289
Warren, Samuel D., and Louis D. Brandeis. ” The Right to Privacy.” Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 75-103
Wasserstrom, Richard A. ” Privacy:Some Arguments and Assumptions.”
Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ed. Schoeman, Ferdinand
D.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. 317-332
Westin, Alan F. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum press. 1967
甯應斌 “性工作與現代性:現代自我的社會條件” 臺灣社會研究 53(2004):85-143
劉靜怡 “網路社會的資訊隱私權保護” 二十一世紀 63(2001.02):17-27
參考資料:
Allen, Anita L. “Privacy in American Law.” Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations. Ed. by Rossler, Beate. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2004. 19-39
‧‧‧. ”Why Privacy Isn't Everything: Feminist Reflections on Personal.” Philosophy in Review 24.1 (2004): 1-3
Beauchamp, Tom L. “The Right to Privacy and The Right to Die.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 276-292
Chambers, Jean E. ”Privacy, Sex, and Norms: An Indirect Control Definition.”
Journal of Information Ethics 9.1 (2000): 10-25
Corlett, J. Angelo. “The Nature and Value of the Moral Right to Privacy.” Public Affairs Quarterly 16.4 (2002): 329-350
Davison, Scott A. “Privacy and Control.” Faith and Philosophy 14.2 (1997): 137-151
Epstein, Richard A. “Deconstructing Privacy: And Putting It Back Together Again.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 1-24
Frey, R. G. ”Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights.” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2002): 45-67
Halper, Thomas ”Privacy and Autonomy: From Warren and Brandeis to Roe and Cruzan.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21.2 (1996): 121-135
Hixon, Richard F. Privacy In A Public Society:Human Rights In Conflict. New York:Oxford University Press, 1987.
LoPucki, L. M. “Did privacy cause identity theft?” Hastings Law Journal 54.4 (2003): 1277-1297
Marshall, Sandra E. “Public Bodies, Private Selves.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1988): 147-158
Moore, Banmgton. Privacy: Studies In Social And Cultural History. New York:Distributed by Pantheon Books, 1984.
Robison, Wade L. ”Privacy and Personal Identity.” Ethics and Behavior 7.3 (1997):
195-205
Rosenberg, Alexander. “Privacy as a Matter of Taste and Rights.” Social Philosophy
And Policy; 17.2 (2000): 68-90
Staples, William G. The Culture of Surveillance : Discipline and Social Control in
the United States. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1997.
Taylor, James Stacey. “Privacy and Autonomy: A Reappraisal.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 40.4 (2002): 587-604
Weinreb, Lloyd L. “The Right to Privacy” Social Philosophy and Policy 17.2 (2000): 25-44
中文部分:
李松婷撰 國小兒童隱私概念之研究A Study on Children’s Concept of Privacy。 台北市:碩士論文,台北市市立師範學院國民教育研究所,2002。
林建中撰 隱私權概念之再思考:關於概念範圍,定義,及權利形成方式。 台北市:碩士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1999。
詹文凱撰 隱私權之研究。 台北:博士論文,台灣大學法律研究所,1998。
藍培青撰 隱私權在美國演進歷程之研究。 台北縣:博士論文,私立淡江大學美國研究所,1997。
指導教授 甯應斌(Yin-Bin Ning) 審核日期 2006-1-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