應用認知工程配置延展式供應鍊
以PC產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：3.15.27.213

姓名

林傑文(Chieh-Wen Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

應用認知工程配置延展式供應鍊以PC產業為例
(A Cognitive Engineering Approach to Configuring the Extended Supply Chain- An Implementation in the PC Industry )

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

延展式供應鍊成員間的「資訊分享」是一項重要的課題，當吾人談論至此時，每一位成員需使用相同的「語言」。而在此之前，其必須先對於整個系統有著相同方式的認知。我們將會採用Cognitive Work Analysis（CWA）之前兩個階段-- Work Domain Analysis與Control Task Analysis—以達到此一目標。之後，我們將著重在「供應鍊配置」此一主要問題上。
我們視延展式供應鍊為單一系統，我們試著發展一個方法論，能夠確保這樣的系統運作是可信賴及可控制的，然而當系統越趨複雜，越難以認知、了解隱藏於系統的知識與資訊處理的過程，所以我們應用了CWA中的Abstraction Hierarchy (AH) 與Decision Ladder (DL)以挖掘其中的知識與與資訊處理過程，當延展式供應鍊之組成改變時，應用系統動態學探討整個延展式供應鍊之長期因果關係，MFM用於系統之短期監控。藉由組合此四項方法，我們嘗試發展一項包含三層檢驗門檻之方法，其可用於檢驗當外在環境改變時（例如，供應商之選擇、顧客偏好、產品選擇），整個供應鍊是否為可運作；是否可信賴；以及其是否可控制。

摘要(英)

“Information sharing” between the members of Extended Supply Chain is an important issue. When we talk about it, each member must use the same “language”. Before that, they should cognize the whole system with the same way first. We will apply the first two phases of the CWA (Cognitive Work Analysis) -- Work Domain Analysis and Control Task Analysis -- to achieve this objective. Then, we will focus the main issue on "supply chain configuration".
We look the extended supply chain as a system, and try to develop a methodology, which make this system to be reliable and controllable. It’s difficult to understand and recognize the states of knowledge and the information processes of a system when the system is getting to complexity. Because of this reason, we use the methodologies, AH & DL, which extensively implemented in computer-based work in complex socio-technical system to grub the knowledge and the information processes in the system. Apply system dynamics (SD) to investigate the long-term causality of the ESC when the constitution of ESC changes. The MFM is used for short-term monitoring. By combining the four methods, we try to develop an approach which could provide the three levels of threshold to examine that if the supply chain is workable, reliable, and controllable when the environment of the supply chain changes (e.g., vendor choice, customer preferences, product choice).

關鍵字(中)

★ 供應鍊配置
★ 系統動態學
★ 延展式供應鍊
★ 認知工作分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Multilevel Flow Model
★ Reliable
★ Controllable
★ Decision Ladder
★ Abstraction Hierarchy
★ System Dynamic
★ Extended supply chain
★ CWA

