| 參考文獻 |
中文參考書籍
（以筆畫順序排列）
1. 王泰銓，公司法新論，三民書局，民國87年1月初版
2. 伍忠賢，企業併購理論與實務，新陸書局股份有限公司出版，民國91年8月第二版
3. 李貞儀等合著，公司經營權爭奪與假處分，元照出版，民國88年12月
4. 施啟揚，民法總則，自刊，民國85年4月增定七版
5. 柯芳枝，公司法論，三民書局，民國86年10月
6. 柯芳枝，股份有限公司取得自己股份問題之研究，收錄於氏著：公司法專題研究，民國75年
7. 梁宇賢，公司法論，三民書局，民國82年8月修訂再版
8. 陳錦隆，禁止股東會召集之假處分，收錄於：公司經營權爭奪與假處分，元照出版，民國88年12月
9. 陳錦隆，禁止股東會召集之假處分，收錄於：公司經營權爭奪與假處分，元照出版，民國88年12月
10. 曾宛如，董事忠實義務之內涵及適用疑義 ━ 評析新修正公司法第二十三條第一項，收錄於氏著：公司管理與資本市場法制專論（一），學林文化出版，民國91年10月
11. 楊佳璋、張子，經營權爭霸，商周出版，民國90年11月初版
12. 劉連煜，關係企業中子公司取得母公司股份及其表決權行使問題之研究，收錄於氏著：公司法理論與判決研究（一），民國84年
13. 賴源和等合著，新修正公司法解析，元照出版，民國91年1月初版
14. 羅怡德，企業組織法論集，輔仁大學法學叢書編輯委員會出版，民國81年12月
中文參考文獻
（以筆畫順序排列）
1. 王文宇，論公司股東使用委託書法制兼評新版委託書規則，萬國法律，第91期，民國86年2月
2. 王志誠，論我國員工持股制度之現況與前瞻，集保月刊，第63期，民國88年2月
3. 吳桂茂，子公司買回母公司股票及交叉持股問題探討，實用稅務，第289期，民國88年1月
4. 林仁光，公司合併與收購之法律規範，萬國法律，第105期，民國88年6月
5. 林國全，南港經營權爭奪事件所涉及之公司法問題，月旦法學，第8期，民國84年12月
6. 康復明等，「收購委託書對上市公司經營權之影響」座談會，月但法學，第12期，民國85年4月
7. 高靜遠，公司法上法人股東代表人人數之規範探討，月旦法學，第79期，民國90年12月
8. 康榮寶，我國交叉持股規範之研究，中華民國證券商同業公會委託研究，民國88年10月
9. 陳春山，公司董事的定位 ━ 企業控管的規則，證券交易資料，第458期，民國89年6月
10. 陳志雄，公司經營權爭奪之相關法律問題，月旦法學，第26期，民國86年7月
11. 陳美玲，從外場派到內場派 ━ 處理高雄企銀個案經驗談，月旦法學，第26期，民國86年7月
12. 許振明，企業交叉持股與改善之道，證交資料，第452期，民國88年12月
13. 陳春山，從法制政策面看企業財務危機與投資人保護，證券暨期貨市場發展基金會主辦之「企業財務危機與市場管理研討會」，民國87年12月11日
14. 陳渭淳，剖析家族董事的結構特性，實用稅務，第322期，民國90年10月
15. 陳榮杉，企業員工持股信託簡介，金融財務，第1期，民國88年1月
16. 黃銘傑，經營者支配與股東支配的第三條路 ━ 公司治理對未來公司法制革新之啟示，台灣法學會主辦「台灣法學會二○○二年年度法學會議」發表論文，民國91年11月30日
17. 黃銘傑，交叉持股 vs. 公司監控，台大法學論叢，第30卷第一期，民國90年1月
18. 黃銘傑，自己股份買回與公司法 ━ 財政部「庫藏股」制度草案的問題點與盲點，台大法學論叢，第28卷第1期，民國87年10月
19. 曾淑瑜，再論公司經營權爭奪之相關法律問題，月旦法學，第29期，民國86年10月
20. 廖大穎，論交叉持股制度 ━ 另類的財務擒作與企業結合，月旦法學，第45期，民國88年2月
21. 劉連煜，「累積投票制與應當選董事人數之縮減」，法令月刊，第四十六卷第一期，第15頁，民國84年1月
22. 劉連煜，論庫藏股制度 ━ 以證交法法草案第二十八條之二之評論為中心，月旦法學，第39期，民國87年8月
23. 賴英照，論公司轉投資，中興法學，第25期，民國76年11月
24. 謝惠娟，企業員工持股信託之探討，彰銀資料，第47卷第10期，民國87年10月
25. 羅吉台、陳美娥，台灣上市公司交叉持股之經營特徵與防範（上），會計研究月刊，第181期，民國89年12月
中文參考論文
（以筆畫順序排列）
1. 王建文，企業併購法規及其程序之研究，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國84年6月
2. 李瑞瑜，企業購併策略及相關法律規範之研究，東吳大學法律學研究所碩士論文，民國82年6月
3. 耿一馨，敵對性企業收買之研究，輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文，民國80年7月
4. 徐美雯，企業敵意接管之雙方競爭策略研究 ━ 內容分析法之應用，雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文，民國87年6月
5. 張令慧，公司購併法律問題之研究 ━ 中美兩國對兩階段式公司購併之法律制度的比較，東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文，民國81年6月
6. 許志宇，國內外員工入股計畫之研究，台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，民國86年6月
7. 黃思敏，公司敵意接管防禦措施規範之研究，世新大學法律學研究所碩士論文，民國92年7月
8. 楊偉宏，上市公司經營權爭奪問題之研究 ━ 以高興昌、高企為例，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國86年6月
9. 楊佳璋，我國企業敵意接管機能法制與攻防策略之研究，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國85年6月
10. 鄭傑夫，員工持股制度之研究，政治大學法律研究所碩士論文，民國69年6月
英文參考書籍
（以字母順序排列）
1. Robert W. Hamilton, Corporations Including Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies ━ Cases and Materials (6th ed., 1998)
2. Jennings & Marsh., Cases and Materials on Securities Regulation (4th ed., 1997)
3. Frank R. Easterbrook & Daniel R. Fischel, THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE LAW (1991)
