早期現代母職形構：
奶媽的式微與新好媽媽的崛起

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：62

、訪客IP：18.224.0.25

姓名

潘崇立(Chung-Li Pan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英美語文學系

論文名稱

早期現代母職形構：奶媽的式微與新好媽媽的崛起
(Early Modern Formation of Motherhood: The Decline of the Wet-nurse and the Rise of the New Mother )

相關論文

★ The Duchess of Malfi 和 The Revenger's Tragedy 女性身體意涵	★ 夏娃：失樂園中的馴化
★ 夾縫中的女體：《惡有惡報》與《泰特斯．安莊尼克斯》中的失聲現象	★ 偽裝:莎士比亞劇中的另類身份鑄造過程
★ Ghostly Bodies of Knowledge: Authorship, History Writing and Visual Language in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"	★ Time to Sleep and Time Not to Sleep: The Making of the Polite and Productive Body in Modern Taiwan
★ The Representation of the Fit body: Food advertising in Modern Taiwan	★ 從消費論身分認同: 從社會與人際關係間的過程論貝琪的自我體現
★ The Theater of Pain and Community-Making in William Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus and Coriolanus	★ Drags and Gender Play in Pili Budaixi
★ Rabelais and Changes in Renaissance Medicine	★ 關係作為貨幣：《威尼斯商人》與《雅典的泰門》中的社會資本
★ Commercial Exchange and Social Exchange in Shakespeare′s Pericles, Prince of Tyre and The Merchant of Venice

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文主要探討早期現代母職形構過程。論旨是早期現代經歷一場從奶媽式微到〝新好媽媽〞崛起的歷史過渡。第一章分析十六世紀初〝新好媽媽〞論述如何形成。第二章試圖瞭解十七世紀初貴族母親如何回應〝新好媽媽〞論述以及此論述所製造的緊張態勢。第三章探討十七世紀末產婆如何替奶媽辯護，並結論奶媽行業在此重要歷史時刻已被〝新好媽媽〞論述逐漸瓦解而式微。

摘要(英)

This thesis mainly concerns early modern formation of motherhood. I argue that the early modern period witnessed a historical transition from the decline of the wet-nurse to the emergence of the “New Mother.” In Chapter One, I analyze how the “New Mother” discourse was formulated in the early sixteenth century. In Chapter Two, I turn to an elite mother’s response to the “New Mother” discourse as well as the tension this discourse produced in the early seventeenth century. In Chapter Three, I look into a midwife’s defense of the wet-nurse in the late seventeenth century, and conclude that wet-nursing was undermined by the “New Mother” discourse during this crucial moment in history.

關鍵字(中)

★ 母職
★ 新好媽媽
★ 奶媽

關鍵字(英)

★ new mother
★ motherhood
★ wet-nurse

論文目次

Contents
Abstract ---v
Acknowledgement ---vii
Introduction ---1
Chapter One “The Better Part of Childbearing Is the Nursing of the Tender Baby”: Nursing Practice and the Formation of New Motherhood---14
Chapter Two “Bee Not Accessary to That Disorder of Causing a Poorer Woman to Banish Her Owne Infant”: Reforming and Redeeming the Mother---37
Chapter Three Wet-nursing as “a Remedy That Needs a Remedy”:
The Defense and Decline of the Wet-nurse--- 58
Works Cited ---80

參考文獻

Baumslag, Naomi and Dia L. Michels. Milk, Money and Madness: The Culture and Politics of Breastfeeding. London: Bergin & Garvey, 1995.
Crawford, Patricia. “The Construction and Experience of Maternity in Seventeenth-Century England.” Women as Mothers in Pre-Industrial England: Essays in Memory of Dorothy McLaren. Ed. Valerie Fildes. London: Routledge, 1990. 3-38.
Crawford, Patricia and Laura Gowing, ed. Women’s Worlds in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Routledge, 2000.
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process. Vol. 1. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Pantheon, 1978. 2 vols.
Erasmus, Desiderius. Colloquies. Trans. Craig R. Thompson. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1997.
Fildes, Valerie. Breasts, Bottles and Babies: A History of Infant Feeding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1986.
---. “The English Wet-Nurse and Her Role in Infant Care 1538-1800.” Medical History 32 (1988): 142-173.
---. Wet Nursing: A History From Antiquity to the Present. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.
Hull, Suzanne W. Chaste, Silent & Obedient: English Books for Women, 1475-1640. San Marino: Huntington Library, 1982.
---. Women According to Men: The World of Tudor-Stuart Women. London: Altamira, 1996.
McLaren, Dorothy. “Marital Fertility and Lactation 1570-1720.” Women in English Society, 1500-1800. Ed. Mary Prior. London: Methuen, 1985.
Otten, Charlotte F. ed. English Women’s Voices, 1540-1700. Miami: Florida International UP, 1992.
Palmer, Gabrielle. The Politics of Breastfeeding. 2nd Ed. London: Pandora, 1993.
Perry, Ruth. “Colonizing the Breast: Sexuality and Maternity in Eighteenth-Century England.” Forbidden History: The State, Society, and the Regulation of Sexuality in Modern Europe, Essays of the History of Sexuality. Ed. John C. Fout. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1992.
Plato. The Republic. Trans. Desmond Lee. England: Penguin Books, 1974.
Pollock, Linda A. Forgotten Children: Parent-child Relations from 1500 to 1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Radbill, Samuel X. “The Role of Animals in Infant Feeding.” American Folk Medicine, A Symposium. Ed. W.D. Hand. (1976):21-30.
Salisbury, Joyce E. The Beast Within: Animals in the Middle Ages. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.
Salmon, Maylynn. “The Cultural Significance of Breastfeeding and Infant Care in Early Modern England and America.” Journal of Social History 28 (1994): 247-269.
Sharp, Jane. The Midwives Book: On the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered. Ed. Elaine Hobby. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.
Schlueter, Paul and Schlueter, June, ed. An Encyclopedia of British Women Writers. New York: Garland, 1988.
Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500-1800. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1979.
Travitsky, Betty. “Introduction: Placing Women in the English Renaissance.” Attending to Women in Early Modern England. Ed. Betty S. Travitsky and Adele F. Seeff. London: Associated UP, 1994.
---. “The New Mother of the English Renaissance: Her Writings on Motherhood.” The Lost Tradition : Mothers and Daughters in Literature. Ed. Cathy N. Davidson and E. M. Broner. New York: Ungar, 1980.
---, ed. The Paradise of Women: Writings by Englishwomen of the Renaissance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.
Travitsky, Betty S. and Cullen, Patrick, ed. The Early Modern Englishwoman: A facsimile Library of Essential Works. Part 2: Printed Writings, 1500-1640: Vol. 8: Mother’s Advice Books. England: Ashgate, 2001.
Trubowitz, Rachel. “‘Nourish-Milke’: Breastfeeding and the Crisis of Englishness, 1600-1660.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology (2000): 29-49.

指導教授

林錥鋕(Spencer Lin)

審核日期

2006-7-17

推文