| 摘要(英) |
As a result of the globalization and many companies move outside,it make many companies begin to be taken over reluctantly in Taiwan.The factors invole in the business culture,the difference system of hiring labors.On the contrary,it is more difficult than making the business reform policy to solve the bad account ,so on.This situation often happens in the pulic bank apartment and privacy business which have huge financial foundings.For the public bank apartments and privacy business have the limitation of taking over other companies owned by the government and the privacy business.But they must care about the rights of the widespread pulic bank labors.To take the abuse work of Taiwan pulic bank labors for example,this situation show that the pulic bank labors protest their bank from the pulic bank to privacy bank.The pulic bank labors still think they were pulic servant,and they feel unsafe in the rights of job guarantee.A lot of people think that our government should let the bank company to be taken over or combined in the freedom market system.But our government involed in the combine plan too much,make it plan failuare.Without our government protection and many company based on the essence of the benefit.The situation is that there is no protection or guarantee in the rights of labors than before.long time ago,there was a kind of concept which came from three concepts,including of the human,the job and the organization.In other words,People want jobs,identified the organization.Not only the contract relationship between labors and organizations,but also build the agreement between labors and organizations.And the agreement between labors and organizations are breaking up.By the way,many labors had traditional concepts to be loyal to their organizations and devoted themselves to their jobs before,and now these kinds of concepts are disappeared certainly.
The financial business for base on the honor of the business is learned to how to treat their labors on
The rush hour for the business taken over or combined.There is most important thing that organizational ethic should be emphasized.This kind of moral growing up is showed from the low stap benefit base company to the high step ethic business.The context is taking the research access of the business ethic for example and research is on the basis of the Integrative Social Contract Theory.For example,indicating the problems of labors payment and constructing the ethic rules of boss and labors under the business combination .We hope that we can do a little bit favor under the ethic rules of boss and labors under the business combination .I believe deeply that only right way for that business management forever is that both of boss and labors recognize the eternal value of the social responsibilities ,honest and trust, the respect to the human nature, depending on the basis of human being |
| 參考文獻 |
Bowie,N. 1999,Business Ethics：A Kantian Perspective,Oxford：Blackwell.
Boatright,John R. 1999 Ethics in Finance ,Loyola University Chicago.
Carroll,Archie,1993.Business and Society:Ethics and Stakeholder Management.3rd Ed. Ohio:South-Western Publishing Co.
De George, R. T. 1990, Business Ethics, 3rd edition, New York: Macmillan Co.
De George, R. T. 1993,”Competing With Integrity In International Business ” Oxford University Press.
De George, R. T. 1997, The Status Of Business Ethics: Past and Future, In Thomas Donaldson & Thomas W. Dunfee, eds. Ethics in Business and Economics, Volume I, Brookfield: Ashgate Publications.
De George, R. T. 1999, Business Ethics , University of Kansas Press .
Donaldson, T & Thomas Dunfee 1994, Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory , in Thomas Donaldson & Thomas W. Dunfee, eds. Ethics in Business and Economics, Volume I, Brookfield: Ashgate Publications.
Donaldson, T & Thomas Dunfee 1997, Ethics in Business and Economics, Volume I, Brookfield: Ashgate Publications.
Donaldson, T & Thomas Dunfee, 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach To Business Ethics, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Freeman,R. Edward 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman.
Freeman,R. Edward and Robert A. Philips 2002, “Stakeholder Theory:A Libertarian Defense,”Business Ethics Quarterly 12（3）:331-349
Friedman, Milton 1970, “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profit”, New York Times Magazine, September 13:122-126.
Goodpaster, K. E. 1997, “ Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis,” in Thomas Donaldson& Thomas W. Dunfee, eds. Ethics in Business and Economics, Volume I, Brookfield: Ashgate Publications.
IP, P. K. 1999, “Ethics of Trust in Virtual Corporations,”Philosophy and Management: Ethical and Empirical Studies,Edited by Shui Chuen Lee,Chungli,Taiwan:National Central University:167-188.
Kant,Immanuel,Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Moral,Many editions.
Rawls, J. 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Weiss, Joseph W. 1994, Business Ethics: A Managerial, Stakeholder Approach, Belmont,California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Jim Collins著,齊若蘭譯，2001,《Good to Great》,台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
Kenneth E. Goodpaster著，銳博慧網公司譯，2003，（連接東西方管理的橋樑：共生與道德觀念），《國際經濟倫理》，北京：北京大學出版社。
Robert Audi（羅伯特.奧迪）（英文版主編），林正弘（中文版審定召集人），2002，《劍橋哲學辭典》，台北：貓頭鷹出版
李田樹譯 2002，《Harvard Business Review on Mergers＆ Acquisitions》，台北：天下文化書坊。
Noreena Hertz著，許玉雯譯，2003，《當企業併購國家—全球資本主義與民主之死》，台北：經濟新潮社出版。
江盈誼2004，（義大利銀行員團結基金協助企業重整與減輕裁員惡果），《銀行員工會聯合會訊》，第三十七期。
行政院勞工委員會，2001，《勞動基準法紀附屬法規解釋令彙編》， 台北：行政院勞工委員會。
李瑞全 1999，《儒家生命倫理學》，台北：鵝湖出版社。
李春旺2000，《企業倫理》，台北：正中書局。
沈中華2002，《貨幣銀行學》，台北：新陸書局。
沈中華2002, 《我國金融機構併購問題及個案探討》 , 台北：臺灣金融研訓院。
吳亦偉2004，（金飯碗？鐵飯碗？破飯碗？——以金融業為例探討全球化趨勢下台灣工作不安全之形成），中正大學勞工研究所，碩士論文。
周武雄2001，（金融機構合併有關人力資源整合之研究），中華大學工業工程與管理研究所，碩士論文。
林漪楓2005，（勞資關係的倫理探討－以商業倫理學為進路），中壢：中央大學哲學研究所，碩士論文。
夏傳位2002，（玫瑰花叢下的醜陋臉孔），《銀行員工會聯合會訊》，第十六期。
夏傳位2005，《禿鷹的晚餐─金融併購的社會後果》，台北：銀行員工會全國聯合會。
黃偉峰2002，《併購實務的第一本書》，台北：商周出版社。
陳炳富、周祖城，2000,《企業倫理學概論》,天津：南開大學。
陳繼盛1979，《勞資關係》，台北：正中出版社。
陳繼盛1992，《勞資關係》，台北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
陳正輝2004，（本國銀行購併之人力資源管理措施探討），銘傳大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
葉保強 1992，《企業社會責任的爭論》，朱建民編，《管理與哲學研討會論文集》，中壢：中央大學哲學研究所。
葉保強1995，《金錢以外——商業倫理透視》，台北：台灣商務印 書館。
葉保強 2002，《建構企業的社會契約》，台北：鵝湖出版社。
葉保強 2005，《企業倫理學》，台北：五南圖書股份有限公司。
楊國鑫 2003，（論生態旅遊的商業倫理），中壢：中央大學哲學研究所，碩士論文。
韓仕賢2002，（論銀行合併的迷思及工會的因應策略》，政治大學勞工研究所，碩士論文。
韓仕賢2003，（高清愿賣銀行，員工自救討公道！萬通銀行被併引爆勞資爭議），《銀行員工會聯合會訊》，第三十四期。
劉志宏1977，《勞資問題與勞資關係論》，台北：正中出版社。
顏雅倫、蔡淑娟 2002 , 《知識經濟下之勞僱關係與企業競爭力》, 台北：翰蘆圖書出版。
蕭振邦編 1999，《企業的倫理與管理》，中壢：國立中央大學。
網頁文獻：
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/g1.htm（工會法電子書）
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/g2.htm（工會法施行細則電子書）
http://www.ctjob.com.tw/（中時人力網）
http://www.coolloud.org.tw/（苦勞網）
http://www.xiachao.org.tw/（夏潮聯合會--勞動人權協會）
http://www.ilo.org/（國際勞工組織網站）
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/lawbase.htm（勞動基準法電子書）
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/jobser.htm（就業服務法電子書）
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/conflict.htm（勞資糾紛處理法電子書）
http://www.hydraulic.org.tw/cish/lawbase2.htm（勞動基準法施行細則電子書）
http://www.coolloud.org.tw/net/bankunions/index.（銀行員工會全國聯合會） |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit