會議方式、群體大小及人格特質對腦力激盪會議成效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：85

、訪客IP：3.133.111.199

姓名

廖珮容(Pai-Rong Lia ) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理研究所

論文名稱

會議方式、群體大小及人格特質對腦力激盪會議成效之影響

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

對組織中的群體而言，最常見的任務型態即是針對特定意題產生構想。然
而，許多的群體會議多半被認為是沒有效率且浪費時間的。然而，管理人員卻
每天必需花費相當比例的時間在群體會議上。隨著資訊科技一日千里，資訊技
術不斷地創新，亦提供了許多新興的溝通媒體選擇。因此，如何透過電腦的輔
助，來減少群體會議中的缺失，即成為資訊管理研究中的重要課題。本研究欲
了解在腦力激盪會議中，採取不同會議方式的會議方式，及不同大小的群體規
模，是否對於會議成員的會議過程及結果有所影響，以及具有有不同人格特質
的會議成員在群體會議中的表現是否有所差異。
本研究以大學生為實驗樣本，以實驗室實驗法(laboratory experiment)進行腦
力激盪會議之實驗，並利用問卷調查、及在會議中紀錄會議成員所發表構想的
方式收集資料。研究結果發現：
1. 「群體大小」與「人格特質」對會議成員的「會議過程」有所影響，此
外，「人格特質」對會議成員的「會議結果」亦有影響，「會議方式」的
影響則皆未達顯著水準。
2. 「會議方式」與「人格特質」的交互作用對「構想數量」及「構想品質」
有影響。但對於「會議過程滿意度」、「會議過程參與感」的影響均未達
到顯著水準。
3. 「會議方式」、「群體大小」及「人格特質」三因子交互作用對「會議過
程滿意度」、「會議過程參與感」與「構想品質」有所影響，但對於「構
想數量」的影響則未達影響水準。
4. 「會議過程滿意度」、「會議過程參與感」、「構想數量」及「構想品
質」呈現正向變動關係。

關鍵字(中)

★ 人格特質
★ 構想品質
★ 群體決策支援系統
★ 腦力激盪

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄............................................................................................................................... I
圖目錄..........................................................................................................................II
表目錄........................................................................................................................ III
第一章緒論............................................................................................................1
第一節研究背景與動機....................................................................................1
第二節研究目的與問題....................................................................................2
第三節預期貢獻................................................................................................2
第四節研究程序................................................................................................3
第五節論文架構................................................................................................4
第二章文獻探討...................................................................................................5
第一節群體決策................................................................................................5
第二節電腦輔助群體決策..............................................................................13
第三節腦力激盪..............................................................................................16
第四節群體大小..............................................................................................19
第五節人格特質..............................................................................................21
第六節小結......................................................................................................25
第三章研究方法.................................................................................................26
第一節研究方法之選擇..................................................................................26
第二節研究架構..............................................................................................26
第三節研究假說..............................................................................................27
第四節研究變數的定義與操作化..................................................................32
第五節實驗設計..............................................................................................35
第六節問卷設計..............................................................................................38
第七節實驗流程..............................................................................................39
第四章資料分析.................................................................................................42
第一節資料分析架構......................................................................................42
第二節樣本基本資料分析..............................................................................44
第三節統計假說..............................................................................................46
第四節研究假說之檢定..................................................................................48
第五節研究發現..............................................................................................63
第五章結論與建議.............................................................................................68
第一節研究結論..............................................................................................68
第二節研究限制..............................................................................................73
第三節後續研究與建議..................................................................................73
參考文獻.....................................................................................................................76

參考文獻

1. 林暐棠，(民87)，「群體支援系統之實驗室研究—任務特性、人格特
質與匿名特性之影響」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。.
2. 邱建中，(民85)，「群體支援系統中電子交談與群體大小對偏好型決
策之影響」，國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 許楓珊，(民87)，「決策風格與會議因素對會議群體滿意度之影
響」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
4. 陳天亮、洪新原與梁定澎，(民89)，「運用電子腦力激盪以提昇群體
生產力及成員滿意之研究：國內實驗室之實驗」，資訊管理學報，第
7 卷第1 期，19-42 頁。
5. 張春興與楊國樞，(民72)，「心理學」，三民書局。
6. 張春興，(民80)，「心理學」，東華書局。
7. 張銘晃，(民85)，「電子會議使用效果之實驗室研究—群體大小、任
務特性與匿名之影響」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
8. Aiken, M., J. Krosp, A. Shirani, and J. Martin, (1994), “Electronic
Brainstorming in Small and Large Groups,” Information & Management,
Vol.27, pp.141-149.
9. Aiken, M. and M. Vanjani, (1997), “A Comparison of Synchronous and
Virtual Legislative Session Groups Faced with an Idea Generation Task,”
Information & Management, Vol.33, pp.25-31.
10. Aiken, M., H. Sloan, J. Paolillo, and L. Motiwalla, (1997), “The Use of
Two Electronic Idea Generation Techniques in Strategy Planning
Meetings,” The Journal of Business Communication, Vol.34, No.4,
pp.370-382.
11. Aiken, M. and B. Waller, (2000), “Flaming among First-Time Group
Support System Users,” Information & Management, Vol.37, pp.95-100.
12. Carkadon, T.G., (1978), “Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in
Psychology Courses and Discussion Groups,” Teaching of Psychology,
Vol.5 pp.140.142.
13. DeSanctis, G. and R.B. Gallupe, (1987), “A Foundation for the Study of
Group Decision Support Systems,” Management Science, Vol.33, No.5,
pp.589-609.
14. Diehl, M. and W. Stroebe, (1987), “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming
Group: Toward the Solution of a Riddle,” Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, Vol.53, pp.497-509.
15. Dennis, A.R., J.F. George, L.M. Jessup, J.F. Nunamaker, and D.R. Vogel,
(1988), “Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings,” MIS
Quarterly, Vol.12, No.4, pp.591-624.
16. Dennis, A.R., A.R. Heminger, J.F. Nunamaker, and D.R. Vogel, (1990),
“Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings,” MIS Quarterly,
Vol.12, No.4, pp.591-624.
17. Dennis, A.R., (1996), “Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision
Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, But You Can’t Make It
Think,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.4, pp.433-457.
18. Dennis, A.R., C.K. Tyran, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunamaketr, (1997),
“Group Support Systems for Strategic Planning,” Journal of Management
Information Systems, Vol.14, No.1, pp.155-184.
19. Durbin, A.J., (1997), Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior: An
Applied Approach, Cincinnati: South-Western.
20. Dennis, A.R., J.E. Aronson, W.G. Heninger, and E.D. WalkerⅡ, (1999),
“Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming,” MIS Quarterly,
Vol.23, No.1, pp.95-108.
21. Ellis, C.A., S.J. Gibbs, and G.L. Rein, (1991), “Groupware: Some Issues
and Experiences,” Communications of the ACM, Vol.34, No.1, pp.39-58.
22. Easton, A.C., D.R. Vogel, and J.F. Nunumaker, (1992), “Interactive versus
Stand-Alone Group Decision Support Systems for Stakeholder
Identification and Assumption Surfacing in Small Group,” Decision
Support Systems, Vol.8, No.2, pp.159-168.
23. Er, M.C. and A.C. Ng, (1995), “The Anonymity and Proximity Factors in
Group Decision Support Systems,” Decision Support Systems, Vol.14,
pp.75-83.
24. Furnham, A. and T. Yazdanpanahi, (1995), “Personality Differences and
Group versus Individual Brainstorming,” Personality and Individual
Differences, Vol.19, No.1, pp.73-80.
25. Gallupe, R.B., A.R. Dennis, W.H. Cooper, J.S. Valacich, L.M. Bastianutti,
and J.F Nunamaker, (1992), “Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size,”
Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No.2, pp.350-369.
26. Gallupe, R.B. and W.H. Cooper, (1993), “Brainstorming Electronically,”
Sloan Management Review, Vol.35, No.1, pp.27-36.
27. Gopal, A. and P. Prasad, (2000), “Understanding GDSS in Symbolic
Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction,” MIS
Quarterly, Vol.24, No.3, pp.509-546.
28. Huber, G.P., (1982), “Group Decision Support Systems as Aids in the Use
of Structured Group Management Techniques,” Proceeding of the Decision
Support System Conference, pp.96-108
29. Huber, G.P., (1984), “Issue in the Design of Group Decision Support
Systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.8, No.3, pp.195-204.
30. Hellriegel, D., J.W. Slocum, and R.W. Woodman, (1998), Organizational
Behavior, Cincinnati: South-Western.
31. Huang, W., K.K. Wei, and B.Y.T. Tan, (1999), “Compensating Effects of
GSS on Group Perfromance,” Information & Management, Vol.35,
pp.195-202.
32. Johansen, R., (1988), Groupware ：Computer Support for Business Teams,
New York：Free Press.
33. Jessup, L.M., T. Connolly, and J. Galegher, (1990), “The Effects of
Anonymity on GDSS Group Process With an Idea-Generating Task,” MIS
Quarterly, Vol.14, No.3, pp.313-321.
34. Kraemer, K.L. and A. Pinsonneault, (1989), “The Impact of Technological
Support on Groups: An Assessment of the Empirical Research,” Decision
Support Systems, Vol.5, No.2, pp.197-216
35. Kay, G., (1995), “Effective Meetings Through Electronic Brainstorming,”
Management Quarterly, Vol.35, No.4, pp.15-26.
36. Kahai, S.S. and R.B. Cooper, (1999), “The Effect of Computer-Mediated
Communication on Agreement and Acceptance,” Journal of Management
Information Systems, Vol.16, No.1, pp.165-188.
37. Lam, S.S.K., (1997), “The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and
Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality,” Journal
of Management Information Systems, Vol.13, No.4, pp.193-215.
38. Myers, I.B. and M.H. McCaulley, (1985), Manual: A Guide to the
Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Palo Alto:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
39. McCaulley, M.H., (1990), “The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A Measure
for Individuals and Group,” Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling &
Development, Vol.22, No.4, pp.181-195.
40. Mullen, B., C. Johnson, and E. Salas, (1991), “Productivity Loss in
Brainstorming Groups ： A Meta-Analytical Integration,” Basic and
Applied Social Psychology, Vol.12, pp.3-23.
41. McLagan P. and C. Nel, (1996), The Age of Participation, San Francisco:
Berrett-Kohler.
42. Sambamurthy, V. and W.W. Chin, (1994), “The Effects of Group Attitudes
toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision-making Performance of
Computer-Supported Groups,” Decision Sciences, Vol.25, No.2, pp.215-
241.
43. Osbron, A.F., (1954), Applied Imagination, New York: Scribner.
44. Ramsey, R.W., (1968), “Speech Patterns and Personality,” Language and
Speech, Vol.11, pp.54-63.
45. Rowe, A.J. and J.D. Boulgarides, (1992), Managerial Decision Making,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hill.
46. Robbins, S.P., (1997), Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies,
Applications, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
47. Steeb, R. and S.C. Johnston, (1981), “A Computer-Base Interactive System
for Group Decision Making,” IEEE Transaction on System, Man, and
Cybernet, Vol.SMC-11, No.88, pp.544-552.
48. Shirani, A., M. Aiken, and J.G.P. Paolillo, (1998), “Group Decision
Support Systems and Incentive Structures,” Information & Management,
Vol.33, pp.231-240.
49. Thorne, A., (1987), “The Press of Personality: A Study of Conversations
Between Introverts and Extroverts,” Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, Vol.53, No.4, pp.718-726.
50. Turban, E., (1995), Decision Support Systems and Expert Systems, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall.
51. Trauth, E.M. and L.M. Jessup, (2000), “Understanding Computer-Mediated
Discussions: Positivist and Interpretive Analyses of Group Support System
Use,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, pp.43-79.
52. Van de Ven, A.H. and A.L. Delbecq, (1971), “Nominal versus Interacting
Group Processes for Committer Decision Making Effectiveness,” Academy
of Management Journal, Vol.14, pp.203-212.
53. Watson, R.T., G. DeSanctis, and M.S. Poole, (1988), “Using a GDSS to
Facilitate Group Intended and Unintended Consequences,” MIS Quarterly,
Vol.12, No.3, pp.463-478.
54. Wagner Ⅲ, J.A. and J.R. Hollenbeck, (1998), Organizational Behavior:
Securing Competitive Advantage, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
55. Yellen, R.E., M. Winniford, and C.C. Sanford, (1995), “Extraversion and
Introversion in Electronically-Supported Meeting,” Information &
Management, Vol.28, pp.63-74.
56. Zigurs, I., M.S. Poole, G.L. DeSanctis, (1988), “A Study of Influence in
Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.28,
No.4, pp.625-644.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-wen Chou)

審核日期

2001-7-25

推文