潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析

、線上人數：51

、訪客IP：3.145.91.121

姓名	林智文(Chie-Wen Lin) 查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	土木工程學系
論文名稱	潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式] [Bibtex 格式] [相關文章] [文章引用] [完整記錄] [館藏目錄] [檢視] [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	程中，鄰近地表面之隧道開挖面穩定分析是一個複雜的三向度問題。因此，本研究以離心模型試驗探討單隧道開挖面崩潰後，所引致之地盤沉陷分布型態、孔隙水壓變化及隧道破壞時周圍土體變位情形。本研究採用大型壓密儀製作等強度剖面之離心模型試體。土體經由100g 離心加速度下進行再壓密後，在1g 的情況下進行隧道開挖，並置入6cm 直徑之模型襯砌，模擬現地6m 直徑之隧道。由於要模擬三向度的問題，所以隧道並沒有貫穿整個土體。在不同試驗中改變隧道開挖方向前之未襯砌長度(P)。在預定之100g 下逐步調降支撐氣壓造成隧道變形直至開挖面崩壞。藉由不同之深徑比(C/D) 及未襯砌長度與隧道直徑比(P/D)之隧道模型試驗，對單隧道開挖面之穩定性做探討。研究結果顯示，在相同覆土深度時，隨著未襯砌長度之增大，單隧道崩潰時之超載係數降低、最大地表沉陷量( max d )增大。當 P/D 5 . 0 £ 時，深徑比(C/D)越大時max d 越大；但當P/D 5 . 1 ³ 時，深徑比(C/D) 越大時max d 反而越小。另外，在相同之深徑比(C/D)之下，平面應變試驗(P/D=¥)之max d 遠大於三維試驗(P/D=0，0.5 及1.5)之max d 。在相同未襯砌長度時，深徑比越大時其地表沉陷槽寬度也越大。另外，在相同深徑比下，隧道開挖面之水平位移，隨著P/D 之增大而增大。潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析若己知現場土壤之剪力強度(Su)，便可推估出隧道開挖面崩潰時所需提供的支撐氣壓。
摘要(英)	Shield tunneling is being carried out ever more frequently for tunnel construction in soft ground. During excavation, the face stability analysis of a shallow tunnel is a complex three-dimensional problem. Therefore, a series of single tunnel centrifuge models embedded in soft soils was used to investigate the distributions of surface settlement troughs, the changes of pore water pressure and the collapse mechanisms around the tunnel. The clay beds were consolidated in a rectangular consolidometer. Then the clay bed was reconsolidated in a centrifugal acceleration of 100g. A horizontal hole with 6cm in diameter was carefully cut and a model liner with 6cm in diameter was carefully put inside the hole in 1g to model a liner. The model tested in a centrifuge gravity field of 100g can model a prototype tunnel with 6m in diameter. The tunnel was not penetrated through the whole clay bed in order to simulate a threedimensional problem. After centrifuge acceleration was increased to 100g, the tunnel collapse tests were performed by gradually reducing the air pressure. Model tests with different cover-to-diameter ratio (C/D) and unlined length-to-diameter ratio (P/D) were conducted to investigate the face stability during tunneling in soft ground. For the tunnel having the same cover, the test results show that collapse (OF)c decreases and maximum surface settlement ( max d ) increases with increasing of the unlined length. If the P/D ratio is less than or equal to 0.5, the measured max d increases as the C/D ratio 潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析 -IVincreases. On the other hand, if the P/D ratio is large than or equal to 1.5, the measured max d decreases as the C/D ratio increases. The values of max d obtained from plane strain tests (P/D=¥) are larger than those obtained from 3D tests (P/D=0,0.5,1.5). For the same P/D ratio, the width of settlement trough increases as the C/D ratio increases. For the same C/D ratio, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel face becomes larger when the P/D ratio is greater. If the shear strength (Su) of soil in the field is known, designers can estimate the possible supporting pressure at collapse.
關鍵字(中)	★ 潛盾隧道 ★ 未襯砌長度 ★ 開挖面穩定 ★ 三度空間	關鍵字(英)	★ shield tunnel ★ unlined length ★ face stability ★ threedimensional
論文目次	中文摘要I 英文摘要III 目錄V 表目錄VIII 圖目錄XI 照片目錄XV 符號說明XVI 第一章緒論1 1.1 引言1 1.2 研究動機2 1.3 研究架構3 1.4 論文內容4 第二章文獻回顧5 2.1 離心機原理5 2.1.1 離心模型之基本相似律5 2.1.2 離心模型試驗之模型模擬9 2.2 軟弱地盤中構築隧道需考量之問題10 2.3 軟地通隧之臨時支撐壓力11 潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析 2.4 隧道模型試驗12 2.4.1 置於粘土層中的離心隧道模型試驗12 2.4.2 砂土層中隧道開挖面穩定之離心模型試驗13 2.4.3 粘土層中隧道開挖面穩定之離心模型試驗15 2.5 潛盾隧道之開挖面穩定分析17 2.5.1 開挖面主動破壞之作用力Pa(Pmin) 17 2.5.2 開挖面被動破壞之作用力Pp(Pmax) 21 2.5.3 適當之開挖面作用力之P 大小22 2.6 地表沉陷相關研究23 第三章試驗土樣、儀器設備及試驗方法47 3.1 試驗方法47 3.2 試驗儀器及相關設備47 3.2.1 地工離心機47 3.2.2 模型準備箱48 3.2.3 模型試驗箱49 3.2.4 其他量測工具50 3.3 試體準備與模型製作51 3.3.1 重模試體準備51 3.3.2 單向度壓密試驗52 3.3.3 標線及孔隙水壓計之埋設53 3.3.4 模型隧道之製作54 3.4 試驗方法與步驟54 3.5 無圍壓縮試驗及含水量量測55 潛盾隧道開挖面穩定分析第四章試驗結果與討論71 4.1 模型試驗及試驗類別71 4.2 土壤強度之標定72 4.3 地表沉陷分布型態73 4.3.1 單隧道地表沉陷槽分布曲線75 4.3.2 地表沉陷槽寬度77 4.4 開挖面之水平位移78 4.5 孔隙水壓分布型態78 4.6 破壞型態與地盤變位80 4.7 破壞機制理論分析81 4.7.1 二維分析模式82 4.7.2 三維分析模式83 第五章結論與建議141 5.1 結論141 5.2 建議143 參考文獻145
參考文獻	[1] Acutronic, Civil Engineering Centrifuge Model 665-1 Installation Manual 5941E, France (1992). [2] Acutronic, Geotechnical Centrifuge Model 665-1 Product Description 5933H, France (1993). [3] Acutronic, Geotechnical Centrifuge Model 665-1 Technical Proposal 6022, France (1993). [4] Anagnostou, G. and K. Kovári,“Face Stability Conditions with Earth-Pressure-Balanced Shields, ” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 165-173 (1996). [5] Anagnostou, G. and K. Kovári,“The Face Stability of Slurry-Shield- Driven Tunnels,”Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 165-174 (1994). [6] Broms, B. B. and H. Bennermark,“Stability of Clay at Vertical Openings,”ASCE, J. of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 71-94 (1967). [7] Chambon, P. and J. F. Corté,“Shallow Tunnels in Cohesionless Soil: Stability of Tunnel Face,”ASCE, J. of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 7, pp. 1148-1165 (1994). [8] Chambon, P., J. F. Corté, and J. Garnier,“Face Stability of Shallow Tunnels in Granular Soils,”Centrifuge 91, pp. 99-105 (1991). [9] Clough, G. W. and B. Schmidt, “ Design and Performance of Excavations and Tunnels in Soft Clay,”in Soft Clay Engineering, edited by Brand, E. W. and R. P. Brenner, pp. 600-634 (1981). [10] Davis, E. H., M. J. Gunn, R. J. Mair, and H. N. Seneviratne,“The Stability of Shallow Tunnels and Underground Openings in Cohesive Material,”Geo-technique, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 397-416 (1980). [11] Fang, Y. S., J. S. Lin, and C. S. Su,“An Estimation of Ground Settlement due to Shield Tunnelling by the Peck-Fujita Method,” Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 31, pp. 431-443 (1994). [12] Kimura T. and R. J. Mair,“Centrifuge Testing of Model Tunnels in Soft Clay,”Proc., 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Vol. 1, pp. 319-322 (1981). [13] Lee, K. M. and R. K. Rowe,“An Analysis of Three-Dimensional Ground Movements: the Thunder Bay Tunnel,”Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 28, pp. 25-41 (1991). [14] Mair, R. J., M. J. Gunn, and M. P. O'Reilly,“Ground Movements Around Shallow Tunnels in Soft Clay, ”Proc., 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Vol. 1, pp. 323-328 (1981). [15] Mair, R. J., R. Phillips, A. N. Schofield, and R N. Taylor, “Application of Centrifuge Modelling to the Design of Tunnels and Excavations in Soft Clay,”Proc. Symposium on the Application of Centrifuge Modeling of Geotechnical Design, pp. 356-379 (1984). [16] Mair, R. J.,“Centrifuge Model Testing of Tunnel Construction in Soft Clay, ” Seminar on Tunnels and Underground Structure Technology, Taipei, pp. 269-309 (1978). [17] Peck, R. B.,“Deep Excavations and Tunneling in Soft Ground,” Proc. 7th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, State-of-the-Art Volume, pp. 225-290 (1969). [18] Skiker, A., P. Chambon, E. Leca, and J. Garnier,“Face Stability of Tunnels Constructed Using the Mechanical Precutting,”Centrifuge 參考文獻 94, Balkema, Singapore, pp.713-718 (1994). [19] Takenmura, J., T. Kimura, and S. F. Wong,“Undrained Stability of Two-Dimensional Unlined Tunnels in Soft Soil,”Proc. of JSCE, No. 418/III-12 (Geotechnical Eng.), pp. 267-277 (1990). [20] 方永壽，「台北市潛盾隧道施工對地盤沉陷之影響」，國立交通大學土木系，國科會專題研究報告，新竹(1990)。 [21] 王繼勝等人，「潛盾工法與地表沉陷」，地工技術雜誌，第二十三期，第72-83 頁(1988)。 [22] 何泰源，「土壓平衡式潛盾工法--開挖面穩定分析及管理方法」，地工技術雜誌，第29 期，第88-103 頁(1990)。 [23] 李崇正，林志棟，林俊雄，「大地工程研究者知新工具：離心模型試驗」，岩盤工程研討會論文集，中壢，第649-669 頁(1994)。 [24] 林志忠，「潛盾機盾尾間隙閉合引致之土壓力轉移及襯砌應力之變化」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢（1998）。 [25] 林俊雄，「離心模型黏土試體之準備與強度標定」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(1995)。參考文獻 [26] 林建良，「潛盾隧道周圍之土壓力分布」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢（1999）。 [27] 邱顯堯，「並行雙隧道變形之互制行為」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(1997)。 [28] 莊孟翰，「未襯砌隧道壁變形引致地盤下限分布形態分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(1996)。 [29] 陳思宏，「黏土層中未襯砌隧道之破壞機制」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(1996)。 [30] 黃哲君，「層狀土壤之基礎承載力」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢（1998）。
指導教授	李祟正(Chung-Jung Lee)	審核日期	2000-7-12
推文	facebook plurk twitter funp google live udn HD myshare reddit netvibes friend youpush delicious baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks del.icio.us hemidemi myshare

博碩士論文 87322008 詳細資訊