教師情緒智慧、教師權能與教師效能感之相關研究─以桃園縣公立國民小學教師為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：27

、訪客IP：3.135.217.228

姓名

李欣慧(Shin-Huei Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

教師情緒智慧、教師權能與教師效能感之相關研究─以桃園縣公立國民小學教師為例
(An Examination of the Relationships among Emotional Intelligence, Teacher Empowerment, and Teachers' sense of efficacy.)

相關論文

★ 國民小學教師創新接受傾向與資訊科技融入教學接受程度之相關因素研究 -以台北市資訊重點學校為例	★ 內外在動機、創造力工作環境與創造力之相關研究－以第八屆創思設計與製作競賽之參賽學生為例
★ 台北市國小教師教學信念、學校環境因素與資訊科技融入教學實施成效之相關研究	★ 一位大學優良教師的教育實踐—女研究生與主角的共同敘說
★ 敘說一位研究型大學教師之自我座落	★ 書法教學現況及教師書法教學意願之研究—以台北市國小為例
★ 影響實習教師實習困擾之相關因素研究-以九十四學年度半年制實習教師為例	★ 敘說實習教師之教師認同
★ 工科研究生的學習樣貌—一個情境學習的觀點	★ 探究「一位教學傑出教師的生命與特質」—以外甥與研究生角色進行探究
★ 用心傾聽一段永不停止的關係-一位大學傑出教師與學生關係之敘說	★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例
★ 編織生命樣貌—一位工藝藝術師與研究生共同勾勒美的故事	★ 脫下假面：敘說一位穿梭於舞蹈班與普通班之間的初任教師之蛻變
★ 以故事、合作、對話、反省融入國中生數學學習的行動研究	★ 經驗的聆聽、凝視與回觀─我在沈昭良的攝影課上

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

摘要
　　本研究在國內教師效能感和組織中他人相關之變項的相關研究不多的背景下，基於辨識和教師效能感相關因素的重要性，及過去文獻中教師情緒智慧、教師權能與教師效能感間的可能關聯，運用問卷調查法及訪談法蒐集資料，探討教師情緒智慧、教師權能和教師效能感間的關聯。
　　本研究之獨立變項為「教師效能感」及「教師權能」，依變項為「教師效能感」，研究母群為桃園縣九十四學年度公立國小教師（以學校網頁能蒐集到教師名單者為限），共計44所國民小學，1819位教師，採用分層隨機抽樣，以學校規模作為分層標準，共抽出270位教師為研究樣本進行問卷調查。本研究所使用之研究工具包括「教師情緒智慧量表」、「教師權能量表」及「教師效能感量表」，資料分析方式為描述性統計、信度及效度分析、關聯分析、半淨相關複迴歸分析及多元逐步複迴歸分析，並於問卷資料蒐集後選取6位教師進行訪談，以訪談內容輔助及補充說明問卷統計結果。
　　本研究之研究結果如下：
一、「任教年資」、「情緒的注意和辨識」、「情緒的調整」、「專業成長與決策參與」、「專業地位與自主權」、「專業對話」與「教師效能感」有顯著相關。
二、經由半淨相關複迴歸分析得知「情緒的注意和辨識」、「情緒的調整」、「專業地位與自主權」及「專業對話」共解釋了「教師效能感」63%的變異量，其中「專業地位與自主權」單獨解釋「教師效能感」6.7%的變異量，「專業對話」單獨解釋「教師效能感」4.4%的變異量，「情緒的調整」單獨解釋「教師效能感」2.6%的變異量，「情緒的注意和辨識」單獨解釋「教師效能感」1.5%的變異量。
三、經由逐步複迴歸分析得知「專業地位與自主權」、「情緒的調整」、「專業對話」與「情緒的注意和辨識」（依其重要性排列）為預測「教師效能感」的因素，共可解釋「教師效能感」62.3%的變異量。

摘要(英)

Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the relationships among emotional intelligence, teacher empowerment, and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect data. Participants were 270 elementary teachers from 44 public schools in Taoyuan. Three instruments, the Emotional Intelligence Scale, the Teacher Empowerment Scale, and the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale were developed by the researcher and utilized to collect data. Descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, semi-partial multiple regression analysis, and stepwise multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data.
According to the analysis of data, significant correlations were found between teachers’ sense of efficacy and (1) teaching experience, (2) attention and clarity of emotion, (3) mood repair, (4) professional development and participation of decision-making, (5) professional status and teaching autonomy, and (6) discussion of teaching proficiency. Among these variables, attention and clarity of emotion, mood repair, professional status and teaching autonomy, and discussion of teaching proficiency account for 63% of the variance of teachers’ sense of efficacy all together with a statistically significant independent contribution of 1.5%, 2.6%, 4.4%, and 6.7%. Additionally, these variables are also statistically significant predictors of teachers’ sense of efficacy.

關鍵字(中)

★ 情緒智慧
★ 教師權能
★ 教師效能感

關鍵字(英)

★ and teacher empowerment
★ teachers’ sense of efficacy
★ emotional intelligence

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論……………………………………………………………………...1-6
第一節研究動機........................................................................................................1
第二節研究目的與問題……………………………………………………………5
第三節主要名詞釋義………………………………………………………………5
第四節研究限制........................................................................................................6
第二章文獻探討…………………………………………………...………….7-22
第一節教師效能感的理論基礎……………………………………………………7
第二節教師效能感的測量…………………………………………………………9
第三節教師效能感方面與本研究相關之研究…………………………………..11
第四節情緒智慧的模式…………………………………………………………..12
第五節情緒智慧的測量…………………………………………………………..14
第六節情緒智慧和效能感相關研究……………………………………………..16
第七節權能理論…………………………………………………………………..18
第八節教師權能的測量…………………………………………………………..20
第九節教師權能和教師效能感相關研究………………………………………..21
第三章研究方法………………………………...…………………………...23-29
第一節研究設計…………………………………………………………………..23
第二節研究假設…………………………………………………………………..24
第三節研究對象…………………………………………………………………..24
第四節研究工具…………………………………………………………………..25
第五節資料分析…………………………………………………………………..28
第四章　結果與討論…………………………………………………..…….31-54
第一節樣本背景資料之描述性統計分析………………………………………..31
第二節教師情緒智慧、教師權能及教師效能感量表信度及效度分析………..33
第三節教師個人背景變項與教師效能感之關聯………………………………..34
第四節教師情緒智慧、教師權能與教師效能感之關聯………………………..35
第五節達顯著之背景變項、教師情緒智慧、教師權能變項
對教師效能感之單獨解釋力與預測公式………………………………..36
第六節開放性題項及訪談資料分析……………………………………………..40
第七節討論………………………………………………………………………..52
第五章　結論與建議……………………………………………..………….55-60
第一節結論………………………………………………………………………..55
第二節建議………………………………………………………………………..59
參考文獻..............................................................................................................61-65
附錄一　專家名單……………………………………………………………….66
附錄二　研究工具信度、效度及項目分析結果摘要表………..……68-79
附錄三　國民小學教師教學現況調查問卷.............................................80-84

參考文獻

參考文獻
朱陳翰思（2002）。國民小學教師自我效能感與專業知能關係之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教師研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
李彗碧（1997）。學校情境因素與教師效能感關係之研究--以國中教師為例。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
吳志柔（2004）。國民小學教師課程設計能力與其自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林亭如（2004）。高職餐飲管理科教師工作壓力、教師效能信念與有效教學行為關係之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
林意苹（2002）。國小英語教師之效能感探究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
洪嘉鴻（2003）。國民小學教師增權與教師自我效能關係之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教師研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
孫志麟（2003）。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報，34(2), 139-156。
郭萱之（1997）。中等學校教育學程之課程與教學和職前教師教師效能關係之研究。淡江大學教育資料科學學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
郭峰偉（2000）。國中教師工作壓力與教師效能關係之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
黃菁芬（2004）。高職(中)工業類科教師教學困擾與教師效能之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
陳家蓁（2001）。大學餐飲管理相關學系教師專業成長與教師效能相關因素之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳惠敏（2003）。國民小學教師之校長教學領導知覺與自我效能關係之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學─三化取向的理論於實踐。台北：東華。
廖瑩如（2005）。國小英語教師教學效能之自我評估。明道管理學院教學藝術研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化縣。
盧志芬（2005）。台灣地區高中職餐飲管理科教師效能感之研究。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
鍾任琴、黃增榮（2000）。中小學教師權能量表編製之研究。朝陽學報，5，345-372。
顏淑惠（2000）。國民小學教師情緒管理與教師效能之研究。台北市立師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
Allinder, R. A. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(2), 86-95.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Blase, J. & Blase J. (1997). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers’ sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 138-164.
Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D. & Rhee, K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence. In R. Bar-on & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp.343-362). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Brophy, J. E. & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Byron, C. M. (2000). The effects of emotional knowledge education in the training of novice teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York, Columbia University, the United States.
Chan, D. W. (2004). Perceived emotional intelligence and self-efficacy amoung Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1781-1795.
Cherniss, C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and the good community. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards, J. L., Green, K. E., & Lyons, C. A. (2002). Personal Empowerment, Efficacy, and Environment Characteristics. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(1), 67-86.
Enderlin-Lampe, S. (2002). Empowerment: Teacher perceptions, aspirations and efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(3), 139-146.
Fernandez-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., & Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychological Reports, 94, 751-755.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd.) New York: Teacher College Press, Columbia University.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy belief: theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researchers, 33(3), 3-13.
Goleman, D. (1995). When Smart Is Dumb (pp. 35-49). In Goleman, D., Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998). Appendix 1: Emotional Intelligence (pp.375-376). In Goleman, D., Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
Gundlach, M. J., Martinko, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2003). Emotional intelligence, causal reasoning, and the self-efficacy development process. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(3), 229-246.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44(8), 835-854.
Hipp, K. (1997). Documenting the effects of transformational leadership behavior on teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 734).
Hobbs, M. E. (2004). Systems dynamics and empowerment in career science teachers: A narrative theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas Tech University.
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
Keedy, J. L. & Finch, A. M. (1994). Examining teacher-principal empowerment: an analysis of power. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(3), 162-175.
Lichtenstein, G., Mclaughlin M. W., & Knudsen, J. (1992). Teacher Empowerment and Professional Knowledge. In Lieberman, A (Ed.), The Changing Contexts of Teaching (pp.37-58). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S.D. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 33(4), 757-798.
Maher, M. C. (2000). A model for understanding the influence of principal leadership upon teacher empowerment as mediated by school culture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Martin, B. N., Crossland, B., & Johnson, J. A. (2001). Is there a connection: teacher empowerment, teachers’ sense of responsibility, and student success? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid- South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 460 116).
Martin Jr, W.E., Easton, C., Wilson, S., Takemoto, M., & Sullivan S. (2004). Salience of emotional intelligence as a core characteristic of being a counselor. Counselor Education and Supervision, 44(1), 17-30.
Matthew, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Since & Myth. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey, & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: educational implications (pp.3-31). New York: Basic Books.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2000). Emotional intelligence as zeitgeist, as personality, and as a mental ability. In R. Bar-on & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp.92-117). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task- related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247-258.
Newmann, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 221-238.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Page, R. M., & Page T. S. (2000). Fostering emotional well-being in the classroom. Boston, Mass: Jones and Bartlett.
Pajares,F., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
Palmer, B., Gignac, G., Bates, T., & Stough, C. (2003). Examining the structure of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(3), 154-158.
Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. The journal of educational research, 74(3), 185-190.
Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., & Gadalla, T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 385-400.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995) Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp.125-154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Short, P. M. (1992). Dimensions of teacher empowerment. (Report No. SP 035 133). Pennsylvania State University, Program in Educational Administration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 701).
Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 144(4), 488-492.
Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(6), 951-960.
Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1-30.
Smylie, M. A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: connections to the classroom. In L. DarlingHammond(Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 20, pp.129-177). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Taylor, D. L., & Tashakkori, A. (1995). Decision participation and school climate as predictors of job satisfaction and teachers’ sense of efficacy. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(3), 217-230.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, W. A., & Hoy, W. K (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-240.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805.
Weissberg, R. P., Barton, H. A., & Shriver, T. P. (1997). The Social-Competence Promotion Program for young adolescents. In G. Albee & T. Gulotta (Eds.), Primary prevention works (pp.268-289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “Ideal” school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
Wilson, S. M. (1993). The self-empowerment index: A measure of internally and externally expressed teacher autonomy. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 727-737.
Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. (1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their belief about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.

指導教授

林信榕(Shinn-Rong Lin)

審核日期

2006-7-19

推文