博碩士論文 91122004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:8 、訪客IP:54.81.69.220
姓名 劉純瑀(Chun-yu Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 英美語文學系
論文名稱 被遺忘的一群:蜜雪兒克里夫小說中的賤民角色
(The Neglected Ones: Subaltern Characters in Michelle Cliff’s Novels)
相關論文
★ 從同情到自省-美國十九世級改革文學的轉變★ 作勢反叛: 亡命鴛鴦電影與六十年代反文化的批判
★ 運動同志與同志運動:台灣男女同志運動團體的興起★ 《達洛威夫人》中的影子、罔兩與女性賦權
★ 金髮美女與恐怖片: 影集《魔法奇兵》與《暗夜天使》中性別與文類的顛覆★ 葛楚德、史坦茵之「鼓舉的肚腹」詩中浮現的三種感知形態:視覺、聽覺、觸覺感知
★ 弱勢酷兒的文本政治:閱讀《羅莉塔》、《繁花聖母》、《天河撩亂》★ A History Refusing to be Enclosed: Mau Mau Historiography, Ngugi wa Thiong'o's A Grain of Wheat, and M.G. Vassanji's The In-Between World of Vikram Lall
★ Remembering the Past, Revising the Future:Trauma and Memory in Saving Private Ryan and Beloved★ Ghostly Bodies of Knowledge: Authorship, History Writing and Visual Language in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"
★ 家關何處: 以尼爾.蓋曼《無有鄉》論述幻奇作為欲望文學★ “Gathering Paradise”:Emily Dickinson's Pursuit of Heaven
★ 可見與不可見:當代生態論述中自然存有觀點的歧異★ 重寫女性歌德: 童妮.摩里森《摯愛》中母性與女性的「厚愛」
★ Ambivalence and Dilemma, Queer Spaces Made: Queer Reading of the Spaces in Giovanni’s Room★ 愛倫坡之威廉˙威爾生與詹姆士˙萊斯登之獨角人中的自我駕馭幻想
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本論文主要在檢視蜜雪兒克里夫兩部半自傳小說中的四個賤民角色,而他們在其他評論中經常被忽略,或是被視作次要的角色,因此在此論文中將把這些角色集合在一起並詳細探討書中呈現的生活經驗。這四個角色的背景和社會地位差異極大,而他們遭逢的剝削與困境也不相同;也就是說,使他們成為賤民階級的因素也都是不同的。而這點顯示出賤民這一範疇其實並不是一個固定的團體,而是有各種不同的組成份子,也有差異性,甚至是衝突。史碧瓦克曾提出「賤民無法發聲」的主張,因為在第一世界的知識份子認為自己能為賤民們代言,而在這個過程中,賤民真正的聲音和主張就被知識份子挪用,最終消失不見。然而,詳細的去檢視小說中這四個賤民角色的經歷,我們將會發現他們的聲音在被挪用或取代之前,早已消失、被忽視、甚至被遺忘。這種困境的原因在於他們所經歷的剝削和壓迫使得他們不想,或不願意發聲,而選擇了沉默或甚至是與社會中各種支配性的力量共謀的立場。但這種沉默或是共謀卻是他們自己對於殖民主義、階級、性別或其他意識型態的反抗方式,即使這些方式看似消極或順從。換句話說,這些角色不僅揭露了即使在賤民的群體中也可能存在著差異與衝突,也帶出了消極性抵抗的可能性,並且問題化了對於反抗運動的一般看法。也就是說這種消極性反抗提出了相對於革命這類反抗運動的另一種可能。然而如果評論者或讀者忽略了關於這四個角色的重要細節,那麼也可能會陷入知識性暴力的陷阱中。
摘要(英) This thesis is focused on life experiences of the four characters that can be categorized into the subaltern in Michelle Cliff’s two semi-autobiographical novels, No Telephone to Heaven and Abeng, who are often neglected in other critics’ analyses of the novels. These four characters, Christopher, Bobby, Zoe and Kitty, are different in their backgrounds and social status, and the exploitation and predicament they have suffered are not the same, either. That is, what makes them subaltern is different, and this suggests that the category of the subaltern is not a single or fixed organization, but there could be dissimilarities, contradictions and also conflicts. As Gayatri Spivak has claimed that “the subaltern cannot speak,” because their voices will be appropriated by the first world scholars who think they can represent the subaltern people. Consequently, the subaltern people’s claims and voices are lost, and thus they cannot speak. However, by examining the experiences of these four subaltern characters together and in detail, it would be seen that before the subaltern’s voice could be appropriated, it is lost, forgotten or neglected. The reason is that the predicaments caused by exploitations and oppressions have made them do not wish to speak, but choose to be silent or even to conform to the dominant powers instead of voicing their claims. Nevertheless, this kind of silence and conformity is their own way of resistance to the injustices produced by colonialism, class, gender and other ideologies, even though it seems to be passive or submissive. In other words, these characters not only reveal that there could be dissimilarities and even conflicts in the subaltern group, but also bring out the possibility of a passive kind of resistance and therefore problematize the general notion of resistance as the revolutionary action. However, if the critics neglected or overlooked these trivial but important aspects of these four characters, they might fall into the trap of epistemic violence in the critical level.
關鍵字(中) ★ 壓迫
★ 消極性抵抗
★ 賤民
關鍵字(英) ★ oppression
★ passive resistance
★ subaltern
論文目次 Abstract i
Acknowledgements iii
Chapter One: Introduction 1
Chapter Two: Reading Christopher and Bobby: Oppression, Violence and Traumatic Experiences 14
Chapter Three: Zoe’s Consciousness: A Different Kind of Resistance 37
Chapter Four: The Problematic and Limitation of Resistance: Kitty Savage as an In-between Character 55
Chapter Five: Conclusion 70
Works Cited 78
參考文獻 Adisa, Opal Palmer. “Journey into Speech—A Writer Between Two Worlds: An Interview with Michelle Cliff.” African American Review 28.2 (Summer 1994): 273-281.
Aegerter, Lindsay Pentolfe. “Michelle Cliff and the Paradox of Privilege.” College English 59.8 (1997): 898-915.
Agosto, Noraida. Michelle Cliff’s Novels: Piecing the Tapstry of Memory and History. New York: Peter Lang, 1999.
Bost, Suzanne. “Fluidity without Postmodernism: Michelle Cliff and the ‘Tragic Mulatta’ Tradition.” African American Review 32.4 (Winter 1998): 673-689.
Cliff, Michelle. Abeng. 1984. New York: Penguin Books, 1991.
---. No Telephone to Heaven. 1987. New York: Plume, 1996.
Edmondson, Belinda. “Race, Privilege, and the Politics of (Re)Writing History: An Analysis of The Novels of Michelle Cliff.” Callallo 16.1 (Winter, 1993): 180-191.
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. And trans. Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.
Guha, Ranajit. “On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India.” Selected Subaltern Studies. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. 37-44.
Schwartz, Meryl F. “An Interview with Michelle Cliff.” Contemporary Literature 34.4 (Winter 1993): 595-619.
Sethuraman, Ramchandran. “Evidence-Cum-Witness: Subaltern History, violence, and the (De)Formation of Nation in Michelle Cliff’s No Telephone to Heaven.” Modern Fiction Studies 43.1 (Spring 1997): 249-287
She, Chia-ling. “A Question of Representations: Reading the Intellectual and the Subaltern in No Telephone to Heaven.” MA Thesis. NCU, 2002.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. "Can the Subaltern Speak?" The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Gen. ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York and London: Norton, 2001. 2197-2208.
---. A Critigue of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambrige, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1999.
指導教授 白瑞梅(Amie Parry) 審核日期 2006-1-17
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明