博碩士論文 88126007 詳細資訊


姓名 高文萱(Wen-Hsuan Kao)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 藝術學研究所
論文名稱 從狄德羅的沙龍評論 看夏爾丹的靜物畫在法國繪畫史上的地位與影響
(Re-evaluating the Position and Influence of Chardin's Still Life in the Tradition of French Painting in light of Diderot's Salons Criticism )
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在十八世紀的法國畫壇中,夏爾丹無疑是一位特殊的畫家。他在學院中的位置、繪
畫事業的轉變、十八世紀評論者對其的評價觀點,乃至當代研究者對其藝術在繪畫史上
地位的建構,這幾個不同脈絡所顯示的矛盾,引發這篇論文最初的好奇。本文的首要工
作是找出一個能解釋其藝術本質的一貫性,並嘗試解決上述不同面向間的斷裂。
因此,這本論文試圖透過十八世紀的當代藝術評論,重新認識並評價夏爾丹的靜物
畫。而在眾多評論者中,無論是十九世紀的評論者或是當代學術研究,當將狄德羅的評
論視為理解夏爾丹藝術與建構夏爾丹歷史地位的重要資料,這些資料一方面作為研究者
的佐證,一方面也跟著繪畫成為被建構的對象。對本文而言,欲重新發掘夏爾丹作品的
性質、重新定位他的藝術,必須一併重新理解並評價狄德羅的評論。同時,透過對狄德
羅評論的分析,將關注的焦點從對畫面性質的直接分析,轉移至討論藝術形式與「觀者」
之間所形成的特定關係,以求有效發掘出夏爾丹作品的形式特質。藉此,本文一方面希
望探究夏爾丹藝術在當時如何被接受與解讀,另一方面也欲指出十八世紀觀者如何開發
回應夏爾丹藝術形式的語言。
本文將狄德羅的評論區分為兩個主要觀點:繪畫中的逼真幻象與畫家技法。針對前
者,因為受到經驗主義的影響,狄德羅認可並提高了原本在學院古典理論中價值較低的
「幻象」地位,並在此基礎上發展新的觀看經驗。此觀看經驗正相應於狄德羅進對夏爾
丹作品技法性的發掘。在這個脈絡中狄德羅的觀點由「藝術」作為自然複製或透明幻象,
轉移至藝術作為「再現」。而於此過程中,狄德羅拋棄舊有的論述框架,審美對象逐漸
擴張並轉移至繪畫的固有性質以及繪畫實作的手工層面,同時發掘相應於此,屬於直觀
的觀看模式與評論語言。
最後,本文認為,狄德羅的評論以及評論所相應的繪畫特質及觀看模式,兩者皆有
其法國傳統中的前例,且這些分享類似性質的文化/藝術脈絡皆以相對於哲學或藝術上
「義大利」傳統的形式出現。顯示法國繪畫在歷史發展上,與其所承襲的其他傳統—諸
如義大利與北方法蘭德斯—的相對性。在藝術史發展的光譜上,若義大利傳統代表著理
性、心智、精神、線條等可納入言說架構的事物,則相對於此的便是感性、感官、物質、
色彩等無法納入言說架構的事物。夏爾丹的藝術與洛可可,以它們皆反映與後者相關的
繪畫模式與觀看關係而言,是屬於相對於義大利傳統的「法國傳統」。而正是因為夏爾
丹一方面繼承洛可可的審美性質,一方面則以自然為觀察對象;以視覺經驗為憑藉將之
轉譯在二維平面上,使得夏爾丹的藝術在法國繪畫的發展中,扮演一關鍵性的角色。
摘要(英) Among numerous painters in eighteenth century France, Chardin is Undoubtedly an unique figure. There are some contradictions between his status in Academy, his several shifts on the choices of subject matter during his career, the way by which critics at that time assessed his painting and his position in French tradition of painting which is still under construction by art historians. However, it is those contradictions of different contexts mentioned above evoke the initial curiosity of this thesis. Therefore, the main effort of this thesis is try to find out a kind of coherence explainable for the nature of Chardin’s art and to resolve the complicated contradictions just mentioned.
For this reason, this thesis tries to re-evaluate the still life of Chardin by analyzing the art criticisms in eighteenth century. Among those critics, via the discussion of commentators of nineteenth century and art historians of twentieth century, Diderot’s criticisms are adopted as not only the important sources for understanding the art of Chardin but also the materials for constructing his historical position. Thus, this thesis aims to re-interpret Diderot’s criticism in order to re-discover the quality of Chardin’s works and to re-place his art. Meanwhile, by doing so, the main concern of this study is transferred from the direct discussion of Chardin’s painting surface to analyze the specific relationship between the artistic form and the audience. This thesis attempts to investigate in which way Chardin’s art has been accepted and interpreted at his time on one hand, and indicate how the critical language which responds to Chardin’s artistic style has been developed by audience of eighteenth century on the other.
Diderot’s position to Chardin’s art drawing from criticism can be considered in two way: trompe-l’oeil and the technicity of painting. As to the former, because of the influence from empiricism, Diderot legitimatised and raised the status of illusion, which used to be devaluated in the classical theory of Academy, and then developed a new kind of visual experience of looking at his still life. However, this new looking experience corresponds to his discovery of the technicity from Chardin’s works. In this context, Diderot’s viewpoint shifts from art as a natural replica or transparent illusion, to art as representation. During this process, the object of aesthetic activity expands and transfers to the inherent qualities of painting and the manual aspect of artistic practice. Moreover, Diderot also detects the intuitive looking pattern and critical rhetoric appropriate to his experience.
Finally, this study retraces Diderot’s criticism, the quality of Chardin’s painting, the looking pattern which corresponds his criticism back to the French cultural tradition and find out that there are precedents which possess similar qualities and can be regarded as examples opposite to Italian tradition. Therefore, it reveals the relativity of French painting tradition to the other traditions it inherits—the Italian and the Flemish tradition for example. On the spectrum of art history, if the Italian tradition presents those related to discourse, such as reason, mind, spirit and lines etc, then, their oppositions are those excluded from discourse, such as sensation, sense, material and color etc. Since the art of Chardin and Rococo both demonstrate the artistic pattern and looking relationship related to the latter, they belongs to the French tradition which is opposite to Italian tradition. Hence, Chardin inherits the aesthetic qualities of Rococo on one hand, he also takes nature as an object of observation, and translates his visual experience to two-dimensional plane on the other. That’s the reason that Chardin’s art plays a crucial role in the historical development of French painting.
J.B.S Chardin, Denis Diderot, Still life, Art criticism, Salons, Tradition of French painting
關鍵字(中) ★ 法國繪畫史
★ 沙龍評論
★ 狄德羅
★ 靜物畫
★ 夏爾丹
關鍵字(英) ★ Chardin
★ Still life
★ French painting tradition
★ Art Criticism
★ Salons
★ Diderot
論文目次 論文提要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iv
導論 1
研究動機 1
研究問題與研究架構 3
第一章 夏爾丹的藝術、生平與研究 8
第一節 夏爾丹的生平與學院生涯 8
(一)藝術事業的開始 9
(二)學院生涯 12
第二節 夏爾丹的繪畫分期 15
(一)早期作品與靜物畫 15
(二)風俗畫時期 19
(三)回歸靜物畫 21
(四)晚期的粉彩創作 22
第三節 文獻回顧 23
(一)夏爾丹的傳記回顧及其問題 23
(二)法國繪畫發展中的關鍵:夏爾丹的風俗畫與靜物畫 27
(三)神秘的魔術師:夏爾丹藝術中的視覺性問題 33
小結 34
第二章 逼真幻象:介於自然與藝術間的夏爾丹 35
十八世紀藝術評論的興起與沙龍評論 35
第一節 靜物畫的逼真幻象 40
(一)以「逼真幻象」作為評論標準 40
(二)幻象與感官作用 49
第二節 繪畫中的自然 52
(一)自然完美:自然作為繪畫典範 52
(二)模仿自然帶來的合理性 54
(三)藝術概念的介入 60
第三節 十八世紀自然觀對狄德羅藝術觀點的影響 64
(一)十八世紀自然觀與模仿自然的藝術 64
(二)感官經驗:狄德羅對色彩的看法 69
小結 71
第三章 繪畫中的技法性:論夏爾丹藝術的地位 73
第一節 畫家的技法性(technicit?) 75
(一)技法問題 75
(二)圖畫感知與審美感知 80
(三)法國畫派中的色彩畫家 90
第二節 十八世紀的美感幻象理論 93
(一)學院理論傳統與幻象位階 93
(二)去中心的審美感知 99
第三節 夏爾丹靜物畫與法國繪畫傳統 103
(一)莊重雅緻的君子風度(Honn?tet?)與感性鑑賞力 103
(二)對洛可可的繼承:從華鐸改變敘述畫的修辭模式開始 106
結論 109
參考書目 113
西文參考書目 113
中文參考書目 118
圖版 119
參考文獻 西文參考書目
(一)夏爾丹畫冊專論:
Chardin, 1699-1779 : a special exhibition organized by the Reunion des Musees Nationaux,
Paris, the Cleveland Museum of Art, and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston,
catalog tr. by Emilie P. Kadish and Ursula Korneitchouk, U.S: Cleveland
Museum of Art, 1979
Collins, Kristin B. Manet and Chardin: Artistic Affiliation and the Problem of Frenchness
in Painting, 1858-1870, M.A. diss., University of Oregon, 1996, 8
Conisbee, Philip, Chardin , Lewisburg [N.J.] : Bucknell University Press, 1986
CrosPhilippe, Chardin ,Paris : soci?t? nouvelle Adam Biro, 1999
Goncourt, Edmond de, and Gouncout, Jules de. French XVIII Century Painters: Watteau,
Boucher,Chardin, La Tour, Greuze, Fragonard, trans by Robin Ironside ,
Cornell University Press, 1981
Edizel, Gerar, Jean-Simeon Chardin: seeing, playing, forgetting, and the practice of
modern imitation, Ph. D diss. Michigan University, UMI, 1995
McCoubrey, John Walker, Studies in French Still-Life Painting, Theory and Criticism, Ph. D.
diss. , 1958, New York University, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms
---------------------. The revival of Chardin in French Still-life Painting, Art Bulletin 46, 1964
Roland Michel, Marianne, Chardin, Paris : Hazan, 1994
Rosenberg, Pierre, Chardin : biograpgical and critical study, tr. from the French by Helga
Harrison, Skira, U.S. Cleveland : World Pub. Co, 1963
--------------------- Chardin, Paris, Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais, 7 September-22
November 1999 : D?sseldorf, Kunstmuseum im Ehrenhof, 5 December
1999-20 February 2000 : London, Royal Academy of Arts, 11 March-29
May 2000 : New York, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 27 June-3
September 2000 [exhibition committee ; assisted by Florence Bruyant ;
translated from the French by Caroline Beamish, London : Royal
Academy of Arts /New York : Metropolitan Museum of Art , 2000
--------------------- Chardin : biographical and critical study, New York: Zizzoli, 1991
--------------------- Chardin, Paris : Renaud Temperini, 1999
--------------------- Tout L’Oeuvre Peint de Chardin, Les Classique de l’Art,
Paris: Flammarion, 1983
--------------------- Chardin, An Intimate Art, London: Thames & Hudson, 2000
Weisberg, Gabriel P., and Talbot, William S, Chardin and the still-life tradition in France,
Cleveland: Cleveland Museum of Art, 1979
(二)狄德羅著作及評論
Diderot, Denis, Salons, Jean Seznec et Jean Adhemar eds. 4vols, Oxford : Clarendon Press,
1857
------------------- Oeuvres, Tome I, Philosophie, Paris : R. Laffont, c1994
Oeuvres, Tome IV, Esthetique – Th??tre, Paris : R. Laffont, c1994
Oeuvres, Tome V, Correspodonce, Paris : R. Laffont, c1994
------------------- Oeuvres comp?ltes de Diderot : revues sur les editions originales,
comprenant ce qui a ete publie a diverses epoques et les manuscrits inedits,
conserves ? la Bibliotheque de l'Ermitage, notices, notes, table analytique,
Tome 14-17. Encyclopedie, Nendeln, Germany: Kraus Reprint, 1875-77
------------------- Diderot on Art, the Salon of 1765 and Notes on Painting, trans by John
Goodman, 2vols. , Yale University Press, 1995
------------------- Selected Writings on Art and Literature, trans by Geoffery Bremner,London/
New York: Penguin Book, 1994
Diderot & l'art de Boucher 1a David les Salons, 1759-1781, Paris : Ministrer de la Culture,
Editions de la Reunion des Mus?es Nationaux, 1984, Catalogues des Expositions ? L’Hot?l de
la monnaie
Bonnet, Jean-Claude, Diderot, Paris : Le Livre de poche, 1984
Brookner, Anita, The Genius of the Future, Essays in French Art Criticism: Diderot,
Stendhal, Baudelaire, Zola, the brothers Goncourt, Huysmans, New
York: Cornell University Press, 1971
Bukdahl, Else Marie, Diderot, Critique d’Art, 2vols, Copenhague : Rosenkilde et Bagger,
1980
(三)其他參考文獻
Alembert, Jeam Le Rond d’, Preliminary discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot ,
translated by Richard N. Schwab, with the collaboration of Walter E. Rex.
With an intro. and notes by Richard N. Schwab, Indianapolis :
Bobbs-Merrill, 1963
Alpers, Svetlana, The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century, U.S.: the
University of Chicago Press, 1983。
Art Criticism and its Institutions in Nineteenth-Century France, ed. by Orwicz, Muchael R.,
Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press, 1994
Arnold, Julie Wegner, Art Criticism as Narrative, Diderot’s Salon de 1767, New York;
Washington, D.C./Baltimore; San Francisco; Bern; Frankfurt; am Main;
Berlin; Vienna; Paris; Lang: Peter Lang Publishing, 1995
Barrell, John, Painting and the Politics of Culture: New Essays on British Art 1700-1850,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1992。
Baxandall, Michael, Patterns of Intention, on the Historical Explanation of Picture, New
Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1985
-------------------- Giotto and Orator, New York: Oxford University Press, 1971
-------------------- Shadows and Enlightenment, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995
Boime, Albert, Art in an Age of Revolution 1750-1800, Chicago : University of Chicago
Press, 1987
Bremner, Geoffrey, Order and Chance: the pattern of Diderot's thought, Cambridge; New
York : Cambridge University Press, 1983
Brewer Daniel, The Discourse of enlightenment in eighteenth-century France: Diderot and
the Art of Philosophizing, Cambridge, [England]; New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1993
Bryson, Norman, Looking at the Overlooked, Four Essays on Still Life Painting, London;
U.S. : Harvard University Press, 1990
-------------------- Word and Image, French painting of the Ancien Regime, New York
Cambridge University Press, 1981
Couillet, Jacques, La Formation des Id?es Esth?tiques de Diderot, Paris : Librairie Armand
Colin, 1973
Crocker, Lester G, Diderot's chaotic order: approach to synthesis, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 1974
Crow, Thomas, Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris, New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1985
Duro, Paul, The Academy and the Limits of Painting in seventeenth-century France, New
York: Cambridge University, 1997
Francis Frascina and Jonathan Harris edited, Art in modern culture an anthology of critical
texts, New York:HarperCollins, 1992
Fried Michael, Absorption and Theatricality, Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988
------------------ Manet's modernism, or, The face of painting in the 1860s, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1996
Gillian, Perry, Femininity and masculinity in eighteenth-century art and culture, edited by
Gill Perry and Michael Rossington, Manchester; New York: Manchester
University Press, New York Distributed exclusively in the USA and Canada
by St. Martin's Press , 1994
Goldstein, Carl, Visual fact over verbal fiction a study of the Carracci and the criticism,
theory, and practice of art in Renaissance and Baroque Italy, Cambridge;
England New York: Cambridge University Press 1988
------------------ Teaching art academies and schools from Vasari to Albers, New York:
Cambridge University Press 1996
------------------ Rhetoric and Art History in the Italian Renaissance and Baroque, Art
Bulletin, p. 641-652, 1991
Gombrich, Ernst Hans, Art and illusion; a study in the psychology of pictorial
representation, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1969
Greenberg, Clement, Modernist Painting, Art and Literature, Vol. 4, (1965), p. 193-201
Hobson, Marian, The Object of Art: The Theory of Illusion in Eighteenth-Century France,
London: Cambridge University press, 1982
Iversen, Margaret, Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory, U. S. : Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, 1993
Levey, Michael, Painting and Sculpture in France 1700-1789, New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1972
------------------- Rococo to Revolution, Major Trends in Eighteenth Century Painting,London: Thames & Hudson, 1986
Lichtenstein, Jacqueline, translated by Emily Mcvarish, The Eloquence of Color: Rhetoric
and Painting in the French Classical age, U.S.: University of California press,
1993。
Mitchell, W. T. J., Blake’s Composite Art: A study of the Illuminated Poetry, Princeton
University Press, [1978] 1982
------------------ Iconology: image, text, ideology, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1986
Montagu, Jennifer, The Expression of the Passions: The Origin and Influence of Charles
Le Brun's Conf?rence sur l'expression generale et particuli?re, U.S.: Yale
University press, 1994。
Outram, Dorinda, The Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995
Paulson, Ronald, Emblem and Expression, Meaning in English Art of the Eighteenth
Century, London: Thames & Hudson, 1975
Perkins, Merle L, Diderot and the time-space continuum: his philosophy, aesthetics, and
politics, Oxford, Eng.: Voltaire Foundation at the Taylor Institution, 1982
Perry, Gill & Rossington, Michael edited, Femininity and Masculinity in Eighteenth-
Century Art and Culture, Manchester and New York: Manchester
University Press, 1997
Podro, Michael, Depiction, New York: Yale University Press, 1998
Puttfarken, Thomas,Roger de Piles' theory of art, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985
------------------- The Discovery of Pictorial Composition, Theories of Visual Order in
Painting 1400-1800, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen, ‘’Aesthetic Illusion in the Eighteenth-Century’’ in Aesthetic Illusion:
Theoretical and Historical Approaches, ed. Frederick Burwick and Walter Pape,
Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1990, p. 105-121
Wrigley,Richard, The Origins of French Art Criticism,from the Ancien Regime to the
Rretaration, New York: Oxford, University Press, 1993
中文參考書目
狄德羅著,陳占元譯,《狄德羅論繪畫》,桂林:廣西師範大學出版社,2002 年11 月。
狄德羅著,瑜青主編,《狄德羅經典文存》,上海市:上海大學出版社,2002 年。
狄德羅,《狄德羅美學論文集》,北京:人民文學出版社,1984 年。
狄德羅著,江天驛、陳修儒、傅太慶譯,《狄德羅哲學選集》北京:商務印書館,1991
年。
李鳳鳴,《狄德羅》,傅偉勳、韋政通主編,台北市:東大圖書公司,2000 年。
朱建民,《知識論》,台北縣蘆洲市:空中大學,2003 年。
羅勃。史都華(Robert Stewart)《改變世界的觀念》(Ideas That Shaped Our Ward) 台北
市:貓頭鷹出版社,2001 年
沃夫林(Heinrich W?fflin),《藝術史的原則》,曾雅雲譯,台北:雄師圖書,1987 年。
柯普斯登(Frederick Copleston),《西洋哲學史》(五)近代哲學(霍布斯到休謨)朱建民、
李瑞全翻譯,傅佩榮校訂,台北市:黎明出版社,1986 年。
葉嘉華,《從文藝復興到狄德羅主編的《百科全書》探討繪畫地位的轉變及其意義》,中
壢市:中央大學藝術學研究所,民國87 年6 月。
謝佳娟,《萊辛之《拉奧孔:詩與畫的界限》--「詩畫同律」在十八世紀美術概念中
的轉變》,中壢市:中央大學藝術學研究所,民國88 年12 月。
蕭佳倩,《論繪畫物質的視象化:杜畢費(Jean Dubuffet)1951-63 系列作品研究》,國立中央大學藝術學研究所碩士論文,民國90 年6 月。
指導教授 吳方正(Fang-cheng WU) 審核日期 2005-7-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