博碩士論文 87423004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:9 、訪客IP:18.204.2.190
姓名 林亮德(Lian-De Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 消費者創新產品之採用行為與產品屬性評估之研究—以數位影音光碟機(DVD)為例
相關論文
★ 半導體二手設備之行銷策略-以應用材料公司為例★ 從創新擴散角度探討新科技技術行銷策略之影響 —以全球資訊大廠推廣Web Services為例
★ 企業多角化經營策略之研究 ─以某機構拓展資訊應用服務市場為例★ 汽車產業網站行銷之應用與效益探討研究-以N品牌為例
★ 系統整合業轉型策略之探討--以A公司為例★ 顧客關係管理系統導入之研究-以A、B公司為例
★ 策略聯盟個案分析 - 以台灣光碟機廠商為例★ 資訊教育訓練機構的轉型策略 —以某資訊教育機構為例
★ 組織文化及組織承諾對組織變革影響之研究- 以外商銀行與本國銀行資訊部門為例★ 高階資訊教育市場行銷策略與會員制度之研究-資訊教育產業為例
★ 探討平衡計分卡在售前技術支援部門績效管理的運用 - 以外商資訊科技公司為例★ 軟體行銷策略與競爭優勢分析-以全球二家資訊大廠為例
★ 綠色供應鏈管理研究-以A公司為例★ 企業專案管理系統 - 提升專案即時資訊透通性及其效益分析
★ 金融軟體專案管理導入國際專案管理師(PMP)專案管理機制之效益分析★ 企業轉型與其資源基礎之關係研究及轉型策略之發展-以M公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 高科技產品的應用從早期應用在科學到軍事至政府到企業最後廣為消費者接受,現在相當多的高科技產品已成為家庭的消費性產品。高科技產品日益推陳出新而消費者的接受度也因為個人特色的不同而有差異。本研究根據Boyd &Mason(1999)、Midgley(1993)、Holak(1988)等學者所提出之個人層次消費者採用處理模型(Model of the Individual-level Consumer Adoption Processes)為基礎,將消費者依據Moore(1995)、Rogers(1983) 及Bass (1969)的創新擴散模型,以事後分群的方式區分不同個人特色的消費群體;並探究新產品屬性對於不同群體的消費者的吸引力和此屬性是否影響消費者購買意願。
綜觀過去新產品相關的研究,部分以創新擴散為主題,少部分則探討消費者對產品屬性的評估。本研究主要整合兩項議題,採用情境設計方式,探討不同特色的消費者對於新產品的屬性評估及此屬性是否影響不同消費群體的購買意願。據此研擬發展出研究架構及研究假設,並根據實證結果提供管理者更進一步認識消費者評估新產品的過程,且依據產品擴散的時間維度來區隔消費群體形成目標市場,更進一步針對目標市場凸顯此一目標顧客所重視的新產品屬性,以增進新產品的接受程度,以增加企業新產品上市的成功率。最後則提出未來新產品研究議題的後序實證研究方向。
關鍵字(中) ★ 創新擴散
★ 購買意願
★ 消費群體
★ 產品屬性
★ 個人特色
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的與問題 5
第四節 研究範圍 6
第五節 預期貢獻 7
第六節 研究程序 9
第二章 文獻探討 11
第一節 創新產品的概念 11
第二節 新產品的採用模式與過程 15
第三節 產品屬性 19
第四節 個人特色 28
第三章 研究方法 32
第一節 研究架構的建立 32
第二節 研究假說的建立 35
第三節 研究變數的定義與操作化 40
第四節 研究方法的選擇 47
第五節 資料蒐集 48
第六節 研究設計 50
第四章 資料分析與結果 53
第一節 資料分析方法 53
第二節 前測之分析結果 54
第三節 問卷回收 58
第四節 樣本之基本特性分析 58
第五節 問卷量表之信度檢定 62
第六節 創新採用之個人特色分析 63
第七節 產品屬性的假設檢定分析 68
第八節 資料分析結果彙整說明 79
第五章 結論與建議 84
第一節 研究結果之推論與解釋 84
第二節 研究貢獻 89
第三節 對實務界之管理意涵 90
第四節 研究限制 93
第五節 未來研究方向與建議 94
參考文獻 95
中文部分 95
英文部分 95
附錄一:前測問卷 1
附錄二:正式問卷 1
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文部分
1. Moore Geoffrey A,著 陳正平 譯 ,「Crossing the Chasm,跨越鴻溝」,臉譜出版社,民國八十九年
2. Moore Geoffrey A,著 陳正平 譯 ,「Inside the tornado,龍捲風暴」,麥田出版社,民國八十五年
3. PC Shopper編輯部,「新硬體、新軟體」,PC Shopper,民國八十八年
4. Philip Kotler 著,方世榮譯,「行銷管理學」,東華書局,民國八十六年。
5. Robert Bocock 著,張君玫、黃鵬仁譯,「Consumption,消費」,巨流出版社,民國八十四年。
6. 黃慧中,「產品相對屬性及品牌引入策略對目標品牌及競爭品牌影響之研究」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所,民國88年
7. 楊淑君,「產品微關特性、涉入程度與消費者行為關係之研究」,私立實踐大學企業管理研究所未出版論文,民國87年
8. 廖年榮,「我國資訊工業概況等」,產業經濟第215期,民國八十八年。
9. 劉小芳,「跨國流行商品擴散模型之比較研究」,國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系未出版碩士論文,民國87年
10. 蕭淑惠,「創新擴散模型之研究--以數據機為例」, 國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版論文,民國87年
英文部分
英文部分
英文部分
3. Bass, Frank M. (1969) “ A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,” Management Science 15 : 215-227.
3. Bass, Frank M. (1969) “ A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables,” Management Science 15 : 215-227.
5. Blythe, Jim (1999), “Innovativeness and Newness in High-Tech Consumer Durables.” Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol.8 , pp.415-429.
6. Bone, Paula Fitzgerald (1995), “Word-of-Mouth Effects in Short-term and Long-term Product Judgments,” Journal of Business Research, 32, pp.213-223.
6. Bone, Paula Fitzgerald (1995), “Word-of-Mouth Effects in Short-term and Long-term Product Judgments,” Journal of Business Research, 32, pp.213-223.
8. Brown, Jacqueline Jounson and Peter H. Reingen,(1987) “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14,pp.350-362.
8. Brown, Jacqueline Jounson and Peter H. Reingen,(1987) “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14,pp.350-362.
10. Chernev, Alex (1997). ”The Effect of Common Features on Brand Choice : Moderating Role of Attribute Importance,“ Journal of Consumer Research , Vol.23, pp.304-311.
11. Coupey, Eloise , Jule R. Irwin and John W. Payne (1998). “Product Category Familiarity and Preference Construction ,“ Journal of Consumer Research , Vol.24 ,pp.459-468.
12. Cooper, Rober G. and Elko J. Kleinschmidt,(1991) New Product : The Key Factors in success.
12. Cooper, Rober G. and Elko J. Kleinschmidt,(1991) New Product : The Key Factors in success.
14. Dhar, Ravi and Itamar Simonson,(1992), “The Effext of the Focus of Comparison on Consumer Preferences ,“ Journal of Marketing Research ,Vol. XXIX ,pp.430-440.
15. Dhar, Ravi and Steven J. Sherman, (1996), “The Effect of Common and Unique Features in Consumer Choice, “ Journal of Consumer Research ,Vol 23 ,pp193-203.
16. Dhebar, Anirudha (1995), “Complementarity, Compatibility, and Product Change: Breaking With the Past?,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 12, pp.136-152.
16. Dhebar, Anirudha (1995), “Complementarity, Compatibility, and Product Change: Breaking With the Past?,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 12, pp.136-152.
16. Dhebar, Anirudha (1995), “Complementarity, Compatibility, and Product Change: Breaking With the Past?,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 12, pp.136-152.
19. Fisher, Robert J and Linda L. Price ,(1992), “An Investigation Inte the Social Context of Early Adoption Behavior, “ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19 ,pp476-486.
20. Folkes, Valerie S.(1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14,pp.548-565.
20. Folkes, Valerie S.(1988), “Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14,pp.548-565.
22. Gatignon, Hubert, and Thomas S. Robertson ,(1989).”Thechnology Diffusion : an Empirical Test of Competitive Effects ,“ Journal of Marketing ,Vol. 53 pp35-49.
22. Gatignon, Hubert, and Thomas S. Robertson ,(1989).”Thechnology Diffusion : an Empirical Test of Competitive Effects ,“ Journal of Marketing ,Vol. 53 pp35-49.
24. Goldsmith, Ronald E. and Charkes F. Hofacker (1991) “ Measuring Consumer Innovativeness, ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.19
24. Goldsmith, Ronald E. and Charkes F. Hofacker (1991) “ Measuring Consumer Innovativeness, ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.19
26. Greenleaf, Eric A. and Donald R. Lehmann,(1995).”Reasons for Substantial Delay in Consumer Decision Making, “ Journal of Consumer Reseach ,Vol.22, pp186-199.
27. Griffin, Abbie, (1997).”The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time, “ Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.XXXIV ,pp24-35.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
28. Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1999), “Launch Strategy, Launch Tactics, and Demand Outcomes,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 16, pp.509-529.
35. Horsky, Dan (1990),“A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits, Price, Income and Information.” Marketing Science, Vol.9, pp.342-365.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
36. Hsee, Christopher K. and france Leclerc(1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25,pp.175-186.
42. Kohli, Rajeev, Donald R. Kehmann and Jae Pae (1999) “Extent and Impact of Incubation Time in New Product Diffusion.” Journal Product Innovation Management , 16, pp.134-144.
42. Kohli, Rajeev, Donald R. Kehmann and Jae Pae (1999) “Extent and Impact of Incubation Time in New Product Diffusion.” Journal Product Innovation Management , 16, pp.134-144.
42. Kohli, Rajeev, Donald R. Kehmann and Jae Pae (1999) “Extent and Impact of Incubation Time in New Product Diffusion.” Journal Product Innovation Management , 16, pp.134-144.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
45. Malhotra, Naresh K.(1981), “A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts,” Journal of Marketing Research.Vol.XVⅢ,pp.456-464.
54. Muthukrishnan, A. V. (1995). “Decision Ambiguity and Incumbent Brand Advantage, “ Journal of Consumer Research , Vol.22 , pp.98-109.
54. Muthukrishnan, A. V. (1995). “Decision Ambiguity and Incumbent Brand Advantage, “ Journal of Consumer Research , Vol.22 , pp.98-109.
56. Nowlis, Stephen M. and Itamar Simonson (1996)” The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. XXXIII, pp.36-46
56. Nowlis, Stephen M. and Itamar Simonson (1996)” The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. XXXIII, pp.36-46
58. Rao, Vithala R (1997) “Resources For Research And Pedagogy on New Product Development Processes, ” Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. XXXIV ,pp185-192.
59. Rogers, Everett M. (1983) 「Diffusion of Innovation」 ,3rd ed. New York :Free Press.
59. Rogers, Everett M. (1983) 「Diffusion of Innovation」 ,3rd ed. New York :Free Press.
61. Scitovsky. Tibor, Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price. Review of Economic Studies 12 (1944-45):100.
62. Sen, Sankar, (1998).” Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect .“ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 ,pp64-77.
62. Sen, Sankar, (1998).” Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect .“ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 ,pp64-77.
62. Sen, Sankar, (1998).” Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect .“ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 ,pp64-77.
62. Sen, Sankar, (1998).” Knowledge, Information Mode, and the Attraction Effect .“ Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 ,pp64-77.
66. Sultan, Fareena (1999), “Consumer Preferences for Forthcoming Innovations: the Case of High Definition Television,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.16,pp.24-41.
67. Swinyard, William R .,(1993).”The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20,pp.271-280.
67. Swinyard, William R .,(1993).”The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20,pp.271-280.
69. Uray, Nimet and Ayla Dedeoglu (1997), “Identifying Fashion Clothing Innovators by Self-Report Method,” Journal of Euromarketing, Vol.6(3), pp.27-46.
70. Veryzer ,Robert W., Jr, (1998),”Key Factors Affecting Customer Evaluation of Discontinuous,” Journal of Product Innovation Management ,15. pp 136-150.
71. Veryzer ,Robert W., Jr, (1998), “Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.304-321.
71. Veryzer ,Robert W., Jr, (1998), “Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.304-321.
71. Veryzer ,Robert W., Jr, (1998), “Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Development Process,” Journal Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.304-321.
指導教授 李小梅(Shau-Mei Li) 審核日期 2000-6-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明