4. CHARLES R. O’KELLEY, JR. & ROBERT B. THOMSPON, CORPORATIONS AND OTHER BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS ━ CASES AND MATERIALS (2nd ed. 1996)
英文參考文獻
（以字母順序排列）
1. Andrei Shelifer & Lawrence H. Summers, Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers, in CORPORATE TAKEOVER：CALUSES AND CONSEQUENCE 33 (Alan J. Auerbach ed., 1988)
2. Addison D. Braendel, Article：Defeating Poison Pills Through Enactment of a State Shareholder Protection Statute, 25 DEL. J. CORP. L. 651 (2000)
3. Arthur R. Pinto, Article：Section Ⅲ：Corporate Governance：Monitoring the Board of Directors in American Corporations, 46 AM. J. CORP. L. 317
4. Anonymous, Article：Lock-up Options：Toward a State Law Standard, HARV. L. REV. Vol.96, Iss.5 (Mar. 1983)
5. Bernard S. Black, Article: The First International Merger Wave (the Fifth and Last U. S. Wave), 54 U. MIAMI. L. REV. (2000)
6. Bruce Chapman, Article：Trust, Economic Rationality, and the Corporate Fiduciary Obligation, 43 U. TORON. L. REV. 547 (1993)
7. Babatunde M. Animashaun, Poison Pill：Corporate Anti-Takeover Defensive Plan and the Directors Responsibilities in Responding to Takeover Bids, 18 S.U.L. REV. 171 (1991)
8. Brett W. King, Article：The Use of Supermajority Voting Rules in Corporate America：Majority Rule, Corporate Legitimacy, and Minority Shareholder Protection, 21 DEL. J. CORP. L. 895 (1996)
9. Charles R. Knoeber, Article：Golden Parachutes, Shark Repellents, and Hostile Tender Offers, 76 AM. ECON. REV. 155 (1986)
10. Dennis J. Block et al., Mergers and Acquisitions Symposium：Article：Defensive Measures in Anticipation of and in Response to Unsolicited Takeover Proposals, 51 U. MIAMI. L REV. 652 (1997)
11. Deborah A. Demott, Article：Directors’ Duties in Management Buyouts and Leveraged Recapitalization, 49 OHIO, ST. L.J. 517 (1988)
12. Dennis J. Block et al., Mergers and Acquisitions Symposium：Article： Defensive Measures in Anticipation of and in Response to Unsolicited Takeover Proposals, 51 U. MIAMI. L. REV. 623 (1997)
13. Douglas C. Ashton, Article：Revisiting Dual-Class Stock, 68 ST. JOHN’S L. REV. 863 (1994)
14. Debra Denise Palmer, Students’ Comment：Corporate Takeover Battles ━ Shark-Repellent Charter and Bylaw Provision that Deter Hostile Tender Offers or Other Acquisitions ━ A Comprehensive Examination., 27 HOW. L.J. 1683 (1984)
15. David Manry & David Stangeland, Features：Greenmail：A Brief History, 6 STAN. J. L. BUS. & FIN. 217 (2001)
16. Daniel J. Hartnett, Comment：Greenmail：Can the Abuses Be Stopped？, NW. U.L. REV. 1271 (1986)
17. Deborah A. DeMott, Comment：Pac-Man Tender Offers, 1983 DUKE. L. J. 116 (1983)
18. David W. Ware, Note：Shareholders’ Right to Review the Adoption and Continuation of a Takeover Defense Plan：Is the Fleming Decision Dead on Arrival？, 2000 U. ILL. L. REV. 1053 (2000)
19. Edward S Adams & Arijit Mukherji, Article：Spin-offs, Fiduciary Duty, and the Law, 68 FORDHAM L. REV. 15 (1999)
20. Ezra S. Field, Note：Money for Nothing and Leveraged for Free：The Politics and History of the leveraged ESOP Tax Subsidy, 97 COLUM. L. REV. 740(1997)
21. Ely R. Levy, Note： Corporate Courtship Gone Sour：Applying a Bankruptcy Approach to Termination Fee Provisions in Merger and Acquisition Agreements, 30 HOFSTRA L. REV. 1361 (2002)
22. Ellen S. Friedenberg, Article：Jaws Ⅲ：The Impropriety of Shark-Repellent Amendments as a Takeover Defense, 7 DEL. J. CORP. L. 32 (1982)
23. Frank R. Easterbrook & Daniel Fischel, Article：The Proper Role of a Target’s Management in Responding to a Tender Offer, 94 HARV. L. REV. 1161 (1981)
24. Frank H. Easterbrook & Daniel R. Fischel, The Proper Role of a Target’s Management in Responding to a Tender Offer, 94 HARV. L. REV. 1161
25. Guhan Subramanian, Article：The Influence of Anti-takeover Statute on Incorporation Choice in the 1990s：Evidence on the “Race” Debate and Anti-takeover Overreaching, 150 U. PA. L. REV. 1795 (June, 2002)
26. Gina Marie Agresta-Richardson, Comment：”Employee Voting and Defensive ESOPs”, 14 AKRON TAX J. 91 (1999)
27. Gary G. Lynch & Marc I. Steinberg, The Legitimacy of Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers, 64 CORNELL L. REV. 901 (1979)
28. Hunter C. Blum, Comment：ESOP’s Fables：Leveraged ESOPs and Their Effect on Managerial Slack, Employee Risk and Motivation in the Public Corporation, 31 U. RICH. L. REV. 1539 (1997)
29. John C. Coates Ⅳ & Guhan Subramanian, Article：A Buy-Side Model of M&A Lockups：Theory and Evidence, 53 STAN. L. REV. 307 (2000)
30. John C. Coffee Jr., Article：The Uncertain Case for Takeover Reform：An Essay on Stockholders, Stakeholders, and Bust-Ups, 1988 WISC. L. REV. 435
31. John C. Coffee, Fr., Article：Shareholders v. Managers：The Strain in the Corporate Web, 85 MICH. L. REV. 1 (1986)
32. John C. Coates Ⅳ, Article：Explaining Variation in Takeover Defenses：Blame the Lawyers, 89 CALIF. L. REV. 1301 (2001)
33. Jason M. Klein, Features：When the Board Should Just Say Yes to Management：The Interplay Between the Decision of Whether to Conduct an Auction and Transaction Structure, 5 STAN. J. L. BUS. & FIN. 45 (1999)
34. Jeffrey N. Gordon, Article：Ties that Bond：Dual Class Common Stock and the Problem of Shareholder Choice, 76 CALIF. L. REV. 3 (1988)
35. John C. Coates Ⅳ, Article：Takeover Defenses in the Shadow of the Pill：A Critique of the Scientific Evidence, 79 TEX. L. REV. 271 (2002)
36. Jeffrey N. Gordon, The Mandatory Structure of Corporate Law, 89 COLUM. L. REV. 1549 (1989)
37. Joseph A. Grundfest, Article：Just Vote No：A Minimalist Strategy for Dealing with Barbarians Inside the Gates, STAN. L. REV. 45 (1993)
38. John Pound, Shareholder Activism and Share Values, Article：The Causes and Consequences of Counter-solicitations Against Management Anti-takeover Proposals, Journal of Law & Economics, Vol.32 (Oct. 1989)
39. Jeffrey N. Gordon, Article：Just Say Never？Poison Pills, Deadhand Pills, and Shareholder-Adopted Bylaw：An Essay for Warren Buffett, CARD. L. REV., Vol.19, No.2
40. Kenneth C. Johnsen, Note：Golden Parachutes and the Business Judgment Rule：Toward a Proper Standard of Review, 94 YALE L.J. 909 (1985)
41. Lynn A. Stout, Article：Do Anti-takeover Defenses Decrease Sharesholder Wealth？The Ex Post/Ex Ante Valuation Problem, 55 STAN. L. REV. 845 (Dec. 2002)
42. Lucian Arye Bebchuk, John C. Coates Ⅳ, and Guhan Subramania, Article：The Powerful Force of Staggered Boards：Theory, Evidence, and Policy, 54 STAN. L. REV. 887 (2002)
43. Lucian Bebchuk, Article：The Case Against Board Veto Power In Corporate Takeovers, 69 U. CHI. L. REV. 973 (2002)
44. Lynn A. Stout, Article：Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy, 76 S. CALIF. L. REV. 1189 (2002)
45. Lucian Bebchuk & Alma Cohen, Firms’ Decision Where to Incorporate, HARV. L., Economics and Business Discussion Paper No. 351
46. Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, & Allen Ferrell, Article：Does Evidence Favor State Competition In Corporate Law, 90 CALIF. L. REV. 1775 (Dec. 2002)
47. Lunian Bebchuk, Article：Federalism and the Corporation：The Desirable Limits on State Competition in Corporate Law, 105 HARV. L. REV. 1435 (1992)
48. Lucian A. Bebchuk & Marcel Kahan, Article：A Framework for Analyzing Legal Policy Towards Proxy Contests, 78 CALIF. L. REV. 1071 (1990)
49. Lipton, Martin, Brownstein, Andrew R, Article：Takeover Responses and Directors’ Responsibilities ━ An Update：ABA National Institute on the Dynamics of Corporate Control (Dec. 1983)
50. Lucian Bebchuk et al., Article：Does the Evidence Favor State Competition in Corporation Law？, 90 CALIF. L. REV. 1775 (2002)
51. Leo Herzel et al., Why Corporate Directors Have a Right to Resist Tender Offers, 3 CORP. L. REV. 107 (1980)
52. Lawrence E. Mitchell, A Theoretical and Practical Framework for Enforcing Corporate Constituency Statutes, 70 TEX. L. REV. 579 (1992)
53. Martin Lipton, Article：Corporate Governance in the Age of Finance Corporatism, 136 U. PA. L. REV. 1 (1987)
54. Michael D. Floyd, Comment：Junk Bonds：Do They Have a Value？, 35 EMORY L.J. 921 (1986)
55 Margaret M. Blair and Lynn A. Stout, Article：A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, 85 VA. L. REV. 247 (1999)
56. Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, Article：Director Accountability and the Mediating Role of the Corporate Board, 79 WASH. U. L. Q. 403 (2001)
57. Margaret M. Blair & Lynn. A. Stout, Article：Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Behavioral Foundations of Corporate Law, 149 U. PA. L. REV. 1375 (2001)
58. Milton Friedman, Article：The Social Responsibility of Business Is To Increase Its Profits, N.Y. TIMES MAG., (Sept.1970)
59. Mitu G. Gulati, William A. Klein & Eric M. Zolt, Article：Connected Contracts, 47 U.C.L.A. L. REV. 887 (2000)
60. Michael Klausner, Article：Institutional Shareholders’ Split Personality on Corporate Governance：Active in Proxies, Passive in IPOs, Directorship Newsletter 4 (forthcoming 2001) (downloadable at SSRN.com.)
61. Michael Kliegman, Symposium Agenda：Corporate Restructuring & Spin-offs, 1 FORDHAM FIN. SEC. & TAXI. F. 35 (1996)
62. Melissa M. Kurp, Article：Corporate Takeover Defenses after OVC：Can Target Boards Prevent Hostile Tender Offers without Breaching Their Fiduciary Duty？, 26 LOY. U. CHI. L. J. 29 (1994)
63. Michael Bradley & Michael Rosenzweig, Article：Defensive Stock Repurchases, 99 HARV. L. REV. 1378 (1987)
64. Moore, Article：The “Interested” Director or Officer Transaction, 4 Del. J. Corp. L., 674-76 (1979)；Nathan & Shapiro, Article：Legal Standard of Fairness of Merger Terms Under Delaware Law 4 DEL. J. CORP. L.44 (1977)
65. Mark Klock, Article：Dead Hands ━ Poison Catalyst or Strength-Enchancing Megavitamin？ An Analysis of the Benefits of Managerial Protection and the Detriments of Judicial Interference, 2001 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 67 (2001)
66. Martin Lipton, Takeover Bids in the Target’s Boardroom, 35 BUS. L. 101 (1979)
67. Nathan & Shapiro, Article：Legal Standard of Fairness of Merger Terms Under Delaware Law, 4 DEL. J. CORP. L.44 (1977)
68. Peter V. Letsou, Thirteenth Annual Corporation Law Symposium, Article：Contemporary Issues in the Law of Business Organizations：Are Dead Hand (and No Hand) Poison Pills Really Dead？, 68 U. CIN. L. REV. 1101 (2000)
69. Robert A. Prentice, Article：Front-end Loaded, Two-Tiered Tender Offers：An Examination of the Counterproductive Effects of a Mighty Offensive Weapon, 39 CASE W. REV. 389 (1989)
70. Renald Gilson, Article：The Case Against Shark Repellent Amendments：Structural Limitations on the Enabling Concept, 34 STAN. L. REV. 775 (1982)
71. Robert B. Thompson & D. Gordon Smith, Article：Toward A New Theory of Shareholder Role：”Sacred Space” in Corporate Takeovers, 80 TEX. L. REV. 261 (2001)
72. Robert Daines & Michael Klausner, Article：Do IPO Charters Maximize Firm Value？Antitakeover Protections in IPOs, 17 J. L. ECON. & ORG. 83 (2001)
73. Ross W. Wooten, Comment：Restructurings durings a Hostile Takeover：Directors’ Discretion or Shareholders’ Choice？, 35 HOUS. L. REV. 524 (1998)
74. Richard A. Graeter, Comment：Golden Parachutes：Safe Landings in Ohio and Elsewhere, 57 U. CIN. L. REV. 699 (1988)
75. Robert W. Rodriguez, Note：Hostile Takeover Contests：The Rise and Fall of Lock-Up Options, 1987 COLUM. BUS. L. REV. 193 (1987)
76. Richard A. Shaw, Q.C., Article：Hostile Takeover Bids：Defensive Strategies, 38 ALBERTA L. REV. 111 (2000)
77. Richard A. Graeter, Comment：Golden Parachutes：Safe Landings in Ohio and Elsewhere, 57 U. CIN. L. REV. 699 (1988)
78. Robert Goodyear Murray, Comment：Money Talks, Constituents Walk：Pennsylvania’s Corporate Constituency Statute Can Maximize Shareholders’ Wealth, 48 BUFFALO L. REV. 629 (2000)
79. Stephen M. Bainbridge, Article：Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers：Preliminary Reflections, 55 STAN. L. REV. 791 (December, 2002)
80. Stephen M. Bainbridge, Article：Director Primacy：The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance, 97 NW. L. REV. (forthcoming 2002)
81. Shawn C. Lese, Preventing Control From the Grave, Article：A Proposal for Judicial Treatment of Dead Hand Provision in Poison Pills, 96 COLUM. L. REV. 2175 (1996)
82. Shawn C. Lese, Article：Preventing Control From the Grave：A Proposal for Judicial Treatment of Dead Hand Provision in Poision Pills, 96 COLUM. L. REV. 2175 (1996)
83. S. Comm. On Finance, 98th Cong., Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Explanation of Provisions Approved by the Comm. ( Mar. 1984) (Comm. Print 1984)
84. Tom Ablum & Mary Beth Burgis, Article：Leveraged Buyouts：The Ever Changing Landscape, 13 DEPAUL. L.J. 109 (2000)
85. Thomas A. Smith, Article：The Efficient Norm for Corporate Law：A Neotraditional Interpretation of Fiduciary Duty, 98 MICH. L. REV. 214 (1999)
86. Thomas A. Swett, Comment：Merger Terminations after Bell Atlantic：Applying a Liquidated Damages Analysis to Termination Fee Provisions, 70 U. COLO. L. REV. 341 (1998)
87. Valentin Dimitrov and Prem Jain, Article：Dual Class Recapitalization and Managerial Commitment：Long-Run Stock Market and Operating Performance (December 11, 2001) (downloadable at SSRN.com.)
88. William B. Shearer Ⅲ, Comment：Poison Pills：Are Dead Hand Pills Dead in Gerogia？, 50 MERCER L. REV. 809 (1999)
89. Xueqing Linda Ji, Comment：A New Look at Dead Hand Provision in Poison Pills：Are They per se Invalid after Toll Brothers and Quickturn？, 44 ST. LOUIS L.J. 223 (2000)
90. Yeh, Y. H. & T. S. Lee, Family Control, Board Composition and Corporation Performance：Corporate Governance in Taiwan, Economics and Accounting 1999, Taipei, Taiwan
英文參考案例
（以字母順序排列）
1. AMP Inc. v. Allied Signal Inc., 1998 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 15617 (E.D.PA. Oct. 8, 1998)
2. Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (1983)
3. Andersen v. Albert & J.M. Anderson Mfg. Co., 1950 MASS. LEXIS 1071 (1950)
4. Aprahamian v. HBO & Company, 531 A.2d 1204 (1987)
5. Amanda Acquisition Corp. v. Universal Foods Corp., 877 F.2d 496 (1989)
6. Buckhorn, Inc. v. Ropak Corp., 656 F. Supr. 209 (1987)
7. Black & Decker Corp. v. American Standard Inc., 682 F. Supr. 772 (1988)
8. Bank of New York Company, Inc. v. Irving Bank Corp., 528 N.Y.S.2d 482 (Apr. 18, 1998)
9. Bennett v. Propp, 187 A.2d 405 (1962)
10. Bastian v. Bourns, Inc., 278 A.2d 467 (1970)
11. Blasius Industries v. Atlas Corp., 564 A.2d 651 (1988)
12. Broad v. Rockwell International Corp., 5th Cir., 642 F.2d 929, cert. Denied, 454 U.S. 965, 70L. Ed. 2d 380, 102 S. Ct. 506 (1981)
13. Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798 (6th Cir. 1985)
14. Cheff v. Mathes, 199 A.2d 548 (DEL. CH. 1964)
15. Carmody v. Toll Brothers, Inc., 723 A.2d 1180 (DEL. CH. Jul. 24, 1998)
16. Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, Inc., 634 F.2d 690 (2nd Cir. 1980)
17. Cheff v. Mathes, 199 A.2d 556 (1964)
18. Canada Southern Oils, Ltd v. Manabi Exploration Co., 96 A.2d 810 (1953)
19. Condec Corporation v. Lunkenheimer Company, 230 A.2d 769 (1967)
20. CRTF Corp. v. Federated Department Stores, Inc., 683 F. Supr. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
21. Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc., 663 A.2d 1156 (DEL. 1995)
22. Cummings v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., 204 A.2d 795 (1964)
23. CTS Corp. v. Dynamic Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69 (1987)
24. David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International Inc. 249 A.2d 427 (1968)
25. Datapoint Corp. v. Plaza Securities Co., 496 A.2d 1031 (1985)
26. Guth v. Loft, Inc., 5 A.2d 503 (1939)
27. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp., 91 A.2d 57 (1952)
28. Gaillard v. Huntington Bancshares, 1987 OHIO APP. LEXIS 9827
29. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great N. Nekoosa Corp., F. Supr. 31 (D. ME. 1989)
30. Hall v. Trans-Lux Daylight Picture Screen Corp., 20 DEL. CH. 78 (1934)
31. Hubbard v. Hollywood Park Realty Enter., Inc. 1991 DEL. CH. LEXIS 9 (DEL. CH. 1991)
32. Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp., 535 A.2d 1334 (1987)
33. Invacare Corp. v. Healthdyne Technologies, Inc., 968 F. Supr. 1578 (1997)
34. Kors v. Carey, 158 A.2d 136 (1960)
35. Karasik v. Pacific Eastern Corp., 180 A.2d 604 (1935)
36. Kaplan v. Goldensamt, 380 A.2d 556
37. Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp., 383 A.2d 278 (1977).
38. Lewis v. Anderson, 477 A.2d 1040 (DEL. SUPR. 1984).
39. Lerman v. Diagnostic Data, Inc., 241 A.2d 906 (1980).
40. Mentor Graphics, Inc. v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc., 24 DEL. J. CORP. L. 881 (1999).
41. Moran v. Household International Inc., 500 A.2d 1346 (1985).
42. Moore Corp. Ltd. v. Wallace Computer Services, 907 F. Supr. 1545(D. DEL. 1995).
43. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc., 559 A.2d 1261 (1989).
44. Macht v. Merchants Mortgage & Credit Co., 1937 DEL. CH. LEXIS 55 (1937).
45. Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corporation, 92 A.2d 295 (1952)
46. Mountain Manor Realty, Inc. v. Buccheri, 461 A.2d 45 (1983)
47. NCR Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 761 F. Supr. 475 (1991)
48. Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp., 549 F. Supr. 623 (D. MD. 1982)
48. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc., 637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994)
49. Pantrer v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271 (7th Cir. 1981)
50. Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 571 A.2d 1140 (1989)
51. Polk v. Good, 507 A.2d 531 (1986)
52. Phillips v. Insituform of North America, Inc., 1987 DEL. CH. LEXIS 474 (1987).
53. Providence and Worcester Co. v. Baker, 378 A.2d 121 (1977)
54. Quickturn Design System, Inc. v. Shapiro, 721 A.2d 1281 (DEL. Dec. 31, 1998)
55. Revlon, Inc. v. McAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. 506 A.2d 173 (1986)
56. Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (1985)
57. Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc., 285 A.2d 437 (1971)
58. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp., 93 A.2d 107 (1952)
59. Stroud v. Grace, Del. Supr., 606 A.2d 75 (1992)
60. Shamrock Holding, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp., 559 A.2d 257 (DEL.CH. 1989)
61. Tri-Continental Corp. v. Battye, 74 A.2d 71 (1950)
62. Thompson v. Enstar Corp., 509 A.2d 578 (1984)
63. Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (1985)
64. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp. 651 A.2d 1361 (1995)
65. Worth v. Huntington Bancshares, Inc., 1987 OHIO APP. LEXIS 9827, 50 (OHIO 1987)
66. Wellman v. Dickinson, 475 F. Supr. 783 (S.D.N.Y.)
67. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., 457 A.2d 701 (1983)
69. Worth v. Huntington Bancshares, 1987 OHIO APP. LEXIS 9827.
70. Yasik v. Wachtel, 17 A.2d 309 (1941) |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit