博碩士論文 91421026 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:35 、訪客IP:3.214.184.124
姓名 鄭淑慧(Shu-Huei Jeng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 分析師預測與新上市公司新股折價關聯性之研究
(Analyst forecast and IPO underpricing)
相關論文
★ 我國中小企業貸款門檻操縱行為分析 -以某銀行授信戶為例★ 董事會結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性
★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效:台灣上市公司董事會結構論析★ 國際化對公司經營績效的影響:資訊透明度的中介效果
★ 內部人持股與會計師選擇關聯性之研究-以馬來西亞上市公司為例★ 利用吸引力因子進行嚴重服務失誤補救之成效
★ 提升企業價值之永續發展策略 -以H公司資源回收為例★ 組織變革對業務人員銷售力的影響-以電子零組件通路商為例
★ 會計保守性與法說會的關聯性★ 探索產品品牌、品牌個性與人格特質的對應關係
★ 復徵證券交易所得稅對台灣股市之影響★ 法人說明會對國際化績效與創新的影響
★ 投資人情緒與資訊透明度關聯性之研究★ 公司股權結構與內部人交易關聯性之研究
★ 分析師是否高估應計項目的價值-兼論其對現金增資偏低訂價之影響★ 分析師預測與現金增資偏低定價關係之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 由於新上市股票於上市過程中,發行公司、承銷商和投資人三個當事人間資訊的不對稱而造成了新股折價。財務分析師是很重要的資訊中介。在理論上,財務分析師可增進投資者的知識且可降低資本市場資訊不對稱。在這篇論文中,我們藉由調查分析師預測是否能降低新股折價的幅度來提供分析師預測所造成利益的直接證明。
我們以分析師預測的一致性、總合個別分析師預測的利益及分析師人數來衡量分析師預測對資訊不對稱的影響,以探討分析師預測與新股折價的關係。另外,由於分析師在預測新股未來的每股盈餘或長期成長率時,通常會過份樂觀,因此我們亦探討分析師預測樂觀幅度與新股折價的關連性。
實證結果顯示,分析師預測一致性愈高則新股折價幅度愈小,總和個別分析師預測利益愈高則新股折價幅度愈大,分析師人數愈多則新股折價幅度愈小,分析師預測樂觀程度愈大,則新股折價幅度愈大。
摘要(英) Underpricing and consensus exists amount analysts forecasting earnings are negative.
Underpricing and benefit of aggregating individual analysts’’ forecasts are positive.
Underpricing and analyst coverage are negative.
Underpricing and analyst optimism are positive.
關鍵字(中) ★ 分析師預測
★ 新股折價
關鍵字(英) ★ analyst forecast
★ IPO underpricing
論文目次 第一章 緒論...... .................................................1
第二章 研究假說……………………………………………………….……………….4
第一節 分析師預測之理論性架構……………………...…………………………….4
第二節 資訊不對稱與新股折價的關係……..………...…………………………….6
第三節 分析師預測與資訊不對稱及新股折價的關係…...………………………….6
第三章 資料來源與研究設計……………………………………..……..…………..7
第一節 選樣資料…………….……………….……..…..…………….…………….7
第二節 變數定義……..….….……………………………..…………………………9
第四章 實證結果……………………………….………………..…………….…….11
第一節 敘述統計分析..……….…………….………………….……………….….11
第二節 多元迴歸分析………….…………….……………………………...………14
第五章 敏感度分析…..………………………….……………………….………...17
第六章 結論…………………………..………..………………………….………..20
參考文獻..............................................................21
參考文獻 Allen, Franklin and Gerald R. F., 1989, Signaling by underpricing in the IPO market,Journal of Financial Economics, 303-323.
Baron, David P., 1982, A model of the demand for investment banking advising anddistribution services for new issues, The Journal of Finance 37, 955-976.
Barth, M. E. and R. Kasznik,1999, Share repurchase and intangible assets, Journal of Accounting and Economics 28, 211-241.
Beatty, R.P., 1989, Auditor Reputation and the Pricing of Initial Public Offerings. The Accounting Review 64: 693 – 709.
Benveniste, Lawrence M. and Paul A. Spindt, 1989, How investment bankers
determine the offer price and allocation of new issues, Journal of Financial
Economics 24, 343-361.
Brown, L., 1996, Analyst forecasting errors and their implications for security analysis: an alternative perspective, Financial Analyst Journal, Jan-Feb, 40-47.
Brown, L., 1997, Earnings surprise research: synthesis and perspectives, Financial AnalystJournal, Mar-Apr, 13-19.
Carter, R. and S. Manaster, 1990, Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation. The Journal of Finance 45: 1045-1067.
Catherine Schrand, Robert E. Verrecchia, 2002, Disclosure Choice and Cost of
Capital:Evidence from Underpricing in Initial Public Offrings. Working Paper
Chemmanur, Thomas J., 1993, The pricing of initial public offerings: A dynamic
model with information production, Journal of Finance 68, 285-304.
DeAngelo, L., 1981, Auditor independence, low balling, and disclosure regulation, Journal of Accounting and Economics 3, 113-127.
Dechow, P., A. Hutton, and R. Sloan, 2000, The relation between analysts’ forecasts of long-term earnings growth and stock price performance following equity offerings, Contemporary Accounting Research 17, 1-32.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French., 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. The Journal of Finance (June):65- 427.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French., 1997, Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics 43: 93-153.
Francois Degeorge, Francois Derrien, 2001, IPO performance and earnings
expectations:some French evidence. HEC School of Management.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling., 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 4(October): 60-305.
Koh, F. and Walter, T., 1989, A direct test of Rock’s model of the pricing of
unseasoned issues, Journal of Financial Economics 23, pp. 251-272
Lim, T., 2001, Rationality and analyst’s forecast bias, Journal of Finance 56 (1),369-385.
McNichols, M., and P. C. O’Brien., 1997, Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Supplement): 99-167.
Menon, K. and D. D. Willams., 1991, Auditor credibility and initial public offerings, The Accounting Review 66, 313-332.
Merton, R. C., 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. The Journal of Finance 42 (3): 483-510.
Michaely, R., and K. L. Womack, 2002, Brokerage recommendations: Stylized
characteristics, market responses, and biases. Working paper. Cornell
University. Prepared for Advances in Behavioral Finance II edited by Richard
Thaler.
Orie E. Barron, Oliver Kim, Steve C. Lim, Douglas E. Stevens, 1998, Using Analysts's forecasts to Measure Properties of Analysts’s Information Environment. The Accounting Review 73, 33-421
Orie E. Barron, Donal Byard, Charles Kile, Edward J. Riedl, 2002, High-Technology Intangibles and Analysts’ Forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 40(2),289-312.
Rajan, R., and H. Servaes, 1997, Analyst following of Initial Public Offerings, Journal of Finance 52 (2), 507-529.
Robert M. Bowen, Xia Chen, Qiang Cheng, 2003, Information asymmetry, analyst
coverage and underpricing of seasoned equity offerings. Working paper,
University of Washington Business Rock, Kevin, 1986, Why new issues are underpriced, Journal of Financial Economics 15, 187-212.
Welch, I., 1989, Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 44, PP. 421-449
Welch, I., 1996, Equity offerings following IPO:theory and evidence, Journal of Corporate Finance 2, 227-259.
陳沛諭、王雅芳、金成隆( 2003),新上市公司異常現象與創新程度關係之研究,頁2-26。
指導教授 曹壽民(Shou-min Tsao) 審核日期 2004-7-3
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明