論文目次

Table of Contents
Table of Contents iii
List of Figures v
List of Tables vii
Chapter I Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Background Overview 1
1.3 Research Objectives 3
1.4 Thesis Structure 3
Chapter II Literature Review 5
2.1 Extended Supply Chain 5
2.2 Information Sharing 7
2.2.1 Three Information Sharing Levels 7
2.2.2 Models of Information Sharing 9
2.2.3 Benefit of Information Sharing 10
2.3 Cognitive Work Analysis and Long-term Causality 10
2.3.1 Work Domain Analysis 11
2.3.2 Control Task Analysis 12
2.3.3 The Long-term Causality 13
2.4 Supply Chain Reference-Model 16
2.4.1 Introduction of Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model (SCOR) 16
2.4.2 Scope 16
2.4.3 SCOR-model Structure 18
2.5 Supply Chain Configuration 21
2.5.1 The Overview of Supply Chain Configuration 21
2.5.2 Approaches of Supply configuration 23
Chapter III Modeling Framework 27
3.1 Abstract Hierarchy and Decision Ladder 27
3.1.1 Introduction of Abstract Hierarchy and Decision Ladder 27
3.1.2 Apply AH and DL in Supply Chain 32
3.2 System Dynamics 42
3.2.1 Introduction of the System Dynamics 42
3.2.2 Main Implement Fields of SD 46
3.2.3 SD in Supply Chain based on AH & DL 47
3.3 Multilevel Flow Model (MFM) 48
3.3.1 Introduction of the Multilevel Flow Model 48
3.3.2 Main Implement Fields of MFM 53
3.3.3 Apply MFM in Supply Chain 55
3.4 Implication for Supply Chain Configuration 56
3.4.1 Relationship between the Methodologies 57
Chapter IV Extended Supply Chain configuration constructed based on cognitive engineering 59
4.1 Case Description 59
4.1.1 Background 59
4.1.2 Scenario 60
4.1.3 Implement AH and DL in extended supply chain 60
4.1.4 Implement System Dynamic in extended supply chain based on AH & DL 77
4.1.4 Implement MFM in extended supply chain. 79
Light 81
Meaning 81
Normal Light 81
Low Light 81
High Light 81
Chapter V Conclusion & Recommendation 82
5.1 Conclusion 82
5.2 Recommendation 83
Reference 84

參考文獻

Reference
1. Jerry Lin，「設計一以i-Hub所整合之延展式供應鍊診斷預警系統」，碩士論文，中央大學工業管理研究所，2003年。
2. Angerhofer, B. J., and Angelides, M. C., “System Dynamics Modelling in Supply Chain Management: Research Review”, Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference
3. Beamon, B. M., “Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods”, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 281-294, 1998
4. Bruce A. Chalmers, Robert D.G. Webb, and Roy Keeble, “Cognitive Work Analysis Modeling for Tactical Decision Support” http://www.dodccrp.org, 2001
5. Card, S. K.,Moran, T.P., and Newell, The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Charles H. Fine, Roger Vardan, Robert Pethick and Jamal El-Hout, “Rapid-Response Capability in Value-Chain Design”, Sloan Management Review, pp. 69-75, Winter 2002
7. Cohen, M. A. and H. L. Lee, “Strategic Analysis of Integrated Production Distribution System: Models and Methods”, Operations Research 36(2): 216-228, 1988
8. Cohen, M. A. and H. L. Lee, “Resource Deployment Analysis of Global manufacturing and Distribution Networks”, Journal of Manufacturing and Operations Management 2(2): 81-104, 1989
9. Craig W. Kirkwood, ”System Dynamics Methods: A Quick Introduction”, 1998; http://www.public.asu.edu/~kirkwood/sysdyn/SDRes.htm
10. Dal Vernon C. Reising, and Penelope M. Sanderson, “Work domain analysis and sensors II: Pasteurizer II case study” Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 2002 56, pp.597–637
11. Denise Emerson and Selwyn Piramuthu, “Agent-Based Framework for Dynamic Supply Chain Configuration”, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004
12. Forrester, J. W., “Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers,” Harvard Business Review, vol.36, no.4, pp.37-66, 1958
13. Forrester, J. W., “Industrial Dynamics”, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,1961
14. Frank Lui, “Mapping Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) To An Intelligent Agents Software Architecture: Command Agents”, Defence Human Factors Special Interest Group, 2002.
15. Gene Bellinger, “Mental Model Musings”;
http://www.systems-thinking.org/welcome.htm
16. Higgins, P. G., “A Formal Method for Analysing Field Data and Setting the Design Requirements for Scheduling Tools”, Human-Centred Computing: Cognitive, Social and Ergonomic Aspects. Volume 3 of the Proceedings of HCI International 2003, June 22 - 27, 2003, Heraklion, Crete. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 457-461,2003.
17. Jack, G. A. J., V. D. Vorst, A. J. M. Beulens and P. V. Beek, “Modeling and simulating multi-echelon food systems”, European Journal of Operational Research, 122, 354.366, 2000.
18. Kleindorfer, P. R., and Snir, E. M., “Environmental Information in Supply-Chain Design and Coordination”, 2001
19. Kirkwood, C. W., “System Dynamics Methods: A Quick Introduction”, 1998.
20. Lane, D. C., “Invited Review and Reappraisal: Industrial Dynamics”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol.48, p.1037-1042, 1997
21. Larsson, J.E., “Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Means-End Models: Experiences and Future Prospects”, Knowledge-Based System Journal, vol.15, no. 1-2, 2002.
22. Lee, H.L. and Whang S., “Information sharing in a supply chains”, Research paper series, Graduate school of business Stanford University., 1998
23. Lambert, D.M., Cooper, M.C. and Pagh, J.D., “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1 – 19, 1998
24. Lee, H. L. and C. Billington, “The Evolution of Supply Chain Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard”, Interfaces 25(5): 42-63, 1995
25. Lind, M., “Modeling Goals and Functions of Complex Industrial Plants,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 259–283, 1994
26. Masud Arjmand and Stuart Roach, “Creating Greater Customer Value by Synchronizing the Supply Chain”, Ascet Volume 1, 1999; http://www.ascet.com
27. Mahendrawathi Er and Bart MacCarthy, “Configuration of International Supply Networks and their Operational Implications: Evidences from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia”, The 7th Annual International Manufacturing Symposium, 12th-13th September 2002
28. McCormack, K. and Kasper, K., “The Extended Supply Chain: A Statistical Study”, DRK Research, December 1st, 2000
29. Moray, N. and Huey, B., “Human factors research and nuclear safety”, Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1988
30. Neelam Naikar and Alyson Saunders, “Crossing the Boundaries of Safe Operation: Training for Error Detection and Error Recovery” 21st European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Control, pp. 8-15 2002
31. Öhman, B., "Discrete Sensor Validation with Multilevel Flow Models," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 55-61, May/June 2002.
32. Öhman, B., “Failure Mode Analysis Using Multilevel Flow Models,” Proceedings of the 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1999
33. Penelope, S., Marcus, W., and Janet, W., “Intelligent Command Agents for Command and Control Simulations using Cognitive Work Analysis and Machine Learning”
34. Prater, E., Biehl, M. and Smith, M. A., “International Supply Chain Agility: Tradeoffs between Flexibility and Uncertainty”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 5/6, pp. 823-839, 2001
35. Saraoglu, H., Yobaccio, E., and Louton, D., “Teaching Dynamic Processes in Finance: How Can We Prepare Students for an Age of Rapid and Continual Change”, Fall/Winter 2000
36. Stewart, G., “Supply Chain Operations Reference Model (SCOR): the First Cross-industry Framework for Integrated Supply Chain Management”, Logistics Information Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 62 -67, 1997
37. Supply-Chain Council, “Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model: SCOR Version 6.0”, Supply-Chain Council, Inc., 2003
38. Togar M. Simatupang and R. Sridharan, “A Characterisation of Information Sharing in Supply Chains”, Proceedings of the 36th Annual ORSNZ Conference, 16-25, Canterbury, New Zealand, November 2001
39. Togar M. Simatupang and R. Sridharan, “The Collaborative Supply Chain: A Scheme for Information Sharing and Incentive Alignment”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 15-30, 2002
40. Tu Hoang Truong and Farhad Azadivar, “Simulation Based Optimization for Supply Chain Configuration Design”, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003
41. Viewlocity, “The New Extended Supply Chain Concept - Unleash the Potential of your Supply Network”, Viewlocity Whitepaper Series, 2001
42. Viewlocity, “Bridge the Chasm Between Planning and Execution with Supply Chain Event Management”, Viewlocity Whitepaper Series, 2001
43. Vicente, K.J., Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999
44. Zhenxin, Yu, Hong, Y. and Cheng, T.C. Edwin., “Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101/3, pp. 114.119, 2001

指導教授

高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao)

審核日期

2004-7-7

推文